Australian Government weighing national road-user charge for EVs
Federal Treasury officials, as well as those from the Productivity Commission and the New South Wales and Victorian treasury departments, will reportedly attend a road-user charging forum in Sydney.
This will be hosted by Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, which is calling for a distance-based charge on drivers of electric vehicles (EVs), and will also be attended by Australian Automobile Association (AAA) managing director Michael Bradley.
With state-based road-user charges struck down in 2023 by the High Court of Australia, the federal government is working on a scheme of its own to help offset declining fuel excise revenue and thereby help maintain a source of revenue for road construction and maintenance.
CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief executive Adrian Dwyer argues such a charge would have little impact on EV adoption and that combustion-powered vehicles would still be subject to fuel excise.
"I wouldn't want to jump ahead of any sort of decision-making with that," federal environment minister Murray Watt told ABC News Breakfast.
"It's no secret that we've said previously we'll work with the states and territories on this matter. There's obviously some reporting about that today in some of the newspapers.
"You'd be aware that there was a High Court decision which really raised this issue front and centre and ever since then, we've been working with the states and territories.
"But it's probably premature to say exactly what will occur."
However, by charging EV owners through a separate scheme and maintaining the fuel excise that affects owners of combustion-powered vehicles, the Australian Government may disappoint those calling for a more holistic scheme like that in New Zealand.
The New Zealand government announced last week it plans to drop its fuel excise and make petrol-powered vehicles subject to a road-user charge based on distance travelled and vehicle weight, as diesel, electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles already are.
Dr Chalmers had already confirmed in June he was working with state and territory governments on "the future of road-user charging", following remarks he made in February at a Business Council of Australia event about introducing a mileage-based charge for EV owners.
The Australian Government has already introduced a road-user charge, however, this is part of pilot program for heavy vehicles.
The National Heavy Vehicle Charging Pilot, of which Phase 3 was just completed, is designed to test different ways to charge heavy vehicles for their road usage based on their weight and the distance travelled instead of through registration or fuel excise.
State-based road user charges were struck down by a High Court ruling in 2023, when the Court found that under section 90 of the Constitution, only the Commonwealth can impose customs and excise duties.
This forced Victoria to shutter its scheme and refund all charges to owners of EVs and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs).
Victoria collected $3.9 million in EV and PHEV road user charges during the 2022/23 financial year alone.
The New South Wales and Western Australian state governments previously also pledged to roll out similar taxes around 2027, while South Australia promised to do the same but reversed course following a change in government.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia says the federal government has the right to collect these charges, but it has "limited practical capacity" to collect them as it doesn't handle driver licensing or vehicle registration.
Former Victorian treasurer Tim Pallas, who is also attending next week's forum, told The Australian that EVs are "heavier and do more damage to the road network as a consequence than do internal combustion engine vehicles".
"But there's an environmental plus to electric vehicles. So getting that balance right was key to us. The way we figured it, [a road-user charge] came in about half of the equivalent costs of fuel excise and that's not counting the incentives the state was putting into the vehicle purchase or registration for low-emissions vehicles."
Mr Pallas said any federal road-user charge would need to work out how distance travelled is measured – Victoria's defunct scheme required intermittent photographs of odometer readings, for example – while also taking into account interstate travel to ensure revenue is distributed fairly.
"Even when electric vehicles didn't exist, fuel excise was a really inefficient way of charging for road use," Mr Pallas told The Australian.
"With the share of electric vehicles expected to increase over time – which is a good thing – we need to update the current system," former Liberal urban infrastructure minister Paul Fletcher, who is also attending the forum, told The Australian.
"The current arrangements are also unfair – particularly to those petrol and diesel car owners who drive longer distances, in our outer suburbs and in regional and remote Australia.
"If most Australians have no choice but to pay this particular tax – but some can avoid it by buying an expensive vehicle using the latest technology – then we have a problem with the design of the tax."
Also attending the forum will be Michelle Jablko, chief executive of toll road operator Transurban, who has touted her company's experience in partnering with governments on real-world trials of road-user charging schemes in North America.
The Australian Electric Vehicle Association (AEVA) has called for a federal road-user charge to be implemented, but to cover all vehicles and to take into account a vehicle's mass.
"A universal, mass × distance road-user charge would serve the same role as fuel excise – a pay-by-use system which is proportional to the impact driving has on society and infrastructure. EV drivers don't have a problem with it – we just want to ensure the system is fair," said AEVA president Dr Chris Jones in a statement.
