Jagan Reddy calls liquor scam a 'manufactured narrative' for media theatrics
"The alleged liquor scam is nothing but a manufactured narrative, created purely for media theatrics and to divert attention from real issues," said Jagan Mohan Reddy in a post on X.He highlighted Midhun Reddy's three consecutive Lok Sabha victories, accusing the TDP-led NDA government of orchestrating a false narrative to hide its own scams and target opposition voices.Jagan Mohan Reddy said Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu himself remains out on bail in liquor-related corruption cases with regard to the 2014-19 period.The YSRCP alleged that the TDP is reviving corrupt liquor practices by reopening belt shops (unlicensed liquor shos), illegal permit rooms and encouraging backdoor sales after dismantling the erstwhile YSRCP government's 'successful transparent liquor reforms'.Jagan Mohan Reddy accused the TDP of reintroducing liquor mafia control, reinstating syndicate-driven corruption in licence allocations and weakening the enforcement established under the previous YSRCP government's liquor distribution system.The former CM said that Naidu is allegedly misusing the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to arrest YSRCP leaders indefinitely without fair trial, using false cases as political weapons to destabilise strong opposition leadership.The opposition leader vowed that the YSRCP will courageously fight injustices, defend democracy and protect people's rights against the TDP's alleged oppressive, politically driven actions under Naidu's administration.- EndsMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Andhra Pradesh
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Send leaders empowered to take decisions for all-party meetings: LS Speaker
New Delhi, Jul 28 (PTI) Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Monday urged leaders of political parties to send representatives who are empowered to take decisions to meetings for finalising the agenda for Parliament. Birla's remarks came as the opposition members sought an assurance from the government on discussion on the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar after the conclusion of the debate on Operation Sindoor. The opposition members were in the Well of the House, raising slogans and seeking an assurance before the Lok Sabha took up the discussion on Operation Sindoor. Birla said that at the all-party meeting chaired by him last week, all leaders sought a discussion on Operation Sindoor, which was agreed to, and 16 hours were allocated for the same. 'There is something called commitment. Leaders of all parties had sought a discussion on Operation Sindoor and now you are in the Well of the House raising other issues," he said, addressing opposition members. 'You can't demand a discussion on any issue from the Well of the House. The House runs as per rules of procedure," Birla said. The Speaker told SP chief Akhilesh Yadav, who was on his feet demanding a discussion on SIR, to send a representative who is empowered to take decisions to the all-party meeting. 'If you are not empowered and if someone else has to take decisions, then such persons should not come to the all-party meetings," Birla said. The Lok Sabha was to take up a special discussion on 'India's strong, successful and decisive" Operation Sindoor in response to the terror attack in Pahalgam at 12 noon. However, when the House convened for the discussion, the opposition parties sought an assurance on the debate on SIR exercise in Bihar. PTI SKU SKU MNK MNK view comments First Published: July 28, 2025, 14:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Opposition running away from discussion on Operation Sindoor: Kiren Rijiju
The government on Monday accused the opposition of "betrayal" by not allowing the scheduled debate in the Lok Sabha on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor . Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju told reporters that a few minutes before the discussion was to start, the Opposition wanted the government to give an assurance that it will allow a debate on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar after the discussion of Operation Sindoor is over. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Others Data Analytics Management Product Management Digital Marketing Public Policy Operations Management Leadership CXO Data Science MCA Artificial Intelligence Finance PGDM Data Science MBA healthcare Cybersecurity Design Thinking Healthcare Degree Project Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 28 Weeks MICA CERT-MICA SBMPR Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 28 Weeks MICA CERT-MICA SBMPR Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Exec Cert Prog in AI for Biz India Starts on undefined Get Details The opposition, he said, is running away from a discussion on Operation Sindoor after initial agreement and is now putting preconditions. Rijiju said Parliament runs in accordance with rules and accused the opposition of going back on its commitment and betraying everyone. "The opposition is looking at ways to run away from the debate on Operation Sindoor," he said.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Congress MP Employs Cryptic Response Amid Parliamentary Debate Speculation
