
How BJP clinched a massive victory in Assam's panchayat election
Written by Juri Baruah
The BJP-led National Democratic Alliance's massive victory in the Assam panchayat election — it secured 300 out of 376 zilla parishad seats — reveals its strong foothold at the village and block level. While the BJP's seat share has increased from 50.48 per cent in 2018 to 68.51 per cent in 2025 for the zilla parishad, for the anchalik panchayat, it has increased from 46.66 per cent to 57.70 per cent. The BJP, with its alliance partners Asom Gana Parishad, Gana Sakti, and Rabha Hasong Joutha Mancha, reinforced its dominance in state politics as the Opposition struggled to regain lost ground. The panchayat election results can be used as an entry point to understand the trajectory of electoral politics in the state.
A possible reason for the BJP's victory is the popularity of several beneficiary schemes at the grassroots. Schemes like Orunodoi, Nijut Moina, and Mahila Udayamita seem to have played a massive role in consolidating the votes. Along with the beneficiary schemes, the BJP-led government's employment drive for Grade III and IV benefited the lower middle class and the educated young generation.
On the contrary, a lack of substantial trust and failure to raise important issues for the panchayat election led to the Opposition's crushing defeat. Its failure to forge an alliance, the absence of a clear imaginative roadmap, and a lack of connection to the common people also worked against it.
Notably, Congress even fared poorly in Upper Assam districts, particularly in the Jorhat parliamentary constituency represented by MP Gaurav Gogoi. In the last Lok Sabha elections, the Jorhat constituency gained national attention due to a tough battle between the BJP and Congress. Though people supported Gogoi — it was the first time he fought from Jorhat constituency — the ground situation has changed in 2025. Congress failed to win even a single zilla parishad seat in the Jorhat constituency.
The performance of Raijor Dal, another opposition party that contested the rural polls for the first time, was also not satisfactory. The party lost its home turf in Sivasagar, from where Akhil Gogoi was elected as an MLA in the 2021 Assembly election. In the Sivasagar constituency, while Raijor Dal failed to open its account, the BJP won 11 ZP seats out of 12, and its alliance partner, Asom Gana Parishad, won the remaining one. Raijor Dol managed to win only one seat in the Demow assembly constituency out of 82 anchalik panchayats. The party won three zilla parishad seats and 19 anchalik panchayat seats across the state. Notably, all three ZP seats won by Raijor Dal are part of the Opposition-ruled constituencies: Pabho zila parishad under Naobiocha constituency, Shyamtila Aparia zila parishad under Dalgaon constituency, and Mahamaya zila parishad under Gauripur constituency. The party's victory in anchalik panchayat mostly came from Dhubri, Barpeta, and Morigaon districts — the traditional bastions of Congress or AIUDF.
Most opposition leaders, while criticising the Hindutva agenda of the BJP-led alliances, failed to provide an alternative outline for the voters. They were busy discussing issues such as the state's increasing debt, which hardly resonated at the grassroots. On the contrary, the BJP, without stepping into the campaign rhetoric of the Opposition, made promises to reduce electricity bills, cooking gas prices, and affordable rations of rice and sugar. The panchayat election in Assam shows that without a strong alliance and an alternative politics, the Opposition cannot beat the BJP. Unfortunately, there is a lack of visionary leaders in the opposition parties in Assam who can understand that unity is not only required to win elections but also to hold a strong government accountable.
The writer teaches at DCB Girls' college, Jorhat, Assam
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Dynastic feuds may reshape Indian politics
In Bihar, the Rashtriya Janata Dal leans on its OBC and Muslim vote bank, and Lalu Prasad Yadav's anti-elite legacy. His sons, Tej Pratap and Tejashwi, are locked in a clownish feud as Tej Pratap's social media rant about 'Jaichands' and a 12-year romance clash with Tejashwi's steady hand as Lalu's heir. The RJD's political now wobbles as Tej Pratap's antics, in the backdrop of his estranged wife Aishwarya's lament, alienate voters. If the RJD fractures, Bihar's educated youth craving jobs over drama could turn to the BJP's development narrative or Nitish Kumar's JD(U) again. Consolidation under Tejashwi would bolster the RJD's clout, challenging the BJP's dominance and forcing the Congress to play second fiddle in alliances. UP's Samajwadi Party (SP), rooted in Yadav and OBC identity, still stings from its 2016 family feud, when Akhilesh Yadav ousted uncle Shivpal, costing the party the 2017 election. Akhilesh now wields the SP's political clout consisting of its caste-based vote bank. But UP's urbanising youth, less swayed by caste, demand results. If the SP splinters further, the BJP with its Hindutva and development mix will tighten its grip on the state, leaving the Congress to pick up scraps. A unified SP leveraging its Yadav-Muslim base could challenge the BJP's hegemony, forcing national parties to negotiate hard for UP's 80 Lok Sabha seats. Maharashtra's NCP, built on Maratha pride and rural networks, is reeling from Ajit Pawar's 2023 betrayal splitting from Sharad Pawar and his daughter Supriya Sule to join the BJP. Ajit's grab for the NCP's name, symbol and the Maratha vote bank left Supriya's faction scrambling. If the split persists, the BJP and its ally Shiv Sena will dominate the state, with the Congress gaining marginal urban votes. A reunited NCP, though a long shot, could reclaim