He argued that by taking into account vehicle mass, such a charge "would help drive sales of smaller, lighter vehicles regardless of fuel source".
The Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA) has also previously called for an "equitable national road-user charging system… [which] does not discourage the uptake of hybrids and EVs" and is done in a "technology-neutral manner across all vehicles regardless of powertrain choice".
MORE: Australian Government wants new tax on EVs – report
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
The Australian Government has said there's "no secret" it is looking at introducing a federal road-user charge, following a report in The Australian today that said federal treasurer Jim Chalmers is "accelerating work" on such a charge.
Federal Treasury officials, as well as those from the Productivity Commission and the New South Wales and Victorian treasury departments, will reportedly attend a road-user charging forum in Sydney.
This will be hosted by Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, which is calling for a distance-based charge on drivers of electric vehicles (EVs), and will also be attended by Australian Automobile Association (AAA) managing director Michael Bradley.
With state-based road-user charges struck down in 2023 by the High Court of Australia, the federal government is working on a scheme of its own to help offset declining fuel excise revenue and thereby help maintain a source of revenue for road construction and maintenance.
CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief executive Adrian Dwyer argues such a charge would have little impact on EV adoption and that combustion-powered vehicles would still be subject to fuel excise.
"I wouldn't want to jump ahead of any sort of decision-making with that," federal environment minister Murray Watt told ABC News Breakfast.
"It's no secret that we've said previously we'll work with the states and territories on this matter. There's obviously some reporting about that today in some of the newspapers.
"You'd be aware that there was a High Court decision which really raised this issue front and centre and ever since then, we've been working with the states and territories.
"But it's probably premature to say exactly what will occur."
However, by charging EV owners through a separate scheme and maintaining the fuel excise that affects owners of combustion-powered vehicles, the Australian Government may disappoint those calling for a more holistic scheme like that in New Zealand.
The New Zealand government announced last week it plans to drop its fuel excise and make petrol-powered vehicles subject to a road-user charge based on distance travelled and vehicle weight, as diesel, electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles already are.
Dr Chalmers had already confirmed in June he was working with state and territory governments on "the future of road-user charging", following remarks he made in February at a Business Council of Australia event about introducing a mileage-based charge for EV owners.
The Australian Government has already introduced a road-user charge, however, this is part of pilot program for heavy vehicles.
The National Heavy Vehicle Charging Pilot, of which Phase 3 was just completed, is designed to test different ways to charge heavy vehicles for their road usage based on their weight and the distance travelled instead of through registration or fuel excise.
State-based road user charges were struck down by a High Court ruling in 2023, when the Court found that under section 90 of the Constitution, only the Commonwealth can impose customs and excise duties.
This forced Victoria to shutter its scheme and refund all charges to owners of EVs and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs).
Victoria collected $3.9 million in EV and PHEV road user charges during the 2022/23 financial year alone.
The New South Wales and Western Australian state governments previously also pledged to roll out similar taxes around 2027, while South Australia promised to do the same but reversed course following a change in government.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia says the federal government has the right to collect these charges, but it has "limited practical capacity" to collect them as it doesn't handle driver licensing or vehicle registration.
Former Victorian treasurer Tim Pallas, who is also attending next week's forum, told The Australian that EVs are "heavier and do more damage to the road network as a consequence than do internal combustion engine vehicles".
"But there's an environmental plus to electric vehicles. So getting that balance right was key to us. The way we figured it, [a road-user charge] came in about half of the equivalent costs of fuel excise and that's not counting the incentives the state was putting into the vehicle purchase or registration for low-emissions vehicles."
Mr Pallas said any federal road-user charge would need to work out how distance travelled is measured – Victoria's defunct scheme required intermittent photographs of odometer readings, for example – while also taking into account interstate travel to ensure revenue is distributed fairly.
"Even when electric vehicles didn't exist, fuel excise was a really inefficient way of charging for road use," Mr Pallas told The Australian.
"With the share of electric vehicles expected to increase over time – which is a good thing – we need to update the current system," former Liberal urban infrastructure minister Paul Fletcher, who is also attending the forum, told The Australian.
"The current arrangements are also unfair – particularly to those petrol and diesel car owners who drive longer distances, in our outer suburbs and in regional and remote Australia.
