logo
AP: Reports of Govt's Planned Incentives for ArcelorMittal-Nippon Steel Reveal Its True Priorities

AP: Reports of Govt's Planned Incentives for ArcelorMittal-Nippon Steel Reveal Its True Priorities

The Wire3 days ago

Vizag Steel Plant. Photo: Av9, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute Now
New Delhi: The news that ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel (AM/NS) India is poised to receive a staggering incentive package for the first phase of its Anakapalli greenfield project – a facility just 60 km from the Vizag Steel Plant (VSP) – is not just a business development; it's a damning indictment.
For years, the VSP has been met with carefully worded 'packages' from the Union government, platitudes from state leadership and a persistent, deafening silence on its most critical need: captive iron ore mines.
The AM/NS deal is eye-watering. For an initial investment of Rs 56,000 crore in a 7.3 million tonne capacity plant, the Andhra Pradesh government is reportedly offering benefits spread over two decades.
These include stamp duty exemptions, 100% GST reimbursement for 15 years, electricity duty waivers, subsidised power at Re 1/unit and industrial water at Rs 50/kL.
Furthermore, AM/NS is being facilitated with a captive port, a critical logistical advantage.
This proactive, comprehensive support is precisely what the VSP has been starved of for decades.
Contrast this with the narrative spun around the VSP. Following the Union cabinet's approval of an Rs 11,440-crore 'special package' for the plant earlier this year, chief minister N. Chandrababu Naidu confidently declared the privatisation threat 'over,' urging VSP employees to 'work hard and utilise taxpayers' funds efficiently.'
This, even as his government was evidently deep in negotiations to roll out the red carpet for AM/NS.
Indeed, that VSP package – a mix of equity and repayable preferential shares – was fraught with questions from the start, doing little to address the plant's Rs 35,000 crore-plus liabilities or its fundamental structural infirmity: the lack of captive mines, which makes its raw material costs up to ten times higher than for competitors.
The Department of Investment and Public Asset Management confirmed only in April, in response to a query by labour leader Padi Thrinadha Rao, that its policy of 100% disinvestment for the VSP remains firmly 'unchanged.'
This renders the Rs 11,440 crore package, and Naidu's assurances, as little more than political obfuscation – a temporary balm designed perhaps to quell public discontent or, more cynically, to ready a 'distressed' asset for a private suitor, as Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader Ch Narsingha Rao astutely pointed out earlier this year.
One cannot help but wonder: what if even a portion of the AM/NS bonanza, say the Rs 28,000 crore, had been strategically directed towards VSP?
Such an infusion, coupled with a genuine commitment from both the state and the Union government to secure captive iron ore mines could have decisively addressed its debt burden and operational inefficiencies.
It could have unshackled the VSP from reliance on expensive market-rate ore, allowing it to leverage its prime land assets (worth an estimated Rs 2 lakh crore) and operate at its full 7.3 million tonne capacity, potentially generating profits to clear remaining debts within years. This is not fantasy; it's basic industrial economics.
Instead, we witness the state government actively soliciting Union government assistance for AM/NS's raw material supply and fast-tracking its clearances, including a 2.9 km stretch of coastline for a captive port. This is the kind of proactive support the VSP has only dreamt of.
As former Union secretary E.A.S. Sarma has consistently highlighted, the refusal to grant the VSP captive mines, while readily allocating them to private players, is the 'root cause of VSP's financial woes.' The state's facilitation of a direct competitor, AM/NS, complete with a captive port that could erode the Visakhapatnam Port Trust's viability, adds insult to injury.
The narrative that the VSP is a 'white elephant' due to worker inefficiency, a line subtly pushed by asking employees to 'work hard' to justify taxpayer money, crumbles under scrutiny. The VSP has demonstrated profitability even in challenging periods (Rs 930 crore in 2020-21). The 'laziness' jibe is a convenient, if disingenuous, deflection from the systemic handicaps imposed upon it.
The NDA government's actions, both at the Union government and in Andhra Pradesh, reek of a meticulously orchestrated strategy: publicly project concern for the VSP with insufficient, conditional aid, while paving a golden path for a major private competitor.
The Rs 11,440-crore VSP package increasingly looks like a pre-privatisation touch-up, an attempt to make the books slightly more palatable before the eventual strategic sale, a sale the Union government remains committed to. The new AM/NS incentives reveal where the government's true priorities and energies lie.
This isn't merely about fiscal prudence or fostering industrial growth; it's about a fundamental, perhaps ideological, bias. If the state can underwrite nearly half the initial investment for a private entity like AM/NS with long-term sops, its failure to offer a truly transformative, structurally sound revival plan for the VSP – a plant intrinsically linked to Andhra's identity and employing thousands – is a profound betrayal.
The 'double-engine' government, it appears, runs full steam for private enterprise, while the engine meant to power public sector revival sputters on rhetoric and half-measures.
The thousands of VSP employees, whose 'steely resolve' has kept the plant running and protests alive for over three years, deserve more than hollow assurances and the sight of a new, heavily subsidised competitor rising nearby.
They deserve genuine commitment, starting with the one thing that can truly level the playing field: captive mines and support on par with what is now being offered to AM/NS.
Anything less confirms that the pronouncements of saving VSP are just that – talk, designed to mislead and hoodwink, while the groundwork for its dismantling continues apace.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Fixing accountability, initiating projects to produce skilled workforce top priorities': Himachal Pradesh University V-C
‘Fixing accountability, initiating projects to produce skilled workforce top priorities': Himachal Pradesh University V-C

