logo
Royal Caribbean makes unpopular change; Cruise lines reborn

Royal Caribbean makes unpopular change; Cruise lines reborn

Yahoo28-02-2025

Passengers get angry when a cruise line skips a port.
They often demand compensation even though they're not entitled to any under their cruise contract. Cruise lines may even offer compensation if they make an unpopular change.Passengers do always get a full refund of any port fee or taxes.
Ports often get skipped for weather reasons. Sometimes, for example, it is too rough to dock at Royal Caribbean's private island Perfect Day at CocoCay. That can be disappointing for passengers, but the cruise line has to act in the best interest of safety.
In other cases, a cruise port get skipped because there is something wrong at the port. Maybe it's a small disruption and only one or two cruises will be missed or, perhaps, there's a bigger issue.
One popular cruise port has not been available for a few months. Royal Caribbean has had to cancel more sailing to that port.
Doug Parker of Cruise News Today has the full story along with news on two closed cruise lines making a comeback.
.
This is cruise news today with Doug Parker.
Good morning. Here's your cruise news for Thursday, February 27.
Royal Caribbean continues to adjust itineraries on more ships due to ongoing repairs at San Juan's Pier 3, which has been out of service since last April.
Now, Icon of the Seas will skip San Juan on select May, June, and July sailings, replacing the stop with Port of Ponce, Puerto Rico, or St. Martin.
Meanwhile, Symphony of the Seas will reroute April itineraries to Porta Plata or Labadee. The pier, which was damaged by an MSC cruise ship last year, is the only one in San Juan that can accommodate Royal Caribbean's larger ships.And two major cruise brands that collapsed under the company Genting during the pandemic are making a comeback.
Resorts World Cruises announced it'll rebrand and resurrect Dream Cruises and Star Cruises over the next three months.
Dream Cruises will continue sailing the Genting Dream from Singapore, while Star Cruises will launch two ships in Asia, the Star Navigator and Star Voyager, that'll be starting next month, both of the Genting-owned lines without a business following the pandemic.
A lesson that bankruptcy isn't always the end. It's just a brief stop before setting sail again.
And Royal Caribbean's Allure of the Seas has entered dry dock in Cádiz, Spain, for a refurbishment under the Royal Amplified Program.
Upgrades will include new suites, dining venues, an expanded pool deck, and family-friendly areas. The ship will also feature the Ultimate Abyss slide and the Perfect Storm waterslides, similar to those on other Oasis-class ships.
After the refit, Allure will spend the summer sailing the Mediterranean before repositioning to Port Everglades in November.
If you have a lead on a story, let us know. Tips@cruiseradio.net.
And this week's Cruise Radio podcast, a review of Norwegian Escape, where you listen to your favorite podcasts.
I'm Doug Parker with Cruise News Today. Have yourself a great Thursday.
(The Arena Group will earn a commission if you book a cruise.)
, or email Amy Post at or call or text her at 386-383-2472.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PBM lobby sues Arkansas over law requiring drug middlemen to sell pharmacies
PBM lobby sues Arkansas over law requiring drug middlemen to sell pharmacies

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

PBM lobby sues Arkansas over law requiring drug middlemen to sell pharmacies

This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. The main lobby representing pharmacy benefit managers is suing Arkansas in a bid to stop the state's law preventing the drug middlemen from owning pharmacies. The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association's lawsuit filed Monday in a federal court argues that Arkansas' law — the first of its kind — is unconstitutional and would result in pharmacies closing and medications becoming more difficult for Arkansans to access. It's the latest legal challenge from the PBM industry as it hustles to halt the law and set a precedent that might dissuade other states from passing similar legislation. Arkansas' legislation, called Act 624, is meant to protect local community pharmacies from larger, more diversified chains by requiring companies that own both PBMs and pharmacies to shutter their operations in the state. When signing Act 624 in April, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the law was necessary to curb anticompetitive behavior among major PBMs that threatens Arkansas' independent pharmacies. However, PBMs — powerful middlemen that shape interactions and payments between drugmakers, payers and pharmacies — decried the law, arguing it eliminates a significant source of efficiency in the pharmacy supply chain by forcing them to sell off their brick-and-mortar stores and halt mail-order pharmacy operations in the state. The policy would unfairly benefit Arkansas-owned pharmacies at their expense, major PBMs said. Now, the PCMA — which represents 20 PBMs, including the so-called 'Big Three' that control an outsized share of the market — is taking to the courts in an attempt to stop the law before it kicks in at the start of 2026. Arkansas' law will cause roughly 40 PBM-owned pharmacies to close, along with eliminating home delivery options and jeopardizing access to specialty drugs for patients managing complex conditions, according to the PCMA's complaint. Act 624 will also lead to job losses and reduce market competition, which could cause costs to to rise for patients and their payers, the association argues. 'We will continue to fight to protect patients' access to health care and educate policymakers and stakeholders about the severe consequences of harmful legislation threatening patient access to pharmacy services,' the PCMA said in an emailed statement. The lobby's lawsuit argues that Act 624 violates the Constitution's Dormant Commerce clause and Privileges and Immunities clause by penalizing out-of-state operators to protect local businesses. The law also violates the Bill of Attainder clause, which forbids states from enacting punishments — in this case, revoking an actor's permit to conduct business — without a court proceeding, according to the complaint. The complaint makes similar legal arguments as prior lawsuits filed against Arkansas' law by CVS and Cigna, which operate two of the largest PBMs in the country: Caremark and Express Scripts, respectively. 'PCMA does not bring this suit because Act 624 is bad policy, although it very certainly is. Rather PCMA brings this suit because Act 624 is as clear an example of unconstitutional state legislation as the Court is likely ever to see,' the complaint reads. The PCMA's suit, which was filed in Arkansas' eastern district against the state's pharmacy board, seeks a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the law while the lawsuit proceeds. Navitus Health Solutions is also a plaintiff in the suit. The Wisconsin-based PBM, which operates on a pass-through model — meaning it makes money only through administrative fees and not by retaining rebates — is not a member of the PCMA. The outcome of the suits could have significant ramifications for the PBM industry, as other states considering similar legislation could be deterred or spurred on by the court's eventual decision. Bills with similar provisions were recently introduced in Vermont, Texas and New York. States are stepping into a gap left by Congress as lawmakers scramble to make prescription drugs more affordable. Despite numerous proposals to rein in controversial PBM business practices over the past few years — including a bill that would force PBMs to sell pharmacy businesses nationwide — Congress has yet to pass significant federal reform. However, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in Washington have expressed anger over PBMs' business practices in recent hearings. And, the GOP megabill currently being considered by the Senate includes some PBM provisions, including banning spread pricing in Medicaid, preventing PBMs from being paid based on a drug's list price and requiring more transparency about PBMs' business practices. Recommended Reading CVS, Cigna sue Arkansas to overturn new PBM law

