The Fascinating Reason Women Use Their ‘HR Voice' To Reject You
And although men go to social media to joke and complain about this formal shift, the women who do or encourage this say it's the kinder response.
'I'm the queen of a polite termination text,' said Emily Durham, a Toronto-based career coach and former recruiter who uses HR-speak when rejecting men she's gone on a few dates with. 'In times of stress, I default to speaking like I'm someone's human resources manager, and that's just how I am.'
What she does might sound similar to anyone who's had to hear hard news during a performance review.
'I'll use the sandwich method, which is [to] thank them for their time, compliment a character trait that I genuinely enjoy about them. Tell them it doesn't feel like the right connection for me right now,' she recalled. 'If it feels warranted to deliver feedback, for example, like because ... we work opposite hours or something like that, feel free to pop it in. ... And then like, 'Wishing you all the best.''
Why 'HR voice' can actually be a kinder, safer way to reject someone you've dated.
Durham defends the 'HR voice' for women and anyone who is queer or trans who are more likely to experience violence while dating. 'In the beginning of dating, you use this HR-speak to mitigate risk. You don't really know who you're dealing with yet, but you still want to balance being respectful,' she said.
Sex and dating coach Myisha Battle, author of 'This Is Supposed to Be Fun,' agreed with this use of HR voice, noting, 'If you expect that the person you're breaking up with will have an outsized response or you know them to be toxic or abusive, HR voice can be the best way to get your point across while protecting yourself.'
'People use 'HR voice' to soften the blow of emotionally charged and difficult conversations like breakups,' Battle said. 'We know that it's not kind to say to someone, 'I just don't want to date you anymore.' So people fall back on language that feels more clinical and sterile and devoid of emotion.'
There is no easy way to deliver the message that your connection, however short, has fizzled out, but an 'HR voice' text can at least firmly but gently let a person know it's over. 'It is coming from a place of having respect for the other person, like setting them free back into the dating universe,' Durham said.
It may also be kinder to send this type of message because it focuses on how you feel and is not a reflection of who your date is. 'I think a lot of people lean on these HR-safe termination messages because it centers more how that connection feels for you versus who that person is,' Durham said.
Dating and relationship coach Ali Jackson said she posts text templates of how to reject people and has been accused of perpetuating an 'HR voice.' When she has done it, her wording follows the script of ''Hey, I've really enjoyed getting to know you, but after thinking about it, I don't feel the romantic connection that I'm looking for. But I wish you all the best.' I sent that text countless times,' she said.
When people have critiqued her scripts as robotic and generic, 'My response is always like, 'Feel free to make it your own,'' she said. 'For me, that type of text message is actually pretty authentic.'
Of course, 'HR voice' is better-suited for early dating than long-term relationships. If a connection lasts beyond one or two dates, Durham said she will call to end things with someone.
'I do think it is context dependent,' Jackson said. 'If I was going to break up with my boyfriend right now, I certainly would not be sending him that text message.'
If you have been dating for more than a couple of months, Jackson recommends doing a phone call, at the very least.
That way, if you have been emotionally vulnerable with someone, the other person deserves a heartfelt message you cannot copy-paste.
Accusations of 'HR voice' might be a gendered idea.
Although women get called out for adopting an HR voice, they aren't the only people to default to corporate, generic responses when dealing with thorny emotions or rejection. 'I don't think that 'HR voice' is exclusive to women. I think that women tend to get their tone policed more than men, though,' Battle said.
Rejection texts that sound like HR may sting, but it's better than ghosting when someone asks for a third date. Some form of acknowledgment is welcomed, regardless of who you are.
'I think if a woman gets that response, she is so happy that this man has communicated his feelings, even if it sucks. She's not policing his language,' Jackson said.
'I've received the same messages from men, and I've never been like, 'Oh, it's corporate speak.' I was like, 'Oh, this is a direct, clear, empathetic communicator,'' Durham said. 'But when I have shared my termination texts, I'll get DMs [direct messages] from people being like, 'Oh my God, you're so stuffy.' I'm like, 'Am I? Or am I just not sugarcoating?''
Telling someone you don't want to date them is hard, no matter how you phrase it, but corporate language at least signals you're trying to soften the blunt edge of rejection.
