Kulgam Police Tighten Noose, Attach Drug Peddler's Property Under NDPS Act
This move reflects the firm resolve of Kulgam Police to curb the drug menace by not only prosecuting offenders but also by targeting their ill-gotten assets.
The said individual is involved in two separate NDPS cases: FIR No. 85/2020 at Police Station Mattan under Sections 8, 15, and 29 NDPS Act.
FIR No. 104/2025 at Police Station Qazigund under Sections 8 and 15 NDPS Act.
As per Section 68-F of the NDPS Act, proceedings were initiated by the competent authority for the attachment of illegally acquired property believed to have been purchased through the proceeds of narcotic trafficking.
Accordingly, a single-storey residential building (850 sq. ft.) along with 12 marlas of land, situated at Zadoora, Mirbazar, and falling under Khewat No. 3, with an estimated market value of Rs. 65 lakhs, has been attached.
Srinagar Police's Crackdown
Earlier, Srinagar Police had attached a residential property worth approximately Rs. 55 lakhs under the NDPS Act. The attached property comprises a two-story residential house constructed on 13.5 marlas of land, valued at approximately Rs 55 lakhs, belonging to Khazir Mohammad Tiploo.
The action pertained to a case filed at Police Station Soura, in which the son of the owner of the attached property, namely Hilal Ahmad Tiploo, is involved as the accused person.
The accused is a notorious drug peddler, and he has a history of involvement in drug peddling, primarily targeting local youth, thereby posing a grave threat to public health and safety. Investigations revealed that the property was acquired through proceeds from illicit drug trafficking.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Can raze illegal parts, won't leave': Residents stay put in homes declared ‘dangerous' by MCD
As of July 14, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), as part of its annual survey across its 12 zones in the Capital, has declared 22 houses as 'dangerous' and 320 'in need of repair'. However, despite being issued evacuation notices, residents of several such 'dangerous' houses continue to stay on, refusing to vacate the premises. These 'dangerous' structures are located in areas like Kotla Mubarakpur, Okhla village, Sahyog Vihar, Seelampur, Dariba Kalan, Rohini, Burari, and Jahangirpuri, among others. The Indian Express visited a few such houses, where many residents have refused to leave. At Keshavpuram Zone in Shalimar Bagh in Northwest Delhi, four lower-income group flats in a building constructed by the Delhi Development Authority in BB Block have been declared dangerous by the MCD. All four flats are occupied, with one resident claiming he has a 'stability certificate' issued by a 'structural engineer'. Visible cracks run along the pillars of the building — which has 18 flats — while swollen walls do not allow any door to be shut. A resident of one of the four flats said that several parts of the building have been constructed illegally. 'Two years ago, I had written to various authorities stating that the house has developed cracks… the ceiling of rooms and washrooms has fallen multiple times. They conducted a survey and said either to vacate the house or demolish the illegal parts.' The last evacuation notice was received by the resident on May 22, asking him to vacate the premises within 24 hours. 'But since then, no one has come here to check… We are ready to demolish unauthorised constructions but not vacate the flat,' he added. A resident who stays in a flat on the first floor — also in the list of four dangerous houses — said he had taken the flat on rent in 2009. 'After the building was declared dangerous, we got a survey done by structural engineers, who said the building is safe. Now, we will go and meet the authorities.' Over 17 km away, a narrow road covered with silt and flooded with rainwater leads to an old red-coloured building with visible cracks in the plaster. Located near Piayaao Chowk in Garhi village in East of Kailash, houses, along with shops in the building, have been declared dangerous. The ground floor houses three shops – a pharmacy, a mobile store, and a shop selling bags. Residents live on the above three floors. The pharmacy owner said he did not know that the building had been categorised as dangerous. However, tenants, who have been staying on the second floor for over a year and paying a rent of Rs 10,000, said the notice came two to three months ago. Following this, they were told by the owner that the building had been repaired, they claimed. The owner of the building could not be contacted for a comment. At 766, Chabi Ganj in Kashmere Gate, a two-storey building — housing six-seven flats — stands with half-demolished walls, mattresses and toilet seats buried under the debris. According to the residents, they were issued a notice of evacuation on June 2. Two weeks later, the houses were demolished. Local residents claimed most of the occupants were either given money or land by the builder to vacate the premises. One of the residents, Bharat Kumar, claimed that the building had not been surveyed by the civic authorities. The MCD study, being conducted for over five months now, has surveyed 98.35% or 30,93,678 houses that fall under the civic body's limits. While nine zones have been examined, surveys at Shahdara (North), City-SP, and Karol zones are yet to be completed, said officials. An official from MCD said that once a house is declared dangerous after a survey conducted by a local junior engineer (JE), a 'vacation notice' is served to the occupants as well as the local police. 'The police have to ensure that the building is vacated,' the official said, adding that this should usually happen within a day or sometimes within a week. The official further said that if residents of a 'dangerous' building ask for time to get the premises repaired, the JE has to take a call on this. 'If permission is granted, repair work has to start within a few hours… following which a structure engineer will survey the work and submit a report to the MCD for approval.'
