
Quebec's budget will include measures to address Trump's tariff threats — but they'll be expensive
Social Sharing
Quebec will present its budget on Tuesday and the province's finance minister Eric Girard has signalled it will include financial supports to help businesses adapt to tariffs and the changing economic situation with the U.S.
But the new measures will increase costs at a time when Quebec is running a historically large deficit and struggling to rein in spending.
Last year, Quebec presented a budget with a projected deficit of $11 billion — its highest ever, Girard said at the time.
On Friday, Girard signalled that the projected deficit this year will be even larger because of economic headwinds caused by tariffs.
"There's a lot of uncertainty. It has an impact on the economic situation," he said. "It has an impact on the measures we have to take."
But Girard said the province was still committed to "responsible management of public finances."
There is as of yet no indication on exactly how large of a deficit Quebec will run in 2025-26, but Girard has indicated that the government supports to help businesses cope with tariff threats will have a cost and that will mean increases to public spending.
He said last week the government was planning to support businesses affected by tariffs and economic uncertainty in three phases.
"There are emergency measures … to support businesses," he said. "There will be a period of transition because the economy will transform and there are important efforts at the level of innovation, investing to help companies to be able to face the new economic challenges."
Much of the province's deficit from 2024-25 — $3.2 billion — was structural. That means that the province had some expensive budget items that were considered temporary costs, but even in a perfectly healthy economy, the cost of running the government would still exceed tax revenue by $3.2 billion.
With that kind of spending, the government stands little chance of presenting a balanced budget in the next five years.
The Institut du Québec (IDQ), a non-profit economic research institute, said in a report earlier this month that Quebec will be unable to attain a balanced budget by 2029-30 — as prescribed by law — unless it seriously limits spending or increases taxes.
The IDQ said Quebec could reach a balanced budget sooner than projected by raising the provincial sales tax 0.5 per cent — or by drastically reducing spending.
The institute said that despite a slowdown in public spending, Quebec is still taking on too much debt and is in no place to balance its budget any time soon nor reduce debt-to-GDP ratio to 35.5 per cent — another legal requirement under the Balanced Budget Act.
Santé Quebec, the new Crown corporation in charge of the health-care system, has attempted to reduce spending throughout the network while reducing the impact on patients, but it has so far proven difficult.
Girard told reporters last week that he was not ruling out raising taxes — but he said the government would not increase the sales tax as the IDQ suggested. He declined to provide more details about what could be in the budget, beyond suggesting that Quebec was prepping for economic uncertainty caused by President Donald Trump's tariff threats.
"You'll see that the government has been thoughtful, has supported the economy in different phases," Girard said.
Tariff turmoil could also throw the economy into a recession, Girard has warned. If that happens, it would constrain Quebec's public spending even further because when the economy contracts, government revenues tend to dip and program costs for things like unemployment tend to rise.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
4 days ago
- CTV News
Increasing permanent immigration for now could reduce temporary residency: Institut du Québec
Temporarily increasing the number of new permanent immigrants to Quebec could reduce reliance on temporary residency, according to the Institut du Québec (IQ). In a new report unveiled on Wednesday, IQ suggests several possible courses of action in a context where Quebec and Ottawa are seeing a decline in immigration flows compared with recent years. In one scenario, IQ proposes that Quebec plan for a temporarily higher permanent immigration threshold, up to 90,000. This target would be accompanied by a 'clear trajectory' back towards 60,000, 'to allow the integration of skilled temporary residents already present and to reduce delays in access to permanent residence.' IQ points out that Quebec could facilitate the transition to permanent residency for highly skilled temporary residents and maintain a pathway to permanent residency for international students who have graduated in Quebec. According to IQ, 'it is preferable to focus on permanent immigration rather than temporary residency' since 'people who choose to settle permanently make a greater contribution to Quebec society and the economy.' 'That said, temporary residents play an essential role in meeting certain specific labour market needs or serving as a gateway to permanent residence for skilled profiles,' adds IQ. The institute says it has also explored scenarios where Quebec would set its permanent immigration thresholds at 35,000 or 60,000, but believes that this would force the province to take in more temporary residents to meet needs. There are currently around 600,000 temporary residents in Quebec. For several months now, Quebec Premier François Legault has been hammering home the point that Quebec's capacity to take in newcomers has been exceeded and that temporary residents are putting pressure on housing and public services. – This report by The Canadian Press was first published on June 4, 2024.

