I used to be scared of being a ‘difficult woman'. Now it's a badge of honour
I remember being in the back seat of our brown HJ Holden when I was young, leaving a family party and being reprimanded by my parents for my 'behaviour'. I was mystified. I had no idea what I had done that had caused them such embarrassment. Had I run when I was told not to? Or had I misunderstood an instruction? Was I a 'bad girl', I remember wondering.
As powerful and incentivising as the idea of being a 'good girl' was, the 'bad girl' label was probably more powerful in the way it encouraged me to avoid it at all costs. I would have done anything to never be thought of as bad. I wasn't clear in those early years on what being a bad girl entailed but the threat was powerful enough for me to remain strictly within a narrow set of ideas of how I needed to behave.
I have a strong memory of some family friends having a 'bad girl' stay with them for a while. Her mother was no longer around to care for her and her father was barely in the picture. I remember the warning that came with her before she arrived, that she was a kid who had done some 'bad' things and I wasn't to get too close. This all horrified me. So grand was the image of the bad girl in my psyche that I was immediately scared of what she might try to make me do. What sort of badness would she get up to?
Only days after her arrival, I heard she had weed on the front lawn. She had simply pulled her pants down and peed. No one was sure why she hadn't gone into the house to use the toilet, and everyone was confused and shocked. So I pretended to be shocked too. But I don't think I was shocked – I think I was afraid. Afraid of her wildness. A wildness that I understood and felt inside me too but that had been pushed far down.
While I performed the 'good girl', I never felt like one. The mere suggestion that goodness was judged by people on the outside of me was enough to send me into spirals of doubt and self-loathing. I would watch adults closely to see if I had made them happy. Had I said 'thank you'? Had I smiled at the right time at their joke? Had I spoken sweetly enough? Had I agreed with the way they thought about the world, even if I didn't?
In writing my latest book, The Wisdom of Age, I wanted to find out from the elder women I interviewed if it was true that I might be able to grow old disgracefully, as all the Hallmark cards are now suggesting. Was it going to be real disgrace? Or just a performance of disgrace? Would I be regarded as difficult if I didn't do what was expected of me as an ageing woman?
Yes, I was told by many women: if you step out of line and outside our ageing woman tropes, the swiftness of 'difficult' being attached to you and its conjuring of the bad girl trope remained a powerful restraint. Who would want to be considered difficult after so many years playing the game?
There had been a stirring in me since my mid-30s to stop placating the people around me, and now that I had hit my 50s, it had begun to feel as though it was shaking me to get out. I wanted to break some metaphorical plates and leave them for someone else to clean up.
I spoke to artists and activists in their 70s, 80s and 90s to find out if they were comfortable being thought of as difficult. These were women who were not making it easy for those around them to violate the rights or safety of others. They were speaking up and turning up to the frontline of protests, or they were simply letting their families know that they were no longer going to put up with their shit.
In every conversation, there was a glint in their eyes at the suggestion of being 'difficult'. 'Difficult' had become a rallying cry – a sign that they were on the right track, a sign that they had reconnected with the girl who raged inside them. Many of those women wanted to clarify that being difficult was not done merely for difficulty's sake. Rather, they were finally following the beat of their heart, unmoved by the social conditioning that had held them captive for so long. 'Difficult' didn't faze them – it emboldened them.
This wisdom, along with so much else I received in the writing of the book, has caused me to revisit that good girl and suggest that perhaps we might consider a do-over. Get back some of those years when we kept the peace and smiled nicely. We will invite back the girl who is clear on who she is – before she was told to be something else. The girl who doesn't please those around her for the sake of pleasing but instead loves wildly and passionately when it feels right to do so. The girl who is in touch with the voice that has been calling her for her whole life. The girl who might, facing the horrors of the life she had been given, pull down her pants and wee on the front lawn.
Jacinta Parsons is a radio broadcaster and writer from Melbourne. Her latest book is titled A Wisdom of Age
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
Parents can claim back £10,000s if they took time off to raise kids in certain time frame – are you eligible?
