
Should India rethink ‘secular, socialism'? Why RSS prompt won't get BJP moving
The Sangh has since nurtured the grouse that Indira's socialism was closer to what was practised in the former Soviet Union or China of the time, and had envisaged the nationalisation of all of India's means of production. This is completely in opposition to the Sangh's ideas and economic outlook.Hosabale didn't make an offhand remark. In the Sangh Parivar, few public interventions are accidental. The occasion—an Emergency remembrance event—was steeped in ideological symbolism. The venue (Nagpur) is the intellectual nerve-centre of the RSS. And the political context was no less significant: the BJP in power for a third consecutive term under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, albeit with fewer seats and greater coalition dependence.The 2024 Lok Sabha poll campaign had seen an uncharacteristic restraint from the RSS. But now, a year into the government being in place, the Sangh decided to gain control of the narrative along with setting a trajectory for the government as well as the organisation. Its chosen target? The very words Indira had inserted into the Preamble via the 42nd Constitutional Amendment in 1976.Reactions followed—measured, but pointed. Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan said at a university convocation in Bhubaneswar a few days later. 'What Hosabale-ji said is historically correct. 'Socialist' and 'secular' were introduced during the Emergency, without full democratic debate. It's worth revisiting in today's context.'In Bhopal, Union agriculture minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan argued: 'India has always been secular in spirit—these labels were unnecessary. Our civilisational culture is far more inclusive than these terms can capture.'advertisementBut the government offered no response. No constitutional amendment was proposed. No debate will be initiated in Parliament. The BJP's strategic instinct was restraint. The RSS had floated the idea. The BJP made no move to act on it.This isn't new. The present-day BJP has moved beyond several of the socialist leaders to expand into different geographies and demographies. This helped rid the party some of its untouchability while making it skillful in alliances with socialist parties. The collapse of the Janata Dal meant several of its constituents joining the BJP over the years, aiding the party's expansion in Karnataka, Gujarat, Haryana and Bihar, and a bounce-back in Uttar Pradesh.The BJP's relationship with the word 'socialism' has always been fraught. When the party was formed in April 1980 in Delhi, it was born from the wreckage of the Janata experiment. Its leaders—Atal Bihari Vajpayee, L.K. Advani and Nanaji Deshmukh—chose to name it the Bharatiya Janata Party, not the revived Bharatiya Jana Sangh. Seeking to appeal to a broader middle-class constituency and mindful of India's post-Emergency mood, they adopted 'Gandhian Socialism' as the party's guiding philosophy. Jayaprakash Narayan's portrait was placed beside those of Jana Sangh founders Deendayal Upadhyaya and Syama Prasad Mookerjee.But the term never sat easy. Rajmata Vijaya Raje Scindia and many RSS swayamsevaks were openly critical. For them, even Gandhian Socialism smacked of ideological compromise. In the RSS's intellectual tradition, 'socialism' was seen as a Western import, inimical to India's civilisational values of dharma, decentralization and family-centric welfare.advertisementThe BJP's 1984 electoral disaster—just two Lok Sabha seats—prompted a rethink. Gandhian Socialism was dropped from party literature. The BJP began to articulate its vision through the lens of 'Integral Humanism' and 'Anatodayaya', the philosophical framework propounded by Upadhyaya in the 1960s.Another Sangh pracharak, Dattopant Thengadi, deepened this narrative. In his book Third Way, he laid out a sweeping rejection of both capitalism and socialism, arguing for a uniquely Indian path grounded in spiritual economics and self-reliant communities. This language suited the Sangh: it was civilisational, not class-based; moral, not ideological.Prime Minister Narendra Modi's rise to power enabled the BJP to recast this discourse in a modern, managerial idiom. The phrase 'Garib Kalyan' replaced the older frameworks of socialism. Massive welfare schemes, such as Ujjwala, Ayushman Bharat and Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana, were implemented using digital governance tools. Benefits were targeted via the 'JAM' trinity: Jan Dhan accounts, Aadhaar authentication and Mobile connectivity. Redistribution took place, but it was framed not as class war but empowerment. Modi's model promised dignity through delivery.advertisementThe genius of this political project was in divorcing the mechanics of redistribution from the vocabulary of socialism. 