"If most Australians have no choice but to pay this particular tax – but some can avoid it by buying an expensive vehicle using the latest technology – then we have a problem with the design of the tax."
Also attending the forum will be Michelle Jablko, chief executive of toll road operator Transurban, who has touted her company's experience in partnering with governments on real-world trials of road-user charging schemes in North America.
The Australian Electric Vehicle Association (AEVA) has called for a federal road-user charge to be implemented, but to cover all vehicles and to take into account a vehicle's mass.
"A universal, mass × distance road-user charge would serve the same role as fuel excise – a pay-by-use system which is proportional to the impact driving has on society and infrastructure. EV drivers don't have a problem with it – we just want to ensure the system is fair," said AEVA president Dr Chris Jones in a statement.
He argued that by taking into account vehicle mass, such a charge "would help drive sales of smaller, lighter vehicles regardless of fuel source".
The Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA) has also previously called for an "equitable national road-user charging system… [which] does not discourage the uptake of hybrids and EVs" and is done in a "technology-neutral manner across all vehicles regardless of powertrain choice".
MORE: Australian Government wants new tax on EVs – report
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
The Australian Government has said there's "no secret" it is looking at introducing a federal road-user charge, following a report in The Australian today that said federal treasurer Jim Chalmers is "accelerating work" on such a charge.
Federal Treasury officials, as well as those from the Productivity Commission and the New South Wales and Victorian treasury departments, will reportedly attend a road-user charging forum in Sydney.
This will be hosted by Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, which is calling for a distance-based charge on drivers of electric vehicles (EVs), and will also be attended by Australian Automobile Association (AAA) managing director Michael Bradley.
With state-based road-user charges struck down in 2023 by the High Court of Australia, the federal government is working on a scheme of its own to help offset declining fuel excise revenue and thereby help maintain a source of revenue for road construction and maintenance.
CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief executive Adrian Dwyer argues such a charge would have little impact on EV adoption and that combustion-powered vehicles would still be subject to fuel excise.
"I wouldn't want to jump ahead of any sort of decision-making with that," federal environment minister Murray Watt told ABC News Breakfast.
"It's no secret that we've said previously we'll work with the states and territories on this matter. There's obviously some reporting about that today in some of the newspapers.
"You'd be aware that there was a High Court decision which really raised this issue front and centre and ever since then, we've been working with the states and territories.
"But it's probably premature to say exactly what will occur."
However, by charging EV owners through a separate scheme and maintaining the fuel excise that affects owners of combustion-powered vehicles, the Australian Government may disappoint those calling for a more holistic scheme like that in New Zealand.
The New Zealand government announced last week it plans to drop its fuel excise and make petrol-powered vehicles subject to a road-user charge based on distance travelled and vehicle weight, as diesel, electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles already are.
Dr Chalmers had already confirmed in June he was working with state and territory governments on "the future of road-user charging", following remarks he made in February at a Business Council of Australia event about introducing a mileage-based charge for EV owners.
The Australian Government has already introduced a road-user charge, however, this is part of pilot program for heavy vehicles.
The National Heavy Vehicle Charging Pilot, of which Phase 3 was just completed, is designed to test different ways to charge heavy vehicles for their road usage based on their weight and the distance travelled instead of through registration or fuel excise.
State-based road user charges were struck down by a High Court ruling in 2023, when the Court found that under section 90 of the Constitution, only the Commonwealth can impose customs and excise duties.
This forced Victoria to shutter its scheme and refund all charges to owners of EVs and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs).
Victoria collected $3.9 million in EV and PHEV road user charges during the 2022/23 financial year alone.
The New South Wales and Western Australian state governments previously also pledged to roll out similar taxes around 2027, while South Australia promised to do the same but reversed course following a change in government.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia says the federal government has the right to collect these charges, but it has "limited practical capacity" to collect them as it doesn't handle driver licensing or vehicle registration.
Former Victorian treasurer Tim Pallas, who is also attending next week's forum, told The Australian that EVs are "heavier and do more damage to the road network as a consequence than do internal combustion engine vehicles".
"But there's an environmental plus to electric vehicles. So getting that balance right was key to us. The way we figured it, [a road-user charge] came in about half of the equivalent costs of fuel excise and that's not counting the incentives the state was putting into the vehicle purchase or registration for low-emissions vehicles."
Mr Pallas said any federal road-user charge would need to work out how distance travelled is measured – Victoria's defunct scheme required intermittent photographs of odometer readings, for example – while also taking into account interstate travel to ensure revenue is distributed fairly.