'Hope you find what you're looking for' and 'Wish you all the best' may sound copy-pasted, but they're also an appropriate way to end an early connection. When you get it, the message is clear: your contract has ended; you're being dismissed.
'I understand why people don't like it; at the same time, I'm not sure that you're ever going to like that text,' Jackson said.
Related...
Is This The Worst 1-Word Text Message You Can Possibly Send?
These Jobs Will Get You More Matches On Dating Apps. But Should They?
8 Tips For Working Through A Hard, Sad Breakup
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
As memories fade, Canadians mark 80 years since the end of the Second World War
OTTAWA — Relatives of war veterans gathered at the National War Memorial in Ottawa on Friday to mark the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender and the official end of the Second World War. Sweat poured down the faces of those assembled in the August midday heat as the Canadian Armed Forces bugler performed the Last Post. Michael Babin, president of the Hong Kong Veterans Commemorative Association, said there are no living veterans remaining out of the nearly 2,000 Canadians who took part in the Battle of Hong Kong in December 1941. He said the last known veteran from that fight died a little more than a year and a half ago, at the age of 106. Babin is one of many with direct ties to the war who expressed the concern on Friday that the history of that battle — and the stories of the many Canadians who fought and died there — are not being passed on to younger generations. "There are no veterans left anymore to tell their stories, so it's up to us — the children and the grandchildren — to tell their stories and to remember them," he said. "Most Canadians don't (know about this battle) because most of the action took place in Europe and that's what Canadians heard about and that's what's taught in the schools. But to send 2,000 men and two nursing sisters to Hong Kong was significant, and all of them were volunteers." Babin said that of the 1,975 Canadian volunteers who went to Hong Kong, only 1,418 returned — 290 were killed in the battle and others later died as prisoners. His own father, Alfred Babin, was released from nearly four years of captivity as a prisoner of war on Aug. 15, 1941. Mitzi Ross said her father, Lance Ross, was hit in the neck by shrapnel but survived the battle. He was captured and sent to Japan to work in a mine as a prisoner of war. "All of the men that were in these camps had to work in mines or shipyards, things like that. It was really a horrible, horrible experience. When they came back they all had PTSD but nobody knew what it was at the time," she said. "They all had hard lives after their return (to Canada)." Francois Vigneault, a retired captain who served 36 years with the Royal Canadian Air Force, said his father's cousin, Laureat Vigneault, was killed in the Battle of Hong Kong. He said his body was never recovered and, thanks to a bureaucratic error, it took his family years to learn that he had been killed in action. "For me, it's a very important battle (but) it's very unknown for Canadians," he said. Anne Okaley said her father became a PoW after the Hong Kong conflict; she's still researching what his exact role was in the battle. Okaley said she worries about people forgetting these stories as time passes — and the risk of grim history repeating itself. 'I just hope the memory carries on,' she said. 'We're not going to be here forever to carry it on, so I'm really grateful for my nephew who is going to carry the torch forward.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 15, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Trend That Is Dating Your Living Room According To Designers
Putting wall-mounted flat-screen TVs over the fireplace has become such a go-to design trend that people have largely forgotten that TVs used to be ornate furniture pieces in their own right. Likewise, fireplace mantels were the stuff that family photos, not TVs, sat on. Over the course of time, as the flat-screened TVs have gotten bigger, fireplace mantels have gone from hulky, to, if not lilliputian, at least a much smaller size. This is so much the case that rooms that still feature those monstrously oversized traditional fireplace mantels look tired, outdated even, like something you'd see on reruns of classic shows from the '70s and '80s, like "Dallas" or "The Six Million Dollar Man." So what's the solution to this dilemma? For the modern flat-screened TV owner, there are other fireplace mantel choices that make more sense than these outdated stone fireplace designs. Mantels that are lower to the ground and less bulky than more traditional mantels come to mind. This design choice allows you to place the TV above the fireplace at a more comfortable height. Here's a good rule of thumb. Sans fireplace, the ideal height