Sharad Pawar claims offer of 160 Assembly seats before Maharashtra polls, says he and Rahul Gandhi declined it
'We did not give it the attention it perhaps required. But I still remember — before the Assembly elections were announced, two people came to meet me in Delhi. They told me that Maharashtra has 288 Assembly seats, and out of those, they would guarantee us 160 seats. I was surprised. To be clear, even though they claimed such a guarantee, I had no doubts about the Election Commission. But such people do show up, so I ignored them.'
'I arranged their meeting with Rahul Gandhi. They told him whatever they wanted to. However, both Rahul Gandhi and I felt that we should not pay attention to such things. This is not our path. We decided we would go before the people and find ways to earn their support,' Pawar told reporters in Nagpur.
Pawar lauded Rahul Gandhi's recent presentation on alleged polling irregularities and criticised the Election Commission of India (ECI) for seeking a separate affidavit from him.
'The Election Commission is an independent body. Rahul Gandhi said he has already taken an oath in Parliament, so there is no need for a separate affidavit. If the Election Commission still insists on such a thing, that is not right. Rahul Gandhi's allegations need to be probed in depth. The truth must come out. My only point is that the objection was regarding the Election Commission. Then why do BJP leaders or the chief minister need to respond? We want an answer from the Election Commission, not from the BJP,' said Pawar.
Referring to the recent INDIA bloc meeting in Delhi, Pawar dismissed speculation over Uddhav Thackeray's seating position, comparing it humorously to movie-goers avoiding the front row.
'First, I must say I have been seeing since yesterday that there is politics over where Uddhav Thackeray was seated in Delhi. When you watch a presentation, you don't sit in the first row just as when you go to watch a movie, you don't sit in the first row, you sit further back. Similarly, I, too, was seated at the back. The point is, you don't sit close to the screen; you keep some distance. Unfortunately, politics is being done over where Uddhav Thackeray was seated,' he said.
Hours after Pawar's comments, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said the Opposition has a habit of lying and running away.
'Although Rahul Gandhi has often raised doubts about the EVM machines, Sharad Pawar has never said so. In fact, Sharad Pawar has often taken a clear stand that it is wrong to blame the EVMs. However, now, after Rahul Gandhi's meeting, Sharad Pawar has suddenly started talking about changes in the voting process. This is the result of Rahul Gandhi's meeting,' said Fadnavis.
'No matter how much confusion the Opposition creates, elections are not held anywhere as transparent and free as in India. Those who accuse EVMs and the Election Commission speak in public. But they are not ready to give an affidavit. They say that we have taken an oath in Parliament. But is the oath in Parliament valid in the Supreme Court and the high court? They know that if they are caught lying, criminal action can be taken against them tomorrow. Therefore, these are cowardly people who lie and run away every day,' criticised Fadnavis.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
The Hindu Morning Digest - August 10, 2025
ECI again asks Rahul Gandhi to submit evidence of irregularity in Karnataka Assembly election under oath The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Saturday (August 9, 2025) again asked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to submit under oath the allegations made by him on voter roll manipulation in a Karnataka Assembly Constituency. Either Mr. Gandhi should give a declaration/oath, or apologise to the country, sources in the ECI said. Mr. Gandhi had in a press conference claimed that 1,00,250 'fake votes' were created in the Mahadevapura Assembly seat under the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha constituency in Karnataka, in order to ensure a win for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). No name will be deleted without notice, says ECI on Bihar SIR The Election Commission of India (ECI) assured the Supreme Court on Saturday (August 9, 2025) that deletion of voters' names in the Bihar draft electoral roll, published on August 1 as part of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, would be done only after issuing prior notice indicating the grounds for the action. The poll body said 2.5 lakh volunteers, mostly Bihar government officials, have been deployed to assist eligible voters obtain requisite documents from the various State departments to avoid exclusion from the final electoral roll. India welcomes Donald Trump-Vladimir Putin summit in Alaska India on Saturday (August 9, 2025) welcomed the summit between the United States and Russia to be held in Alaska on August 15. In a statement, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) described the summit, which comes after more than three years of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, as a move that holds the 'promise' of ending the conflict. The meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin was announced by Mr. Trump earlier on Saturday. Under whose pressure did PM stop Operation Sindoor, asks Congress Hours after Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh revealed on Saturday (August 9, 2025) that the Indian Air Force (IAF) had shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and a large aircraft during Operation Sindoor, the Congress asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi why India's military action against Pakistan was 'suddenly stopped' and under whose 'pressure'. India launched the operation against a few terror bases in Pakistan on May 7 in retaliation for the Pahalagam terror attack on April 22. After three days of intense