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Online bullying can be as mentally traumatic as physical violence: Delhi HC
Cyberbullying can be as mentally traumatic and scarring as physical violence, the Delhi High Court has said, while upholding the conviction of a man who sent morphed nude images and threatening messages to a minor girl studying in Class 9. The judgment, delivered on July 28 by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, stressed the devastating psychological impact of online harassment, particularly on children. (HT Archive) The court rejected his appeal against a five-year sentence, describing the case as a 'textbook example of cyberbullying.' The judgment, delivered on July 28 by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, stressed the devastating psychological impact of online harassment, particularly on children. 'What is deeply concerning is the use of technology to commit cyberbullying – an act that, while faceless and silent, can be as mentally traumatic and scarring as physical violence, especially when directed towards children. Such conduct, in the virtual world, has very real and devastating consequences in the real world,' justice Sharma said. The conviction stems from a complaint filed in September 2016 by the victim's mother. The minor girl, then in Class 9, was using a tablet for studying when she received morphed obscene images of herself along with threatening messages on WhatsApp. The sender, a man known to the family, warned her that the photos would be circulated if she didn't comply with his demands. The trial court in March last year had convicted him under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code including sexual harassment, stalking, criminial intimidation, sections 12 (sexual harassment) and 14 (using child for pornographic purposes) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, 2012 and section 67 (publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form) under the Information Technology Act. Challenging the verdict, the man claimed he was falsely implicated and that the case was full of contradictions. The Delhi Police, however, maintained that the evidence clearly showed he had transmitted obscene material and had criminally intimidated a minor. Justice Sharma, in her 35-page ruling, upheld the trial court's decision. She said that even the threat of circulating morphed images, without actually doing so, can cause irreparable long-term damage to a child's mental well-being and dignity. The act of morphing her face, the court added, sought to not only shame her but to coerce her by creating fear. 'A morphed image once created and circulated can have long-term consequences for a child's mental health, dignity, and reputation,' the judge observed. 'The fear of such circulation alone, even if the image is never actually published, is enough to terrorise a young mind.' The court also highlighted the urgent need to protect children in digital spaces. With growing reliance on gadgets for education, it said, the notion of child safety must extend beyond physical environments. 'This court is of the view that creating a safe environment for children cannot be restricted to physical spaces alone. The modern world demands that equal protection be extended to digital spaces, where children are now spending considerable time,' the court said.
Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ghaziabad interfaith couple under fire again: Man held for wife's ‘abduction' — twice in two months
For the second time in two months, a Ghaziabad man was arrested on Friday for allegedly abducting his 25-year-old wife — despite the woman maintaining that they got married under the Special Marriage Act and she had left her parents' home of her own free will. The police, later in the day, sent the woman to her parents' home. Akbar Khan (29) and Sonika Chauhan (25) maintained they had been married for three years but were reduced to their only identity – their faith. On July 30, Sonika's father, Laxman Singh Chauhan, had filed a complaint at the Indirapuram police station, alleging that she had been kidnapped by her husband, Akbar, and in-laws. Minutes later, a purported video had surfaced in which Sonika claimed that she had left her home on July 30 to be with Akbar. 'I, Sonika, on July 30, around 2 pm, left my house as per my wish… For the last two months, my parents and some other people, including Meena Bhandari, Harish Karakoti, Kapil Tyagi, my maternal uncle Vikram Rawat and my paternal uncle Jagdish Singh Chauhan, had been torturing me physically and mentally… they wanted me to give a statement against Akbar in court and frame him under the POCSO (Act) and put him behind bars. But I protested… I will only tell the truth,' she is heard saying in the video. This was not the first time that Sonika's family had accused Akbar of abducting her. On May 25, too, Laxman had filed a similar complaint at the same police station — accusing Akbar of kidnapping Sonika a day earlier. Back then, Sonika had clarified that she had left home on her own. The Ghaziabad Police had then raided Akbar's home in Indirapuram and 'handed over' Sonika to her parents. Following this, the police had arrested Akbar, his two sisters, sister-in-law, and a neighbour. A group of around 60 men had also attacked Akbar's shop and vandalised it. A purported video had surfaced before Akbar's arrest in May, in which Sonika could be heard saying that she wanted to stay with him and that they had secretly gotten married at a Delhi SDM office under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, in August 2022. Akbar was released on bail on June 8. On Friday, Ghaziabad Commissioner of Police, J Ravinder Goud, said Akbar was arrested in the fresh case of abduction. 'The woman was sent to stay with her family after we took an undertaking from her parents,' he told The Indian Express. Asked why she was sent to stay with her family when she had maintained that she was mentally tortured at their home, Goud said he would check if she wished to stay at a One Stop Centre, set up to support women affected by violence. 'Her safety is our priority, and we will record her statement on Saturday before the magistrate,' he added. Laxman, in his latest complaint, had alleged that Sonika was abducted in the middle of the night by Akbar and his accomplices. He also alleged that Akbar's family had been threatening his family in the days leading up to Sonika's 'abduction on May 24'. Neetika Jha is a Correspondent with The Indian Express. She covers crime, health, environment as well as stories of human interest, in Noida, Ghaziabad and western UP. When not on the field she is probably working on another story idea. On weekends, she loves to read fiction over a cup of coffee. The Thursday Murder club, Yellow Face and Before the Coffee Gets Cold were her recent favourites. She loves her garden as much as she loves her job. She is an alumnus of Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. ... Read More
