Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement
Disney and Universal have filed a copyright lawsuit against popular artificial intelligence image-generator Midjourney, marking the first time major Hollywood companies have entered the legal battle over generative AI.
Filed in federal district court in Los Angeles on Wednesday, the complaint claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute "endless unauthorized copies" of their famed characters, such as Darth Vader from Star Wars and the Minions from Despicable Me.
"Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing," the companies state in the complaint.
The studios also claimed the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to take technological measures to halt such image generation.
Midjourney didn't immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
WATCH | AI's effect on the creative industry:
How is AI affecting the creative media industry?
1 year ago
Duration 10:10
For many, artificial intelligence is a tool. For others, it represents plagiarism and theft of intellectual property. Lorelei Pepi, a professor of animation at Emily Carr University in Vancouver, joins our Dan Burritt in conversation to unpack AI's impact on the creative sector.
In a 2022 interview with The Associated Press, Midjourney CEO David Holz described his image-making service as "kind of like a search engine," pulling in a wide swath of images from across the internet. He compared copyright concerns about the technology with how such laws have adapted to human creativity.
"Can a person look at somebody else's picture and learn from it and make a similar picture?" Holz said. "Obviously, it's allowed for people, and if it wasn't, then it would destroy the whole professional art industry. Probably the nonprofessional industry, too. To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it's sort of the same thing, and if the images come out differently, then it seems like it's fine."
Major AI developers don't typically disclose their data sources but have argued that taking troves of publicly accessible online text, images and other media to train their AI systems is protected by the "fair use" doctrine of American copyright law.
The studios' case joins a growing number of lawsuits filed against developers of AI platforms — such as OpenAI and Anthropic — in San Francisco and New York.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
37 minutes ago
- CBC
A satirical article said Cape Breton has its own time zone. Google and Meta AI repeated it as fact
Janel Comeau managed to trick Google and Meta with just her words. The Halifax-based writer had penned a satirical article for The Beaverton, a Canadian parody news site. It said that Cape Breton, the island off the northern coast of Nova Scotia, was adopting its own time zone in a cheeky plea for attention from the rest of the Maritimes. "We are tired of being ignored. And that is why we will be making the incredibly irritating step of moving the entire island to the new Cape Breton Time Zone, where we will be 12 minutes ahead of mainland Nova Scotia, and 18 minutes behind Newfoundland," Comeau wrote. But what came next was no joke. While reviewing her past work, Comeau noticed something odd on Facebook: Meta's AI-generated prompts were appearing under her article — as if it were real news. "It was like, 'Find out more information about when this time zone change will take effect,' [or] 'How will this affect businesses?'" she told As It Happens host Nil Köksal. "I realized very quickly: Oh, it's treating this as a real article." Curious, Comeau asked Meta AI directly, and searched on Google with the question of whether Cape Breton would indeed be getting its own time zone. Both said that yes, it would. "[I felt] in-between, this is very funny and oh no, what have I done?" she said. Unpacking search engines and AI Jian-Yun Nie, a professor in the department of computer science at the University of Montreal, says this incident reflects how artificial intelligence and search engines process content, without necessarily evaluating its truthfulness. And in Google's case, says Nie, search rankings are driven by a mix of factors: the use of keywords that match a query, how often an article is linked to other content, and its overall popularity — like user clicks. " So if you ask what is the time zone of Cape Breton and whether there is a new time zone, [Comeau's] article may appear at some top position," said Nie. Nie says AI systems typically scan multiple related articles to synthesize an answer, but that only works well if the sources are correct, and if the system can distinguish between reliable and unreliable information. Without understanding context — or satire — they can mistake humour for fact. According to Nie, AI systems primarily assess reliability based on the source of the information — favouring trusted outlets like reputable newspapers over less credible ones. However, he says there's no universal standard for determining what's reliable and what isn't. "How do you trust one person and not another [person]?" Nie said as a comparison. "It is quite difficult to make an algorithm to mimic exactly the same behaviour of human beings, but the algorithms are trying to do the same thing at this stage." How do we avoid being misled? Since the incident, both Google and Meta have corrected their systems. At the time of writing, Meta AI now responds: "No, Cape Breton Island does not have its own time zone. It follows Atlantic Standard Time and Atlantic Daylight Time, the same as the rest of Nova Scotia." According to Osmar Zaiane, a University of Alberta professor specializing in AI and data mining, that kind of swift correction is standard procedure, and part of the growing pains of emerging technologies. "Each time they find a hole like this, they try to fix it," said Zaiane. "You can't think of all possibilities; there's always something that some people discover." CBC reached out to Google and Meta for comment, but have not yet received a response. Both companies have language in their terms and services disclaiming responsibility for the accuracy of their search or query results. To avoid being misled, both Zaiane and Nie urge people to cross-check AI-generated answers with multiple sources. "We should use our own judgment to see whether it can be plausible," said Nie. "In this case, if Google tells you there is a new time zone in Cape Breton, you [should] check other articles." Fortunately, Comeau's fictional time zone seems to have caused no real confusion or chaos — or at least, none that she has heard of. "I've not heard of from any tourists who've missed their ferries as a result of this, but maybe they're out there," she said. "Knowing that somebody may have not gotten to Greco Pizza before it closes — I don't know, it's a heavy cross to bear."