PARENTS and carers could be missing out on tens of thousands of pounds due to a Government error. More than 100,000 people are thought to have incorrect gaps in their National Insurance records, reducing their state pension pots. 1 The issue has impacted some people who cared for a child or someone with a long-term disability between 1978 and 2010. At the time, the Government had a system in place to make sure people would still get the state pension if they were taking time off work to look after a child or a loved one. The system was called Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) and it should have been automatically awarded to those claiming Child Benefit. But there were errors in the system and it meant hundreds of thousands of people were left with gaps in their National Insurance records that shouldn't be there. Those affected are being underpaid the state pension, or could be in future. The HRP error was first discovered in September 2022 and published in the DWP's annual report. The Government department said the error was the "second largest" it had found relating to state pensions. Earlier this year, the Government confirmed all cases relating to the issue would be resolved by March 2027. It said people had up to two years from March 2025 to provide any additional information so they could claim back the money. The DWP and HMRC have already identified about 119,000 cases of - largely women - who were underpaid due to the error. How to protect your pension and Inheritance from the new Budget Between them they have received £735million. But it's thought there are still thousands of eligible people who are yet to respond to letters sent by the Government telling them they could be owed money. It is understood this is due to the Government requiring further documentation from them. What is Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP)? BELOW we reveal what Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) is and why if you received it before 2000 you could be missing out on cash. From 1978 to 2010, protection was provided for parents to avoid gaps in their "qualifying years" by a system known as Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) credits. This system was then replaced in 2010 by the one we have now, called National Insurance Credits. Most people got HRP automatically if they were getting child benefit in their name for a child under the age of 16 and they had given the child benefit office their National Insurance (NI) number. If someone claimed child benefit before May 2000 and did not provide their NI number on the form, it's possible that their credits may not have been transferred to their NI account from the child benefit computer. This may affect their pension entitlement and women who are now in their 60s and 70s are most likely to be affected. If you think you may be entitled, but you have questions, the Pension Service can be reached using the website or by calling 0800 731 0469. Could you be affected? It might be worth checking to see if you're affected if the following apply to you: You're currently aged between 41 and 90 You took time away from paid work to look after a child or a person with a long-term disability or illness at any point between 1978 and 2010 You claimed Child Benefit or Income Support for the first time between May 2000 OR Your partner claimed Child Benefit but you stayed at home to look after a child or person with a long-term health condition at any point between 1978 and 2010 OR You didn't include your National Insurance number on your claim. How can you check? If you're not sure whether you're being paid the right amount in your state pension, you can try these checks. First look at your state pension forecast or statement on the website. Another option is to call the Future Pension Centre, who can post you a copy of your forecast. Make sure you have your National Insurance number to hand when you call. If you're not getting the full state pension, or your forecast says you're not on track to get it, you should then check your National Insurance record for gaps. You can do this online on the website or call up the National Insurance Helpline on 0300 200 3500. If there are gaps in your record between 1978 and 2010, and these were years you took off work to care for a child, you may be missing Home Responsibilities Protection. What should you do next? You may have already received a letter if you're likely to have been affected. But HMRC has said many people didn't act on the letter - perhaps because they thought it was a scam or didn't need to take action. If you think you're eligible for HRP you can still claim without the letter. You can make a claim on the Government website here. The process takes about 15 minutes. You can also claim by post by filling in a CF411 form which can be downloaded off the link above or call the HMRC helpline on 0300 200 3500.
