logo
Purge, paranoia, and power: Inside China's black box - Is Xi Jinping losing control?

Purge, paranoia, and power: Inside China's black box - Is Xi Jinping losing control?

Time of India20 hours ago
Beneath the surface, Xi is facing friction on multiple fronts.
TL;DR:
Xi Jinping
still rules unchallenged, but his control now relies more on loyalty than performance.
Top generals purged, including close allies, fueling questions about cracks in the military.
Xi's visibility is down, and key commissions are less active - a shift or a retreat?
rumours swirl, but most are speculation fueled by secrecy and wishful thinking.
Public unrest and economic stress are rising, especially among youth and the middle class.
No successor in sight - Xi looks set to rule indefinitely, despite mounting pressure.
Driving the news
In recent months, speculation about the stability of President Xi Jinping's rule has reached a fever pitch, fueled by high-profile purges in China's military, unusual absences from key international summits, and a steady churn of rumours about elite infighting.
But is Xi really losing control-or is the rumour mill just a symptom of the opacity that has long defined Chinese politics?
Rumours about the inner workings of the Communist Party are nothing new. As Karishma Vaswani of Bloomberg notes, 'Hearsay about the inner workings of the Politburo has a long tradition of being wholly inaccurate.'
Speculation surged after Xi skipped the BRICS summit in Brazil - a first since taking office - and continued as over 20 senior military officers vanished or were removed from posts, including Admiral Miao Hua and Politburo member He Weidong.
But experts warn: The truth is more complex than the rumours suggest.
Why it matters
Xi is the most powerful Chinese leader in decades.
Some analysts call Xi 'president-for-life'. He controls the party, the state, and the military. If there's instability in his leadership, it would be the most significant political event in China since Mao - with ripple effects for the global economy, US-China relations, and regional stability in Asia.
No clear successor:
Xi's refusal to groom or name an heir creates a dangerous vacuum. A sudden health emergency could spark chaos at the top of the Communist Party.
Opaque signals:
Beijing watchers have turned back to 'Pekingology,' the Cold War-era practice of decoding state media, absences, and seating charts to assess political power - a sign of just how tightly controlled information has become.
High stakes for Taiwan: The purges have also affected units reportedly tasked with preparing for a Taiwan invasion. That has caught the attention of US intelligence, which sees cracks in China's chain of command - or at least in its discipline.
The big picture
Despite the rumours, most analysts agree Xi remains firmly in charge. But his governing style appears to be shifting - subtly and strategically.
'He guides the world's second-biggest economy and its largest armed forces seemingly unchallenged,' the Economist wrote. 'Yet analysts now whisper that Mr Xi's governing style may be changing in subtle ways.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Get Your Personalized IQ Certificate Today
IQ-Worldwide.org
Try Now
Undo
Delegation over domination: Xi is sending lieutenants - like Li Qiang, Cai Qi, and Ding Xuexiang - to manage critical commissions and international trips. In 2025, he skipped BRICS and sent Li instead.
Decline in meetings: Some of Xi's signature commissions, including the one on economic reform, haven't publicly met since August 2024. Communiqués are shorter, suggesting fewer decisions.
Purges as a strategy: Over 400,000 officials are under investigation since April 2024, according to the Economist. In the military, top brass close to Xi have been targeted - a sign he may be preemptively removing threats inside his own camp.This tightening of control, even within his base, points to a leader who's preparing to rule indefinitely - but from a more remote, less visible perch.
The purges shouldn't necessarily indicate that Xi is safe, although he's certainly cemented power within his base. He will likely rule China until he 'goes to meet Marx,' as the saying goes.
An Opinion in Bloomberg
What they're saying
Not everyone buys the coup chatter. Most seasoned observers argue Xi is not on the verge of collapse — but that doesn't mean everything is stable either.
'Despite the noise, no one has credibly explained how a leader who dominates every significant CCP organization could be toppled,' writes Michael Cunningham of the Lowy Institute.
'He will likely rule China until he 'goes to meet Marx,' as the saying goes,' Asia Society's Center for China Analysis wrote in a report. 'At every stage, he's defied convention to solidify his grip.'
In their twilight years, both Mao and Deng Xiaoping fragmented authority to ensure that subordinates served as counterweights to prevent any one gaining too much influence. They became oracle-like, pontificating on ideology from behind a curtain. Over time Mr Xi may come to shape such a system—one where ultimate power remains his, even in absentia.
An article in the Economist
Still, challenges are mounting:
Retired Party elders: Like Wen Jiabao and Li Ruihuan have criticized Xi's economic policies and mishandling of US relations, according to Radio Free Asia. While they lack direct power, their discontent underscores elite unease.
Red aristocrats' or princelings, including those in exile, are reportedly sharing kompromat with foreign intelligence agencies - a risky but potentially destabilizing factor.
Middle-class anger is rising amid a stagnant economy, rising unemployment, and censorship over local scandals like the student suicide in Shaanxi Province that led to violent protests.
PLA
grumbling: While a military coup remains highly unlikely, the recent sidelining of high-ranking officers, many with ties to Xi from his Fujian days, suggests serious internal friction.
Even the PLA Daily - the military's official mouthpiece - recently promoted 'collective leadership,' a not-so-subtle rebuke of Xi's longstanding 'one-man rule' mantra.
Between the lines
The growing perception that Xi may be centralizing too much power - even for an autocrat - could erode internal loyalty over time.
'Those chosen for their loyalty may lack experience, shy away from delivering bad news, or see opportunities for graft,' the Economist warned. Xi himself seemed to acknowledge this when he told the Politburo, 'The string of self-revolution must be tightened even further.'
There is little evidence Xi has begun preparing for succession. That's a red flag for analysts who recall how leadership vacuums in China have historically led to chaos - from Lin Biao's plane crash in 1971 to post-Deng power struggles.
Instead, Xi appears to be reducing personal exposure while ensuring his ideological agenda is institutionalized through rules, written directives, and tightly controlled personnel decisions.
Some observers suggest this is a strategy for long-term rule: less presence, more permanence.
What's next
The clearest signs of real trouble for Xi would be overt - not rumours.
'If some of Xi's closest allies - Cai Qi or Ding Xuexiang - are targeted, that will be a more likely sign of trouble,' notes * Institute's* Cunningham.
Right now, purged officials like He Weidong, though powerful, are not considered part of Xi's innermost circle.
Their fall suggests a shakeup - not a power struggle.
As Asia Society notes, Xi's refusal to name a successor is no accident. Installing one would weaken his grip and create a rival power center. Naming no one ensures everyone remains beholden to him - but also makes China's future deeply uncertain.
And that uncertainty has consequences:
For the economy: Xi's mix of state-led stimulus and repression of private enterprise has underperformed. Even EV giants like BYD and SAIC are over-leveraged.
For foreign relations: A softer tone with Washington, especially ahead of President Donald Trump's inauguration, may reflect desperation rather than détente.
For stability: As purges continue and confidence erodes, even within the elite, the line between strength and fear starts to blur.
The bottom line: So, is Xi Jinping losing control?
Not exactly. But he is entering a phase where maintaining control requires more energy, more surveillance, more loyalty tests-and fewer missteps. He still commands the Party, the military, and the machinery of the state. But cracks are showing. Not enough to break him, yet-but enough to make the question impossible to ignore.
The emperor still rules. But he's looking over his shoulder.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Game-changing': Piyush Goyal lauds India-UK FTA; calls it 'stepping stone towards dream of Viksit Bharat'
'Game-changing': Piyush Goyal lauds India-UK FTA; calls it 'stepping stone towards dream of Viksit Bharat'

