Kuching High Court upholds conviction of teacher who sexually assaulted six male students but orders jail terms to run concurrently
KUCHING (Aug 15): The High Court here yesterday dismissed the appeal of a boarding school counselling teacher convicted of sexually assaulting six male students, but ordered his prison terms to run concurrently for a total of 15 years.
Judicial Commissioner Datuk Faridz Gohim Abdullah made the decision after dismissing the appeal of the 35-year-old appellant to set aside the sentence and conviction handed down by the Sessions Court on Oct 21, 2022.
The original consecutive sentence against the 35-year-old appellant totalled 90 years, with each charge carrying 15 years' imprisonment.
However, the court upheld the 24 strokes of the cane imposed by the lower court.
All the six charges were framed under Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, which is punishable under Section 14 of the same Act and read together with Section 16 of the same Act, which provides for a jail term of up to 20 years and possible caning upon conviction.
According to the facts of the case, between 11.30pm and 4am in March, April, and May 2018, the teacher sexually assaulted the students, aged between 14 and 16, at separate times and dates in the school compound.
He touched the victims' private parts and thighs, as well as hugged one of them.
Police reports were lodged by all the victims and investigations revealed that several of them had been assaulted on multiple occasions.
Deputy public prosecutor Nor Azhari Yusof appeared for the prosecution.
Related story: Sexually assaulting 6 students gets Sabahan teacher total 90 years' jail, 24 lashes Faridz Gohim Abdullah Kuching High Court lead Nor Azhari Yusof
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
2 hours ago
- Borneo Post
High Court upholds 7-year sentence for man convicted of drug use
Judge Wong emphasised that mental illness does not automatically render someone unfit to plead, and Fadzlan's conduct during proceedings showed he understood the case. – Stock photo SIBU (Aug 15): The High Court here today dismissed Mohamad Fadzlan Shaini's appeal against his conviction and sentence for consuming dangerous drugs. Fadzlan was sentenced by the Kapit Sessions Court on Nov 14 last year to seven years' imprisonment and three strokes of the cane after pleading guilty to consuming amphetamine and methamphetamine under Section 15(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act (DDA) 1952, with sentencing under Section 39C(2) of the Act. In rejecting the appeal, High Court Judge Wong Siong Tung said the Sessions Court had complied with procedural requirements, including explaining the charge and its consequences to the appellant in Bahasa Malaysia, and found no evidence to challenge the legality of the proceedings. Regarding Fadzlan's mental health, the court noted that the medical report presented was neither submitted to the Sessions Court nor conclusive about his fitness to plead. Judge Wong emphasised that mental illness does not automatically render someone unfit to plead, and Fadzlan's conduct during proceedings showed he understood the case. The court also found no evidence that a police officer had influenced Fadzlan's guilty plea. Affidavits submitted failed to show any direct communication between the officer and the appellant. Judge Wong concluded that the appellant's grounds were inconsistent and lacked credibility, upholding the conviction and sentence. Fadzlan, who had a previous drug offence, was represented by lawyer Harold Emparak, while Deputy Public Prosecutor Mark Kenneth Netto represented the prosecution. appeal dismiss drugs jail Kapit Sibu
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Appeals Court reinstates Perak man's eight-month jail term for outraging stepdaughter's modesty
PUTRAJAYA, Aug 15 — The Court of Appeal today reinstated an eight-month prison sentence on a 52-year-old man, for outraging the modesty of his teenage stepdaughter, overturning the High Court's earlier decision to acquit him. A three-man bench, led by Justice Datuk Azman Abdullah, allowed the prosecution's appeal, setting aside the High Court's acquittal, and restoring the conviction and sentence imposed by the Magistrate's Court in November 2023. Delivering the court's unanimous decision, Justice Azman said that the High Court had erred in acquitting and discharging the man, who works as a security guard. He said the High Court judge did not assess the victim's testimony thoroughly, and had ignored her spontaneous response following the incident, which included kicking the respondent (the man), calling for her younger brother, her aunt, and her mother, and lodging a police report. 'We find that there is overwhelming evidence showing the victim to be a credible witness, and her testimony is consistent with the police report,' Justice Azman said, sitting with Justices Datuk Azmi Ariffin and Datuk Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz. He also said that the man's defence that he entered the room to retrieve dirty clothes was unreasonable, as he entered through the bathroom door without knocking on the door, because the victim's room door was locked. The victim's testimony was not a fabrication intended to incriminate the respondent, he added. The Magistrates' Court had earlier found the man guilty of using criminal force with the intention of outraging the victim's modesty. The incident occurred at a house in Muallim district, Perak, at about 9 am on July 9, 2022, when the victim was 19 years old. He subsequently appealed to the High Court, which acquitted and discharged him last year. The prosecution then brought the matter to the Court of Appeal. Deputy public prosecutor Solehah Noratikah Ismail argued that the man's act of entering the victim's locked bedroom via a bathroom connected to the kitchen, while she was asleep, demonstrated malicious intent. The man's lawyer, Siti Umairah Zainudin, submitted that the High Court had correctly acquitted her client after considering inconsistencies in the victim's testimony. — Bernama
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Hannah Yeoh files bankruptcy notice against Kamarul Zaman for unpaid damages
KUALA LUMPUR: Segambut MP Hannah Yeoh has initiated bankruptcy proceedings against Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) lecturer Dr Kamarul Zaman Yusoff for unpaid defamation damages exceeding RM400,000. The High Court had ordered Kamarul Zaman to compensate Yeoh RM400,000 in damages and RM80,000 in costs for defamatory remarks made eight years ago. Yeoh's lawyer, Sangeet Kaur Deo, confirmed the bankruptcy notice was filed on July 9 but could not be served directly to Kamarul Zaman. The court subsequently approved alternative service methods, including newspaper advertisements, on July 29. Kamarul Zaman has since applied to stay the court's decision pending an appeal at the Court of Appeal. The stay application hearing is scheduled for August 28, allowing Yeoh to enforce the judgment in the meantime. On May 30, Judge Datuk Aliza Sulaiman ruled in Yeoh's favour, dismissing Kamarul Zaman's claim that she lacked legal standing to sue. The defamation case stemmed from Facebook posts in 2017 where Kamarul Zaman accused Yeoh of promoting Christianity through her political role. He cited her autobiography, 'Becoming Hannah: A Personal Journey,' as alleged proof of a Christian agenda to influence Malaysia. Kamarul Zaman denied the posts were defamatory, maintaining his statements were justified. - Bernama
