logo
Trump's tariffs are making money. That may make them hard to quit

Trump's tariffs are making money. That may make them hard to quit

Time of India4 days ago
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's
extensive tariffs
have already started to generate a
significant amount of money
for the federal government, a new source of revenue for a heavily indebted nation that American policymakers may start to rely on.
As part of his quest to reorder the global trading system, Trump has imposed steep tariffs on America's trading partners, with the bulk of those set to go into effect Thursday. Even before the latest tariffs kick in, revenue from taxes collected on
imported goods
has grown dramatically so far this year. Customs duties, along with some excise taxes, generated $152 billion through July, roughly double the $78 billion netted over the same time period last fiscal year, according to Treasury data.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Data Analytics
Cybersecurity
Leadership
Data Science
Others
MBA
Data Science
healthcare
Project Management
Operations Management
PGDM
MCA
Healthcare
CXO
Technology
Design Thinking
others
Artificial Intelligence
Degree
Digital Marketing
Public Policy
Management
Product Management
Finance
Skills you'll gain:
Data Analysis & Visualization
Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning
Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making
Analytics Strategy & Implementation
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Applied Business Analytics
Starts on
Jun 13, 2024
Get Details
Indeed, Trump has routinely cited the tariff revenue as evidence that his trade approach, which has sowed uncertainty and begun to increase prices for consumers, is a win for the United States. Members of his administration have argued that the money from the tariffs would help plug the hole created by the broad tax cuts Congress passed last month, which are expected to cost the government at least $3.4 trillion.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
"The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!" Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labor market.
Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than $2 trillion in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that doesn't happen and the United States abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit.
Live Events
"I think this is addictive," said Joao Gomes, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. "I think a source of revenue is very hard to turn away from when the debt and deficit are what they are."
Trump has long fantasized about replacing taxes on income with tariffs. He often refers fondly to American fiscal policy in the late 19th century, when there was no income tax and the government relied on tariffs, citing that as a model for the future. And while income and payroll taxes remain by far the most important sources of government revenue, the combination of
Trump's tariffs
and the latest Republican tax cut does, on the margin, move the United States away from taxing earnings and toward taxing goods.
Such a shift is expected to be regressive, meaning that rich Americans will fare better than poorer Americans under the change. That's because cutting taxes on income does, in general, provide the biggest benefit to richer Americans who earn the most income. The recent Republican cut to income taxes and the social safety net is perhaps the most regressive piece of major legislation in decades.
Placing new taxes on imported products, however, is expected to raise the cost of everyday goods. Lower-income Americans spend more of their earnings on those more expensive goods, meaning the tariffs amount to a larger tax increase for them compared with richer Americans.
Tariffs have begun to bleed into consumer prices, with many companies saying they will have to start raising prices as a result of added costs. And analysts expect the tariffs to weigh on the performance of the economy overall, which in turn could reduce the amount of traditional income tax revenue the government collects every year.
"Is there a better way to raise that amount of revenue? The economic answer is: Yes, there is a better way, there are more efficient ways," said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and a former Biden administration official. "But it's really a political question."
Tedeschi said that future leaders in Washington, whether Republican or Democrat, may be hesitant to roll back the tariffs if that would mean a further addition to the federal debt load, which is already raising alarms on Wall Street. And replacing the tariff revenue with another type of tax increase would require Congress to act, while the tariffs would be a legacy decision made by a previous president.
"Congress may not be excited about taking such a politically risky vote when they didn't have to vote on tariffs in the first place," Tedeschi said.
Some in Washington are already starting to think about how they could spend the tariff revenue. Trump recently floated the possibility of sending Americans a cash rebate for the tariffs, and Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recently introduced legislation to send $600 to many Americans. "We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate, but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt," Trump said last month of the tariffs.
Democrats, once they return to power, may face a similar temptation to use the tariff revenue to fund a new social program, especially if raising taxes in Congress proves as challenging as it has in the past. As it is, Democrats have been divided over tariffs. Maintaining the status quo may be an easier political option than changing trade policy.
"That's a hefty chunk of change," Tyson Brody, a Democratic strategist, said of the tariffs. "The way that Democrats are starting to think about it is not that 'these will be impossible to withdraw.' It's: 'Oh, look, there's now going to be a large pot of money to use and reprogram.'"
Of course, the tariffs could prove unpopular, and future elected officials may want to take steps that could lower consumer prices. At the same time, the amount of revenue the tariffs generate could decline over time if companies do, in fact, end up bringing back more of their operations to the United States, reducing the number of goods that face the import tax.
"This is clearly not an efficient way to gather revenue," said Alex Jacquez, a former Biden official and the chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal group. "And I don't think it would be a long-term progressive priority as a way to simply collect revenue."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's new India tariffs could hit American household kitchen cabinet. Here's how, why?
Donald Trump's new India tariffs could hit American household kitchen cabinet. Here's how, why?

Economic Times

timea minute ago

  • Economic Times

Donald Trump's new India tariffs could hit American household kitchen cabinet. Here's how, why?

