Bengaluru company slammed after candidate flies 2000 km for interview, but only to get ghosted
Thinking of flying to another state to interview for your dream job? Think again. A Bengaluru-based firm has ignited ire from netizens after it allegedly ghosted a candidate from UP after inviting them for a face-to-face interview. Taking to the subreddit Indian Workplace, the candidate's friend shared her ordeal.
After advancing through several rounds of remote interviews with a Bengaluru-based startup, she was informed that the company was impressed by her and wanted to meet her in person before making a final decision. However, they asked her to travel to Bengaluru for the face-to-face round—assuring her that all travel expenses would be reimbursed.
Due to financial constraints in her family, she was unable to afford the journey herself. The friend, wanting to support her aspirations, stepped in and booked the flight tickets on his credit card, trusting the company's verbal commitment to repay the costs. She made the trip, attended the interview, and returned home with high hopes. But those hopes were soon dashed—weeks passed, and there was no communication from the startup. Follow-up emails and messages went unanswered. It became evident that the company had vanished without fulfilling its promise.
Going Public: A Friend's Plea for Justice
Frustrated by the silence, the friend who had funded the trip turned to Reddit's Indian Workplace community to share the situation. Detailing everything from the initial promise of reimbursement to the company's sudden lack of communication, he sought advice from the online community, hoping someone would suggest a solution.
His post captured the attention of many users who were both empathetic and outraged. For them, the situation highlighted a larger issue in corporate India—the growing trend of companies not respecting candidates' time, money, or effort, especially in early-stage or startup environments where HR practices are often informal and inconsistent.
Online Reactions: Outrage and Advice
Several Reddit users offered practical suggestions. A few advised that the candidate make a professional post on LinkedIn explaining the entire situation to raise awareness and potentially shame the company into responding.
Many emphasized that candidates should request companies to make bookings on their behalf instead of relying on post-interview reimbursements—especially when travel is involved. Others shared that this kind of experience has made them more cautious about attending interviews that require out-of-town travel, particularly when the promises are not in writing.
Some users proposed a more creative and emotionally resonant way of presenting the situation—using humor and storytelling to make the post go viral. For example, one suggested posting a selfie at home with a caption that highlights the emotional and financial toll of the experience while tagging senior executives of the company in the hope of drawing attention and resolving the issue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
35 minutes ago
- The Wire
The Battle for TikTok Is at the Forefront of a Deeper Geopolitical Trend
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now World The Battle for TikTok Is at the Forefront of a Deeper Geopolitical Trend Shweta Singh 44 minutes ago US politicians worry that its owner, ByteDance, could be forced by the Chinese government to hand over American user data, or manipulate TikTok's algorithm to serve Beijing's political agenda. Representative image of a person holding phone with the TikTok app open on it. Photo: Solen Feyissa/Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0). Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now After years of mounting scrutiny over TikTok's data practices, in 2024 the Chinese video platform was threatened with a forced sale in the US or a nationwide ban. With the deadline looming on June 19, US–China tech rivalry has entered a new and more aggressive phase. TikTok vowed to fight forced divestment, claiming it would 'trample' free speech. But what started as a controversy over data privacy now has global implications. This conflict is about more than just an app. It represents a shift in the balance of digital power — one that could redefine how nations view national security, economic sovereignty and the internet itself. In light of my research on AI bias, algorithmic fairness, and the societal impact of digital platforms and my experience advising government on AI regulation and digital ethics, I see TikTok as the flashpoint of a broader, more dangerous trend. Digital spaces are becoming battlefronts for geopolitical influence. TikTok has evolved from a social media app to – in the eyes of some policymakers – a digital weapon. Its massive global following has made it a cultural juggernaut. But this viral success has also made it a prime target in the escalating US-China tech war. US politicians worry that its owner, ByteDance, could be forced by the Chinese government to hand over American user data, or manipulate TikTok's algorithm to serve Beijing's political agenda. The concerns are serious, even if not proven. Platforms have been used to sway political sentiment before — as with Facebook in the Cambridge Analytica scandal. But TikTok is different. Its algorithm isn't like those of other social platforms that rely on a user's social graph (what you follow, who you know) to connect people, organisations and places. Instead, TikTok uses a real-time recommendation system based on