for your TV is around 26 inches to 27 inches off the floor, with the middle of the TV, or eye level, being 40 inches off the floor. The average height for a fireplace mantel is around 54 inches to 60 inches above the floor. As such, you may want to think about lowering the mantel's height so that it aligns with those measurements. It's also wise to explore different fireplace and mantel designs because a change in one often necessitates a change in the other. Read more: Ditch These Dated Backsplash Trends For Timeless Alternatives Designs That Work Better For The TV/ Fireplace Combo For many fireplace owners, traditional stone or brick mantels have gone the way of the Dodo, as have traditional fireplace designs. There's almost no way around this problem unless you reconsider the design of both the fireplace and the mantel that sits on top of it. Linear fireplaces, for example, are wider than they are tall and usually sit about 12 inches to 36 inches off the floor. If you work on the lower end of those parameters, you could add a small floating mantel as a visual counterweight between a linear fireplace and the TV. The design of the fireplace also allows you to lower the height of the mantel so that the TV hangs at a more comfortable height for the space and for TV-viewing. It additionally alleviates some of the restrictions that a frame-style fireplace can introduce into a design problem like this one. Floating mantels range in length, width, and height, with some of them being little more than a shelf inserted into the wall above the fireplace – something that would accommodate the TV/ fireplace combo well. Or if your fireplace boasts a more traditional design, consider looking at a custom-designed mantel. This permits you to work within the parameters of the room's architectural elements, and can include space allowances for the TV. Ideally, you can design a mantel that allows the bottom of the TV to hang 3 inches to 4 inches above the top of the mantel. If you don't have that kind of clearance between the mantel and the TV, it could interfere with your view of the TV. What To Do Instead Of The TV/ Fireplace Combo If you're lucky enough to have a new-build home, the problems caused by the TV/ fireplace combo might have already been solved for you with a creative fireplace makeover. For example, your abode might feature a mantel that's already both slimmer and shorter than older mantel/ fireplace set-ups. This arrangement means that the TV will sit lower. You'll avoid neck strain with this arrangement. However, the television still competes with the fireplace for focal dominance, which is one reason why this combo is problematic for many designers. A better option for correcting the problem rethinks the design of the space by moving the TV from directly above the fireplace. One solution could be a faux fireplace mantel that serves as housing for a flat-screen TV. In other words, instead of having a fireplace below the mantel, you build a false mantel and place your TV inside of it where the firebox normally is. This solution also means that you'll still have some mantel space to decorate without the design dilemma caused by the fireplace/ mantel combo. Or, you could embrace a design that features an asymmetrical placement of the TV with the fireplace. This allows you to put the TV and the fireplace on opposite sides of the same wall or even on opposite walls altogether. In both cases, a mantel can be a part of the architectural design of the room, leaving you with plenty of space to decorate a fireplace like a professional. And if you still love those big, bulky mantels of old, this design tactic allows you to embrace this classical style. Enjoyed this article? Get expert home tips, DIY guides, and design inspiration by signing up to the House Digest newsletter! Read the original article on House Digest. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
These Depression-Era Recipes Still Save Money Nearly 100 Years Later
With today's grocery prices, it's no surprise these frugal recipes are making a big comeback. I never thought I'd find myself rummaging through my great-grandmother's old recipe cards, hoping for some last-minute inspiration for an easy treat to celebrate my daughter's awesome report card. Yet, here I am—standing in my kitchen, staring at a faded index card with a recipe for Grandma's Chocolate Cake, aka Wacky Cake. No eggs, no butter, just simple, inexpensive ingredients—flour, sugar, cocoa powder, baking soda, salt, vegetable oil, cider vinegar, vanilla extract, and water. Feeding my family of three has gotten harder. Grocery prices keep climbing—eggs practically feel like a luxury—and dining out? Forget it. Even a casual takeout night is stretching the budget. My grandmother, Anna, was born a few years before the devastating 1929 stock market crash. She was raised in a big family on her mom's budget-minded home cooking, and by