CTV News
38 minutes ago
- CTV News
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' lawyer complains about trial secrecy as a famous rapper's name goes unmentioned
Sean Combs arrives at the Pre-Grammy Gala And Salute To Industry Icons at the Beverly Hilton Hotel on Jan. 25, 2020, in Beverly Hills, Calif. (Photo by Mark Von Holden/Invision/AP, File) NEW YORK — A lawyer for Sean 'Diddy' Combs protested the rising tide of secrecy at the hip-hop icon's federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial on Thursday after Combs and the public were excluded from lengthy arguments over whether another famous rapper's name could be disclosed. Defence attorney Marc Agnifilo complained to Judge Arun Subramanian after Combs was left out of an hour-long meeting in a private room outside the courtroom where lawyers and the judge discussed a hotel room 'event' in January 2024. That meeting added a two-hour delay to the start of the sixth and final day of testimony from a woman identified in court only by the pseudonym 'Jane,' who dated Combs from 2001 until his arrest last September. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to charges that carry a potential prison sentence of 15 years to life in prison if he is convicted. Prosecutors say he used his fame, fortune, violence and threats to manipulate girlfriends into sex with paid sex workers in multi-day events that they later said they regretted. Defence attorneys say the government is trying to prosecute consensual sex between adults. Under cross-examination, Jane testified Thursday that she flew to Las Vegas in January 2023 with a famous rapper and his girlfriend. Defence attorney Teny Geragos did not identify the rapper but asked Jane if he was someone who had recorded with Combs, 'an individual at the top of the music industry as well ... an icon in the music industry.' She also asked if Combs and the rapper were 'really close to one another.' 'Yes,' Jane replied to each question. Once in Las Vegas, Jane testified, she went with a group including the rapper to dinner, a strip club and then a hotel room party, where a sex worker had sex with a woman while a half-dozen others in the room watched. She said there was dancing in the room and the rapper said, 'hey beautiful,' and told her that he'd always wanted to have sex with her. Jane said she didn't recall exactly when she did it, but said she flashed her breasts in the room as she danced. The testimony came soon after the closed-door session Thursday, when lawyers discussed what facts could be disclosed about the hotel room encounter. Agnifilo said the need for a public trial was 'an important issue, a constitutional issue' and objected to so much happening out of the earshot of his client. In response, the judge offered more secrecy, saying 'If your client wishes to be heard ... we can clear this courtroom if need be to address it.' Agnifilo turned down the offer. 'Part of the reason trials are fully public is so if other people realize they know something about an event discussed in a public courtroom, they can come forward and share their recollection of it,' the lawyer said, adding: 'That is kind of the practical side of the constitutional right to a public trial.' A monitor that is used to show exhibits to spectators has been shut off throughout Jane's testimony, although lawyers, the judge, Combs and jurors can view them. Some sidebar conversations between lawyers and the judge during the testimony have been sealed. The judge also has banned the public from viewing any exhibits containing sexual content, even though the defence has said images from the group sex episodes proves they were consensual acts between adults, and not proof of crimes. And many of the letters to the judge from lawyers each day are filed under seal, preventing the public from quickly knowing, for instance, the grounds under which prosecutors are trying to get a Black juror ejected from the jury in mid-trial. The judge has said he'll rule on the request on Friday. Defence attorney Alexandra Shapiro has called the prosecution's effort a 'thinly veiled effort to dismiss a Black juror.' Jane and Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura, who testified for four days in the trial's first week about her relationship with Combs from 2007 through 2018, both said they participated in the sex marathons for years, with Cassie calling them 'freak-off' nights and Jane referring to them as 'hotel nights.' Agnifilo said the defece consented to Jane testifying with a pseudonym but did not consent to other events related to her testimony and the testimony of other witnesses not being public. Assistant U.S. Attorney Maureen Comey attacked Agnifilo's rationale for disclosing more information publicly with the risk that it would be easier for someone to guess Jane's identity, saying it was an 'attempt to harass and intimidate this witness.' Michael R. Sisak And Larry Neumeister, The Associated Press
