Woman calls it quits after realising she couldn't live in her boyfriend's former matrimonial home
Posting on Reddit, the 35-year-old explained that both she and her 39–year-old boyfriend owned HDB flats. She had purchased a four-room unit in the Canberra area last year as a single owner, while her boyfriend was in the process of taking over full ownership of a four-room flat in the east, which he had previously lived in with his ex-wife.
Since HDB regulations don't allow couples to each own a flat, the pair had to discuss what to do next. That's when things got tricky.
According to her, she didn't want to give up her flat to move in with him. The idea of living in a space that had been part of a seven-year relationship didn't sit well with her.
'I was not keen by the idea that he's lived there with his ex for over 5 years, together for 7 years?' she wrote. 'I wanted to avoid the emotional baggage that comes with it.'
Her boyfriend, however, wasn't willing to part with his flat either. He felt it had better resale potential and that its value would appreciate significantly over time, while hers would likely stay about the same.
A friend, who knew about the situation, told her she was 'being unreasonable' and suggested that they could simply renovate the space.
'He [my friend] was convinced that we could have spent some money on a complete makeover of his flat, i.e., hack the walls, floors, replace the furnitures, repaint the house, etc., to make it look as good as brand new but mentally, it still irks me knowing that they've shared the same space,' she wrote.
'I know some people are willing parties to buy over the ex's share of the flat (good for you!!!), but it's just not for me,' she added.
At the end of her post, she asked the Reddit community, 'Was wondering if it's normal to feel out of place, or am I over-reacting over something simple like this?' 'Memories within the four walls can be rewritten with the present.'
In the comments, many Singaporean Redditors strongly supported the woman's decision to end the relationship.
'Your concerns are valid. Would be pretty complicated moving into his matrimonial home since all his memories with his ex-partner (and kids) were all created there,' one Redditor wrote. 'If he doesn't agree to moving elsewhere, you are better off with someone else.'
Another shared her own experience, writing, 'I'm living with my BF in the home he lived in with his ex-wife and their children. My circumstances are a little different because it's his family's multi-gen legacy landed kinda type, but sometimes I still get a little sad and feel little bit like the outsider because some of her things are still here and there.'
A third said, 'Nahh, you're not overreacting or at least not for me, the thought of living in the same house as his ex-wife used to would give me the biggest ick.'
Still, not everyone saw things the same way. Several Redditors felt that the woman was indeed 'overreacting,' and said it was 'unfair' of her to expect the man to give up his flat simply because he had lived there with his family.
'As a female, I do think that it's ridiculous to expect that from another guy. It's not like you don't have your own past relationships and baggages,' one Redditor added.
'Yes, it is a home he shared with his ex-wife, but memories within the four walls can be rewritten with the present. Personally, I'll be able to accept a guy like that, but then again, I'm not the emotional type.'
In other news, an employer took to social media to share that her domestic helper refuses to care for her toddler, even when the child is sick or in distress.
Posting in the 'Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid / Domestic Helper' Facebook group, the employer explained that she had clearly laid out her expectations when hiring the helper around five months ago.
Read more: Employer says her helper refuses to care for her 3 yo daughter, claims she left child in soiled diaper and standing in her own vomit
Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
4 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
'No, we don't chew gum': What people really get wrong about Singapore
SINGAPORE: When people think and picture the Lion City, certain stereotypes come to mind: It's part of China, it's impeccably clean to the point of being sterile, and no one dares to chew gum, but talk to long-time residents, and a far more distinct, culturally rich depiction emerges—one that's frequently misjudged or disregarded by those on the outside looking in. A post on Reddit asking, 'What do people who live outside of Singapore misunderstand about Singapore?' triggered a spate of responses from both locals and expats. Their perceptions depicted a fascinating representation of a nation far more encrusted than the trivialities imply. Myth #1: 'Singapore is part of China' This is perhaps the most insistent and erroneous supposition. For many strangers, predominantly those unacquainted with Southeast Asia, Singapore gets lumped in with its much bigger northern neighbour. 