Pentagon inks contracts for Musk's xAI, competitors
Each of the contracts to xAI, Anthropic, Google and OpenAI have a ceiling value of $200 million, the Pentagon's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) said in a statement.
The awards will enable the Department of Defense "to leverage the technology and talent of US frontier AI companies to develop agentic AI workflows across a variety of mission areas," it said.
The contract with xAI comes just days after the company was forced to apologize again for controversial posts by its Grok chatbot.
After an update on July 7, the chatbot praised Adolf Hitler in some responses on the X social media platform, denounced "anti-white hate," and described Jewish representation in Hollywood as "disproportionate."
xAI apologized for the extremist and offensive messages, and said it had corrected the instructions that led to the incidents.
The release on Wednesday of Grok 4, the latest chatbot version, was almost met with scrutiny after it appeared to consult Musk's positions on some questions it was asked before responding.
The contract between xAI and the Department of Defense comes even as Musk and President Donald Trump have publicly feuded in recent weeks.
Musk, a top backer of Trump's most recent presidential campaign, was entrusted with managing the new agency known as DOGE to massively slash government spending under the current administration.
After ending his assignment in May, the South African-born entrepreneur publicly criticized Trump's major budget bill for increasing government debt.
The president and the businessman engaged in heated exchanges on social media and in public statements before Musk apologized for some of his more combative messages.
- 'Critical national security needs' -
The government and the defense sector are considered a potential growth driver for AI giants.
Musk's xAI announced on Monday the launch of a "Grok for Government" service, following a similar initiative by OpenAI.
In addition to the Pentagon contract, "every federal government department, agency, or office (can now) purchase xAI products" thanks to its inclusion on an official supplier list, xAI said.
Meta meanwhile has partnered with the start-up Anduril to develop virtual reality headsets for soldiers and law enforcement.
OpenAI had previously announced in June that it had secured a Defense Department contract with a ceiling of $200 million.
"Establishing these partnerships will broaden DoD use of and experience in frontier AI capabilities and increase the ability of these companies to understand and address critical national security needs with the most advanced AI capabilities U.S. industry has to offer," said the CDAO statement on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
3 hours ago
- SBS Australia
National push to combat AI facilitated child abuse
National push to combat AI facilitated child abuse Published 17 July 2025, 9:33 am There are calls for the federal government to criminalise the possession and use of AI tools designed to create child abuse material. Advocates say Australia can set a global benchmark for ethical AI and child protection.
News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Starbucks increases office attendance to four days a week, rolling back WFH even further
Starbucks is ordering corporate staff back into the office four days a week, as part of the company's plan to 'turn around the business'. CEO Brian Niccol announced the new in-office policy this week, which will affect staff in the US and Canada. From October, the company's three-day in-office requirement will increase to a minimum of four days, with common days being Monday to Thursday. This applies to Starbucks' Seattle and Toronto Support Centres, along with the North America regional offices. 'We'll share more details before October, including our plans to ensure everyone has an assigned dedicated desk,' Mr Niccol said. He also noted the company wants leaders and people managers to be 'physically present with their teams'. So, on top of the increased office days, all Support Centre 'people leaders' currently working from other areas will be required to relocate to Seattle or Toronto within 12 months. This does not apply to 'individual contributors', but the CEO noted that hiring for future roles and lateral moves will require partners to be either Seattle or Toronto based. Mr Niccol noted that not every employee would agree with this approach and that an updated in-office culture 'may not work for everyone'. For those that feel this way, the company will be offering cash payments for people who wish to leave. 'If you decide you want to leave Starbucks for any reason, we respect that,' the CEO said. 'To support those who decide to 'opt out', we're offering a one-time voluntary exit program with a cash payment for partners who make this choice.' Mr Niccol said the company is re-establishing its 'in-office culture' because they believe everyone does their 'best work' when they are together, such as sharing ideas, solving problems and, in general, moving 'much faster'. 'Being in person also helps us build and strengthen our culture. As we work to turn the business around, all these things matter more than ever,' he said. Employees were informed that the company understood there were circumstances in which they may need to leave the office early for personal reasons, but the 'default' should be working in person in a Starbucks office. Starbucks has become the latest major company to turn their backs on previous flexible working policies and push ahead with increasingly strict return to office mandates. Amazon, JPMorgan Chase, Tabcorp, AT&T and Dell are just a few of the companies that have ordered staff back into the office. However, the cracks have started to show, with employees less than impressed with how some of these RTO mandates are going. A report from Business Insider published last month suggested that Dell was dealing with multiple issues, three months into ordering people back into the office full time. Dell staff told the publication that enforcement varies between managers, with some employees saying they were in eight hours a day, while others seemingly coming into the office to show their face and leaving soon after. This has reportedly been causing a lot of 'in-office politics'. Last month, a leaked internal memo from JPMorgan showed morale had taken a hit in the wake of the RTO mandate. A yearly employee survey showed the company's health and wellbeing scores had dropped, with leaders attributing this to the return to office. 