conflict, both countries reached an understanding on May 10 to end the hostilities. Though U.S. President Donald Trump claimed that he helped broker the ceasefire, the Centre has consistently denied it. Not a single Pakistani aircraft was hit or destroyed by Indian armed forces, claims Khawaja Asif Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif on Saturday (August 9, 2025) claimed that no aircraft of the military was hit or destroyed by Indian armed forces during the recent conflict. His comments came hours after Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh said the Indian Air Force (IAF) shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and a large aircraft during Operation Sindoor. He said the operation also resulted in a large number of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), drones and some of their missiles falling into the Indian territory. Gaza civil defence says 18 killed across territory Gaza's civil defence agency said at least 18 people were killed across the Palestinian territory on Saturday (August 9, 2025), including civilians who were waiting to collect aid. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that at least six people were killed and 30 wounded after Israeli troops targeted civilians assembling near an aid point in central Gaza. The spokesman said strikes hit areas elsewhere in central Gaza, resulting in multiple casualties. Thailand again accuses Cambodia of planting land mines as 3 soldiers are hurt by blast along border Three Thai soldiers on patrol were wounded Saturday (August 9, 2025) when one stepped on a land mine in territory along the border with Cambodia, Thailand's army announced. The incident came just two days after the two countries reaffirmed their adherence to a ceasefire to end a brief armed conflict. The Army's statement said the incident took place in Thailand's Sisaket province and 'clearly demonstrates to both domestic and international society that the use of concealed weapons in border areas continues to exist, constituting a clear violation of the Ottawa Convention by the Cambodian side.' In Gurez Valley, a lone man is archiving the Dard-Shin story The Dard-Shin tribe, which once ruled large parts of Kashmir in the 16th Century and is now nestled in the Gurez valley with Pakistan border posts in the backyard, has found an archivist in Basheer Ahmad Teroo. For the past three years, Mr. Teroo, 48, has been travelling the length and breadth of what was once known as Dardistan, collecting vestiges of his community's culture – items that he has begun storing and displaying at his home in Dawar town. Political parties say they have filed many claims and objections after Bihar draft roll, though ECI lists zero complaints Even as the Election Commission maintains that no claims and objections have been filed by political parties over names wrongfully included or excluded in the draft electoral list in Bihar, political workers — including Booth Level Agents (BLA) on the ground — claim that they have filed many such complaints. In fact, party workers say that when they flag the deletion of names of eligible voters through these complaints, Electoral Registration Officers (ERO) tell them to ask voters to instead file Form 6, which is meant for first-time voter registrations. Restored Nagasaki bell rings in 80 years since A-bomb Twin cathedral bells rang in unison on Saturday (August 9, 2025) in Japan's Nagasaki for the first time since the atomic bombing of the city 80 years ago, commemorating the moment of horror. On August 9, 1945, at 11:02 a.m., three days after a nuclear attack on Hiroshima, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki. After heavy downpours Saturday morning, the rain stopped shortly before a moment of silence and ceremony in which Nagasaki mayor Shiro Suzuki urged the world to 'stop armed conflicts immediately'. ₹2,000 for a Coolie ticket: Bengalureans shocked at exorbitant rates for Rajinikanth's film The ₹200 price cap on movie tickets continues to be a dream for film lovers of Bengaluru. In July, the State government had issued a draft notification on capping cinema ticket prices. However, the ticket rates for the upcoming Rajinikanth biggie, Coolie, has left people surprised and shocked in equal measure. The movie will hit the screens worldwide on August 14, 2025.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Widespread doubts over voter rolls will deal a body blow to Indian democracy
Rahul Gandhi's press conference on Thursday started off poorly: his slides suddenly disappeared from the screen even as he stood there, his face taut with anger. But once these technical glitches were sorted, what Gandhi disclosed was shocking. The leader of the Opposition alleged tgat his party had found more than a lakh bogus voters in the Mahadevapura Assembly constituency in Bengaluru. The press conference detailed five types of bogus entries in the electoral roll: duplicate voters, voters with fake addresses, bulk voters with the same address, invalid photographs (which made identification impossible) and enrolling fake first-time voters (using form six). The examples Gandhi brought up were striking. Gurkirat Singh Dang, for example, appears four times in the roll with the exact same address. Another gent, Aditya Srivastava, can vote across the country: Mumbai, Lucknow and in two booths in Bengaluru. One address in Bengaluru, a single-room house, has 80 voters registered to it. Other voters have strings of gibberish for address and father's name (one was a Mr dfojgaidf). A 70-year-old woman called Shakun Rani enrolled as a new voter too, which meant that she was able to vote twice. As striking as these examples were, even worse was the Election Commission's response – or lack of it. A few hours after Gandhi's press conference, it put out a tweet with the tag #ECIFactCheck. Except there was no fact check: it did not actually rebut Gandhi. In