Operation Sindoor is ‘Modi normal', no third party behind ceasefire: Jaishankar; Opp flags lapses
Intervening in the special discussion on Operation Sindoor and Pahalgam terror attack in the Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar castigated the Congress over its governments' apathetic response to the incidents of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism.
During his hour-long speech, he referred to the previous Congress-led UPA government's 'inaction' in the wake of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack, saying 'there is a Congress normal… and a Modi normal'.
'There is a Congress normal, which I spoke about, and there is a (Narendra) Modi normal… The Modi normal is terrorists are not proxies. Number two, cross-border terrorism will get an appropriate response in our way, at our time. Three, talks and terror will not go together. If there are talks, it will only be about terror. Number four, we will not give in to nuclear blackmail. And number five, terrorism and good neighbourliness cannot go together,' he said.
The Opposition MPs kept their guns trained on the government, asking it to come clean on President Trump's claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan.
Apart from Jaishankar, Leader of the House J P Nadda, the BJP president, also slammed the Congress for its 'appeasement' of Pakistan.
Taking on the Opposition, Jaishankar said, 'Kaan khol ke sun lein (listen carefully), April 22 se June 16 tak ek bhi phone call President (Donald) Trump and Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi ke beech mein nahi huyi
PM Modi and President Trump did not have any phone calls between April 22, when the Pahalgam attack took place, and June 16,' he said.
He took a jibe at Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Jairam Ramesh as 'China gurus', who took 'private tuitions' from Chinese diplomats.
The Congress recently questioned Jaishankar's visit to China, while Gandhi flagged a 'two-front challenge' from China and Pakistan while attacking the Modi government.
Nadda mounted a scathing attack on the Congress for its 'appeasement' of Pakistan during the UPA regime between 2004-2014 despite numerous terror attacks. He likened the Modi government's tenure as a period of 'full moon' as against amavasya (dark period) of the Congress rule.
'We are a responsive, responsible, sensitive, pro-active government who responds as per need of the hour, whereas your (Congress rule) was inactive, lukewarm, non-reactive, non-responsive. Only when you see the full sequence and chronology of the dark period, can you appreciate the period that came afterwards,' he said.
RJD MP Manoj Kumar Jha said the pain of those who had lost their lives in the Pahalgam attack necessitated an apology from the government as it showed that no lessons had been learnt from similar incidents in the past.
He appealed for a full-fledged statehood for Jammu and Kashmir, and proposed the adoption of a resolution condemning President Trump for claiming credit for the ceasefire. 'Come clean, we are with you Prime Minister…I propose a resolution that 'This House unilaterally condemns the repeated statements of American President Donald Trump,' he said.
CPI(M) MP John Brittas said that under the Modi government a new normal meant the 'celebration of failure'. 'Pulwama would be the biggest intelligence and security failure in the history of Independent India. There was deliberate, criminal negligence and you mixed it with hubris,' he said.
Brittas recalled the resignations of then Union home minister Shivraj Patil following the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack and questioned the Modi government over its accountability over the Pahalgam attack.
'They depicted Amit Shah as the second Sardar Patel. Will history judge Shah as morally inferior to Shivraj Patil?' he asked.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delhi Confidential: Caught in crossfire
Senior BJP leader and Lok Sabha MP Rajiv Pratap Rudy got a taste of the bitterness between TMC leaders Kalyan Banerjee and Mahua Moitra on Monday. Rudy, who is contesting against his party colleague Sanjeev Balyan for the post of secretary (administration), Constitution Club of India, was at the Makar Dwar of the Parliament House when he saw Banerjee leaving the premises. Rudy approached Banerjee, a four-time MP from Serampore, seeking his vote but the latter shouted at him that he would not support anyone who is backed by Moitra. 'You are supported by Mahua Moitra. I will not vote for you,' Banerjee told Rudy. As the stunned BJP leader looked at him, Banerjee announced that he 'would warn everyone who is friendly' with Moitra to stay away from him. Old Practice Revived Rajya Sabha getting adjourned for the day after being informed about the death of former Jharkhand CM and sitting MP Shibu Soren marked a return to a practice which was discontinued a few years ago. The proceedings of the Upper House were adjourned only for a few hours after the death of former Union Ministers Arun Jaitley (2019), Ram Vilas Paswan (2020) and Congress leader Rajeev Satav (2021). On Monday, Opposition leaders led by Congress's Jairam Ramesh suggested that the House should go back to the old practice of adjournment as a mark of respect to the deceased member. Mission Sindoor The invitation cards for Independence Day programme this year carry a logo of Operation Sindoor, an effort by the government to publicise India's military operation against terror targets in Pakistan in May this year. It is learnt that Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi in an address to senior Army officers post-Operation Sindoor had mentioned the decision to imprint the logo on all cards and official correspondence of the defence services. Senior Army officers are also likely to deliver lectures in schools on Operation Sindoor to create awareness among students on the operation.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
