Where does OU land in ESPN's preseason bowl projections?
Kyle Bonagura and Mark Schlabach cover college football for ESPN, and they released their preseason bowl projections on Friday morning. Both believe that Oklahoma will make it to a 27th-straight bowl game, but will fall short of the College Football Playoff.
Bonagura has the Sooners slated to play in the TransPerfect Music City Bowl, which will be played in Nashville, Tennessee, on December 30th. Oklahoma's projected opponent in that game is Minnesota, out of the Big Ten.
The Sooners are undefeated all-time against the Golden Gophers, with both wins coming in the late-Barry Switzer era. OU won a close 13-7 contest on the road in 1985 on its way to a national title, then dominated Minnesota 63-0 at home in 1986.
Missouri beat Iowa in the 2024 edition of the Music City Bowl.
Meanwhile, Schlabach has Oklahoma renewing an old conference rivalry with Baylor. He has the Sooners and the Bears facing off in the AutoZone Liberty Bowl, which will be played in Memphis, Tennessee, on January 2nd.
The two teams have faced off 33 total times. OU owns a 28-5 advantage in the series, but Baylor has won the last two matchups, which came in 2021 and 2022. The two teams played two thrillers in 2019, with Oklahoma ruining Baylor's undefeated season by coming back from a 28-3 deficit in Waco in the regular season to win 34-31. The rematch came in the Big 12 Championship Game, where the Sooners won in overtime 30-23, bumping the Bears out of the College Football Playoff race and securing a spot themselves.
Arkansas beat Texas Tech in the 2024 edition of the Liberty Bowl.
A berth in the Music City Bowl or the Liberty Bowl certainly isn't where Sooner Nation hopes this season will end up. However, the opportunity to play a historic team from the Big Ten or get some revenge against an old league foe would, at least, be a fun consolation prize if that's how 2025 turns out.
Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
41 minutes ago
- New York Times
Need a College Football Playoff expansion plan that makes sense? Look to the FCS format
In case you haven't heard, the latest crackpot College Football Playoff expansion idea was presented to Big Ten athletic directors recently. It goes something like this (you're forgiven if you lose track): Either 24 or 28 teams, with the Big Ten and SEC receiving six or seven automatic bids, the Big 12 and ACC receiving two fewer and four slots designated for non-automatic qualifiers. Advertisement Come again? In recent months, CFP expansion has flooded the discourse, with the SEC and Big Ten's standoff over whether there should be a 16-team bracket with five conference champions and 11 at-larges or Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti's plan, which includes four autobids each for his league and the SEC, two each for the Big 12 and ACC, and one for the Group of 5. This is all nonsense. Codifying favored status for a conference into a postseason format is now a four-decade college football tradition, dating back to the Bowl Alliance and Bowl Championship Series days, but that doesn't make it right. Let's course correct, starting with the next iteration of the CFP. There's one Playoff format that has proven to work and would appease almost everyone in the sport. It can be found in the FCS ranks. And it's pretty simple. Twenty-four teams qualify. Ten of them are conference champions. The rest are at-large entrants selected by a committee. The top eight seeds receive a first-round bye, the other 16 play each other, and off we go. Sounds a lot simpler than 4-4-2-2-1-3 or 7-7-5-5-4 or whatever the heck else is floating around. Before you poo-poo the idea and decry an even bigger role for the selection committee, consider the upside. This format provides a path to the Playoff for virtually every team in the FBS. Win your league, and you're in. It's right. It's fair. And it would work. Also, it allows the two wealthiest conferences — the Big Ten and SEC — more teams into the field, via at-large selection. Upset that 9-3 Alabama didn't make it last year? South Carolina, Ole Miss, Missouri and Illinois — also all 9-3 last year — would have made it in such a format. So would Miami from the ACC and BYU from the Big 12, a team that somehow wasn't even in the conversation despite an impressive 10-2 campaign and a road win over a team that made the Playoff last year, SMU. At the end of the day, chances are the SEC and Big Ten would gobble up a large chunk of those 14 at-larges, and the Big 12 and ACC would get a few extras, too. Everybody wins. Advertisement But the FCS format would also create opportunities for schools in other conferences as well. Instead of having 68 teams outside the Power 4 vie for