
Shoppers are wary of digital shelf labels, but a study found they don't lead to price surges
But some shoppers, consumer advocates and lawmakers remain skeptical about the tiny electronic screens, which let stores change prices instantly from a central computer instead of having workers swap out paper labels by hand.
'It's corporations vs. the humans, and that chasm between us goes further and further,' said Dan Gallant, who works in sports media in Edmonton Canada. Gallant's local Loblaws supermarket recently switched to digital labels.
Social media is filled with warnings that grocers will use the technology to charge more for ice cream if it's hot outside, hike the price of umbrellas if it's raining or to gather information about customers.
Democratic U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania fired off a letter to Kroger last fall demanding to know whether it would use its electronic labels as part of a dynamic pricing strategy.
Lawmakers in Rhode Island and Maine have introduced bills to limit the use of digital labels. In Arizona, Democratic state Rep. Cesar Aguilar recently introduced a bill that would ban them altogether.
The bill hasn't gotten a hearing, but Aguilar said he's determined to start a conversation about digital labels and how stores could abuse them.
'Grocery stores study when people go shopping the most. And so you might be able to see a price go down one day and then go up another day,' Aguilar told The Associated Press.
Researchers say those fears are misplaced. A study published in late May found 'virtually no surge pricing' before or after electronic shelf labels were adopted. The study was authored by Ioannis Stamatopoulos of the University of Texas, Austin, Robert Evan Sanders of the University of California, San Diego and Robert Bray of Northwestern University
The researchers looked at prices between 2019 and 2024 at an unnamed grocery chain than began using digital labels in October 2022. They found that temporary price increases affected 0.005% of products on any given day before electronic shelf labels were introduced, a share that increased by only 0.0006 percentage points after digital labels were installed.
The study also determined that discounts were slightly more common after digital labels were introduced.
Economists have long wondered why grocery prices don't change more often, according to Stamatopoulos. If bananas are about to expire, for example, it makes sense to lower the price on them. He said the cost of having workers change prices by hand could be one issue.
But there's another reason: Shoppers watch grocery prices closely, and stores don't want to risk angering them.
'Selling groceries is not selling a couch. It's not a one-time transaction and you will never see them again,' Stamatopoulos said. 'You want them coming to the store every week.'
Electronic price labels aren't new. They've been in use for more than a decade at groceries in Europe and some U.S. retailers, like Kohl's.
But they've been slow to migrate to U.S. grocery stores. Only around 5% to 10% of U.S. supermarkets now have electronic labels, compared to 80% in Europe, said Amanda Oren, vice president of industry strategy for North American grocery at Relex Solutions, a technology company that helps retailers forecast demand.
Oren said cost is one issue that has slowed the U.S. rollout. The tiny screens cost between $5 and $20, Oren said, but every product a store sells needs one, and the average supermarket has 100,000 or more individual products.
Still, the U.S. industry is charging ahead. Walmart, the nation's largest grocer and retailer, hopes to have digital price labels at 2,300 U.S. stores by 2026. Kroger is expanding the use of digital labels this year after testing them at 20 stores. Whole Foods is testing the labels in nearly 50 stores.
Companies say electronic price labels have tremendous advantages. Walmart says it used to take employees two days to change paper price labels on the 120,000 items it has in a typical store. With digital tags, it takes a few minutes.
The labels can also be useful. Some have codes shoppers can scan to see recipes or nutrition information. Instacart has a system in thousands of U.S. stores, including Aldi and Schnucks, that flashes a light on the digital tag when Instacart shoppers are nearby to help them find products.
Ahold Delhaize's Albert Heijn supermarket chain in the Netherlands and Belgium has been testing an artificial intelligence-enabled tool since 2022 that marks down prices on its digital labels every 15 minutes for products nearing expiration. The system has reduced more than 250 tons of food waste annually, the company said.
But Warren and Casey are skeptical. In their letter to Kroger, the U.S. senators noted a partnership with Microsoft that planned to put cameras in grocery aisles and offer personalized deals to shoppers depending on their gender and age.
In its response, Kroger said the prices shown on its digital labels were not connected to any sort of facial recognition technology. It also denied surging prices during periods of peak demand.
'Kroger's business model is built on a foundation of lowering prices to attract more customers,' the company said.
Aguilar, the Arizona lawmaker, said he also opposes the transition to digital labels because he thinks they will cost jobs. His constituents have pointed out that grocery prices keep rising even though there are fewer workers in checkout lanes, he said.
'They are supposed to be part of our community, and that means hiring people from our community that fill those jobs," Aguilar said.
But Relex Solutions' Oren said she doesn't think cutting labor costs is the main reason stores deploy digital price tags.
'It's about working smarter, not harder, and being able to use that labor in better ways across the store rather than these very mundane, repetitive tasks,' she said.
