Govt wrongly blaming Oppn for House disruptions, says Sangrur MP
How do you look at your experience in the first year of the 18th Lok Sabha?
As the name suggests, the Lok Sabha is truly the House of the people, representing citizens from all walks of life. I feel honoured to represent the constituents of Sangrur, a region known for its political awareness and spirit of experimentation. Having been a two-time MLA and a cabinet minister in Punjab, I have been working at the grassroots level for a long time, but my tenure as an MP has brought a new kind of energy, motivating me as well as testing the best in me at times. I am fully committed to my role and thoroughly living every moment.
What was the high point of the year for you personally or your party in the House?
Being an MP offers no dull moments – each day is engaging and unique in its own right. However, I do feel that the BJP government's legislative agenda has been heavily influenced by select interest groups, often neglecting the concerns of the common man. My focus has been to raise the demands and concerns of the common people. I have consistently upheld the promise I made to my voters of being the voice of the common man in Parliament.
I am using my MPLAD funds for projects that drive long-term development rather than for short-term optics. A key initiative involves Sansarpur, a historic village known for producing numerous hockey Olympians, which lacked an astroturf due to administrative delays. This issue has been taken up with the central government.
Are you satisfied with the number of sittings of the Lok Sabha, and why or why not?
We are the world's largest democracy, where every voice deserves to be heard. In the 1980s and 1990s, parliamentary sessions were longer and often included double sittings. BJP's politics is such that anyone who seeks accountability from them is dubbed as anti-national. While the government blames the Opposition for disruptions, it is their responsibility to ensure the House functions. The BJP has two to three leaders who make remarks that cause chaos and adjournments. If India wishes to achieve the aspirations of its youth, their representatives and institutions need to work in mission mode.
What is the most effective way to raise issues of public importance in the House?
I have been a student of politics and Parliamentary procedures since my teenage years. Over time, I have adopted core values — maintaining parliamentary decorum, avoiding personal attacks, and showing respect to individuals across political ideologies. At the same time, I remain clear and assertive in expressing my ideological beliefs and in advocating for the public's agenda. This balanced approach has helped me ensure the effective resolution of constituency matters, even from the opposition benches.
What difference have you made to your constituency in the last one year, and what do you plan to do in the remaining term as MP?
Unlike the previous MP from Sangrur, Simranjit Singh Mann, I have remained constantly active on the ground, regularly engaging with my constituents regularly. When I resigned from the post of cabinet minister after winning the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, there were ongoing infrastructure projects in Barnala, Dhanuala and other areas. These projects have been my top priority. A new sports stadium complex is underway in Dhanaula. One major achievement has been the approval of the long-pending Malwa-Chandigarh rail link, which was delayed due to a legacy political family in Punjab. Through constant persuasion and use of parliamentary tools, I, along with a few other MPs, have succeeded in getting its approval from the Railways. In Parliament, I have consistently raised issues related to central funds for Punjab, a national-level educational institution for Sangrur, and support for farmers and agro-based industries. I am using my MPLAD funds for projects that drive long-term development rather than for short-term optics. A key initiative involves Sansarpur, a historic village known for producing numerous hockey Olympians, which lacked an astroturf due to administrative delays. This issue has been taken up with the central government.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Govt, opposition spar over CISF deployment in House
NEW DELHI: The Opposition and government on Tuesday traded barbs in the Rajya Sabha over deployment of Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel designated as marshals in Parliament, stalling proceedings in the Upper House during the ongoing monsoon session. Govt, opposition spar over CISF deployment in House While Congress president and leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge alleged that the marshals were drawn from the CISF and police force, deputy chairman Harivansh asserted that they were not CISF personnel but 'Parliament Security Service'. Harivansh also criticised the Opposition leader for releasing his letter to the Chair to the media. '… Such communication between constitutional functionaries must remain confidential,' he added. Kharge had last week raised the issue of CISF personnel being deputed as marshals in the Upper House and shot off a letter to the deputy chairman, objecting to their presence. 'We are astonished and shocked at the manner in which CISF personnel are made to run into the well of the House when the members are exercising their democratic right of protest… We expect that in future CISF personnel will not come trooping in the well of the House when members are raising important issues of public concern,' Kharge wrote in the letter dated August 1. He read out the content of the letter in the House on Tuesday as well. Harivansh said the House witnessed several disruptions over the course of the week and added that despite repeated appeals by the Chair, several members violated the provisions of Rule 235 and Rule 238, disrupting the House. 'We members should self-introspect whether such actions enhance the dignity and decorum of the House,' he said. However, the Opposition did not relent. Kharge said: 'If CISF or any paramilitary force has been called inside the house to silence our voice, it is highly objectionable and violates the core values of democracy… We are protesting democratically, and this is our right.' Kharge made a reference to late BJP leaders, Arun Jaitley and Sushma Swaraj, who had referred to disruptions as part of democratic process. DMK member Tiruchi Siva recalled that even after Bhagat Singh threw a bomb in the Central Legislative Assembly, Vitthal Bhai Patel did not allow security forces to enter the house. Hitting at Kharge, parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said the leader of Opposition had attempted to 'mislead' the house. 