one berth, the American, Conference USA, MAC, Mountain West, Pac-12 (once it has eight teams again in 2026) and Sun Belt would each get one team in the field. Though having a true Cinderella in the CFP is much less likely to develop than it is in the NCAA basketball tournament or other sports because of football's physical nature and the role depth plays, it's still fairer than what we have now. The fact that we have allowed college football as a sport to predetermine which conferences get autobids and which don't without any officially stated objective criteria never sat right with me. If you purport to all be in the same subdivision — the FBS — then every league's champion deserves respect and a seat at the table. 'People have been grandfathered in over the course of time and some have a seat at the table and some don't and they're deemed Autonomous Four and everyone else is not, and here's your one seat at the table to get to the CFP,' Boise State athletic director Jeramiah Dickey told The Athletic in May. 'That just doesn't feel right.' A system like this works in other sports as well, most notably in basketball every March. It works in the NFL — division champions get an auto bid, then wild-card teams get the rest of the berths (via records, not a committee, of course). The biggest sport that has a system similar to what the Big Ten is proposing is European soccer, via the Champions League. Some leagues, like the Premier League, get more bids to the tournament each year than others. It's wildly popular — I'm a fan and I watch it annually — and some may argue that something akin to the Big Ten's proposals makes sense because college football operates more like European soccer than it does the NFL. They have a point, but I still say, why not create a system that gives both equal access to each conference and still allows the 'big dogs' the added opportunities they desire? Advertisement A 24-team field, using the FCS format, would have looked like this last year, using the final CFP rankings and a straight seeding format. For the unranked G5 champs, I used Chris Vannini's final 134 to order them. Byes: Remaining seeds: Now, I know what you might be thinking. The Big Ten isn't doing this for fairness — it's doing it for money. It's true. The idea of installing multiple automatic bids for conferences is a money play. I don't see hordes of fans calling for conferences to get multiple bids. Only conference commissioners — or their coaches, who follow their lead — are advocating for a bigger piece of the financial pie, which, by the way, the Big Ten and SEC already get. When is enough enough? An expanded Playoff is going to mean more money, no matter what format it is, autobids or not. That's not to say the FCS format is necessarily the best solution available. There are other alternatives, like keeping the 12-team format (nothing wrong with that! We're only one year in!) or eliminating autobids, taking the top 12/16/24 teams regardless of conference affiliation. But that increases subjectivity even more. And if you're concerned about going to 24 teams creating a precedent that we're always going to look to expand further, I'm sorry to inform you: We got on that path as soon as we established a Playoff. There will always be advocacy for expansion as long as expanding the postseason equates to more dollars. Even the FCS format has undergone expansion multiple times, from four in 1978 (sound familiar?) to eight in 1981, 12 in 1982, 16 in 1986, 20 in 2010 and the current 24-team format in 2013. If we're going to change the College Football Playoff format, let's do it in a way that doesn't perpetuate an inherently unfair postseason system through multiple conference autobids. Let's use something that has proven to work. It's right there if the power brokers are willing to just open their eyes and ears and, for once, consider the greater good of the sport. (Photo of Cam Miller: George Walker / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Carson Beck, Miami are one of college football's biggest unknowns