'I've had people ask if Singapore is in China,' one netizen wrote, reflecting an annoyance that's become too common. Another added, 'Some Filipinos think Singapore is a Chinese country, people- and culture-wise. When they hear you're Malay, they assume you're from Malaysia.' Chinese Singaporeans undeniably comprise the ethnic mainstream, but that doesn't mean the country is culturally or politically Chinese. Singapore is an autonomous, multi-ethnic city-state, home to a rich combination of Chinese, Eurasian, Malay, Indian, and other communities. Each ethnicity contributes to the national distinctiveness in noticeable and expressive ways. Myth #2: 'Everyone in Singapore speaks Chinese' In Singapore, English is the main language of training, business, and day-to-day communication. 'People outside who have never visited Singapore think everyone here speaks Chinese,' one Redditor noticed. 'Even though people here mostly speak English.' Malay, remarkably, holds the position of national language, a detail that amazes many foreigners. Singapore's national anthem, Majulah Singapura , is chanted in Malay. While the regular Singaporean may not speak the language confidently, it remains an essential element of the nation's heritage. Myth #3: 'It's all glitz, glam, and Crazy Rich Asians' The global success of the movie Crazy Rich Asians brought Singapore onto the world stage—but at a cost. 'I think the movie did more harm than good for the cultural identity of Singapore,' one commenter noted. The film's portrayal of the super-rich select few living an extravagant lifestyle in unspoiled environs left many with the idea that Singapore is an adventure playground for the affluent. The truth? While Singapore is undoubtedly contemporary and industrialised, it's also an authentic place with real people wrestling with socioeconomic issues, just like other people in any other country. Myth #4: 'Singapore is immaculately clean and harshly controlled' Yes, Singapore has a character of being a 'fine city'—both in terms of sanitation and in terms of issuing penalties for littering, jaywalking, and, yes, chewing gum, but as some Redditors pointed out, this repute can be deceptive. 'Only to be surprised when they see people spitting on the sidewalks,' one local remarked. Another added, 'There's rubbish lying around and in the bins—Japanese people tweet about it!' While it's more hygienic than most global cities, Singapore isn't a germ-free paradise. It's a lived-in place, with all the inadequacies, defectiveness, and inconsistencies that come with city life. Myth #5: 'There's a 'Singaporean look'' One of the more understated fallacies revolves around physical looks. 'I've had people say 'you don't look Singaporean' when I tell them where I'm from,' said one Redditor. This postulation originates from an inadequate understanding of what a 'typical' Singaporean looks like, habitually defaulting to Chinese physical attributes. Essentially, Singapore is proudly diverse, and its people mirror that multiplicity. From Indian shrines to Malay celebrations to Chinese New Year carnivals, Singapore's cultural calendar is as wide-ranging as its food and its inhabitants. So, what is Singapore? It's not a slice of China. It's not a monument and not a movie set. It's a multilingual, religiously diverse, multi-ethnic society that harmonises order with sincerity, innovativeness with tradition. It's where learners study in English but sing their national hymn in Malay, where Muslims break fast during Ramadan next to hawkers vending pork noodles, and where street food is a national gem served underneath gigantic high-rise buildings. As one Redditor summed it up: 'I wish they would promote our history and culture more. It's something to be proud of.'
Independent Singapore
5 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
'What's that smell?' — Netizen asks why Marina Bay suddenly reeks of manure
Screengrab from SINGAPORE: If you've recently sauntered around Singapore's famous Marina Bay and caught a scent of something less-than-agreeable in the air, you're not alone. Over the past week, locals and office workers have taken to social media—particularly Reddit—to sympathise and solve an unidentified smell that's plainly been dangling in the air — Why does the whole Marina Bay expanse smell like dung? The initial post was as candid as it was significant: 'Why does the whole Marina Bay area smell like manure? Has been for a week. Very strong smell blanketing the whole area. Is there some manure factory nearby?' Then came a torrent of replies. One Redditor, who works in an office within that zone, quickly presented some insight: 'Our offices are there, so I know a thing or two. NParks has just distributed fertiliser on all the greenery around the Marina Bay area. Will need 'a few weeks for it to dissipate' apparently. Still nasty, especially with the humidity.' That appears to be the most probable elucidation—good, antiquated fertiliser, and not just any fertiliser, but the kind that brings you memories of cow grassland on a scorching afternoon. The odour, strengthened by Singapore's dampness, has become a prominent occurrence in the otherwise unspoiled business and leisure area. Others joined in with their experiences. 'OMG YAAAR,' one netizen exclaimed. 'I was just thinking the same and wanted to post on Reddit also. LOL. Glad you asked—have to breathe shallowly every time I pass that field.' Some picked humour as their coping mechanism—'I farted… Thought no one would notice. Sorry…' Others presumed that it might be barge-related: 'Probably planting works going on somewhere… In the absence of that, maybe a barge offshore somewhere carrying a load of fertiliser.' Based on the post's responses, everything points back to the fertiliser. NParks, Singapore's National Parks Board, sporadically treats green spaces around the city with organic fertiliser to preserve the opulent landscape gardening that the tiny nation is renowned for. Regrettably, it's not always a scent-free process. So, if you're passing through Marina Bay and find yourself holding your breath—or breathing superficially, like one ingenious Redditor—you now know why. It's not a cesspit issue, not an offshore accident, and not an impish barge. It's just the price of keeping Singapore green and alive. The odour should dwindle in a week or two. Until then, maybe pack a box of handkerchiefs? () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
