Amit Shah tables Bills seeking removal of PM, CMs facing serious criminal charges in LS, to be referred to joint panel
Home Minister Amit Shah said the three big-ticket anti-corruption draft laws, which also include provisions for the removal of a prime minister and chief ministers arrested on serious criminal charges, will be sent to the joint committee of the Lok Sabha amid protests by the opposition.
According to the proposed laws, if any one of them is arrested and detained in custody for consecutive 30 days for offences that attract a jail term of at least five years, they will lose their job on the 31st day.
Soon after the introduction of the Bills, Congress leader Manish Tewari said these draft laws undermine the law of the land and called these bills 'unconstitutional.' Tewari demanded that the bills be withdrawn immediately.
Shah later informed the house that the three bills would be sent to the joint panel for further scrutiny. This means bills won't be taken up in this Monsoon Session of Parliament as it ends on 21 July, Thursday.
(i) The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025;
(ii) The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025;
(iii) The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025;
"A minister, who for any period of 30 consecutive days during holding the office as such, is arrested and detained in custody, on allegation of committing an offence under any law for the time being in force, which is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or more, shall be removed from his officeby the Presidenton the advice of the Prime Minister to be tendered by the thirty-first day, after being taken in such custody," one of the bill reads.
"Provided that if the advice of theprime minister, for the removal of such minister is not tendered to the President by the thirty-first day, he shall cease to be a minister, with effect from the day falling thereafter".
"Provided further that in case of the prime minister, who for any period of 30 consecutive days during holding the office as such, is arrested and detained in custody, on allegation of committing an offence under any law for the time being in force, which ispunishable with imprisonmentfor a term which may extend to five years or more, shall tender his resignation by the thirty-first day after such arrest and detention, and if he does not tender his resignation, he shall cease to be the Prime Minister with effect from the day falling thereafter," reads the proposed law.
As of now, there is no bar on ministers holding on to their offices after their arrests. Former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji did not resigned from their posts since their arrests on different charges.
According to the statement of objects and reasons of the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025, there is no provision under the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 (20 of 1963) for the removal of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges.
The objectives of theConstitution(One Hundred And Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, say there is no provision under the Constitution for the removal of a minister who is arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges.
The objectives of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025, say there is no provision under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of 2019) for the removal of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges.
Hence, section 54 of theJammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, needs to be amended to provide a legal framework for the removal of the Chief Minister or a Minister in such cases. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives.
The bills' introduction two days before the end of Parliament's Monsoon session and their implications surprised political circles.
(This is a developing story. Check back for updates)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
UPI Transactions Getting Safer: Big Change Explained
Amit Shah Vs Oppn Showdown: Bill To Remove PM, CMs Over Criminal Cases Sparks Big Lok Sabha Ruckus Union Home Minister Amit Shah introduced three controversial bills in the Lok Sabha, triggering sharp protests from the opposition. The bills seek removal of the prime minister, chief ministers, or ministers held in custody for 30 days on serious criminal charges. Opposition MPs, including KC Venugopal and Asaduddin Owaisi, called the bills 'anti-constitutional.' Venugopal questioned Shah's moral authority, referring to his past arrest as Gujarat's home minister. Shah said he had resigned then and did not hold any post until cleared by court. The bills, including the 130th Constitution Amendment, have been sent to the Joint Parliamentary Committee for scrutiny. 18.8K views | 1 hour ago
The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Govt slams Opposition for spreading lies over Maharashtra election data
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) slammed the Opposition for disrupting Rajya Sabha proceedings, saying it was spreading lies on the Maharashtra election data, a day after research organisation CSDS issued a public apology acknowledging errors in its poll data. Follow the Parliament Monsoon session Day 20 LIVE: August 20, 2025 As the Rajya Sabha reassembled post-lunch to discuss the Indian Institutes of Management (Amendment) Bill 2025, Opposition MPs staged protests demanding a discussion on alleged "vote chori" (vote theft) in the recent Maharashtra Assembly elections. Despite Vice-Chairperson Bhubaneswar Kalita's repeated appeals to maintain decorum, Opposition members continued raising slogans of "vote chori bandh karo" (stop vote theft). Also Read | Parliament passes bill to set up IIM in Guwahati Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said, "We are raising this issue every day. We want to share about 'vote chori'... This is an important issue... We have to save democracy and the Constitution." Mr. Pradhan made his opening remarks on the bill amid the sloganeering. When the Chair did not accede to their demand, Opposition members staged a walkout from the Upper House. The Union Minister continued his speech and said, "Opposition is doing harmful work as they are not letting Parliament function. Parliament functions with help of poor taxpayers' money." He accused the Opposition of wanting to discuss "one fact posted by one person in the CSDS related to the Maharashtra election with malafide intention". "There is one person who has deliberately spread confusion in the country and the Opposition, especially Congress, is further circulating it," the Education Minister said. Aiming CSDS, which receives funding from the government's Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), Mr. Pradhan said, "Taking funds from the Government of India, it is not proper to challenge democracy." The Minister noted that ICSSR has taken cognisance of the issue and will take appropriate action. "The head of that institution (CSDS) has issued a public apology saying the facts were wrong," Mr. Pradhan added. The Education Minister accused the Opposition of creating a negative atmosphere and preventing meaningful legislative discussions. "Can Congress tell whether it supports IIM Guwahati or not?" he questioned, adding that the Opposition's stance has "hurt Assamese people".
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lok Sabha passes Bill to prohibit online games played with real money
The Bill was passed by a voice vote after brief remarks by Minister of Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw, amid protests from Opposition lawmakers Rahul Goreja New Delhi The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, aimed at prohibiting all forms of online real-money games. The Bill was passed by a voice vote after brief remarks by Minister of Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw, amid protests from Opposition members. Following its passage, the House was adjourned for the day. What does the Bill ban? The legislation defines an 'online money game' as any game in which an entry fee or monetary deposit is required, irrespective of whether it is based on skill or chance. The Bill prohibits any person or company from offering, aiding, or promoting such games. It also bars advertisements for these platforms and prevents banks and other financial institutions from processing related payments. Criminal penalties Once enacted, any individual or entity found offering or facilitating online money gaming could face imprisonment of up to three years, a fine of up to ₹1 crore, or both. The legislation is part of a broader government effort to regulate digital gaming in India while attempting to safeguard users from financial and psychological risks associated with such platforms. The Bill had earlier been cleared by the Union Cabinet and now awaits consideration in the Rajya Sabha. Lawmakers have highlighted the growing use of online gaming applications, some of which have been linked to financial scams and addictive behaviour, as justification for the legislation.