'We know return full-time to the office has been an adjustment and one that not everyone agrees with, but we continue to believe in-person is how we do our best work and how we foster connections and mobility opportunities,' the memo stated. Elsewhere, there have also been complaints of companies introducing RTO mandates but actually not having the capacity for everyone to come back. Several workers at AT&T told Business Insider that there was a shortage of available desks and the parking lots had become overcrowded. There were also claims of increasingly long wait times for elevators, leading to the company posting signs with 'motivational quotes' encouraging staff to use the stairs. So, why do some companies, both overseas and here in Australia, keep pushing to increase office attendance despite many employees preferring a remote or flexible hybrid approach? Well, according to Employment Hero CEO, Ben Thompson, it is a mix of old habits and good intentions. 'There of course are many genuine cases where working from home is not possible and many industries where face-to-face is a must,' he said. 'But ultimately, trying to retrofit an outdated structure on modern work is holding many businesses back.' He pointed out that many leaders genuinely believe that being physically present is the only way to create a highly effective and collaborate team. In many cases, changing long held mindsets and values of leadership is a significant challenge. 'Where the private office, towering view or city parking space may have formerly been markers of success, leaders need to redefine what this success looks like and the example they are setting for their teams,' he said. 'When the leaders show up, others will follow. But imagine how this could be better done online, with the right tools, to create a sense of unity and commitment remotely.' Mr Thompson also noted that the cost of leases could be a key driver for some of these businesses to focus on office attendance, but claimed if these funds were reinvested into setting up teams for remote work, it could be 'game changing'. Moving forward, he said the modern workplace is at a 'pivotal juncture', and is being influenced by both global and local trends. 'From a first-principles standpoint, the future of work hinges on meeting human needs, leveraging technology, and optimising economics, with AI emerging as a game-changer,' he said. 'There is an increasing case building for sustained hybrid and remote models that will be difficult for companies to ignore.' So, while Mr Thompson believes we may continue to see a short term pull towards the office, he expects the remote working to rise in the long term. 'Humans value autonomy and balance. Combine that with maturing remote collaboration tech and AI capability, many millions of people globally are about to 'come online' with internet access and a growing playbook for building real social connections outside the office – and I think it's clear we will see remote work prosper,' he said.
SBS Australia
5 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Calls to criminalise possession and use of AI tools that create child abuse material
Child safety advocates have met at Parliament House to confront the problem of child safety in the age of Artificial Intelligence. From the rising prevalence of deepfake imagery to the availability of so-called nudify apps, the use of A-I to sexually exploit children is growing exponentially - and there is concern Australian laws are falling behind. The roundtable was convened by the International Centre for Exploited and Missing Children Australia, or ICMEC. CEO Colm Gannon says Australia's current child protection framework, introduced just three years ago, fails to address the threat of AI - and he's calling on the government to make it a priority. "(By) bringing it into the national framework that was brought around in 2021, a 10 year framework that doesn't mention AI. We're working to hopefully develop solutions for government to bring child safety in the age of AI at the forefront." Earlier this year, the United Kingdom became the first country in the world to introduce A-I sexual abuse offences to protect children from predators generating images with artificial intelligence. Colm Gannon is leading the calls for similar legislation in Australia. "What we need to do is look at legislation that's going to be comprehensive - comprehensive for protection, comprehensive for enforcement and comprehensive to actually be technology neutral." Former Australian of the Year Grace Tame says online child abuse needs to be addressed at a society-wide level. "Perpetrators are not just grooming their individual victims, they're grooming their entire environments to create a regime of control in which abuse can operate in plain sight. And there are ways through education that needs to be aimed at, not just children and the people who work with children but the entire community, there are ways to identify these precipitating behaviours that underpin the contact offending framework, it's things like how offenders target victims, which victims they are targeting specifically." In 2023, intelligence company Graphika reported that the use of synthetic, non-consensual, intimate imagery was becoming more widespread - moving from being available in niche internet forums, to an automated and scaled online business. It found that 34 of such image providers received more than 24 million unique visitors to their websites, while links accessing these services increased on platforms including Reddit and X. As part of Task Force Argos, former policeman Professor Jon Rouse pioneered Australia's first proactive operations against internet child sex offenders, and has also chaired INTERPOL's Covert Internet Investigations Group. Now working with Childlight Australia, he says big tech providers like Apple have a responsibility to build safety controls into their products. "Apple has got accountability here as well, they just put things on the app store, they get money every time somebody downloads it, but there's no regulation around this, you create an app you put it on the app store. Who checks and balances what the damages that, that's going to cause is. No-one. The tragedy is we're at a point now that we have to ban our kids from social media. Because we can't rely on any sector of the industry to ban our kids. Which is pretty sad." Apple has not responded to a request for comment. But in 2021 it announced it had introduced new features designed to help keep young people safe - such as sending warnings when children receive, or attempt to send, images or videos containing nudity. Although potentially dangerous, AI can also be used to detect grooming behaviour and child sexual abuse material. Colm Gannon from ICMEC says these opportunities need to be harnessed. "The other thing that we want to do is use law enforcement as a tool to help identify victims. There is technology out there that can assist in rapid and easy access to victim ID and what's happening at the moment is law enforcement are not able to use that technology."