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia's divorce rate is lowest on record and marriages are lasting longer, according to ABS data
Divorce rates are the lowest on record and marriages are lasting longer, according to new data that reflects an increasingly selective approach to marriage and the ongoing effects of the Covid pandemic. The Australian Bureau of Statistics' 2024 marriages and divorces figures, released on Wednesday, reflect a downward trajectory of both marriage and divorce rates over the past two decades. But within the data lies a case for romance: while fewer people were getting married, marriages were both lasting longer and less likely to end in divorce. In 2004, the marriage rate – measured per 1,000 residents over the age of 16 – was 7.1. Twenty years later, in 2024, the rate was 5.5, the same as the year before. Last year, Australia's divorce rate was 2.1, down from 2.3 in 2023. The number of divorces fell 3% from 2023 to 2024. Meanwhile, marriages lasted for a median of 13.2 years – up from 12.1 in 2020 and 13 last year. At the same time, we're marrying and getting divorced later in life. In 2024, the median marriage age was 32.8 years for men and 31.2 for women. The median age for men to divorce was 47.1 years, while for women it was 44.1. And, while younger couples were divorcing less, divorces in the above 60 age category were rising. Sign up: AU Breaking News email There were 2% more marriages in 2024 compared to the year before – a figure that doubled to 4.1% for couples of the same or non-binary gender. More same-sex female couples were married and divorced than male couples, while same-sex and non-binary divorces were slightly up from 1.4% of all divorces in 2023 to 1.6% in 2024. Steep declines then a spike in marriage rates from 2020 to 2022 were a direct impact of Covid restrictions, while the pandemic saw a spike in divorce rates in 2021. Lauren Moran, the head of health and vital statistics at the ABS, said the changing divorce rate was 'a complex picture' but '2024 saw the lowest divorce rate recorded'. She said divorce rates were heavily impacted by court administrative processes and that while the number of divorces granted was between 47,000 and 50,000 a year in recent years, fewer marriages meant there were fewer divorces. 'We are seeing declining divorce rates in younger couples, but increasing divorce rates in older couples. When marriages decreased significantly during the Covid-19 pandemic, the largest decreases were in marriages of younger people,' she said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Older couples were more likely to have a longer marriage, which impacted the median length of marriage, she said. She said there was 'no clear pattern in same-gender divorce rates yet' and that the increases were 'small numbers'. Dr Jan Kabatek, a senior research fellow the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, said the declining divorce rate reflected a more selective approach to marriage. 'Fewer people are getting married and the people who are getting married are usually the ones who are more committed, either through religion or because they are older and more experienced,' he said. He said the pandemic continued to contribute to a lower divorce rate. 'The people who might have got divorced in 2023/2024 already got divorced during Covid,' he said. 'If a lot of people call it quits in 2021, the couples who survived later also have longer marriage durations. Fundamentally, the pool of people who remain married has changed.' He also commented on the most popular day to marry, according to the ABS: 1,773 marriages took place on 24/02/2024. His own research on marriages on 'specifically pleasing dates' found those unions were 25% more likely to end in divorce. The statistics align with an Australian Institute of Family Studies report that in February found the divorce rate had in 2023 fallen to its lowest level since the implementation of the 1975 Family Law Act.
The Guardian
18 hours ago
- The Guardian
Why do I still see my siblings as the people they were in childhood?
I am spending a lot of time at my late mother's house, sorting things out, wondering why she had so much asafoetida and thinking about the past. Every time I'm there, my sister asks me to water the garden, and I never do. Then she says: 'Please, just do the window boxes, otherwise the plants will die,' and I still don't. 'I may come and take the potted plants away, or you could take some, if you want to kill them in your own house?', she says, and still I ignore her, because I don't know anything about gardening. So it follows that, being my sibling, she doesn't either. No amount of evidence to the contrary – her own, frankly magnificent garden – can convince me otherwise. This is a two-way street. She is a fashion designer and exquisite draughtsperson – which I, also, after many decades, have yet to wrap my head around – but she can't drive, and if ever she is a passenger when I'm driving, she is on red alert, pointing out things – mainly other cars, pedestrians, trees – as if, without her intervention, I would plough straight into them. Our brother is a skilled decorator and, when he uses words such as 'primer' and 'dust sheet', I can't help looking at him as if a cat is talking. He is a photographer by profession, and, even if we point the same phone at the same object, he creates images that are unfathomably deeper and more pleasing than mine. I look on this not so much as a knowledge base he has that I don't, and more like an act of hocus-pocus. My other brother is a maths teacher, my other sister is a physicist, and I cannot describe how fanciful I find it that they may really be doing these jobs. Obviously, I have to pretend to believe it. I don't even know whether you get wired in childhood to think all knowledge is equally distributed because otherwise it isn't fair, or that every fine difference in skillset is just a question of whoever is younger catching up. But no amount of adulthood can overturn it. Anyway, I couldn't help but notice that, after it rained, the garden looked amazing. It's possible my sister is right on this one thing. Zoe Williams is a Guardian columnist