"Even when electric vehicles didn't exist, fuel excise was a really inefficient way of charging for road use," Mr Pallas told The Australian.
"With the share of electric vehicles expected to increase over time – which is a good thing – we need to update the current system," former Liberal urban infrastructure minister Paul Fletcher, who is also attending the forum, told The Australian.
"The current arrangements are also unfair – particularly to those petrol and diesel car owners who drive longer distances, in our outer suburbs and in regional and remote Australia.
"If most Australians have no choice but to pay this particular tax – but some can avoid it by buying an expensive vehicle using the latest technology – then we have a problem with the design of the tax."
Also attending the forum will be Michelle Jablko, chief executive of toll road operator Transurban, who has touted her company's experience in partnering with governments on real-world trials of road-user charging schemes in North America.
The Australian Electric Vehicle Association (AEVA) has called for a federal road-user charge to be implemented, but to cover all vehicles and to take into account a vehicle's mass.
"A universal, mass × distance road-user charge would serve the same role as fuel excise – a pay-by-use system which is proportional to the impact driving has on society and infrastructure. EV drivers don't have a problem with it – we just want to ensure the system is fair," said AEVA president Dr Chris Jones in a statement.
He argued that by taking into account vehicle mass, such a charge "would help drive sales of smaller, lighter vehicles regardless of fuel source".
The Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA) has also previously called for an "equitable national road-user charging system… [which] does not discourage the uptake of hybrids and EVs" and is done in a "technology-neutral manner across all vehicles regardless of powertrain choice".
MORE: Australian Government wants new tax on EVs – report
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
The Australian Government has said there's "no secret" it is looking at introducing a federal road-user charge, following a report in The Australian today that said federal treasurer Jim Chalmers is "accelerating work" on such a charge.
Federal Treasury officials, as well as those from the Productivity Commission and the New South Wales and Victorian treasury departments, will reportedly attend a road-user charging forum in Sydney.
This will be hosted by Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, which is calling for a distance-based charge on drivers of electric vehicles (EVs), and will also be attended by Australian Automobile Association (AAA) managing director Michael Bradley.
With state-based road-user charges struck down in 2023 by the High Court of Australia, the federal government is working on a scheme of its own to help offset declining fuel excise revenue and thereby help maintain a source of revenue for road construction and maintenance.
CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief executive Adrian Dwyer argues such a charge would have little impact on EV adoption and that combustion-powered vehicles would still be subject to fuel excise.
"I wouldn't want to jump ahead of any sort of decision-making with that," federal environment minister Murray Watt told ABC News Breakfast.
"It's no secret that we've said previously we'll work with the states and territories on this matter. There's obviously some reporting about that today in some of the newspapers.
"You'd be aware that there was a High Court decision which really raised this issue front and centre and ever since then, we've been working with the states and territories.
"But it's probably premature to say exactly what will occur."
However, by charging EV owners through a separate scheme and maintaining the fuel excise that affects owners of combustion-powered vehicles, the Australian Government may disappoint those calling for a more holistic scheme like that in New Zealand.
The New Zealand government announced last week it plans to drop its fuel excise and make petrol-powered vehicles subject to a road-user charge based on distance travelled and vehicle weight, as diesel, electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles already are.
Dr Chalmers had already confirmed in June he was working with state and territory governments on "the future of road-user charging", following remarks he made in February at a Business Council of Australia event about introducing a mileage-based charge for EV owners.
The Australian Government has already introduced a road-user charge, however, this is part of pilot program for heavy vehicles.
The National Heavy Vehicle Charging Pilot, of which Phase 3 was just completed, is designed to test different ways to charge heavy vehicles for their road usage based on their weight and the distance travelled instead of through registration or fuel excise.
State-based road user charges were struck down by a High Court ruling in 2023, when the Court found that under section 90 of the Constitution, only the Commonwealth can impose customs and excise duties.
This forced Victoria to shutter its scheme and refund all charges to owners of EVs and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs).
Victoria collected $3.9 million in EV and PHEV road user charges during the 2022/23 financial year alone.
The New South Wales and Western Australian state governments previously also pledged to roll out similar taxes around 2027, while South Australia promised to do the same but reversed course following a change in government.
Infrastructure Partnerships Australia says the federal government has the right to collect these charges, but it has "limited practical capacity" to collect them as it doesn't handle driver licensing or vehicle registration.