Indian Express

time13 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Fixing accountability, initiating projects to produce skilled workforce top priorities': Himachal Pradesh University V-C

After being appointed as the Vice-Chancellor of Himachal Pradesh University on Monday, Prof. Mahavir Singh shared with The Indian Express that his top priorities would be establishing accountability and enhancing the standard of research. He also emphasised the need to create centres to produce skilled students, particularly in the field of Green Energy. Meanwhile, a regular Vice Chancellor of HPU Shimla was appointed after a gap of three years. Q: What are your priorities as the V-C? HPU is a prestigious institute, but our university lacks projects relevant to modern times. For instance, when the entire country, especially Himachal Pradesh, is talking about Green Energy, I feel HPU should have a separate wing to deliver skilled scholars in this field. Second, I believe the standard of research at the university should be improved. When I joined HPU as a faculty member, the standard of research at that time was quite higher than what we see today. Third, student exchange programmes are very important for their growth and the growth of the university. Q: HPU had no regular V-C for three years. Do you think this has hurt the university's progress? Besides communication gaps, there were certain shortcomings in day-to-day proceedings in the absence of a regular Vice-Chancellor. Also, the person with the additional V-C charge couldn't come to the university every day. Shortcomings include indiscipline on the part of students as well as faculty members. I will take feedback from every individual to help increase and fix accountability. There is no doubt that HPU staff and faculty members are very hardworking, but what they need is direction. Q: How are you going to address the financial crunch issue? In 2025-26, HPU had prepared an estimated budget of Rs 300 crore but received Rs 152 crore, the same amount it had in 2024-25. I have been a member of the HPU Executive Committee (EC) for a long time, so I understand this problem. Merely increasing the students' fees is not the solution. We have to develop means to generate revenue, like introducing professional courses. I have decided to take up the matter with Governor Shiv Pratap Shukla and Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu, because the past two to three financial years saw HPU receiving the same budget, approximately Rs 152 crore. The liabilities, particularly of pensioners, have been increasing every year. The university should be able to bear these liabilities. Q: Have you been expecting your selection as the V-C? I was among the top five shortlisted contenders. The search and screening committee interviewed me, too. I was hopeful that I would be selected for this responsibility.

Ola Electric Shares Dip 7% As 3.2% Stake Changes Hands Via Block Deal; Time To Sell?
Ola Electric Shares Dip 7% As 3.2% Stake Changes Hands Via Block Deal; Time To Sell?

News18

time14 minutes ago

  • News18

Ola Electric Shares Dip 7% As 3.2% Stake Changes Hands Via Block Deal; Time To Sell?