'Only marshals can enter the House. That day there were only marshals. LoP is misleading and putting forth wrong facts. When a misleading letter is written or a wrong fact is presented, what action needs to be taken?' Rijiju questioned. On the charge of CISF personnel being deployed, Rijiju said, 'They have to be brought from somewhere.. either they have to go through some exams or can be on deputation. It has been explained by the Chair that all those have been from the parliament security staff and part of it.' Leader of the House JP Nadda also criticised the Opposition for disrupting the proceedings of the house. '…I have been in the opposition for over 40 years and I would say take tuition from me on how to work as the opposition… it has only been 10 years…You'll be there for another 30 to 40 years,' he said, taking a swipe at the Opposition. People aware of the matter said that for the first time this session, CISF has been posted across Parliament without any assistance from the Parliamentary Security Service (PSS). The duties of PSS have been transferred to CISF, which includes the role of marshals inside Parliament. PSS was an inhouse security unit within Parliament. They were not people from police or any other paramilitary forces but were posted permanently within the complex. Until last year, the perimeter of Parliament complex was guarded by Central Reserve Police Force and Delhi police. But following a security breach of 2023, a security survey was conducted and the Parliament security was handed to CISF, which took over the security arrangements at the complex in January 2024. 'In the previous three sessions (after CISF's induction), PSS officials were posted along with CISF personnel and were assisting them at every corner... after more than a year, the entire security including marshal duties were handed to CISF this time. For Marshal duty, a separate CISF team has been set up within the complex. They enter the house only when they are called inside by the Speaker or the authorities. PSS personnel are not involved in any security related work anymore,' an official aware of the matter said.
Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
BJP MP's remark on Gaya airport triggers row
New Delhi A BJP MP's complaint that Gaya International Airport's three-letter code 'GAY' is 'socially and culturally offensive' has sparked backlash from LGBTQ activists who say his remarks reinforce prejudice against the community. BJP MP's remark on Gaya airport triggers row Rajya Sabha member Bhim Singh from Bihar submitted a written query to Parliament questioning why the International Air Transport Association (IATA) code for the Bihar airport remains in use when people find it 'uncomfortable'. He asked whether the government would consider changing it to 'a more respectful and culturally appropriate code' and sought a timeline for any such process. The ministry of civil aviation acknowledged receiving similar requests in the past. Minister of state for civil aviation Murlidhar Mohol explained that the three-letter codes are assigned by IATA—a trade association representing 300 airlines—to uniquely identify airports worldwide, typically using the first three letters of the location's name. 'Air India had earlier approached IATA seeking change of the existing airport code,' Mohol said. 'However, IATA has conveyed that under the provisions of Resolution 763, assigned three-letter codes are considered permanent and are altered only under exceptional circumstances, usually involving air safety concerns.' The response did not elaborate on when Air India made the request or who were the other entities. LGBTQ activists condemned Singh's characterisation of the code as offensive, arguing it reflects deep-rooted prejudice rather than legitimate cultural concerns. Arvind Narrain, an LGBTQ activist, pointed to the Supreme Court's 2018 ruling that decriminalised same-sex relationships and recognised LGBTQI persons' right to dignity. 'The member's description of us as immoral strips the community of dignity,' he said. 'They need to educate themselves that as per the Supreme Court, what governs is not personal morality but constitutional morality. He should apologise to the community.' Rajesh Srinivas, another LGBTQ activist, dismissed the need for any change. 'The airport code does not require a change as there is nothing culturally inappropriate about it. The discomfort with the term stems from deeply ingrained prejudice.' Shanmathi Senthil Kumar, a counselling psychologist and diversity advocate who has worked in mental health and social sectors, called Singh's framing 'deeply concerning'. 'That the term 'GAY' is being labelled as offensive, culturally inappropriate, or even unsafe reflects how deeply rooted the stigma against LGBTQIA+ people still is,' Kumar said. 'Such framing reinforces harmful stereotypes and makes society even more difficult and exclusionary for queer individuals. This highlights the urgent need to centre and prioritise LGBTQIA+ voices in public discourse, so that narratives rooted in prejudice are not allowed to define what is deemed acceptable.' 'If we look at how the queer community is perceived in India, we still have a long way to go. There is a lack of awareness, and that fact should not be ignored. If a word is considered offensive, simply avoiding it doesn't help. One way forward is to confront and address it, rather than shy away from it. The question raised is also aiming in that direction—if someone like an MP can endorse inclusion rather than avoid the issue, it becomes all the more meaningful,' psychotherapist Vidya Dinakaran said.
Deccan Herald
3 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Amendments proposed to Sports Bill to keep BCCI out of RTI ambit
Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya had on July 23 introduced the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 in Lok Sabha.