micro-interactions: how long you watch a video, whether you pause or replay it and even your swipe patterns. The result is an ultra-addictive content stream. This gives TikTok an almost unprecedented power to shape opinions, whether intentionally or not. TikTok in the US: three possible scenarios There are three potential outcomes for TikTok. The first is a forced sale to a US-based entity, which could satisfy lawmakers but likely provoke severe retaliation from China. The second is a ban, which may be more symbolic than effective, but would send a strong message. The third, and perhaps most likely, is a long, drawn-out legal battle that results in a stalemate. Trump seems set to extend the June 19 deadline, after all. But there's a deeper issue here. The world is becoming increasingly divided along digital lines. The US and China are building rival digital ecosystems, each suspicious of the other's platforms. Like past restrictions on Huawei and Nvidia chip exports, this case signals how national security and economic policy are merging in the digital age. This threatens to splinter the internet, with countries choosing sides for their suppliers based on political and economic allegiances rather than technical merit. For China, TikTok is a symbol of national pride. It's one of the few Chinese apps to achieve global success and become a household name in western markets. Forcing ByteDance to sell TikTok, or banning it, could be seen as an affront to China's ambitions on the global digital stage. It's no longer just about a platform — it's about control over the future of technology. TikTok's defenders argue that banning the app would undermine free speech, stifle creativity and unfairly target a foreign-owned platform. These concerns are valid, but the broader landscape of digital platforms is far from straightforward. Other platforms have faced criticism over allegations of spreading misinformation, amplifying bias and contributing to social harm. However, the key distinction with TikTok lies in its algorithm and its ability to sway opinions on a global scale. TikTok's 'for you' feed tracks micro-interactions, serving up personalised content with an addictive intensity. As a result, users can find themselves pulled deeper into curated content streams without realising the extent to which their preferences are being shaped. While its competitors might be able to spread misinformation and stoke division in more traditional ways, TikTok could potentially do so through the finely tuned manipulation of the user's attention. This is a potent tool in the world of digital politics. It also raises critical questions about how the US approaches regulation. Is TikTok a genuine national security threat or simply a symbol of the growing strategic competition between two superpowers? Rather than relying on bans and trade wars, what is needed is robust, cross-border frameworks that prioritise transparency, data protection, algorithmic accountability and the mitigation of online harms. Concerns about harassment, disinformation, addictive design and algorithms that amplify toxic content are not unique to TikTok. US legislation such as the Kids Online Safety Act and the proposed Platform Accountability and Transparency Act signal growing concern. But these efforts remain piecemeal. The EU's Digital Services Act is a welcome model for accountability. But global coordination is now essential. Without it, there is the risk of further fragmentation of the internet (what has been called the 'splinternet' — where access is determined by geopolitics rather than universal principles). The digital world has long been dominated by a handful of powerful corporations. Now it is increasingly shaped by state rivalries. The battle over TikTok is a harbinger of deeper tensions around how data, influence and trust are distributed online. The real question now is not whether TikTok survives, but whether nations can craft a digital future that prioritises democratic values, cross-border collaboration and the public good. This isn't just about national security or free speech. It's a defining moment in the battle for the future of the internet. This article was originally published on The Conversation. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Two Systems, Two Spheres: The Slow, Painful Divorce of the US and China Weakened Russia, Rising China and an Unsteady US: A Strategic Triangle That India Must Navigate China Agrees to Supply US With Rare Earths: Trump US-China Trade Talks to Move Forward After Trump-Xi Call Officials of ED Are Evolving by Expanding Their Powers Day by Day: Madras HC Post Op Sindoor, Experts Say India Should Look Beyond Traditional Suppliers For Defence Procurement 'Same Sex Marriage Not Legalised But Couples Can Very Well Form A Family': Madras HC Number of Companies Awaiting Licences From China For Importing Rare-Earth Magnets Double in Two Weeks LA Protests: Trump's Decision to Deploy Military Criticised, California Governor Terms Move 'Deranged' About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Can crude oil prices really double? Let's look at the worst-case scenario
