Wimbledon: Iga Swiatek vs. Belinda Bencic odds, picks, prediction
It has taken Iga Swiatek a long time to figure out the grass at Wimbledon, but it looks as if she's finally done it.
The native of Poland had never made it beyond the quarterfinals in her first five trips to the All England Club, leaving many to wonder if she'd be another elite player who just could never make sense of the unique conditions at Wimbledon.
This year has been different. Not only has Swiatek been dominant at Wimbledon – she's dropped just one set during the tournament – but she also was terrific at the Bad Homburg Open, a warm-up event played on grass.
Swiatek vs. Bencic odds, preview
Player Odds Iga Swiatek -334 Belinda Bencic +250 Odds via bet365
Swiatek made it to the finals at Bad Homburg, where she lost to Jessica Pegula, but she defeated three difficult opponents in straight sets before falling to the American in the showpiece.
Bencic was able to outlast Mirra Andreeva in two tiebreakers in the quarterfinals, but the Russian only broke serve once in that match, which is not a luxury Bencic will be able to rely on against Swiatek, who is one of the best defensive players in the sport.
Belinda Bencic gets ready to serve at Wimbledon.
Getty Images
At her best, Swiatek is a master at getting balls back in play and grinding out long points, forcing her opponents into mistakes. That strategy isn't easy to pull off on the grass, which usually favors speed and power, but the Warsaw native has figured out how to make it work this year.
Bencic will need to be at her best to get a foothold in this match, but there's every chance that Swiatek doesn't even allow her that opportunity.
Swiatek's grass-court form is too hard to ignore, and there's a good chance that this one is over quickly.
The Play: Swiatek -1.5 sets (-120, bet365)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
USC football countdown to kickoff—Dion Bailey in focus
The countdown to USC's 2025 football season is officially on! The Trojans kick off their new campaign 18 days from today. You need something to help you while away the days and hours in the spring and summer. This is one way to do so. In this new series, countdown to kickoff, we will be counting down the days by highlighting a notable Trojan who wore each number. Today, we look at former USC linebacker/safety Dion Bailey. Position: Linebacker/safety Years played at USC: 2010-2013 Career highlights: Bailey arrived at USC as a safety and redshirted his first year on campus in 2010. Prior to the 2011, he was converted to linebacker, where he earned a starting role and impressed, earning freshman All-American honors. He returned as a starter at linebacker in 2012, before switching back to safety in 2013. Bailey finished his time in Cardinal and Gold with 221 total tackles, 11 interceptions, 3.5 sacks, and three forced fumbles. Of those picks, perhaps none was bigger than the one in the Trojans' 2013 upset of No. 4 Stanford. With the game tied at 17 in the fourth quarter, the Cardinal had a second and goal from the Trojans' ten yard-line. Bailey picked off Stanford quarterback Kevin Hogan's pass, keeping the score knotted. USC would go on to earn a 20-17 victory on a last-second field goal by kicker Andre Heidari. After USC: Following his redshirt junior season in 2013, Bailey declared for the 2014 NFL Draft, despite not being projected as a high draft pick. He went undrafted and signed as a free agent with the Seattle Seahawks. In Seattle, Bailey finally got to play with Pete Carroll, the head coach who recruited him to USC, but left prior to his freshman year. Bailey appeared in seven NFL regular games with the Seahawks and the New York Jets. He finished his professional career with 22 tackles, two passes defended, and 0.5 sacks. He was released by New York prior to the start of the 2016 season.
USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
Rumors fly surrounding Oklahoma QB John Mateer and 2022 UCLA-USC football game
There's a new, strange sports betting rumor swirling around the internet, with Oklahoma Sooners quarterback John Mateer being placed under review for any gambling activity. ESPN's Pete Thamel reported that Oklahoma is aware of the situation and is reviewing Mateer for any possible gambling activity. Mateer is entering his first season with the Sooners after playing with the Washington State Cougars the past three years. College Sports Wire writer Riley Donald explained on Tuesday why Mateer is unlikely to be the last player caught in this sort of entanglement. 'While college sports feature ads for different gambling sites every other commercial, the act of collegiate athletes gambling is still strictly prohibited and often a fast-track ticket to suspensions or worse. The latest saga around gambling activity in the college football world has the spotlight shining squarely on the Oklahoma Sooners and their new transfer quarterback John Mateer, just before the 2025 season is set to begin.' Donald wrote. The rumors began after Mateer's Venmo transaction history was posted online, with Mateer having some suspicious payments that allude to sports betting. Perhaps allude isn't a strong enough word, as Mateer had one payment titled simply 'Sports gambling (UCLA vs USC).' Mateer claimed that his transactions were an "inside joke" and that no illegal activity had occured. Mateer shouldn't be viewed as guilty simply off his Venmo transaction history, but the date of Mateer's transaction referring to USC and UCLA came just one day after the Bruins lost to the Trojans 48-45 back in 2022, which only makes it more likely that he had a wager on the game. Three days later, Mateer had another Venmo payment, receiving a payment titled 'Ultra sports gambling fifa World Cup' that was completed three days after the start of the 2022 FIFA World Cup. These sorts of scandals, it will be argued by some, will continue with the continued acceptance of sports betting in American society, with professional and collegiate programs signing deals with sports betting companies while holding the expectation for players, both pro and collegiate, to not participate.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
A UFC fight at the White House? Dana White says it's happening as part of deal with Paramount.