Former Victorian treasurer Tim Pallas, who is also attending next week's forum, told The Australian that EVs are "heavier and do more damage to the road network as a consequence than do internal combustion engine vehicles".
"But there's an environmental plus to electric vehicles. So getting that balance right was key to us. The way we figured it, [a road-user charge] came in about half of the equivalent costs of fuel excise and that's not counting the incentives the state was putting into the vehicle purchase or registration for low-emissions vehicles."
Mr Pallas said any federal road-user charge would need to work out how distance travelled is measured – Victoria's defunct scheme required intermittent photographs of odometer readings, for example – while also taking into account interstate travel to ensure revenue is distributed fairly.
"Even when electric vehicles didn't exist, fuel excise was a really inefficient way of charging for road use," Mr Pallas told The Australian.
"With the share of electric vehicles expected to increase over time – which is a good thing – we need to update the current system," former Liberal urban infrastructure minister Paul Fletcher, who is also attending the forum, told The Australian.
"The current arrangements are also unfair – particularly to those petrol and diesel car owners who drive longer distances, in our outer suburbs and in regional and remote Australia.
"If most Australians have no choice but to pay this particular tax – but some can avoid it by buying an expensive vehicle using the latest technology – then we have a problem with the design of the tax."
Also attending the forum will be Michelle Jablko, chief executive of toll road operator Transurban, who has touted her company's experience in partnering with governments on real-world trials of road-user charging schemes in North America.
The Australian Electric Vehicle Association (AEVA) has called for a federal road-user charge to be implemented, but to cover all vehicles and to take into account a vehicle's mass.
"A universal, mass × distance road-user charge would serve the same role as fuel excise – a pay-by-use system which is proportional to the impact driving has on society and infrastructure. EV drivers don't have a problem with it – we just want to ensure the system is fair," said AEVA president Dr Chris Jones in a statement.
He argued that by taking into account vehicle mass, such a charge "would help drive sales of smaller, lighter vehicles regardless of fuel source".
The Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA) has also previously called for an "equitable national road-user charging system… [which] does not discourage the uptake of hybrids and EVs" and is done in a "technology-neutral manner across all vehicles regardless of powertrain choice".
MORE: Australian Government wants new tax on EVs – report
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
17 minutes ago
- The Age
Real estate underquoting: Industry leaders back calls to reveal auction reserve prices after report
He also said if a vendor insisted on a higher price than an agent recommended, this should be published too. 'Essentially, it turns the process into a private treaty one and will take longer to sell. Once the property has been on the market for long enough, and if it's unsold, then the auction process can be introduced once the price gap has narrowed.' McGrath Estate Agents founder and chief executive John McGrath strongly supported any changes that created greater transparency, but said sellers should retain the right to accept or reject any offer. 'The real issue isn't reserve pricing, it's agent compliance with existing price guide regulations,' McGrath said. 'If agents follow a straight bat with current quoting rules, transparency issues largely disappear.' On Monday, Premier Chris Minns said he reserved the right to look at legislation that would force agents to publish the vendor reserve before auction, but there were no immediate plans to do it. Premier Chris Minns at Burwood Park on Monday. He has not ruled out a look at publishing reserve prices. Credit: Steven Siewert The NSW Office of Fair Trading is looking at potential industry reforms by way of a series of roundtable forums with stakeholders. Key among those measures are increased penalties for underquoting and a similar model to Victoria that offers better pricing guides for buyers. Tim McKibbin, chief executive of the Real Estate Institute of NSW, is among those working in the background with Fair Trading on the reform process. 'What I can say is that we are committed to finding a solution, everything is on the table and some encouraging progress has been made,' said McKibbin. McKibbin's industry lobby group chief counterpart in Victoria, Jacob Caine, revealed on Sunday that the institute would support the introduction of reserve price disclosure as well the adoption of a new model that would provide free building and pest reports to prospective home buyers. The rules around property pricing are tighter in Victoria than in NSW. Victorian legislation makes price guides mandatory on marketing, and price estimates must be accompanied by a statement of information showing comparable sales that inform the estimate. In NSW, Liberal leader Mark Speakman said he would consider the issue of whether vendor reserves should be published, but as yet the party hadn't committed to a position. Start the day with a summary of the day's most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
The Age
17 minutes ago
- The Age
Victorian underquoting laws: Expert calls on Allan government to release review
