Soccer-Liverpool spending backed by title win and long-term plan, says CEO
Liverpool's latest acquisition, French striker Hugo Ekitike from Eintracht Frankfurt in a deal worth 79 million pounds ($106.84 million), including add-ons, has taken the club's transfer expenditure this window to nearly 300 million pounds.
Outgoings, six players including Trent Alexander-Arnold, have so far generated around 64 million pounds.
The outlay marks a sharp departure from Liverpool's traditionally measured approach in the market. However, Hogan insists the club has not deviated from the club's policy of financial sustainability.
"It doesn't just happen; it's been years in the making," Hogan told The Athletic in an interview.
"One of the things we're constantly focused on is that 'virtuous circle'. Trying to run the club in the right way to ensure that we can generate as much revenue as we possibly can. That obviously helps in terms of being able to put more back into the team.
"The difficulty is if you just look at one individual summer. That probably skews the data. There were a lot of comments made last summer that we didn't spend enough..."
Hogan explained the approach reflects the ambitions of American-led Fenway Sports Group (FSG), who are seeking to build on last season's Premier League title under manager Arne Slot.
"We also recognise, having won the English league title for the 20th time, that this is one of the biggest clubs in the world. We want to make sure that we are behaving like one," he added.
"Having massive global stars come and play at Anfield, filling out stadiums in Hong Kong and Japan, those are things we expect and want to do."
Liverpool face AC Milan in Kowloon, Hong Kong on Saturday, before taking on Yokohama FM in the J League World Challenge in Yokohama on Wednesday. They begin their Premier League title defence at home against Bournemouth on August 15.
($1 = 0.7394 pounds) (Reporting by Shifa Jahan in Bengaluru)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
21 minutes ago
- India.com
Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy: Who Will Take Trophy Home If India Win Final Test And Series Ends In Draw? Check Here
IND vs ENG: India pulled off a dramatic escape on Sunday, July 27, as they denied England a series win in the fourth Test at Old Trafford, Manchester. The hosts were firm favourites to seal the inaugural Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, needing just eight Indian wickets with nearly two days to play. However, India's resilience with the bat ensured the match ended in a draw, keeping the series alive at 2-1 in England's favour. Rahul and Gill Lay the Foundation Facing a daunting task, India's survival effort began with KL Rahul and Shubman Gill, who displayed remarkable patience and discipline to bat through the entirety of Day 4. Their stand wore down the English bowling attack and prevented early breakthroughs that could have led to a collapse. Jadeja and Sundar's Match-Saving Partnership On the final day, India were still under pressure, but Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar rose to the occasion. The pair put together an unbroken 203-run partnership that not only frustrated England but also shifted the momentum entirely. Sundar brought up his maiden Test century, while Jadeja remained unbeaten on 107, showcasing grit and maturity. Eventually, with the result inevitable, both teams agreed to shake hands and end the match as a draw—much to India's relief and England's disappointment. Series Heads to The Oval with Everything to Play For With the fourth Test drawn, the five-match series now stands at 2-1 in England's favour. The final Test will be played at The Oval starting Thursday, and India will need to win to level the series. A 2-2 result would be a moral victory for the visitors after being 2-1 down, but the big question remains who would retain the trophy? Who Will Hold the Trophy If Series Is Drawn? According to tradition in most bilateral Test series, if a series ends in a draw, the team that won the previous edition retains the trophy. In this case, while the 2021 Pataudi Trophy ended in a draw, England had beaten India 4-1 in 2018, technically making them the holders. However, the current series marks the inaugural edition of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, replacing the Pataudi Trophy. This raises uncertainty over whether the 2018 result still applies or if a drawn series would mean the trophy is shared. As of now, neither the BCCI nor the ECB has issued an official clarification on the retention rules for the new trophy in the event of a drawn series.