Hours after Paramount and UFC announced a billion-dollar rights deal, Dana White said he had yet to hear from his friend, President Donald Trump, on his thoughts about the fight company's new streaming home. That was fine with White. The UFC CEO was set to travel to Washington on Aug. 28 to meet with Trump and his daughter, Ivanka, to catch up and discuss logistics on the proposed Fourth of July fight card next year at the White House. Trump said last month he wanted to stage a UFC match on the White House grounds with upwards of 20,000 spectators to celebrate 250 years of American independence. 'It's absolutely going to happen,' White told The Associated Press. 'Think about that, the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the UFC will be on the White House south lawn live on CBS.' The idea of cage fights at the White House would have seemed improbable when the Fertitta brothers purchased UFC for $2 million in 2001 and put White in charge of the fledging fight promotion. White helped steer the company into a $4 billion sale in 2016 and broadcast rights deals with Fox and ESPN before landing owner TKO Group's richest one yet — a seven-year deal with Paramount starting in 2026 worth an average of $1.1 billion a year, with all cards on its streaming platform Paramount+ and select numbered events also set to simulcast on CBS. ESPN, Amazon and Netflix and other traditional sports broadcast players seemed more in play for UFC rights — White had previously hinted fights could air across different platforms — but Paramount was a serious contender from the start of the negotiating window. The Paramount and UFC deal came just days after Skydance and Paramount officially closed their $8 billion merger — kicking off the reign of a new entertainment giant after a contentious endeavor to get the transaction over the finish line. White said he was impressed with the vision Skydance CEO David Ellison had for the the global MMA leader early in contract talks and how those plans should blossom now that Ellison is chairman and CEO of Paramount. 'When you talk about Paramount, you talk about David Ellison, they're brilliant businessmen, very aggressive, risk takers,' White said. 'They're right up my alley. These are the kind of guys that I like to be in business with.' The $1.1 billion deals marks a notable jump from the roughly $550 million that ESPN paid each year for UFC coverage today. But UFC's new home on Paramount will simplify offerings for fans — with all content set to be available on Paramount+ (which currently costs between $7.99 and $12.99 a month), rather than various pay-per-view fees. Paramount also said it intends to explore UFC rights outside the U.S. 'as they become available in the future.' UFC matchmakers were set to meet this week to shape what White said would be a loaded debut Paramount card. The UFC boss noted it was still too early to discuss a potential main event for the White House fight night. 'This is a 1-of-1 event,' White said. There are still some moving parts to UFC broadcasts and other television programming it has its hands in as the company moves into the Paramount era. White said there are still moving parts to the deal and that includes potentially finding new homes for 'The Ultimate Fighter,' 'Road To UFC,' and 'Dana White's Contender Series.' It's not necessarily a given the traditional 10 p.m. start time for what were the pay-per-view events would stand, especially on nights cards will also air on CBS. 'We haven't figured that out yet but we will,' White said. And what about the sometimes-contentious issue of fighter pay? Some established fighters have clauses in their contracts that they earn more money the higher the buyrate on their cards. Again, most of those issues are to-be-determined as UFC and Paramount settle in to the new deal — with $1.1 billion headed the fight company's way. 'It will affect fighter pay, big time,' White said. 'From deal-to-deal, fighter pay has grown, too. Every time we win, everybody wins.' Boxer Jake Paul wrote on social media the dying PPV model — which was overpriced for fights as UFC saw a decline in buys because of missing star power in many main events — should give the fighters an increased idea of their worth. 'Every fighter in the UFC now has a clear picture of what the revenue is…no more PPV excuses,' Paul wrote. 'Get your worth boys and girls.' White also scoffed at the idea that the traditional PPV model is dead. There are still UFC cards on pay-per-view the rest of the year through the end of the ESPN contract and White and Saudi Arabia have teamed to launch a new boxing venture that starts next year and could use a PPV home. White, though, is part of the promotional team for the Canelo Álvarez and Terence Crawford fight in September in Las Vegas that airs on Netflix. 'It's definitely not run it's course,' White said. 'There were guys out there who were interested in pay-per-view and there were guys out there that weren't. Wherever we ended up, that's what we're going to roll with.' White said UFC archival footage 'kills it' in repeat views and those classic bouts also needed a new home once the ESPN deal expires. Just when it seems there's little left for UFC to conquer, White says, there's always more. Why stop at becoming the biggest fight game in the world? Why not rewrite the pecking order in popularity and riches and go for No. 1 in all sports? 'You have the NFL, the NBA, the UFC, and soccer globally,' White said. 'We're coming. We're coming for all of them.'