As Parliament prepares for a critical discussion on the Pahalgam terror incident and the subsequent military response Operation Sindoor, considerable uncertainty surrounds the potential participation of senior Congress parliamentarian Shashi Tharoor in the forthcoming debate. The Thiruvananthapuram representative has become the subject of intense political speculation regarding his role in the opposition's strategy. When approached by media personnel outside Parliament on Monday regarding his possible involvement in the debate, Tharoor delivered an enigmatic two-word response: "Maunvrat, Maunvrat," referencing the concept of observing silence. He declined to provide any elaboration or entertain additional questions from the assembled reporters, leaving his intentions deliberately ambiguous. This cryptic communication has intensified discussions within political circles about whether the veteran parliamentarian will be deployed by the Congress party during the high-stakes debate. Tharoor's recent leadership of a parliamentary delegation to the United States and other nations has positioned him as a potentially significant voice in discussions involving international relations and security matters. The uncertainty surrounding Tharoor's participation stems from his increasingly complex relationship with the Congress party leadership in recent months. His apparent endorsement of the government's rapid response to the Pahalgam attack has reportedly created tension within party ranks, where criticism of governmental actions typically forms the cornerstone of opposition strategy. The Congress party leadership has yet to officially confirm whether Tharoor will be included among the designated speakers for the parliamentary discussion, adding to the intrigue surrounding his potential role. This silence from party officials has fueled further speculation about internal disagreements regarding the appropriate approach to the debate. The Monsoon session experienced significant disruptions during its initial week, with repeated interruptions preventing substantive legislative work. Monday's session, which commenced at 11 AM, witnessed immediate adjournment following disturbances created by opposition party members, highlighting the charged political atmosphere surrounding these discussions. As the Congress party prepares to challenge the BJP-led central government over Operation Sindoor, party leadership has emphasized their insistence that Prime Minister Narendra Modi must be physically present in Parliament when the Pahalgam-Operation Sindoor issues are formally addressed. This demand reflects the opposition's desire to ensure direct governmental accountability for the military operation and its aftermath. The Congress party has persistently advocated for comprehensive debate on these matters since the monsoon session's commencement last week. Jairam Ramesh, the party's general secretary responsible for communications, has been particularly vocal in criticizing the Prime Minister's international travel schedule, arguing that it demonstrates neglect of pressing domestic security concerns. Ramesh recently characterized the Prime Minister as a "Super Premium Frequent Flyer," suggesting that another planned foreign visit would disappoint the people of Manipur and other regions affected by security challenges. This criticism came in the context of Modi's recent four-day diplomatic mission to the United Kingdom and the Maldives, where he successfully concluded a significant free trade agreement with the UK. The Congress communications chief has been particularly critical of what he perceives as the Prime Minister's limited parliamentary presence, noting that Modi typically addresses Parliament only once annually during the Motion of Thanks to the President's Address. Ramesh argued that the gravity of the Pahalgam-Operation Sindoor situation, combined with international implications involving former US President Trump's claims, necessitates the Prime Minister's direct participation in parliamentary discussions. The political dynamics surrounding this debate reflect broader tensions between the ruling party and opposition regarding transparency, accountability, and the appropriate governmental response to security challenges. The Congress party's strategy appears focused on challenging both the operational aspects of the military response and the diplomatic communications surrounding the incident. The timing of these discussions coincides with ongoing questions about intelligence failures, operational effectiveness, and international diplomatic coordination in response to cross-border terrorism. Opposition parties have consistently argued that such matters require thorough parliamentary scrutiny and direct governmental accountability. Tharoor's enigmatic response and uncertain participation status highlight the complex internal dynamics within opposition parties when addressing national security matters. The tension between maintaining party unity and individual conscience becomes particularly pronounced when dealing with military operations and international relations. The parliamentary debate represents a crucial moment for both governmental accountability and opposition strategy, with the potential to influence public perception of the administration's security policies and diplomatic approach to regional challenges.