the time she was a young mom herself, she had mastered the art of making delicious, filling meals with what she had. If Grandma could feed her family of eight—stretching ingredients, swapping pricey staples for cheaper alternatives, and wasting nothing—then so can I. Thankfully, her recipes were preserved and passed down to all her grandchildren. As I cook her old-fashioned meals, I feel connected to her. My kids love not only her wacky chocolate cake, but also her simple potato soup, her fried bologna sandwiches, and so many more of the easy, inexpensive dishes she raised her family on. I love knowing that these meals don't just save money—they carry a little taste of Grandma's resilience. From the Dust Bowl to TikTok: Depression-Era Cooking Makes a Comeback Depression-era recipes remind me that good food doesn't have to be fancy—it just has to be made with care. And it turns out that not only am I not alone in thinking this way in my 2025 kitchen—social media food influencers are, too. With rising food costs and a growing interest in reducing waste, Depression-era cooking is officially a thing. Let's begin with a true pioneer of Depression-era online cooking content, Clara Cannucciari. With her grandson, Christopher Cannucciari, the great-grandmother, then in her 90s, filmed episodes of what became a popular YouTube series, Great Depression Cooking with Clara, from 2007 to 2012. The pair also put out a DVD and a cookbook. Clara died in 2013, but the videos, amassing millions of views, continue to be a warm and inspiring approach to home cooking with an eye on the budget. Her mantra? Embrace frugality. These days, #depressioneracooking has gained popularity on TikTok and Instagram. This hashtag leads to home cooks from across the country recreating Depression-era favorites. In 2020, you'll find a flourishing of likely pandemic-inspired videos, like dinner rolls made with mayo in place of yeast, candies made with apple cider vinegar, and hamburger casserole, not to mention TikTok phenom B. Dylan Thomas' take on vintage recipes, including his 2022 video of another, circa-1934, recipe for Wacky Cake. This spring, one home-cooking couple posted their version of Hoover Stew, a dish named after President Herbert Hoover, a bit of a poster boy for the economic collapse that led to the Great Depression. Making Magic from Almost Nothing: Depression-Era Kitchen Lessons The source of these original recipes and frugal lifestyle began on October 29, 1929, with an unprecedentedly cataclysmic stock market crash. At that time, there was no bank insurance, so thousands of banks closed. There was also no federal unemployment, so as the economy plummeted and jobs were slashed, Americans were out of work and desperate. Droughts in the 1930s rendered traditional land use on farms suddenly unproductive, and America's heartland turned to dust—the origins of the Dust Bowl. There was little money, and food was scarce. It was a national crisis, and families were forced to become creative and make do with far less. For home cooks in the 1930s, meals were built around cheap, filling staples like potatoes, beans, rice, and bread. And the maxim of "waste not, want not" was now a matter of survival. Ingredients were stretched as far as they could go while trying to optimize every meal for as much sustenance as possible. Cooks got creative, making meat go further by adding fillers like oats, breadcrumbs, and mashed beans into meatloaf. They sought out ingredients, like cornmeal, which was more widely available and less expensive than flour, to make cornbreads and Johnny Cakes. Buttermilk, often a by-product of home butter-churning, was used in soups, biscuits, and pancakes. Leftovers were aggressively repurposed: Yesterday's roast turned into stew the following day, and vegetable scraps—peels, stems, and tops—were simmered into broths. Stale bread was repurposed into bread pudding or used to thicken soups. Many turned to foraging, gathering wild greens, berries, and edible plants to supplement their diets. And even flour sacks found new life, as they were used to strain liquids, store dry goods, and, with a few careful stitches, transformed into dresses. Today, those same strategies feel as timely as ever. Rising grocery bills, a renewed interest in self-sufficiency, and a growing awareness of food waste have brought Depression-era know-how back into the spotlight—not just as a curiosity from the past, but as a practical guide for the present. With that in mind, here's a menu that channels the spirit of the 1930s into a meal you can make right now. Each dish is simple, affordable, and deeply comforting—a reminder that even in lean times, good food can bring people together. From the 1930s to Your Table: A Depression-Era Meal That Still Works Imagine sitting down at a kitchen table in the 1930s: a modest spread of hearty, home-cooked dishes that make the most of every ingredient. This