Champions League winner PSG short-lists two sites outside Paris for future stadium
Champions League winner PSG short-lists two sites outside Paris for future stadium

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Champions League winner PSG short-lists two sites outside Paris for future stadium

PARIS (AP) — Paris Saint-Germain has short-listed two sites outside the capital city to build its future stadium. The Qatar Sports Investments-owned club wants its own stadium, but Paris city hall has so far refused to sell Parc des Princes, the 48,000-capacity venue that has served as PSG's home since 1972. 'Paris Saint-Germain's Champions League triumph marks a major milestone in the club's development,' PSG said in a statement Tuesday. 'In order to remain competitive at the highest level, to consolidate its business model over the long term and to welcome a greater number of supporters in the best possible conditions, the club must now acquire a stadium that matches its ambitions. This is an essential prerequisite if the club is to sustain its growth over the long term.' PSG said it will now focus on two sites — one in the town of Massy, just south of Paris near Orly airport; the other in Poissy, 25 kilometers (15 miles) west of the city. The club opened its new training center in Poissy last year. 'Further studies will be undertaken to assess more precisely the real feasibility of such a project on each of the two sites and to build an ambitious, responsible and meaningful project for the club, our supporters and the local authorities for the coming decades,' PSG said. 'At this stage, neither of the two sites is favored," it added. "The club will conduct both studies with the same seriousness, rigor and openness, in order to make the best possible decision.' PSG said it will keep playing at the Parc des Princes 'for several years' until the final project is delivered. PSG said last year it had invested more than 85 million euros ($92 million) in maintenance costs for the Parc des Princes, adding that it was committed to investing a further 500 million euros in renovations in order to compete with other clubs at the highest level in Europe. Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo said after PSG's Champions League victory that she would be open to refurbishment works to increase the stadium's capacity, although she remains opposed to a sale. ___

Champions League winner PSG short-lists two sites outside Paris for future stadium
Champions League winner PSG short-lists two sites outside Paris for future stadium

Fox Sports

time2 hours ago

  • Fox Sports

Champions League winner PSG short-lists two sites outside Paris for future stadium

Associated Press PARIS (AP) — Paris Saint-Germain has short-listed two sites outside the capital city to build its future stadium. The Qatar Sports Investments-owned club wants its own stadium, but Paris city hall has so far refused to sell Parc des Princes, the 48,000-capacity venue that has served as PSG's home since 1972. 'Paris Saint-Germain's Champions League triumph marks a major milestone in the club's development,' PSG said in a statement Tuesday. 'In order to remain competitive at the highest level, to consolidate its business model over the long term and to welcome a greater number of supporters in the best possible conditions, the club must now acquire a stadium that matches its ambitions. This is an essential prerequisite if the club is to sustain its growth over the long term.' PSG said it will now focus on two sites — one in the town of Massy, just south of Paris near Orly airport; the other in Poissy, 25 kilometers (15 miles) west of the city. The club opened its new training center in Poissy last year. 'Further studies will be undertaken to assess more precisely the real feasibility of such a project on each of the two sites and to build an ambitious, responsible and meaningful project for the club, our supporters and the local authorities for the coming decades,' PSG said. 'At this stage, neither of the two sites is favored," it added. "The club will conduct both studies with the same seriousness, rigor and openness, in order to make the best possible decision.' PSG said it will keep playing at the Parc des Princes 'for several years' until the final project is delivered. PSG said last year it had invested more than 85 million euros ($92 million) in maintenance costs for the Parc des Princes, adding that it was committed to investing a further 500 million euros in renovations in order to compete with other clubs at the highest level in Europe. Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo said after PSG's Champions League victory that she would be open to refurbishment works to increase the stadium's capacity, although she remains opposed to a sale. ___ AP soccer: in this topic

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store