
Aadhaar to be a must for issuing income certificates
The move aims at eliminating any irregularity in issuing income certificates.
The L-G approved the proposal for notifying the service of 'issuance of income certificate' under Section 7 of the Aadhaar Act, 2016. This provision allows the state government to make Aadhaar-based authentication mandatory to establish identity for receiving any subsidy, benefit, or service for which expenditure is incurred from the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of the State.
The proposal, endorsed by CM Rekha Gupta, stated that income certificates issued by the Revenue Department of the Delhi government are used to determine beneficiary eligibility for various schemes and subsidies — such as reimbursement of tuition fees for SC/ST/OBC students, pensions, and financial assistance under the Delhi Arogya Kosh. Hence, Aadhaar should be made mandatory for this purpose. The Revenue Department stated that using Aadhaar as an identity document for delivering services, benefits, or subsidies simplifies the service delivery process, brings transparency and efficiency, and enables beneficiaries to receive their entitlements directly in a seamless and convenient manner.
UIDAI, through a circular issued in 2019, had authorised state governments to mandate Aadhaar authentication for beneficiaries under Section 7 of the Aadhaar Act in schemes funded from the Consolidated Fund of the State.
According to the notification, individuals not possessing an Aadhaar number but wishing to avail benefits under the listed schemes will now be required to apply for Aadhaar enrolment. In the case of minors without Aadhaar, they must produce either an Aadhaar Enrolment Identification Slip or Biometric Update Identification Slip, along with a Birth Certificate or School Identity Card containing the names of their parents, duly signed by the school Principal.
Other beneficiaries (excluding children) who do not have Aadhaar must submit their Aadhaar Enrolment Identification Slip along with one of the following documents: a Bank or Post Office Passbook, PAN Card, Passport, Kisan Photo Passbook, or Driving License.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
29 minutes ago
- India Today
All fights of US-based United Airlines grounded nationwide due to 'system outage'
All fights of US-based United Airlines grounded nationwide due to 'system outage'This is a developing story. It will be updated.- Ends


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Assam govt realises ₹7.5 cr from Haryana-based company for evading tax
The Assam government on Wednesday realised ₹7.5 crore for tax evasion from a Haryana-based company involved in constructing a four-lane road from Dhemaji to Oyan in Arunachal Pradesh, an official said. Investigations have so far revealed an estimated tax evasion of around ₹ 64 crore. A 12-member team from Guwahati conducted an investigation into tax evasion allegations against Kaluwala Construction Private Limited over six days. Investigations have so far revealed an estimated tax evasion of around ₹64 crore. The company failed to provide adequate justification for several discrepancies identified in their GST profile during the verification process, the official said. 'As a result, immediate enforcement action was taken, leading to the recovery of ₹7.5 crore', he added. Further investigations are underway to determine the full extent of the evasion.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
HC lifts interim stay on investigation into bribery case against employees of L&T, Cognizant, govt officials
Mumbai: The Bombay high court recently lifted an interim stay it had granted on a corruption investigation against employees of Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T),Cognizant Technology Solutions, and government officials, observing that the complaint was not filed against the infrastructure company but against its employees. Bombay High Court (Bhushan Koyande/HT Photo) A division bench of justices AS Gadkari and Rajesh Patil said in its July 23 order that L&T had not been arraigned as an accused in the case by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) in Pune. Following the directions of a sessions court in April 2024, the ACB had registered an offence against officials of L&T, Cognizant and unknown government officials in an alleged $770,000 bribery case. The case pertains to allegations that IT consultancy Cognizant, through its contractor L&T, had paid bribes worth $770,000 to government officials between 2013 and 2014 to obtain clearances to build a campus in Pune's Hinjawadi. The case was registered based on a March 2024 complaint filed by Delhi-based activist and retired police officer Prit Pal Singh, citing newspaper reports. The sessions court then directed the ACB to investigate Pal's allegations. However, L&T challenged the order in the Bombay high court. In May 2024, a different bench of the high court granted an interim stay on the investigation, citing a prima facie 'jurisdictional error' on the part of the sessions court, among other reasons. L&T had contended that Pal's allegations were 'vague, bogus and malafide', adding that they were based on 'hearsay evidence'. The infrastructure firm also said that it had undertaken the Cognizant project in 2011-12, but Pal had sought an investigation into the case after an 'abnormal delay' of over 10 years. However, senior counsel Ashutosh Kumbhakoni and advocate Manoj Badgujar, arguing for Pal, told the court that L&T had not been arraigned as an accused in the case and, hence, its petition seeking the quashing of the FIR was not maintainable. Representing L&T, senior counsel Amit Desai told the court that they were also seeking the quashing of the April 2024 sessions court order directing an investigation into Pal's complaint. On July 23, a division bench of justices Gadkari and Patil directed the investigation of the crime to continue until the next hearing. '...however, in the event the investigating agency intends to implead the petitioner (L&T) as an accused in the final report, it shall not file the said report qua the petitioner without prior leave of this court,' it said. The case will be heard further on August 20. When contacted, an L&T spokesperson said, 'We will not be able to comment this time.' A spokesperson for Cognizant said, 'We have no comments to offer. Cognizant is committed to complying with the law in all its jurisdictions of operations and will cooperate with the local authorities, as appropriate.'