Last Updated: Shares of Ola Electric Mobility Ltd were under significant pressure in Tuesday's trading session, dropping as much as 7.04% Ola Electric Share Price: Shares of Ola Electric Mobility Ltd were under significant pressure in Tuesday's trading session, dropping as much as 7.04 per cent to a low of Rs 49.91. The stock was last seen 5.9 per cent lower at Rs 50.52, extending its six-month losses to 48.74 per cent. On the earnings front, the EV-focused company reported a consolidated net loss of Rs 870 crore for the January-March 2025 quarter (Q4 FY25), widening from Rs 416 crore in the same period last year. Revenue from operations plunged 59.48 per cent year-on-year (YoY) to Rs 611 crore, down from Rs 1,508 crore in the year-ago quarter. What Should Investors Do? Kotak Institutional Equities has maintained a 'Downgrade' rating on the stock, slashing its target price to Rs 30 per share. This suggests a potential downside of nearly 44 per cent from its previous close at Rs 53.24. The brokerage warned that Ola Electric is likely to continue facing EBITDA losses due to weakening brand equity and intensifying competition, as noted in a CNBC-TV18 report. It also flagged challenges in the company's entry into the motorcycle segment, citing execution and credibility concerns. Technical Indicators Show Mixed Signals Technically, Ola Electric's stock is currently trading below five of its eight key simple moving averages (SMAs) — including the 5-day, 10-day, 100-day, 150-day, and 200-day SMAs — pointing to bearish signals across various timeframes. However, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 57.7 indicates the stock is neither overbought nor oversold. Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) remains positive at 0.4, staying above the center and signal lines, which suggests some ongoing bullish momentum. For the full fiscal year 2024-25 (FY25), Ola Electric posted a net loss of Rs 2,276 crore, compared with Rs 1,584 crore in FY24. Revenue from operations also fell to Rs 4,514 crore, down from Rs 5,010 crore in FY24. The company said its gross margins improved by 38 per cent YoY in FY25, and in Q1 FY26, gross margins saw a 10 percentage point sequential improvement. Ola Electric aims to achieve profitability in the current fiscal year (FY26), focusing on revenue growth and operating leverage. 'FY26 will be focused on scaling revenue and operating leverage as the company marches towards sustainable profitability," it stated in a filing.

Court Rejects Patanjali Ayurved's Petition Against Rs 273.5 Crore GST Penalty
Court Rejects Patanjali Ayurved's Petition Against Rs 273.5 Crore GST Penalty

NDTV

time16 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Court Rejects Patanjali Ayurved's Petition Against Rs 273.5 Crore GST Penalty

Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has dismissed Patanjali Ayurved Limited's petition challenging Rs 273.50-crore goods and service tax (GST) penalty. A division bench comprising Justices Shekhar B Saraf and Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit rejected Patanjali's argument that such penalties constitute criminal liability and can be imposed only after a criminal trial. The bench was of the view that tax authorities can impose penalties under Section 122 of the GST Act through civil proceedings without requiring criminal court trials. The court clarified that GST penalty proceedings are civil in nature and can be adjudicated by proper officers. "After detailed analysis, it is clear that the proceeding under Section 122 of the CGST Act is to be adjudicated by the adjudicating officer and is not required to undergo prosecution," the bench said. Patanjali Ayurved operates three manufacturing units at Haridwar (Uttarakhand), Sonipat (Haryana) and Ahmednagar (Maharashtra). The company came under investigation following information received by authorities about suspicious transactions involving firms with high Input Tax Credit (ITC) utilisation but no income tax credentials. The investigation led to allegations that Patanjali "acting as a main person indulged in circular trading of tax invoices only on paper without actual supply of goods". The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Ghaziabad issued a show cause notice on April 19, 2024 to Patanjali Ayurved, proposing a penalty of Rs 273.51 crore under Section 122(1), clauses (ii) and (vii) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017. Later, the DGGI dropped tax demands under Section 74 through an adjudication order dated January 10, 2025. The department found that "for all the commodities, the quantities sold were always more than the quantities purchased from the suppliers, thereby making the observation that all the ITC which was availed in the impugned goods was further passed on by the petitioner". Despite dropping the tax demand, authorities decided to continue with penalty proceedings under Section 122, prompting Patanjali to challenge this before the high court. After hearing both sides, the court in its judgment dated May 29 dismissed the petition.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store