The Victorian Greens said they would this week introduce a bill to parliament requiring the reserve price of a property to be disclosed before auction day, in a bid to stop buyers unwittingly forking out thousands of dollars on inspection reports for homes they can't realistically afford. The REIV is calling on the government to start fresh consultation on how to improve fairness in the property sector. The peak real estate lobby group is also now backing mandatory pre-auction disclosure of reserve prices by sellers, in a significant policy pivot announced on Monday. Premier Jacinta Allan earlier this month. Credit: Eddie Jim 'Reserve price disclosure isn't just backed by consumer advocates, even the Real Estate Institute of Victoria and leading property industry figures support it,' said Greens public and affordable housing spokeswoman Gabrielle de Vietri. 'With the public and industry on board, Labor has no excuse to delay.' Premier Jacinta Allan said she would seek advice on that proposal and also the merits of a model that would result in those selling their home providing prospective buyers with a free pest and building inspection documents. 'We are open to looking at what we can do to make the property market fairer for everyone,' Allan said. She described underquoting as a 'pretty shabby practice, which is why we're cracking down on it and made it illegal'. Enzo Raimondo, pictured in 2014 when he led the REIV. Credit: Fairfax Raimondo said he couldn't disclose the recommendations made by him and his property market review co-author, consumer advocate Carolyn Bond, due to a confidentiality agreement. But he confirmed the 2022 report did include recommendations he believed would reduce the prevalence of underquoting. 'We spent months on it. We interviewed consumers, we interviewed industry groups, we interviewed agents, and there's some, I think, excellent recommendations on the issue of reserve price [disclosure],' he said. 'It's odd that the review, which is meant to assist, hasn't been released … I can only speak for myself and not the other panel members, but I was certainly disappointed that it wasn't released and at least debated openly on what should occur.' When asked if there was any reason not to make the report public, Allan said the report was a cabinet document, and she was more focused on 'acting now, leading the nation in cracking down on illegal underquoting'. Raimondo said the review received fairly consistent feedback from the public that agents were providing price guides that were off the mark. He said while agents would use the excuse that they're not property valuers, they generally worked in the same sector for a long period and should know their market. The use of three comparable properties to justify price guides was being manipulated by agents and the criteria around this needed to be tightened up, Raimondo said. 'In Victoria, it's not a bad system. It's just that it's not being used correctly,' he said. Start the day with a summary of the day's most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
The Age
17 minutes ago
- The Age
Jacinta Allan faces backbench jitters over preselection
Loading There is also no obvious justification for Allan to seek to have preselections called in. One MP suggested the premier did not have the internal power to override the factions, while another said it provided an opportunity to stamp her authority. On Monday, Allan repeatedly refused to say whether she wanted all her MPs to be re-endorsed, but said she supported her team. 'I'm not going to comment on internal party processes that are still being worked through,' Allan said. 'What I will say is I have a great, strong Labor team who are working hard every single day out and about in their local community.' One MP said they were feeling exposed but that it was 'in the hands of the Victorian ALP factional gods'. 'We all know what we sign up for – at times uncertain, at times brutal, but always united thereafter.' Another MP said some of their colleagues were reluctant to fundraise for their 2026 campaigns until they were sure they would be endorsed to run again. However, another Labor figure said the concerns were just 'nervous energy'. They did not believe there was a serious push to renew the party room by forcing MPs out. Preselections for the upper house are expected to be particularly messy, with MPs elected in the second ticket spot in 2022 at risk of losing their seats if Labor endures a swing. Jostling could result in some MPs being shuffled to safer positions. Labor factions are expected to hammer out the details of a new power-sharing arrangement or stability deal over coming months, which carves out seats and upper house spots to different groupings. This is expected to prompt some wheeling and dealing, involving discussions about moving younger MPs into safer positions on upper house tickets. To do this, factional swaps would be required that could push other MPs into second or third ticket positions, which would be considered less safe. Loading A future stability deal will also have to account for MPs who are part of the Australian Workers Union, who were shut out of the current arrangement but have since reunited with the broader Labor Right. A handful of ministers and backbenchers are also expected to announce in coming months they will not contest the November 2026 election. The Age last month revealed a push to overhaul the way gender quotas are calculated in Victorian Labor's preselections, sparking anger that the number of women selected for winnable seats could go backwards. The draft motion was ultimately withdrawn following internal outrage. Victorian Labor declined to comment. Start the day with a summary of the day's most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