Time of India

time22 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Game-changing': Piyush Goyal lauds India-UK FTA; calls it 'stepping stone towards dream of Viksit Bharat'

NEW DELHI: Union commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal on Saturday hailed the newly signed free trade agreement with the United Kingdom and said that the deal was signed on India's terms. While addressing a press conference, Goyal claimed the FTA to be "important" and "game-changing," stating that 99 per cent of India's exports will be able to go to the UK duty-free. "Prime Minister Narendra Modi and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer signed a Free Trade Agreement. Cabinet approval has been given in India, but Parliamentary approval in the UK is pending," Goyal said. "It will be a game-changing FTA that will give immense opportunities and benefits to India's farmers, businessmen, MSME sector, youngsters, and fishermen. Out of all FTAs signed so far, the India-UK FTA has been the biggest, most comprehensive, and most important. This FTA has been signed on our terms. Ninety-nine per cent of our exports will be able to go to the UK duty-free,' he added. — ANI (@ANI) This comes after India and the UK signed a historic trade deal in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and UK PM Starmer. The deal was finalised during PM Modi's visit to the United Kingdom. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Salma Hayek, 58,Shows Her Huge Size In New Photos Boite A Scoop Undo The agreement aims to boost bilateral trade to $120 billion by 2030—effectively doubling the current trade volume between the two nations. Taking a swipe at the previous UPA government, Goyal criticised its trade strategy while highlighting the Modi government's approach to FTAs. He also said that the comprehensive deal will help advance progress towards a Viksit Bharat. Goyal said, "UPA government signed FTAs with our competitors, with those countries who would sell their products in India for cheaper prices to destroy India's manufacturing sector... The FTAs signed during the UPA rule were not in the best interests of the country. FTAs signed by PM Narendra Modi are with Mauritius, Australia, EFTA countries, UAE, and now the UK." "Talks are going on with other developed countries. India now signs FTAs with countries which do not compete with us, but complement us. The UK-India Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement will prove to be a stepping stone towards our dream of a Viksit Bharat," he added. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Ishaq Dar Highlights Trump's ‘Pivotal Role' In India–Pak Ceasefire During Talks With Marco Rubio
Ishaq Dar Highlights Trump's ‘Pivotal Role' In India–Pak Ceasefire During Talks With Marco Rubio