Montreal Gazette
5 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Hanes: Bill 40 appeal shows the Legault government has learned nothing
By Whenever a new fracas erupts between the government of Premier François Legault and the anglophone community, Eric Girard, the minister responsible for relations with English-speaking Quebecers, is dispatched to try to patch things up. Recently, he admitted that new directives issued last summer that suggested eligibility certificates for education in English could be used to access health care in English were ' not our finest moment' and that he was 'disappointed' at how the whole saga played out. Previously, Girard acknowledged that tuition hikes for out-of-province students that disproportionately harmed Quebec's English universities had ruffled feathers, and he vowed to smooth things over. When he was appointed to the portfolio in 2022 after the angst surrounding the adoption of Bill 96, Quebec's update of protections for the French language, Girard promised to allay fears and 'do better.' 'When I say we need to do better, I mean we need to improve relations,' he told The Gazette back in the early days of his tenure. But time and again, these prove to be empty promises. Because actions speak louder than words. And even though it was less than a month ago that Girard called for the latest reset, the Legault government has demonstrated the depth of its contempt for the rights of English-speaking Quebecers anew by announcing its intention to appeal the latest ruling on Bill 40 all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada (if the top court agrees to hear it, that is). The attempt to abolish English school boards and replace them with service centres was one of the first bones of contention between the anglophone community and the Legault government after it was first elected in 2018. The Quebec English School Boards Association launched a constitutional challenge of the law immediately after its passage and has since won two resounding victories. Both Quebec Superior Court and the Quebec Court of Appeals have agreed that Bill 40 is a violation of Section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and affirmed the rights of the English-speaking minority to manage and control its own schools. Both courts have categorically said that transforming school boards into service centres like their francophone counterparts, centralizing many of their decision-making powers in the ministry of education, and axing the elected councils of commissioners run counter to those constitutional guarantees. But the Legault government is forging ahead trying to defend the discredited law. At this point, there is no principled reason to drag this out — and no pragmatic imperative, either. Quebec's English school boards obtained an injunction in 2020, keeping them intact for the duration of the legal proceedings. For five years they have continued to operate as they always have, overseen by elected representatives from the community, alongside French service centres. At this point the government's argument that it can't have two different systems for running French and English schools doesn't really hold water. In fact, there is growing concern that francophone service centres, administered by parents drawn from local school governing boards, lack transparency and accountability. And since Bill 40 was adopted five years ago, Education Minister Bernard Drainville has grabbed even more authority from service centres, like the power to appoint their directors general and overturn their decisions. The English school boards have already proven their management and control rights — twice. But the Legault government just won't let it go. Are they gluttons for punishment? Or is this merely a continuation of the pattern of antagonizing the English-speaking community? So often over two mandates in office, the premier or his ministers say one thing and do another. Legault claimed nothing would change for anglophones under Bill 96, yet there has been major upheaval. English colleges now have quotas for francophone and allophone students and new French course requirements, which has left them destabilized. English versions of government and public websites now have warnings about who is allowed to consult the content, which is an insult to intelligence. English court documents and decisions must be accompanied by French translations, which are costly and time-consuming, impeding access to justice. And these are just a few examples. The rights of anglophones are either complete afterthought or collateral damage. A year ago, when new rules on simultaneous translation of court judgments came into effect, a Quebec Court judge on the verge of presiding over an English criminal trial had to convene representatives of the prosecution service and attorney general's office to get basic information on how this was supposed to work. He was essentially told there was no plan and things were still being figured out. For his efforts, he was the subject of a complaint to the judicial council for overstepping his authority. He was later totally exonerated. His decision declaring the new regulations inoperable for English criminal trials is being appealed, however. The list of slights goes on and on. Yet concerns are frequently dismissed as the rantings of 'angryphones' acting like the world's most spoiled minority — until the government gets egg on its face over something truly ludicrous. Whether it's having to intervene on the Go Habs Go fiasco, override a library's decision not to allow an English book club to meet without simultaneous translation or rewriting the confusing health directives, each incident erodes trust. If Girard was at all serious about wanting to rebuild confidence with English-speaking Quebecers, there was one, simple, concrete gesture the government could have made that would have gone a long way and meant a lot in laying the groundwork for a truce: not appealing the Bill 40 ruling to the Supreme Court. Instead, the Legault government couldn't resist fighting a losing battle to the bitter end.


CTV News
21-05-2025
- CTV News
Legault government closes the door on gas tax cut
Quebec Finance Minister Eric Girard responds to the Opposition during Question Period at the Quebec National Assembly, Thursday, April 24, 2025. (Jacques Boissinot/The Canadian Press)