'Not one dominated by a few': Jaishankar's strong message on India-Russia oil trade amid US pressure
External affairs minister S Jaishankar on Monday reiterated the need for a fair and multipolar global order, stating, 'Our collective desire is to see a fair and representative global order, not one dominated by a few.' His remarks come amid global trade tensions, including US tariff threats and pressure on India's oil trade with Russia. Speaking at the BIMSTEC Traditional Music Festival in Delhi titled SaptaSur: Seven Nations, One Melody, Jaishankar linked cultural traditions to the broader vision of global balance. 'We live in complicated and uncertain times. Our collective desire is to see a fair and representative global order, not one dominated by a few. That quest is often articulated as political or economic rebalancing,' he said. Show more 05:28 08:40 04:25 02:11 07:43 07:11 02:35 11:17 05:30 02:01 01:23 11:06 03:23 07:30 09:41 04:24 12:41 05:05 10:13 07:04 12:12 04:17 08:01 08:24 09:18 01:39 01:14:54 28:24 34:32 05:44
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
How The U.S. Rewired Pakistan's Air Force; Why That Legacy Still Matters Against India
New Delhi: When Indian jets pounded Pakistani positions under Operation Sindoor, Islamabad's narrative tried to flip the script. Claims of tactical success echoed through Pakistani media, even as damage reports told a different story. But behind these optics, Pakistani defence analysts are pointing to a system that did not come from China, but from the United States nearly 70 years ago. Defence portal Quwa highlighted how the foundations of Pakistan's air force still rest on operational practices and doctrine handed down by the United States as far back as the 1950s. The report claims that what many today call 'software', mindset, structure and operational culture, was installed in the early days of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) by American advisors. That legacy has shaped PAF's command philosophy to this day. It even influenced the decision to move the Air Force Headquarters from Rawalpindi to Peshawar, giving the force its own command ecosystem, distinct from the army's shadow. How America Gave PAF Its Operational 'Software' According to Quwa, in the early 1950s, Pakistan's air force lacked both equipment and a professional framework. The turning point came with the 1950 Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement with the United States. Under this, Washington not only provided F-86 Sabre aircraft to Pakistan but also embedded an entire operational doctrine into the PAF. Considered the architect of a modern PAF, then Air Marshal Asghar Khan recognised that the United States was sending jets as well as exporting a full system. This included depot-level aircraft maintenance, rather than the traditional squadron-level model; strict safety regulations, based on U.S. Air Force protocols; and clearly separated departments for operations, maintenance and administration. This model replaced the older British system and gave Pakistan's air force an American-style command structure that is still in use today. According to Quwa, this is the backbone that allows the PAF to integrate foreign fighter jets, including the Chinese J-10CE, into its arsenal smoothly. The report argues that this inherited mindset enables faster pilot adaptation and more coherent training cycles, which translates into better performance during real combat situations. A Quiet Nod to the U.S., Not China While Pakistani media has hyped up the role of Chinese-origin J-10CE fighter jets in countering India's Rafales, Quwa takes a more nuanced position. It suggests that the real enabler was not Chinese technology, but American methodology. The systems laid down decades ago by the United States, it claims, allow the PAF to function as a streamlined and adaptable air force, something its regional rivals have had to build from scratch. This legacy also explains the PAF's ability to quickly operationalise new platforms. Pilots transitioning to newer aircraft often show higher mission-readiness because the doctrine standardises procedures across the force. And it was this very consistency, Quwa argues, that allowed Pakistan to mount any kind of coordinated air response during India's strikes. What Really Happened in the Skies? Despite Pakistan's claims, the outcomes of the recent aerial confrontations tell a more complex story. Islamabad managed to shoot down one Indian aircraft, but failed to intercept or prevent Indian strikes on nine strategic sites in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Indian Rafales inflicted heavy damage. In military terms, Quwa concedes, these results raise questions. One of the contributing factors was a misjudgement by Indian forces regarding the range of China's PL-15 missiles, a gap in calculation that Pakistan used to its advantage. Even then, say Indian analysts, PAF's performance could only be counted as successful if it had prevented India's deep-penetration airstrikes, not merely retaliated after the fact. A Legacy That Still Shapes Air Battles Pakistan's narrative of victory, critics say, may not hold up under scrutiny. But the story that emerges from Quwa's reporting is not about flashy dogfights or headline-grabbing missile launches. It is about how a 70-year-old framework continues to define one of South Asia's most professionalised air forces. In the end, as Quwa puts it, it was not Chinese, but American 'software' (a system of discipline, structure and long-term strategic thinking) that made the real difference.