News18

time42 minutes ago

  • News18

Ishaq Dar Highlights Trump's ‘Pivotal Role' In India–Pak Ceasefire During Talks With Marco Rubio

Ishaq Dar also brought up the Kashmir issue in his meeting with Rubio, calling it the core dispute between India and Pakistan and urging its resolution as per UN resolutions Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar met United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington to discuss bilateral relations, trade cooperation, regional stability, counterterrorism, and global peace initiatives. According to details accessed by CNN-News18, the two leaders discussed the broad contours of Pakistan-US ties and stressed the importance of close cooperation between the two countries to ensure peace and stability in the region. The US conveyed interest in expanding bilateral trade, with Rubio stating that Washington wants to enhance collaboration with Pakistan in the critical minerals sector. The Pakistani side highlighted the importance of strengthening economic ties, particularly through increased trade and investment linkages. Potential areas of cooperation identified by Pakistan included information technology, artificial intelligence, crypto, and minerals, at both the government and private-sector levels. Dar appreciated what he described as the pivotal role played by US President Donald Trump and Secretary Rubio in de-escalating tensions between Pakistan and India by facilitating a ceasefire and averting a broader conflict between the two nuclear-armed states. However, India has consistently maintained that the ceasefire understanding was a bilateral decision between the Indian and Pakistani military leaderships, with no third-party involvement. The Kashmir issue also featured in the discussion. Dar referred to Jammu and Kashmir as the core issue between India and Pakistan, and called for its resolution in accordance with UN resolutions and the aspirations of the Kashmiri people. India has repeatedly rejected any attempt to internationalise the matter, asserting that it remains an internal issue. The meeting also included a briefing from the Pakistani side on its recent presidency of the United Nations Security Council. Dar highlighted several initiatives undertaken during the term, including the consensus adoption of Resolution 2788 on the 'Peaceful Settlement of Disputes." The move was positioned by Pakistan as part of its broader diplomatic engagement on global conflict resolution, even as India has consistently opposed any attempt to bring bilateral disputes, particularly Kashmir, to multilateral platforms like the UN. On the security front, Pakistan reiterated its role as a frontline state in the global war on terror, referring to its past contributions and sacrifices. The emphasis on counterterrorism cooperation comes amid continued international scrutiny of safe havens for extremist elements in the region, a concern India has repeatedly flagged. Pakistan stressed that deeper cooperation with the US on counterterror efforts would be mutually beneficial and support regional stability. The conversation also extended to broader international concerns, including peacebuilding efforts and the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Pakistan expressed its willingness to contribute constructively to global peace initiatives, while both sides discussed the importance of coordinated international action in the Middle East. Rubio acknowledged what he described as a positive trajectory in Pakistan-US relations and conveyed Washington's interest in expanding collaboration, particularly in the domains of economic development, trade, investment, and counterterrorism. He also appreciated Pakistan's commitment to maintaining the ceasefire understanding with India and its efforts to promote regional peace and stability, even though Pakistan broke the truce shortly after Trump publicly announced the ceasefire on social media. The two leaders reaffirmed their commitment to a long-term partnership and agreed to continue working together on bilateral, regional, and global issues of mutual concern. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Italy's Meloni: Recognising Palestinian state before it is established may be 'counterproductive'
Italy's Meloni: Recognising Palestinian state before it is established may be 'counterproductive'

Time of India

time43 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Italy's Meloni: Recognising Palestinian state before it is established may be 'counterproductive'

Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said on Saturday that recognising the State of Palestine before it is established could be counterproductive. "I am very much in favour of the State of Palestine but I am not in favour of recognising it prior to establishing it," Meloni told Italian daily La Repubblica. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Digital Marketing Project Management MCA Design Thinking Technology Degree PGDM Management Data Analytics healthcare Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity Others Product Management MBA others Data Science Public Policy Leadership Healthcare Data Science Operations Management CXO Finance Skills you'll gain: Digital Marketing Strategies Customer Journey Mapping Paid Advertising Campaign Management Emerging Technologies in Digital Marketing Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Digital Marketing and Analytics Starts on May 14, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Digital Marketing Strategy Search Engine Optimization (SEO) & Content Marketing Social Media Marketing & Advertising Data Analytics & Measurement Duration: 24 Weeks Indian School of Business Professional Certificate Programme in Digital Marketing Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details "If something that doesn't exist is recognised on paper, the problem could appear to be solved when it isn't," Meloni added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo France's decision to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September drew condemnation from Israel and the United States, amid the war in Gaza between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas. On Friday, Italy's foreign minister said recognition of a Palestinian state must occur simultaneously with recognition of Israel by the new Palestinian entity. Live Events A German government spokesperson said on Friday that Berlin was not planning to recognise a Palestinian state in the short term and said its priority now is to make "long-overdue progress" towards a two-state solution .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store