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ben Stokes' cheap tactics aimed at Jadeja isn't new; Sunil Gavaskar, Sachin Tendulkar faced a similar situation against…
Cricket, more than any other sport, is a numbers' game. Don't let anyone try to convince you otherwise. And cricketers, more than any other sportspersons, know exactly what their statistics are, never mind that they insist that they don't much care for individual milestones. Like Ravindra Jadeja, Sachin Tendulkar and Sunil Gavaskar also almost sacrificed their centuries(AFP) Batters are judged and measured by centuries and averages, bowlers by five-wicket hauls and strike-rates. That's the nature of the beast. Why, only the other day at Old Trafford, an entire country and all those populating the English dressing-room were going gaga after Joe Root became Test cricket's second-highest run-maker behind Sachin Tendulkar as he went past Rahul Dravid, Jacques Kallis and Ricky Ponting, all in the matter of minutes. Along the way, they also celebrated the former skipper's 38th century, which put him level with Kumar Sangakkara and behind only Tendulkar (51), Kallis (45) and Ponting (41) for the most Test hundreds. That's how cricket works. Also Read: I want Shubman Gill to ask Ben Stokes, 'Why did you…?' Sunil Gavaskar annihilates England for saying 'India were scared' Ben Stokes and the rest of his bunch didn't take kindly to India opting to bat on in the final hour of the final day's play in the fourth Test on Sunday so that Washington Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja could complete their respective tons. Much of it had to do with their own inability to take more than two wickets in 75 ineffectual overs on a day-five strip, and perhaps their misplaced belief that unilaterally, they could decide when the game could be called off. Their churlishness hasn't endeared them to even their die-hard fans, but their behaviour isn't without precedent. When Pakistan tried to deny Sunil Gavaskar a century A major international incident was avoided in Bengaluru in September 1983, all stemming from Pakistan's desire to deny Sunil Gavaskar a 28th Test century. It was the opening game of a turgid three-Test series in which all matches ended in drab draws. The weather had a big part to play in the match meandering into an insipid affair. By the time of the final day, both sides hadn't even completed their first innings, though by then, Javed Miandad had been dismissed for 99, caught in the covers by substitute K Srikkanth off Madan Lal. Gavaskar and Anshuman Gaekwad comfortably erased the 13-run first-innings deficit and built a handy lead of little consequence when, with 14 of the then 20 mandatory overs bowled in the final over, Pakistan captain Zaheer Abbas took his team off the field without informing umpires Madhav Gothoskar and Swaroop Kishen in conduct uncharacteristic of him. Technically, Pakistan had forfeited the Test, but clearly, the law couldn't be strictly enforced in its letter because of the massive ramifications. Gavaskar was on 87; clearly, he wanted to go on to three-figures, well within his rights. Zaheer and Pakistan's reluctance to let him get there was obvious, and it needed a veiled threat from the officials for manager Intikhab Alam and Zaheer to realise that unless they returned to the field – by this time, nearly a half-hour had elapsed since they had left the ground and incensed the home crowd – India would be declared winners. As soon as Gavaskar hit the first ball of the final over, from Mudassar Nazar, for four, he and players left the ground for a second time to formalise the draw. That night, the teams flew together to Delhi for a One-Day International. 'Some of his players were critical of his (Zaheer's) action, which they felt was unnecessary and unsporting," Gavaskar has written. Sachin Tendulkar wasn't spared either The events in Ahmedabad in November 2009 bear greater resemblance to Old Trafford 2025. Sri Lanka replied to India's 426 with 760 for seven declared on the back of a 351-run partnership between Jayawardenes Mahela (275) and Prasanna (154 n.o.). India had to bat out 135 overs to secure a draw; 79 overs were left on the final morning when Tendulkar walked out at No. 5 to join current head coach Gautam Gambhir. Gambhir was the fourth batter dismissed for 114 but Tendulkar and VVS Laxman steered India to safety. With the former approaching his 44th century, Sangakkara wanted to take his troops off the field, ala Stokes, until he was reminded by umpires Daryl Harper and Tony Hill that it wasn't his call alone to make, that Tendulkar and Laxman too would have to play ball. Having battled for more than four and a half hours to ensure an honourable draw, there was no way Tendulkar was going to give up a Test ton. Long Sri Lankan faces were indicative of their displeasure at the turn of events that perhaps had more to do with the flatness of the surface, which prevented their bowlers from making an impression. Just three years earlier, Sangakkara and Mahela had put on 624 for the third wicket against South Africa in Colombo. Surely, they weren't stacking up those many runs only because the team required that of them.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Sex scandal, illegitimate children and more: Why head monk of China's famous Shaolin Temple is under investigation
Shaolin Temple's abbot, Shi Yongxin, known as the 'CEO monk', is under investigation for alleged embezzlement, misuse of temple funds and violating Buddhist vows by having 'improper relationships' and 'fathering illegitimate children'. Authorities have revoked the ordination certificate of the monk who turned the 1,500-year-old temple into a global cultural and commercial brand read more Buddhist abbot Shi Yongxin talks to reporters at the Shaolin Temple in Dengfeng City in China's central eastern province of Henan, May 11, 2006. File Image/Reuters The Shaolin Temple is one of the most iconic religious and cultural landmarks in China. Now, its abbot, Shi Yongxin, has been placed under formal investigation over allegations of embezzlement, financial impropriety and breaches of Buddhist discipline. The case has put a spotlight on years of controversy surrounding Shi, often referred to as the 'CEO monk,' for his role in transforming the 1,500-year-old monastery into a global commercial brand. What are the allegations against Shi Yongxin? A statement released on the temple's official WeChat account confirmed that Shi is suspected of diverting and misusing project funds, as well as temple-owned assets. Beyond financial wrongdoing, he has been accused of long-term 'improper relationships' with multiple women and fathering at least one child — accusations that go against the Buddhist vow of celibacy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The statement noted that the 59-year-old abbot is currently