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Tesla Stock: Why These 2 Downgrades Are Actually a Buy Signal
[content-module:CompanyOverview|NASDAQ:TSLA] When a stock climbs 14% in just two trading sessions despite getting hit with not one but two analyst downgrades, the market is sending a clear message. Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) has done exactly that this week, shrugging off downgrades from both Baird and Argus Research as if they were minor speed bumps on a highway. For growth-focused investors, this apparent disconnect between Wall Street caution and actual market action represents something we love to see and write about: a buying opportunity. The Downgrades That Missed the Mark Monday brought a double dose of analyst pessimism when Baird cut Tesla from Buy to Hold, followed by Argus Research, who made the same move. Both firms cited the same primary concern: the very recent and very public spat between Elon Musk and President Trump, which they believe introduces significant uncertainty to Tesla's prospects. Baird's team also expressed particular skepticism about management's optimistic robotaxi timeline and suggested that positive expectations around the upcoming affordable vehicle launch, which we highlighted last week, might already be baked into the current share price. Meanwhile, Argus focused heavily on how the Musk-Trump dispute could weaken demand, especially as EV tax credits face potential expiration. They warned that Tesla's stock now appears driven more by non-fundamental events than actual business performance. Market Defiance Tells the Real Story But here's what makes Tesla so compelling as a stock to own: Tesla shares have actually gained 14% this week already, suggesting investors are treating the analyst caution as temporary noise rather than a very red warning sign. The stock's ability to climb despite fresh negative coverage indicates that the market sees through the political theater the underlying business momentum and long-term potential. After all, Tesla had posted what analysts called a fundamentally poor quarter in April, yet shares had already begun recovering before the Trump-Musk tensions erupted. That recovery trajectory appears to be reasserting itself regardless of Wall Street's newfound caution. The Bullish Chorus Remains Intact [content-module:Forecast|NASDAQ:TSLA] While Baird and Argus stepped to the sidelines, the broader analyst community tells a different story and is worth noting. The team at Piper Sandler actually reiterated their Overweight rating on Tuesday, echoing the updates from Morgan Stanley and Wedbush this month, already in maintaining bullish stances. Wedbush has been particularly aggressive, slapping a $500 price target on the stock and standing firm despite the recent volatility. This split in analyst opinion actually strengthens the contrarian case. When selective downgrades occur against a backdrop of maintained Buy ratings from other respected firms, it often signals that the negative factors are temporary rather than structural. Case in point: the fact that these downgrades focus primarily on political uncertainty rather than fundamental business deterioration supports this view. Perfect Storm for Patient Capital Tesla's current situation creates an almost textbook setup for contrarian investors. The stock has already absorbed a 25% hit from political noise, endured two high-profile downgrades, and still managed to surge 14% in just two sessions. This combination suggests that temporary headwinds are actually creating opportunity rather than risk. Consider this: if Tesla can gain 14% while dealing with two rare analyst downgrades and political uncertainty, imagine the potential upside once these temporary factors fade. The upcoming affordable vehicle launch and robotaxi development remain on track regardless of Washington drama, and Tesla's core EV market position continues to strengthen globally. For investors who believe in Tesla's long-term transformation story, the current moment offers something increasingly scarce: the chance to buy into a high-growth stock at a potential discount. The Window Is Already Narrowing All that being said, the market's quick dismissal of Monday's downgrades suggests this buying opportunity may be short-lived. Political tensions have a way of resolving themselves, especially when business interests are at stake. Meanwhile, Tesla's product roadmap and market expansion continue regardless of Twitter feuds or analyst hand-wringing. For investors willing to look past the headline noise, these rare downgrades may prove to be perfectly timed entry points rather than warning signals. Where Should You Invest $1,000 Right Now? Before you make your next trade, you'll want to hear this. MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. Our team has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and none of the big name stocks were on the list. They believe these five stocks are the five best companies for investors to buy now...