four-course menu—a meaty loaf meant to stretch into tomorrow's sandwiches, creamy potatoes rich with flavor, a crisp salad gathered fresh from the yard, and a chocolate cake that needs no eggs or butter—captures that same spirit. Here's how to bring it to your own kitchen, step by step. Recipes reprinted from The Civilian Conservation Corps Cookbook by Amy Bizzarri, The History Press 2023. Three-Pound Meatloaf This recipe by John R. Graves, a former Civilian Conservation Corps Mess Sergeant from Fall Creek Falls, Virginia, was featured in the tome Favorite Recipes of the Civilian Conservation Corps Alumni. Graves notes, "It is a three-pound meatloaf with the anticipation that some will be leftover, because there is nothing better than cold meatloaf sandwiches with a dash of catsup." Serves 3 to 6 people Ingredients 2 pounds ground beef 1 pound spicy pork sausage 1 egg 1 cup breadcrumbs (or cracker crumbs or oatmeal; cornflakes or even wheat germ) 1 cup finely chopped onions 1 tablespoon dry mustard 2 tablespoons Worcestershire sauce 1 (8-ounce) can tomato sauce 3 tablespoons tomato paste. 2 cloves garlic, finely chopped 3 tablespoons green pepper, finely chopped (Optional) Directions Preheat the oven to 400 degrees F (200 degrees C). Now it is time to mix thoroughly with your hands (then you wash your hands only once afterward). I mean mix well. If you care to taste, put a small dab in the skillet for a minute and taste it — I have done it without frying it. Blend all the ingredients save for the tomato paste and form into a square loaf, about 2 inches thick (bread loaf pans are OK, but I like the thinner loaf better). If it is too big, freeze half for a later bake. Shape into a Pyrex loaf pan, covering loosely with foil. Turn the oven back to about 250 degrees F (120 degrees C) and bake on the middle rack. After about 45 minutes, remove the foil, pour off juice and fat (save for soup stock), spread tomato paste over the meatloaf, and bake at about 275 degrees F (135 degrees C) for another half hour, or until the top is slightly brown. Let set for a few minutes before slicing. The next day you will savor a great cold meatloaf sandwich. NOTE: Make sure the oven is preheated to 400 degrees F (200 degrees C) and lowered to 250 degrees F (120 degrees C); raise the temperature again when the oven is open to pour off fat and juice. Snowflake Potatoes Snowflake mashed potatoes were a regular option on menus at nicer hotels, trains, ships, and restaurants in the 1930s. Ingredients 4 pounds potatoes, boiled and mashed 1 8-ounce package of cream cheese, softened 1 cup sour cream 2 tablespoons salt 1 tablespoon pepper 2 cloves garlic, minced ½ cup chives, chopped ½ teaspoon paprika 3 tablespoons butter, melted Directions Mix potatoes, cheese, sour cream, salt, pepper, and garlic. Stir in chives. Set the mixture in a greased baking pan. Pour melted butter on top and sprinkle with paprika. Bake at 350 degrees F (175 degrees C) until golden, about 40 minutes. Dandelion Salad Recipe During the Great Depression, dandelion greens, which are packed with nutrients and can be plucked literally from most backyards, became a valuable food source for struggling families. Choose plants growing in areas free from pesticides or pollution, such as wild fields or your own backyard. To harvest, use scissors or a knife to cut the greens close to the base, leaving the root intact for regrowth. Ingredients 1 bunch dandelion greens, washed and dried 1 teaspoon finely chopped shallot 1 teaspoon Dijon mustard 1 tablespoon red wine vinegar 1 anchovy fillet, finely chopped (optional) salt and freshly ground black pepper to taste 3 tablespoons olive oil 1 ounce Parmesan cheese, shaved Directions Whisk shallot, mustard, vinegar, and anchovy together in a bowl. Season with salt and pepper, then slowly whisk in olive oil. Toss dandelion greens with the dressing. Top with Parmesan shavings and serve immediately. Grandma's Wacky Chocolate Cake This simple, rich chocolate cake was created during the Great Depression, when ingredients like eggs, milk, and butter were scarce. Instead, vinegar and baking soda worked as leavening agents, creating a moist and fluffy texture. Ingredients 1 1/2 cups all-purpose flour 1 cup granulated sugar 1/2 cup unsweetened cocoa powder 1/2 teaspoon salt 1 teaspoon baking soda 1 1/4 teaspoons vanilla extract 1 teaspoon white vinegar 1/3 cup vegetable oil 1 cup water Directions Preheat the oven to 350 degrees F (175 degrees C). Grease an 8x8-inch baking pan. Whisk together flour, sugar, cocoa powder, salt, and baking soda in a large bowl. Make three wells in the dry mixture—pour vanilla extract, vinegar, and oil into separate wells. Pour water over everything and mix until smooth. Pour batter into the prepared pan and bake for 30–35 minutes, or until a toothpick inserted in the center comes out clean. Let cool before serving. Read the original article on ALLRECIPES
