How Iowa State Auditor Rob Sand starts his day
State of play: In the mornings, he likes to read, exercise and work through more complicated audits, he tells Axios.
Zoom in: An app he's been using recently is ScreenZen, which helps limit screen time and make sure he doesn't get bogged down or distracted by his phone.
"It's a great app to increase productivity," he says.
Here's how Sand starts his day:
⏰ Wake up: Between 5-6am.
🍳 Breakfast: He's a "big breakfast" guy and eats Casey's breakfast pizza, Waveland Cafe or a breakfast sandwich at home.
"There's usually eggs and meat involved."
💡 How he juggles his days: "As best I can," Sand says.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Drama upends push to ban Congress from trading stocks
A schism is emerging between members of Congress who want to ban their colleagues from trading stocks over how best to accomplish their shared goal. Why it matters: Congressional stock trading has been the white whale of the last several Congresses, with lawmakers repeatedly trying and failing to pass a ban amid growing populist anger around the issue. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) have expressed support for a ban, as has Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. But there are still roadblocks: Bipartisan momentum on a Senate stock trading bill ground to a halt after President Trump engaged in a public dustup with the bill's sponsor, Josh Hawley (R-Mo.). Driving the news: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) announced last month that she plans to introduce a discharge petition on a bill to ban lawmakers, their spouses and dependent children from trading or owning stocks. A discharge petition can bypass House leadership and force a floor vote on any piece of legislation if 218 members — a majority of the chamber — sign on. Luna's announcement came as a shock to House members involved in months-long bipartisan talks on crafting a compromise stock trading bill. "She sort of parachuted in out of nowhere ... none of us knew she was going to do it," said one lawmaker involved in that effort, who said the group is now working to get Luna on side. State of play: The bipartisan group includes Reps. Seth Magaziner (D-R.I.), Chip Roy (R-Texas), Joe Morelle (D-N.Y.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Axios is told. The lawmakers have been trying to reconcile a number of competing stock trading ban bills and figure out how to handle penalties for violations and divestment procedures. The bill Luna wants to force to a vote, introduced by Burchett, has "a few problems," said the lawmaker who spoke anonymously — such as not addressing capital gains taxes for members who are forced to sell off their stocks or exemptions for spouses who get paid in equity. They added that the bipartisan group sees a discharge petition as a "backup plan" and has "been working hard to secure commitments from leadership that this will move forward through regular order." What they're saying: Morelle, who is also the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, told Axios that a stock trading ban is "critically important" and that "in order to make it workable … it has to be done well." "It has to be done with forethought, and it has to be done in a way that's responsible to all the parties involved," he added, saying he hopes Luna's discharge petition "isn't just a way to grab headlines." "We are very close to having a consensus bill that I think will be the strongest one and I think the most viable one that I think has been introduced so far," Magaziner told Axios in an interview. The other side: "I would love to comment because we were never invited to these talks," Luna told Axios. Luna claimed the bipartisan group doesn't actually want to bring forward a bill because they don't "want to hurt their friends. " "And last time I checked it it's called 'representation,' not 'committee assignment jurisdiction,' on who gets to bring what to the floor." The intrigue: Burchett, in a phone interview, suggested he is losing faith in the bipartisan discussions, telling Axios they are "just getting kind of complicated" and "won't go anywhere." "Luna's going to force it, and I think we need to do that, because I'm sick of messing around," he added, predicting "some" Democrats will sign on. But a senior House Democrat, asked about Luna's announcement, told Axios "it is causing problems and being sorted," while a Democratic leadership aide scoffed at the notion of negotiating with her. What to watch: "I think we'll have something to release soon," Magaziner said of the bipartisan group.
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Salvation Army to exit three Denver shelters by year's end amid controversy
The Salvation Army on Thursday said it will cease operating three hotel shelters in partnership with the city once contracts expire at the end of this year. Why it matters: The move marks a major rupture in a longtime partnership strained by safety concerns and criticism of the Salvation Army's shelter management — signaling a deeper rift between the city and one of its largest homeless services providers. The big picture: The change terminates contracts for the Aspen, Stone Creek and Tamarac shelters, per a statement from the nonprofit, which operates multiple local shelters for people experiencing homelessness and receives millions in city funding. Between the lines: The Salvation Army reapplied but was not selected for two of its three sites in the city's competitive bidding process, Mayor Mike Johnston's spokesperson Jon Ewing tells Axios. The nonprofit was rejected for one and "mutually parted ways" on another, Ewing says. State of play: The decision, the nonprofit contends, will allow the Salvation Army's Intermountain Division — which covers Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and Montana — to better deliver services and save money. Friction point: The nonprofit said it shouldered $5.2 million in shelter operating costs last year, which it says exceeded funding. City officials say they can't verify that figure. "I haven't heard it before," Ewing tells us, noting contracts outline funding and eligible expenses. Zoom out: The severed contracts won't affect the Crossroads Shelter, the 24/7 facility exclusively for men that's among the busiest in the city. The massive shelter in June received a $4.6 million infusion from the city, which helps serve about 250 men a day. What they're saying: The Salvation Army said it helped 1,994 people get into permanent and stable housing in connection with Johnston's All In Mile High (AIMH) program.
Axios
6 hours ago
- Axios
Trump says Social Security is stronger, but signs of trouble at the agency mount
President Trump is expected to sign a proclamation today celebrating the 90th anniversary of Social Security and promoting the program's improvements under his leadership, a White House official confirms to Axios. Why it matters: Reports from inside the agency tell a different story; Social Security advocates are questioning whether the administration may be weighing changes to the popular program that would be harmful to its long-term success. Social Security "looks more threatened than ever," is how the AP puts it. Tens of millions of Americans rely on Social Security benefits to make ends meet, and polling suggests it is the most popular government policy. Where it stands: The Social Security Administration, the agency that oversees the program, lost thousands of employees this year, including senior executives with deep understanding of how the program works. The field offices, Social Security's "front door," where the public goes for help, signing up for benefits, getting cards, etc., are down about 20% of staff this year, taking into account folks who've been transferred to work phone lines, per an Axios tally. Workers there are buckling under the strain of understaffing, they told Axios. The administration has a much more upbeat view. "President Donald J. Trump repeatedly promised to preserve and protect Social Security for every eligible American — and he has unquestionably delivered," the White House said in a press release Thursday. "By massively improving the customer service experience through technological improvements, preventing illegal aliens from accessing benefits, and delivering no taxes on Social Security through the One Big Beautiful Bill – President Trump has Made Social Security Great Again," White House spokeswoman Liz Huston said in a statement. Zoom in: While the White House and president have make supportive statements, there's been a drip of comments from administration officials and nominees suggesting that Social Security should be privatized and calling it a Ponzi scheme — a longstanding way conservatives have criticized the program. Meanwhile: The tax cut for seniors in the "big, beautiful bill" will likely speed up the date when the program's trust funds will be depleted, according to the agency's actuary. That follows bipartisan legislation last year that also sped up that process. The depletion in the Social Security trust funds would lead to a cut in benefits — but not the end of the program. The other side: Social Security Administration commissioner Frank Bisignano has been touting improvements to customer service. "Since taking office, I have focused on modernizing operations; investing in our workforce; eliminating fraud, waste, and abuse; and improving how we serve the public, whether online, over the phone, or in person," he wrote in a column for Fox News on Thursday. Bisignano has removed many of the stats that the agency used to display on its website to track customer service, per The Washington Post. But according to data the agency has released this year, wait times for those trying to reach Social Security by phone have declined this year. Critics say that's a misleading measure — since improvements to how the phone lines work were put in place by the prior administration.