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas' became a rallying cry that carried moral force without ideological baggage. It reached Dalits, Adivasis, OBCs and the aspirational middle classes simultaneously, without needing to cite Jawaharlal Nehru or Karl Marx.In the BJP's revision, socialism doesn't talk of 'class struggle', as done by the Marxists. That stands the party out in the present-day debate on the caste census. Caste-focused parties, such as the Janata Dal (United), Rashtriya Janata Dal and Samajwadi Party, and now even the Congress, talk of 'jiski jitni aabadi utna haq' (quota rights as per population) while demanding reservation and a caste census. On the other hand, the BJP is propounding taking everyone along—in effect, rendering socialism obsolete in both policy and politics.This is why the RSS is now asking the obvious question: if the BJP has long abandoned socialism in practice, why preserve its ghost in the Preamble? Why let a word inserted during a constitutional 'dark age' remain enshrined in the foundational text of the Indian republic? From the Sangh's point of view, this isn't just a semantic matter. It's about reclaiming the Constitution from what it sees as ideological distortions imposed during a time of political authoritarianism.advertisementBut for the BJP, the calculus is different. Deleting 'socialist' or 'secular' from the Preamble would require a constitutional amendment—one that could provoke fierce opposition and judicial scrutiny. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the 'basic structure' doctrine and often relied on the Preamble's socialist character to buttress rulings on affirmative action, labour rights and environmental protection. Any attempt to alter that language could ignite a legal firestorm.There's also the political cost. For many voters—especially the rural poor, SC/ST communities and OBCs—the idea of socialism is not about Marxist theory but government support: subsidies, pensions, quotas, welfare. These voters may trust Modi more than the Congress but still expect the State to deliver economic justice. Striking out 'socialist' from the Constitution could alarm these segments just as the BJP tries to deepen its social base beyond the urban middle class and upper castes.Hence the BJP's strategic silence. Let the RSS test the waters. Let sympathetic ministers issue cryptic nods. But don't commit. Don't legislate. Don't provoke yet.Still, the conversation has begun. Hosabale's words may not become policy in this Parliament or even the next. But they represent an ideological challenge to the Nehruvian consensus, still embedded in the constitutional framework. And in the world of the Sangh Parivar, such challenges rarely fade away. They wait and return. Sometimes, they even rewrite the script of the Republic.Subscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsTune InMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Janaki film row: CBFC limits cuts to 2 in Suresh Gopi's film, producers agree
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) on Wednesday said it was willing to revise its earlier demand for 96 cuts in the Malayalam film 'JSK: Janaki v/s State of Kerala' to just two cuts, which the producers of the film agreed to, marking the end of a three-week legal tussle. Suresh Gopi The film, starring Union minister of state and Bharatiya Janata Party leader Suresh Gopi and Anupama Parameshwaran in the lead roles, tells the story of a rape survivor fighting for justice. CBFC had objected to the name 'Janaki' in the title as well as the protagonist's name, claiming it refers to the Hindu goddess and that its usage in a film about sexual violence would offend religious sentiments. During the hearing of the case in the Kerala high court, CBFC counsel said that it was ready to grant the producers a censor certificate if they made two changes — one, the film's title be changed to 'Janaki V v/s state of Kerala' indicating the character's initials and two, the name Janaki be muted in two scenes in the film. The producers agreed to the changes during the hearing. Advocate Haris Beeran, appearing for the producers, told reporters that his client agreed to the changes suggested by CBFC as they were facing mounting financial losses due to the delay in the release of the film. 'This is a case that we can win 100% on appeal. But, the producers have taken a commercial call. They are facing financial losses due to the delay in the film's release. They also have an OTT deal that they have to adhere to. That's why, they have agreed to make the changes. The high court has ordered CBFC to grant the censor certificate within three days of re-submission of the application. So hopefully, the film can release by next Friday,' Beeran told reporters. The Censor Board had earlier refused to grant certification unless the title was changed, citing potential religious sensitivity, as 'Janaki' is also an alternative name for the Hindu goddess Sita. Pravin Narayanan, the film's director, said that they would attempt to make the changes and re-submit the application for censor certificate within the next two days. 'We have reached an amicable solution. As an artiste, it's difficult to make such changes, but somewhere, we will have to compromise,' he said.