its kingmaker status, forcing national parties to vie for its support in coalition games. The BSP, anchored in Dalit empowerment, is Mayawati's fortress. Her anointment of brother Anand Kumar and nephew Aakash screams of nepotism. Its political capital is its Jatav Dalit base, which is slipping as educated Dalits drift to BJP's development promises. If the BSP collapses under dynastic weight, the BJP will absorb its voters, cementing dominance in UP, while the Congress might snag urban Dalits. Consolidation under Aakash, if Mayawati steps back, could revive the BSP's Dalit clout, challenging national parties in UP's caste cauldron. West Bengal's Trinamool Congress, fuelled by Bengali sub-nationalism, is Mamata Banerjee's domain, with nephew Abhishek Banerjee as heir. His rise as MP and party general secretary irks veterans, but Mamata's grip keeps dissent at bay. But Bengal's growing middle class demands merit. If the TMC fractures post-Mamata, the BJP's Hindutva pitch could sway voters, with the Congress a distant contender. A consolidated TMC under Abhishek could dominate Bengal, forcing national parties to cede ground in eastern coalitions. In Tamil Nadu, the DMK thrives on Dravidian identity, championing Tamil pride and social justice. M K Stalin, Karunanidhi's son, rules unchallenged, grooming his son Udhayanidhi Stalin as successor, with hardly any overt pushback from anyone within the family or outside. The DMK's politics, comprising its Tamil base and anti-Hindi stance, is robust, but Tamil Nadu's IT-driven prosperity is breeding a youth sceptical of dynasty. In the unlikely but hypothetical situation of the DMK splintering, the BJP could gain urban footholds while the AIADMK mops up rural votes. A unified DMK, with Udhayanidhi at the helm, would keep Tamil Nadu a regional stronghold by marginalising national parties. The Pattali Makkal Katchi, ensconced in Tamil Nadu's Vanniyar caste silo, faces collapse as S Ramadoss battles son Anbumani, who was sacked from party president's chair in April 2025 over a BJP alliance spat. Anbumani's defiance targets the PMK's political foundation. If the PMK implodes, the DMK and AIADMK will rupture its fountainhead, with the BJP gaining marginal caste votes. But a united PMK could still sway coalitions, forcing national parties to court its niche clout.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
As charges swirl, KLIS duel boils over
Hyderabad: Irrigation minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy slammed former minister T Harish Rao , alleging that Telangana's irrigation sector suffered irreversible damage due to the faulty decisions made by the BRS govt. He demanded Harish Rao tender an unconditional apology for misleading the people of the state on the Kaleshwaram project. In a statement on Saturday, Uttam refuted the allegations levelled by Harish Rao and claimed that after the BRS govt inaugurated the project in 2019, only 162 TMC of water was lifted, of which 63 TMC was released into the sea. He demanded an answer from Harish on how the BRS govt managed to irrigate 22 lakh acres with just 99 TMC. "The BRS govt took out rallies after their delegation returned from Maharashtra and announced that a barrage would be constructed at Thummidihatti. A gravity canal was also constructed from Thummidihatti to Yellampally, covering a distance of 100 km. While that was a gravity-based project, Kaleshwaram relies on reverse pumping — only to release a huge quantity of water into sea," the minister claimed. He also dismissed allegations that the previous Congress govt had spent very little on the Pranahitha-Chevella project. He said before the formation of state, 6,156 crore was spent on the project and by 2016, it rose to 11,679 crore. The minister further said the Central Water Commission had never claimed there was no water availability at Thummidithatti. He said that had the BRS govt completed the project at the site with about 38,000 crore, it could have irrigated 17 lakh acres of new ayacut up to Chevella — eliminating the need for 1 lakh crore for the Kaleshwaram project. Of the remaining amount of 62,000 crore (if Pranahitha-Chevella was taken up with 38,000 cr), the govt could have completed many projects such as Palamuru, Nettampadu, Bheema, SLBC, Dindi, Sitharama, and other projects, Uttam claimed. He further said the govt was paying 16,000 crore in interest on the loans taken by the BRS govt for the Kaleshwaram project.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Mevani attacks BJP over atrocities on Dalits, weaker sections in Gujarat
Congress's Vadgam MLA Jignesh Mevani on Saturday questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah's silence on alleged incidents of atrocities against Dalits, adivasis and other weaker sections in Gujarat, and announced that the party will hit the streets to raise the issue. Addressing a press conference at the AICC headquarters in the Capital, Mevani accused the PM, the Home Minister and the RSS of 'putting the values of Manusmriti above the Constitution'. Citing the low conviction rate in cases of atrocities on Dalits, Mevani said at the national level, this figure is 30-35%, but in Gujarat it is only 3-5%, which means 95% of the culprits in the state go scot-free. The Congress leader told reporters that several incidents of Dalit atrocities have been reported from Gujarat such as the murder of a 19-year-old Dalit youth in Amreli, the alleged setting ablaze of a Dalit senior citizen in Patan and the alleged gangrape of a Dalit girl in which BJP members are alleged to have been involved. 'The Congress is preparing to launch a massive demonstration in August-September against atrocities being afflicted on Dalits, adivasis and those from the weakened sections in Gujarat,' he announced.