Josh Pate previews the Hurricanes' 2025 season and explains why a difficult late-season schedule could make it to advance to the College Football Playoff. Subscribe to 'Josh Pate's College Football Show' on YouTube. View more Video Transcript What do you expect from Miami this year? I've been asked that, so I'll ask all of you that because the one thing that I think we need to do a better job of on this campus here at FSU is we need to make sure that if I'm gonna get trashed for my predictions, which is totally fair, and it is within your constitutional right that you have to state your prediction up front. So I haven't even made a Miami prediction yet, but if you think Miami's gonna be trash this year, that's OK, but let me know in August. There's a comment section. It works here. I know it works here. So let me know in August. No, I mean everyone knows in December whether something went good or went bad, but they're an unknown. They're an unknown because Carson Beck's the quarterback there. They're an unknown because the offensive and defensive lines profile as the kind of lines of scrimmage That could land you in a national championship game, but no one's predicting Miami to go to the national title game. Half of you aren't even predicting them in the playoffs. In fact, three quarters of you aren't predicting them in the playoffs, and that's because you either don't trust the coaching staff, you don't trust the quarterback, you don't trust the defense. And speaking of that, Corey, Heatherman, year one, are they gonna make a quantum leap in defensive production? I, I think their personnel is a little bit better than what D'Anton Lynn had to work with when he got to USC or what Blake Baker had to work with when he got to LSU, but it's a total unknown and they got a much more difficult schedule for those of you who, um, unfortunately and regrettably took an offseason. I haven't spoken to you about Miami's schedule. Miami's schedule is such that If they were to make the conference title game. That would be their eighth game in a row because the ACC has seen fit to give, I think, three of their teams both of their byes within a fifteen day period. Don't let you people say I'm not qualified to be the commissioner of this sport, but yet the people who are running the sport are putting schedules together like this. Listen to this. Miami plays Florida on the twentieth of September by week. They play FSU October fourth, another bye week. They're done. No more bye weeks the rest of the year: Louisville, Stanford, at SMU, Syracuse, NC State at Virginia Tech and at Pitt back to back road games in cold weather late November for a team from South Florida to end the year. And if they make it through all that and they're good enough to play in Charlotte, that is a third consecutive game away from home, maybe in cold weather, who knows what Charlotte has in store for you in December, but anyway. It's a much more difficult path to navigate with, I would say, more uncertainty this year, but that's what makes it an unknown that's not necessarily what makes it a weakness. Close
USA Today
13 hours ago
- USA Today
Where does OU land in ESPN's preseason bowl projections?
The Oklahoma Sooners are two weeks away from kicking off their 2025 season. OU's first game will come at home against Illinois State on August 30th. The Sooners are looking to keep their 26-season streak of making a bowl game alive this year, but they hope to achieve much more than just another bowl game in 2025. Kyle Bonagura and Mark Schlabach cover college football for ESPN, and they released their preseason bowl projections on Friday morning. Both believe that Oklahoma will make it to a 27th-straight bowl game, but will fall short of the College Football Playoff. Bonagura has the Sooners slated to play in the TransPerfect Music City Bowl, which will be played in Nashville, Tennessee, on December 30th. Oklahoma's projected opponent in that game is Minnesota, out of the Big Ten. The Sooners are undefeated all-time against the Golden Gophers, with both wins coming in the late-Barry Switzer era. OU won a close 13-7 contest on the road in 1985 on its way to a national title, then dominated Minnesota 63-0 at home in 1986. Missouri beat Iowa in the 2024 edition of the Music City Bowl. Meanwhile, Schlabach has Oklahoma renewing an old conference rivalry with Baylor. He has the Sooners and the Bears facing off in the AutoZone Liberty Bowl, which will be played in Memphis, Tennessee, on January 2nd. The two teams have faced off 33 total times. OU owns a 28-5 advantage in the series, but Baylor has won the last two matchups, which came in 2021 and 2022. The two teams played two thrillers in 2019, with Oklahoma ruining Baylor's undefeated season by coming back from a 28-3 deficit in Waco in the regular season to win 34-31. The rematch came in the Big 12 Championship Game, where the Sooners won in overtime 30-23, bumping the Bears out of the College Football Playoff race and securing a spot themselves. Arkansas beat Texas Tech in the 2024 edition of the Liberty Bowl. A berth in the Music City Bowl or the Liberty Bowl certainly isn't where Sooner Nation hopes this season will end up. However, the opportunity to play a historic team from the Big Ten or get some revenge against an old league foe would, at least, be a fun consolation prize if that's how 2025 turns out. Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.