The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Odisha police releases 25 suspected foreign nationals
Odisha police on Wednesday (July 9, 2025) released 25 persons out of 444 migrant labourers suspected to be Bangladeshi or Rohingya (Myanmar) held in Jharsuguda after ascertaining their Indian nationality. Document verification was still underway late Wednesday evening, as those detained continued to procure their papers through various means, including WhatsApp and physical submission 'Persons with valid documents are already returning or are in process of returning to their place of stay. We urge the public to refrain from speculation and trust the authorities to carry out this process transparently and fairly,' said Himanshu Lal, Inspector General of Police (Northern Range). 'We understand the concerns raised regarding the holding of individuals in Jharsuguda. However, safeguarding national interest and security remains paramount and cannot be compromised. The individuals under scrutiny lack valid documentation to establish their residency or citizenship, necessitating a thorough verification process to ascertain their identity,' said Mr. Lal. He said, 'without verifiable documents, it is imperative to cross-check records to confirm whether individuals are Indian citizens or foreign nationals. This process is critical to protect our borders and ensure the safety of our nation.' 'These individuals are being held in designated facilities with access to adequate food, water, hygiene, and medical care, in line with humanitarian standards,' said IGP According to police, the verification is being conducted meticulously by senior officials via a JIT (Joint Investigation Team), with multiple layers of scrutiny to ensure no Indian citizen is wrongfully detained or harassed. Every effort is made to uphold the rights of Indian citizens while maintaining the integrity of the process. Tankadhar Tripathy, BJP MLA from Jharsuguda, 'the present government is taking decisive action to uphold national sovereignty and safeguard security—measures that were not undertaken by previous administrations. The documents of suspected foreign nationals, including Bangladeshis and Rohingyas, are being verified in accordance with guidelines issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs and the State government.' 'Those who are able to produce valid documents are being released. The allegations of illegally detaining anyone are baseless. Suspected foreign nationals are being treated with dignity. They have been accommodated on a college premises, not in any detention centre,' said Mr. Tripathy. In May this year, MHA sent a letter to all States saying, 'India, as a matter of policy, does not support any kind of illegal migration or overstay either into its own territory or illegal migration of its citizens to foreign territories. To facilitate orderly migration and timely exit, India has a robust visa and immigration regime in place to enable lawful inward movement of persons including professionals and skilled work force, business persons, students and foreign tourists. However, illegal migration has security and socio-economic ramifications which are often well beyond law enforcement.' The Centre said people overstaying without valid passport or other travel documents or any other document of legal authority should be identified. If suspected Bangladesh I Myanmar (Rohingiyas) national claims Indian citizenship and residence of a place in any other Indian State/UT, the concerned State Government would send the report to concerned home secretary of the State where these foreign


Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance to meet today: From IBC to RBI, here is what's on the agenda…
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance is scheduled to meet at 11 am in Parliament House Annexe today to discuss issues with the Insolvency and Banking Code (IBC), and the Reserve Bank of India's role in the Indian economy, according to an ANI report. Chaired by BJP MP Bhartruhari Mahtab, on the agenda for this Committee meet is: Record oral evidence of the representatives of State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Indian Bank and Indian Overseas Bank on the subject 'Review of working of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and Emerging Issues'. Also, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor, Sanjay Malhotra to brief the committee on the subject 'RBI's Evolving Role in India's Dynamic Economy'. Meanwhile, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs is also set to meet at 11 am in Parliament House Annexe today and tommorow to discuss cyber crime and computing related issues, according to an ANI report. Chaired by BJP MP Dr Radha Mohan Das Agrawal, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs comprises participants from various ministries and government organisations. Topics of discussion on the agenda for this Committee meet, include: Cyber Crime – Ramifications, Protection and Prevention'. i. Reserve Bank of India (RBI); and Ministry of Education and Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC). The Committee will again meet at 11 am in Parliament House Annexe Extension Building on July 11. Topic of discussion on the agenda for tomorrow's Committee meet, include: 'Cyber Crime – Ramifications, Protection and Prevention'. (This is a developing story, more updates coming…)