Live Events FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A dash of this and a pinch of that could cost more in American kitchens with new tariffs on goods from India. Many spices used by home chefs, restaurants and large manufacturers are imported from India, and the 50 per cent tariffs on the country imposed by President Donald Trump could drive costs higher, a trade association warned year, the United States imported more than $410 million in spices from India, according to the U.S. Department of essential spices, including cinnamon, pepper, nutmeg and cloves, require tropical climates and, therefore, cannot be grown in the United States on a large enough scale to meet demand, Laura Shumow, executive director of the American Spice Trade Association, said in a spice industry is one of many sectors that are tallying up the potential costs of Trump's trade wars with various partners, warning that the fallout could hit either profits at American companies or consumers' late June, executives at McCormick warned that Trump's tariff policy could cost the spice company $90 million a year."Tariffs on these products -- including additional new tariffs announced this week -- do not incentivize U.S. production or create American jobs," Shumow said. "Instead, they place an undue financial burden on U.S. food manufacturers, restaurants and, ultimately, American consumers."The spice association noted that in the framework of a trade deal with Indonesia, the Trump administration had created the potential for exemptions or reductions in tariffs for commodities not naturally available or produced in the United States. The trade group said it hoped a similar framework could be put into agreements with other nations."We firmly believe that smart, targeted trade policies can support the U.S. spice industry and other American businesses," Shumow said, "while helping to keep grocery costs down for families."A1. President Donald Trump has imposed 50 per cent tariffs on India.A2. Last year, the United States imported more than $410 million in spices from India, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Tokenization Boom? Wall Street Still Isn't Biting, JPMorgan Says
Tokenization Boom? Wall Street Still Isn't Biting, JPMorgan Says

Mint

timea minute ago

  • Mint

Tokenization Boom? Wall Street Still Isn't Biting, JPMorgan Says

(Bloomberg) -- Despite billions poured into blockchain initiatives promising to reshape finance, the idea of putting traditional assets like bonds, funds and private credit on blockchain rails has yet to win over major institutional investors. The market for tokenized real-world assets — long touted as crypto's bridge to mainstream finance — remains small, with a total value of just $25 billion, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. And most of that, the bank says, is driven by crypto-native firms rather than Wall Street incumbents. For all the hype, the total tokenized asset base remains 'rather insignificant,' JPMorgan strategists led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou wrote in a recent note. Key obstacles include fragmented cross-border regulation, legal uncertainty, and limited trust in the enforceability of smart contracts, or blockchain-based computer programs. 'This rather disappointing picture on tokenization also reflects traditional investors not seeing a need for it thus far,' the team wrote. 'There is also little evidence so far of banks or customers moving from traditional bank deposits to tokenized bank deposits on blockchains.' Tokenization — the process of creating blockchain-based representations of real-world assets such as stocks or Treasury bills — has been touted as a way to make financial markets faster, cheaper and more transparent. In theory, tokenized funds could offer near-instant settlement and disintermediate legacy infrastructure. But that vision remains largely theoretical. Some firms are experimenting. Fidelity Investments filed for an 'on-chain' share class of its Treasury money market fund this year. ETF and mutual-fund manager VanEck launched its tokenized VBILL fund with similar exposure to government debt. BlackRock Inc.'s digital liquidity fund, BUIDL, peaked at $2.9 billion in assets in May before slipping to $2.3 billion as of Aug. 6, according to tracker Washington is also paying attention. The US Securities and Exchange Commission recently launched 'Project Crypto,' a new initiative under Chair Paul Atkins to explore how US markets might adopt blockchain-based settlement. But so far, real-world adoption remains narrow and shallow. Secondary market activity in tokenized bonds and private assets is minimal. Even the $15 billion in tokenized private credit cited by JPMorgan is heavily concentrated among a handful of players. Still, proponents argue tokenization is following a slow but inevitable adoption curve, mirroring the early days of the internet or ETFs. If regulatory clarity improves and infrastructure matures, some say the technology could eventually reshape the plumbing of financial markets. For now, traditional investors still see limited utility. The existing financial system continues to get faster and more efficient — undermining the need for radical change — while concerns about legal clarity, operational risk, and ecosystem fragmentation persist. 'It remains to be seen how effective regulations would be in addressing institutional investors' hurdles and concerns,' JPMorgan wrote, adding that institutional interest in crypto remains largely confined to Bitcoin exposure. --With assistance from Olga Kharif and Denitsa Tsekova.

Donald Trump to sign order requiring universities to submit admissions data on race
Donald Trump to sign order requiring universities to submit admissions data on race

Hindustan Times

timea minute ago

  • Hindustan Times

Donald Trump to sign order requiring universities to submit admissions data on race

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday that US President Donald Trump is expected to sign a memorandum requiring universities with federal funding to submit their admissions data to prove that they are not engaging in any discriminatory practices. The Trump administration has been pushing elite college admissions offices towards a "merit-based" process. (Reuters) Leavitt shared the news on the microblogging platform X. The presidential memorandum, which Trump is expected to approve on Thursday, directs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to expand the scope of requiring reports from institutions' admissions data to "provide adequate transparency" and "to increase accuracy checks" on that data, CNN reported. The US Supreme Court had in June 2023 ruled that colleges and universities could not longer consider race as a basis for admission, terming it to be 'unconstitutional'. In a landmark decision, SCOTUS overturned the long-standing precedent that benefited students of colour in higher education. Citing that there is not enough admissions data from the universities, the White House raised "concerns about whether race is actually used in admissions decisions in practice". ALSO READ | Columbia University to pay $200 million as settlement to Trump administration: Here's why McMahon will also be expected to revamp the higher education database known as the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, which carries out surveys to review trends in tuition and fees, admissions considerations, enrollment and financial aid, the report mentioned. The latest development against the backdrop of Trump's continued emphasis on policy changes at universities and colleges, including Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives. Just recently, two Ivy League universities, Columbia and Brown, agreed to disclose admissions and race data in a settlement with the Trump administration. The administration will reportedly gain access to the standardised test scores and grade point averages of all applicants, including information about their race, a move that could potentially alter college admissions, The New York Times reported. The Trump administration is pushing to bring elite college admissions offices toward "merit-based" processes, which give higher weightage to grades and test scores. Education Secretary Linda McMahon had said while announcing the Brown deal, "Because of the Trump administration's resolution agreement with Brown University, aspiring students will be judged solely on their merits, not their race or sex."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store