As the Middle East slides into its most dangerous flashpoint in years, doomsayers warn that Brent prices could surge past $150 per barrel in a worst-case scenario, a geopolitical shock big enough to sever key oil routes and ignite panic across global markets. While such an outcome is far from consensus, traders are beginning to price in the tail risks as Israel–Iran tensions simmer. Brent crude held near $73 a barrel on Tuesday, up from sub-$67 levels last week, after Israeli strikes hit Iranian energy and military infrastructure. Tehran has vowed retaliation, and though ship-tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains intact, there's growing anxiety that the conflict could spill into the waterway that carries a fifth of the world's oil. The geopolitical premium in crude has unmistakably returned. 'Crude oil prices resumed gains on Tuesday as escalating conflict between Israel and Iran reignited supply concerns,' said Rahul Kalantri, Vice President of Commodities at Mehta Equities. 'While Iran has signaled willingness to de-escalate and resume nuclear talks, uncertainty over further retaliation kept traders cautious.' While the market reaction reflects real unease, forecasts are split on how high oil could go if events spiral further. Singapore-based DBS Bank has floated $150 as the upper bound for Brent in a doomsday scenario that assumes Iranian exports are fully knocked out and regional producers fail to plug the gap. The Strait of Hormuz is open — for now Crucially, there's been no disruption to oil flows. Vessels are still passing through the Strait of Hormuz, and ports like Kharg Island remain untouched. Homayoun Falakshahi, head of crude oil at Kpler, told the Financial Times that the current Israeli strategy appears aimed at crippling Iran's internal energy logistics, not its export infrastructure. That may explain the relatively measured response from global markets. J.P. Morgan, one of the largest oil market participants on Wall Street, said prices currently reflect only a '7% probability' of a nightmare scenario, one in which regional tensions curtail not just Iranian exports but also threaten Gulf shipping lanes. A wider conflict that closes Hormuz, the bank said, is still unlikely. 'Iran would be damaging its own position, both economically and politically, by irritating its main customer,' JP Morgan said, referencing China's growing dependence on Iranian crude. Even as geopolitical temperature rises, J.P. Morgan is sticking with a base case oil forecast of $60–$65 for 2025. The U.S. investment bank also flagged potential ripple effects on inflation and monetary policy. 'An attack on Iran could spike oil prices to $120, driving U.S. CPI to 5%,' it said, warning of a reversal in disinflation and an abrupt rethink of the Federal Reserve's rate-cut trajectory. Markets are nervous, not panicked Still, recent price action shows nervousness is creeping in. Brent rallied nearly 9% last week after the Israeli strikes, while gold surged and equities fell. U.S. inflation expectations also nudged higher. Analysts warn that a spike in crude could push American CPI back toward 5%, complicating central bank rate-cut plans globally. India, which imports nearly 40% of its crude via the Strait of Hormuz, is watching closely. 'Almost 50% of our LNG imports also flow through this route,' said Probal Sen, Senior Research Analyst at ICICI Securities, in an interview with ET Now. 'Sustained oil above $75 would hurt marketing margins for refiners and pressure the rupee.' Public-sector oil firms such as Hindustan Petroleum and Bharat Petroleum could see earnings volatility, Sen said, though valuations may remain attractive on longer horizons. Meanwhile, energy analysts say Gulf producers like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have every reason to keep the situation from spiraling. Both are in the middle of multiyear economic overhauls that depend on regional stability, not a war that shocks oil markets and freezes capital flows. For now, oil traders are pricing fear, not fallout. But with every new headline from Tehran or Tel Aviv, the $150 scenario inches a little closer from the outer rim of possibility into something more plausible. It's still a hedge. But it's no longer a fantasy. Also read | Crude oil prices could spike to $120, warns J.P. Morgan. Explained in 6 key points ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
After license, India looks to partner with Starlink on satcom infrastructure, others
CHENNAI: After granting the much-anticipated license to Elon Musk's satellite internet company Starlink to operate in India, the government is now exploring broader partnerships with the US-based firm to strengthen satellite communications and support the Digital India initiative. Communications Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia announced on Tuesday that the Indian government has granted Starlink a license to operate in the country—a major step toward expanding satellite-based broadband services nationwide. Starlink President and COO Gwynne Shotwell, along with her team, met with the minister to discuss potential collaboration on Tuesday. "Had a productive meeting with Ms Gwynne Shotwell, President & COO of SpaceX, on India's next frontier in connectivity. We delved into opportunities for collaboration in satellite communications to power Digital India's soaring ambitions and empower every citizen across the country. With India's digital revolution under the leadership of PM Narendra Modi, satellite technologies are not just relevant, they're transformative," Scindia wrote on X after meeting with Shotwell and team. Minister Scindia emphasised that India's market is open to all companies that meet regulatory requirements, stating, "You fulfill the requirements, and we are ready to welcome you." He highlighted the government's commitment to fostering competition and improving connectivity, especially in underserved regions.