___
AP Writers Anne D'Innocenzio in New York and Sejal Govindarao in Phoenix contributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Air Force's top uniformed officer is retiring early in latest Trump military shake-up
The Air Force 's top uniformed officer is set to retire early in the most recent shake-up of military leadership during President Donald Trump's second term. Gen. David Allvin will continue serving as the service's chief of staff until a replacement is confirmed by the Senate, the Air Force announced Monday. He expects to retire around Nov. 1, two years into his four-year term, it said in a statement. Allvin joins other top military officials who have stepped down or been fired by Trump 's Republican administration during a broader leadership upheaval, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 's plans to slash the number of senior military positions in what he calls an efficiency effort and a purge of top officers who were believed to endorse diversity, equity and inclusion programs. For example, Trump fired Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr. as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in February. Brown was the second Black general to serve as chairman, and Air Force Gen. Dan Caine later took over the role. Allvin, a command pilot with more than 4,600 flying hours, was appointed Air Force chief of staff by President Joe Biden, a Democrat, serving since November 2023. Before that, he was vice chief of staff during Trump's first term. 'I'm grateful for the opportunity to serve as the 23rd Air Force Chief of Staff and I'm thankful for Secretary Meink, Secretary Hegseth and President Trump's faith in me to lead our service,' Allvin said in the Air Force's statement. When asked for more details on Allvin's departure, the Air Force directed The Associated Press to its statement. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Air Force at


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jesse Watters declares ‘Big Balls, we love you,' as he celebrates Trump's DC crime crackdown
Jesse Watters professed his love for the former Department of Government Efficiency staffer, better known by his nickname ' Big Balls,' claiming that the teen's assault in Washington, D.C., spurred Donald Trump 's decision to deploy the National Guard. Watters praised Edward Coristine for taking a 'beating for the rest of the city' during Monday evening's episode of Jesse Watters Primetime, about two weeks after the 19-year-old was brutally assaulted in an attempted carjacking. According to the Fox News host, Coristine's assault was directly linked to the president mobilizing the military in D.C. last Tuesday. 'When Big Balls went down, that's when Trump had to call it,' Watters told fellow Fox News host Will Cain. 'If Big Balls isn't safe, no one's safe. And I'm glad he took a beating for the rest of the city, and he's back up on his feet.' In closing, Watters declared: 'So, Big Balls, we love you.' Cain also chimed in that, though he doesn't frequent the capital, he said that through 'anecdotal evidence' he can see just 'how bad' crime is there. 'And you're seeing this evidenced by the fact that, as you've pointed out, so many people are happy to see President Trump take over Washington, D.C., and make it feel safe,' he added. Since Trump tried – and subsequently failed – to hand over responsibility for policing the district to Pam Bondi, the attorney general announced on Tuesday morning that 465 arrests have been made – 52 on Monday evening alone. Days after posting a picture of a bloodied Coristine across social media, Trump insisted at a press conference last Monday (August 11) that his strategy was necessary because crime in D.C. is 'out of control.' The president claimed the city required 'liberation' from 'violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people.' His claim is not consistent with official crime statistics over the past two years, which report that street crime has declined to 30-year lows, leading his opponents to suggest he is seeking a 'distraction' from the Jeffrey Epstein firestorm. Last week, tourists in D.C. were met by the unusual and eerie sight of U.S. military members patrolling the city upon sunrise. Members of the National Guard were present along the Mall last Thursday as part of the administration's show of force, which was trailed in advance by an insider who spoke to ABC News.


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
United Airlines faces lawsuit after selling ‘windowless' window seats
United Airlines is facing a class action lawsuit for allegedly selling 'windowless' window seats to passengers. The potential lawsuit, which is still recruiting members, claims that the airline 'misled customers' by charging for aircraft window seats without windows. According to Top Class Actions, plaintiffs are seeking compensation for the 'false advertising' practice that they say violated air passenger rights. California passengers who paid extra for a window seat on a United Airlines flight within the last four years but did not sit next to a physical window may be eligible to join the lawsuit. Airlines often allow passengers to reserve popular window seats for an additional fee. Passengers pay from $24 (£18) per person for preferred seating in United's standard Economy class. That charge rises to $36 (£27) per person for those in 'Basic Economy'. However, different aircraft designs require different configurations, with some rows falling on a blank wall that is not reflected on the plane's seating chart when booking online. The class action would seek to 'hold United Airlines accountable' for the 'misleading and unfair practice', reported Top Class Actions. The lawsuit is being organised by Greenbaum Olbrantz LLP, a legal firm based in New York. According to the airline, no lawsuit has currently been filed against United. In June, a Ryanair passenger who did not pay to reserve a seat found himself bumped from a flight to Mallorca after the airline switched planes at the last minute for an aircraft with fewer seats. Gym coach Scott McCormick and his girlfriend were due to fly with Ryanair on flight FR1954 from Birmingham Airport to Palma de Mallorca on 1 May. The couple said that when they booked their flight, they opted out of paying for a reserved seat, which can range from €4.50 (£3.85) to €33 (£28.20) per flight. 'They put us through at the end, and they said, 'as you are last to check in and you haven't reserved a seat, we have one seat remaining.'' They eventually paid another £100 for a new ticket and waited around four hours to board the next flight to Palma.