fact, it said it would only take action if Gandhi swore an oath. It is unclear why the Election Commission does not think that errors in the voter roll deserve urgent action. Or why it has not agreed to demands by the Opposition to provide machine-readable voter rolls, which would make identifying errors a cinch. Fact-checking is a process through which one determines the authenticity, or lack thereof, of information that has been put out in the public domain. This is done by presenting facts that either contradict the original claim or support it. Only after such a process is followed… — Pratik Sinha (@free_thinker) August 8, 2025 Rising doubts Given that this is not the first time doubts have been expressed about the integrity of India's voter rolls, the Election Commission's non-response was doubly troubling. Reporting by Scroll has found numerous complaints about voter roll exclusions. In 2023, the India Fix broke down a detailed research paper that flagged several statistical anomalies with the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, part of which could be traced back to allegations that the rolls had been corrupted. In March, the Trinamool Congress complained that Election Photo Identity Card numbers used in voter cards were not unique. Different voters across the country somehow had the same number. Again, the Election Commission was unable to explain the error even as it said that it would fix it going forward. Even as the Election Commission is unable to explain how these errors are appearing, it is not holding back from even more drastic changes in voter lists. At present, it is conducting a Special Intensive Revision of the rolls in Bihar. However, it seems that women and Muslims are being especially excluded. The design of the Special Intensive Revision, a de facto citizenship test that has placed enormous powers in the hands of the lower bureaucracy, makes it highly amenable to political pressure. Betraying a legacy The widespread doubts about voter rolls stand in stark contrast to how universal adult franchise was introduced in India: the creation of a voter roll that included all Indian voters was one of the first administrative tasks taken by independent India. India had had elections under the Raj but they were limited to elites. In 1937, the Raj's biggest election ever, with Indians electing state governments, saw around a sixth of Indian adults qualify to be voters. Within a few months of Independence, the Constituent Assembly Secretariat, headed by bureaucrat BN Rau, was drawing up new rolls based on universal adult franchise. The political will for this was solid: the Congress had been asking for the vote for all adult Indians since 1928. The roll was drawn up before the Indian Constitution was drafted and adopted. The result was, as Ornit Shani points out in her remarkable research on independent India's first electoral roll, Indians became voters first and then citizens. 'An electoral roll on the basis of universal franchise prepared and maintained as accurately and up-to-date as possible, was the plinth upon which the institutions of electoral democracy would rest,' Shani writes. Unsurprisingly, this was a major factor for the Constituent Assembly as well. While moving an article which would lead to the formation of the Election Commission, BR Ambedkar, chairman of the drafting committee, was clear that no Indian should be excluded from the rolls 'on the whim of an officer'. Elections are the guts of a democracy. And voter rolls, in turn, are the guts of an election. Seven decades later, the widespread impression that the whims of officers – and politicians – are now deciding voter rolls is severely damaging to the idea of Indian democracy.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Rahul's Rhetorical Revolution Requires Receipts
Democracy is built not on faith alone, but also on trust. Faith is blind; trust is earned. Faith allows you to believe in gods. Trust allows you to believe in institutions. When leaders mistake democracy for theology, when they assume the divine right to declare, accuse, and pronounce guilt without trial, they are not playing politicians. They are playing gods and jurors in the same breath. Standing not in court, not even in Parliament, but in the unmediated court of public opinion, Rahul Gandhi declared that '2,000 sq kms of Indian land is under Chinese occupation,' that 'Chinese soldiers are beating up Indian Army personnel.' An angry Justice Dipankar Datta asked him the only question that matters, 'Were you there? Do you have credible proof?' Rahul's bombastic blitzkrieg was loud on grandiloquence but poor on evidence—'India's election system is already dead.' He claimed, '1.5 lakh voters out of 6.5 lakh were fake,' and had '100 per cent proof.' But he offered none. A sustained offensive is not the same as a sustainable one. If Rahul seeks a transition from the politics of provocation to the politics of power, then he must understand a crucial principle of democratic responsibility: Proof precedes Power. Volume cannot replace verification. This isn't about Rahul alone. Indian politics has long been populated by leaders who believe that volume can replace verification. Indira Gandhi claimed foreign agents were trying to sabotage her government; an accusation that helped justify the Emergency. Narendra Modi's detractors accuse him of promising `15 lakh in every Indian's account when he had said if all the black money abroad is brought back, it would be so much that every person will get `15 lakh. Arvind Kejriwal declared that 'every big leader is corrupt,' only to retract when lawsuits followed. Mamata Banerjee once claimed that the Election Commission was colluding with the BJP, yet could provide no proof beyond her own sense of betrayal. If the bipartisan tradition of accusation without adjudication are left unchallenged, they become precedents. Precedents corrode institutions.