Independent Singapore
7 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Beyond heroism: Sinkhole rescue prompts questions about how migrant workers are treated
SINGAPORE: As the silence of dawn on a typical Saturday dominates Singapore, the morning stillness was crushed when a gaping 3-metre-deep sinkhole swallowed a black Mazda on the road. While speechless bystanders jumbled for help, a group of migrant workers at an adjacent construction site did not falter and immediately lent a hand. According to the latest BBC story, in just a few minutes, they had pitched a rope into the pit and dragged out the traumatised woman to safety. Video footage of the daring act spread like wildfire across social media. Praises were fast — 'heroes,' 'lifesavers,' 'brave souls.' But behind the viral minutes was a more profound, more painful reality about the people behind the heroics. A lifesaving act, a spotlight on inequality Subbiah Pitchai Udaiyappan, the site honcho who led the rescue, told reporters, 'I was scared, but every feeling was that this woman must be rescued first.' Udaiyappan has been working in Singapore for over two decades, and just like the other six men who assisted that day, he's part of the 'unseen' labour force that fuels one of Asia's wealthiest countries. They are the migrant workers who've reached over a million and mostly come from nations such as India, Myanmar, and Bangladesh, to take on the roughest, least wanted jobs in shipping, manufacturing, and construction. See also Pritam Singh updates: Another $700K paid to lawyers for AHTC trial While the city-state's luminous horizon and economic strength have been built on their backs, their existence remains a world apart. They reside in jam-packed dorms far from the city's suburban areas, are paid as little as S$300 per month, and are habitually conveyed in the back of open-air trucks — a mode of transport that has been associated with numerous losses of lives in recent years. As the image of the valiant rescue disappears into the next news series, the country found itself wrestling again with an ancient question – 'Why is it that the people Singapore relies on in its most defenceless moments are treated as 'throwaways' the rest of the time?' Gratitude or tokenism? In the days ensuing the tragic episode, Singaporean bureaucrats presented the seven men with commemorative coins as awards to acknowledge their valour and daring. Some commended the gesture. Others saw it as a bare minimum. 'No amount of 'thanking' them for their heroism should excuse the exploitative economic model that oppresses them every day to sustain the lives we live in Singapore,' wrote activist Suraendher Kumarr. Such sentiment reverberated online. While a few Singaporeans called for monetary compensation or even perpetual residency for the workers, others pushed back, contending that Singapore provides several prospects and better opportunities compared to their home countries, which should be enough. A Redditor bluntly snapped: 'I spoke to one slave recently and he was full of praise for his master… This is what you would sound like in the American South circa 1860.' Another netizen defended local treatment of workers, saying, 'Their pay is equivalent (or more) than a university grad back in their country… Our treatment towards them needs the change, not the pay.' It's a discussion that's long festered in the city-state: 'Is offering economic opportunity sufficient when the structure still downgrades the very people society hinges on?' Beyond the headlines Some Singaporeans attempted to go beyond giving applause. The non-profit 'It's Raining Raincoats' raised more than S$72,000 to recompense the seven men in the sinkhole rescue. Advocacy groups have introduced writing workshops, art expositions, and cultural interactions and conversations to bridge the social divide. Thus far, total change remains vague. Work permit holders — unlike overseas professionals — have no route to permanent residency, irrespective of how long they've been staying in the country. They can't even tie the knot with Singaporeans without government consent. The rulebooks mirror a vital rift — they are here to work, not to belong. For a brief moment, these workers were heroes. But if Singapore is to truly honour them, it will take more than celebratory coins and social media thumbs up. It will take a change in policy making, challenging prejudices, and building a society where every individual — notwithstanding where they come from or how they got to Singapore — is treated with respect. Because occasionally, the marginalised people are the very ones who hold the centre together.