under a 'joint investigation by multiple departments,' adding that more details will be made public as the inquiry progresses. In a move highlighting the seriousness of the accusations, the Buddhist Association of China announced on Monday that it had revoked Shi's ordination certificate — a document that grants official recognition of monastic status. The association condemned his alleged actions, stating: 'Shi Yongxin's actions are of an extremely egregious nature, severely tarnishing the reputation of the Buddhist community and damaging the image of monastics.' Shi has not made any public statement responding to the charges, and attempts by international media to contact him have so far received no reply. Who is Shi Yongxin? Born in 1965 in Yingshang, Anhui province, Shi Yongxin — originally named Liu Yingcheng — first arrived at the Shaolin Temple in 1981. He became a disciple of the 29th-generation abbot, Shi Xingzheng, and later assumed responsibility for temple management after his teacher's death in 1987. By 1999, he was formally appointed abbot, a position that placed him at the helm of one of China's most renowned religious sites. Shaolin Temple, located in Henan province's Songshan Mountains, is not only a place of worship but also the birthplace of Chan (Zen) Buddhism and Shaolin kung fu. President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Jacques Rogge (L) and Buddhist abbot Shi Yongxin watch martial arts performance at Shaolin Temple in Songshan, central China's Henan province, August 9, 2007. File Image/Reuters The temple is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, revered both for its spiritual legacy and its martial arts traditions that have been celebrated in films, literature and pop culture — including the landmark 1982 movie The Shaolin Temple starring Jet Li. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A remake was made in 2011 starring Jackie Chan. Hong Kong actor Jackie Chan (L) holds a giant incense stick with Buddhist abbot Shi Yongxin, while actor Andy Lau (C) looks on, at the Shaolin Temple in Dengfeng, Henan province, October 22, 2009. File Image/Reuters Shi became known as the first Chinese abbot to earn a Master of Business Administration degree, a qualification that would later shape his approach to temple management. Under his leadership, Shaolin transitioned from a historic monastery into a sprawling brand. He licensed the Shaolin name for use in films, cartoons and video games, and built a network of businesses that spanned real estate, publishing, traditional medicine and global tourism. This drive to modernise made him a high-profile figure — but also drew criticism from those who accused him of commercialising the temple's sacred heritage. His frequent appearances abroad, often with an iPhone in hand and photographed alongside figures such as Queen Elizabeth II, Nelson Mandela, Henry Kissinger and Apple CEO Tim Cook, only heightened his reputation as the 'CEO monk.' Russian President Vladimir Putin (2nd R) accompanied by Yongxin (R), head monk of Shaolin Temple, which is famous for martial arts or Kungfu, visits Shaolin Temple in central China's Henan province, March 22, 2006. File Image/China Daily via Reuters In defending his approach, Shi argued that promoting Shaolin culture globally was essential for its preservation. When questioned about his initiatives, he once remarked: 'Cultural promotion is a very dignified undertaking.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After signing a $3 million deal to create a Shaolin branch in Australia, he famously asked: 'If China can import Disney resorts, why can't other countries import the Shaolin Monastery?' What does Shi's tenure at Shaolin tell us? As far back as 2006, Shi faced public anger for accepting a 1 million yuan ($140,000) luxury car from local authorities as a reward for boosting tourism. Responding to the uproar, Shi defended himself, saying: 'Monks are also citizens. We have fulfilled our duties and made contributions to society, so it is only right that we receive rewards.' In 2015, accusations against Shi escalated dramatically when an individual claiming to have insider knowledge posted allegations on Chinese social media. The claims painted him as an embezzler and a womaniser with multiple illegitimate children. The posts included documents dating to the late 1980s, including a supposed birth certificate for one of the abbot's alleged children and photographs of the mother and child. Shi strongly denied the allegations at the time. In an interview with BBC Chinese, he responded: 'If there were a problem, it would have surfaced long ago.' Authorities launched an investigation into the claims but, by 2017, concluded there was insufficient evidence to pursue charges. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite this, Shi continued to hold prominent positions within China's religious hierarchy. He was re-elected as deputy head of the Buddhist Association of China in 2020, a role he had held since 2002. He also served as president of the Henan Provincial Buddhist Association since 1998 and represented his region in China's National People's Congress from 1998 to 2018. Where is Shi Yongxin now? The present investigation appears to have begun late last week, with the Chinese newspaper Economic Observer reporting that Shi was taken into custody by police in Xinxiang, a city in northern Henan. Social media rumours about his whereabouts increased over the weekend, some even falsely claiming he had attempted to flee to the United States with multiple mistresses and children — a story that authorities quickly dismissed as fabricated. Despite being one of China's most recognisable monks, Shi's public communications have ceased since the news broke. His Weibo account, where he has amassed more than 870,000 followers and typically posts daily, has been inactive since last Thursday. On Monday, his removal as an ordained monk by the Buddhist Association of China added further weight to the unfolding events. The association stated that it 'firmly supports and endorses the decision to handle Shi Yongxin's case in accordance with the law.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What about the Shaolin Temple? Founded more than 1,500 years ago, Shaolin Temple is more than just a religious site; it is an enduring symbol of Chinese culture and martial arts. Under Shi, the temple expanded worldwide, creating over 50 Shaolin cultural centres abroad and staging kung fu performances that reached audiences across continents. Shaolin martial arts students perform at Shaolin Temple in Dengfeng, Henan province, October 13, 2013. File Image/Reuters Critics claim that Shaolin's spiritual values were diluted by aggressive branding and business ventures, while supporters argue Shi helped ensure the temple's relevance in the modern world. With inputs from agencies
