
Should India rethink ‘secular, socialism'? Why RSS prompt won't get BJP moving
The Sangh has since nurtured the grouse that Indira's socialism was closer to what was practised in the former Soviet Union or China of the time, and had envisaged the nationalisation of all of India's means of production. This is completely in opposition to the Sangh's ideas and economic outlook.Hosabale didn't make an offhand remark. In the Sangh Parivar, few public interventions are accidental. The occasion—an Emergency remembrance event—was steeped in ideological symbolism. The venue (Nagpur) is the intellectual nerve-centre of the RSS. And the political context was no less significant: the BJP in power for a third consecutive term under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, albeit with fewer seats and greater coalition dependence.The 2024 Lok Sabha poll campaign had seen an uncharacteristic restraint from the RSS. But now, a year into the government being in place, the Sangh decided to gain control of the narrative along with setting a trajectory for the government as well as the organisation. Its chosen target? The very words Indira had inserted into the Preamble via the 42nd Constitutional Amendment in 1976.Reactions followed—measured, but pointed. Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan said at a university convocation in Bhubaneswar a few days later. 'What Hosabale-ji said is historically correct. 'Socialist' and 'secular' were introduced during the Emergency, without full democratic debate. It's worth revisiting in today's context.'In Bhopal, Union agriculture minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan argued: 'India has always been secular in spirit—these labels were unnecessary. Our civilisational culture is far more inclusive than these terms can capture.'advertisementBut the government offered no response. No constitutional amendment was proposed. No debate will be initiated in Parliament. The BJP's strategic instinct was restraint. The RSS had floated the idea. The BJP made no move to act on it.This isn't new. The present-day BJP has moved beyond several of the socialist leaders to expand into different geographies and demographies. This helped rid the party some of its untouchability while making it skillful in alliances with socialist parties. The collapse of the Janata Dal meant several of its constituents joining the BJP over the years, aiding the party's expansion in Karnataka, Gujarat, Haryana and Bihar, and a bounce-back in Uttar Pradesh.The BJP's relationship with the word 'socialism' has always been fraught. When the party was formed in April 1980 in Delhi, it was born from the wreckage of the Janata experiment. Its leaders—Atal Bihari Vajpayee, L.K. Advani and Nanaji Deshmukh—chose to name it the Bharatiya Janata Party, not the revived Bharatiya Jana Sangh. Seeking to appeal to a broader middle-class constituency and mindful of India's post-Emergency mood, they adopted 'Gandhian Socialism' as the party's guiding philosophy. Jayaprakash Narayan's portrait was placed beside those of Jana Sangh founders Deendayal Upadhyaya and Syama Prasad Mookerjee.But the term never sat easy. Rajmata Vijaya Raje Scindia and many RSS swayamsevaks were openly critical. For them, even Gandhian Socialism smacked of ideological compromise. In the RSS's intellectual tradition, 'socialism' was seen as a Western import, inimical to India's civilisational values of dharma, decentralization and family-centric welfare.advertisementThe BJP's 1984 electoral disaster—just two Lok Sabha seats—prompted a rethink. Gandhian Socialism was dropped from party literature. The BJP began to articulate its vision through the lens of 'Integral Humanism' and 'Anatodayaya', the philosophical framework propounded by Upadhyaya in the 1960s.Another Sangh pracharak, Dattopant Thengadi, deepened this narrative. In his book Third Way, he laid out a sweeping rejection of both capitalism and socialism, arguing for a uniquely Indian path grounded in spiritual economics and self-reliant communities. This language suited the Sangh: it was civilisational, not class-based; moral, not ideological.Prime Minister Narendra Modi's rise to power enabled the BJP to recast this discourse in a modern, managerial idiom. The phrase 'Garib Kalyan' replaced the older frameworks of socialism. Massive welfare schemes, such as Ujjwala, Ayushman Bharat and Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana, were implemented using digital governance tools. Benefits were targeted via the 'JAM' trinity: Jan Dhan accounts, Aadhaar authentication and Mobile connectivity. Redistribution took place, but it was framed not as class war but empowerment. Modi's model promised dignity through delivery.advertisementThe genius of this political project was in divorcing the mechanics of redistribution from the vocabulary of socialism. 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas' became a rallying cry that carried moral force without ideological baggage. It reached Dalits, Adivasis, OBCs and the aspirational middle classes simultaneously, without needing to cite Jawaharlal Nehru or Karl Marx.In the BJP's revision, socialism doesn't talk of 'class struggle', as done by the Marxists. That stands the party out in the present-day debate on the caste census. Caste-focused parties, such as the Janata Dal (United), Rashtriya Janata Dal and Samajwadi Party, and now even the Congress, talk of 'jiski jitni aabadi utna haq' (quota rights as per population) while demanding reservation and a caste census. On the other hand, the BJP is propounding taking everyone along—in effect, rendering socialism obsolete in both policy and politics.This is why the RSS is now asking the obvious question: if the BJP has long abandoned socialism in practice, why preserve its ghost in the Preamble? Why let a word inserted during a constitutional 'dark age' remain enshrined in the foundational text of the Indian republic? From the Sangh's point of view, this isn't just a semantic matter. It's about reclaiming the Constitution from what it sees as ideological distortions imposed during a time of political authoritarianism.advertisementBut for the BJP, the calculus is different. Deleting 'socialist' or 'secular' from the Preamble would require a constitutional amendment—one that could provoke fierce opposition and judicial scrutiny. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the 'basic structure' doctrine and often relied on the Preamble's socialist character to buttress rulings on affirmative action, labour rights and environmental protection. Any attempt to alter that language could ignite a legal firestorm.There's also the political cost. For many voters—especially the rural poor, SC/ST communities and OBCs—the idea of socialism is not about Marxist theory but government support: subsidies, pensions, quotas, welfare. These voters may trust Modi more than the Congress but still expect the State to deliver economic justice. Striking out 'socialist' from the Constitution could alarm these segments just as the BJP tries to deepen its social base beyond the urban middle class and upper castes.Hence the BJP's strategic silence. Let the RSS test the waters. Let sympathetic ministers issue cryptic nods. But don't commit. Don't legislate. Don't provoke yet.Still, the conversation has begun. Hosabale's words may not become policy in this Parliament or even the next. But they represent an ideological challenge to the Nehruvian consensus, still embedded in the constitutional framework. And in the world of the Sangh Parivar, such challenges rarely fade away. They wait and return. Sometimes, they even rewrite the script of the Republic.Subscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsTune InMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US trade deal: Will Donald Trump go for less than 20% tariff rate for India? Top 10 developments to track
A trade deal between India and the US has still not been finalized. (AI image) India-US trade deal: In February this year, US President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the intent for a trade deal by fall this year. Come April 2025, and Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on a lot of countries, India being one of them. The American President soon suspended his tariffs for a 90-day period giving countries time to strike a trade deal with the US. That deadline of July 9 has now been extended to August 1. A trade deal between India and the US has still not been finalized. Though, there are indications that an interim agreement may be announced soon. Trump's tariff war has changed the global economic landscape and progress on a trade deal between the world's largest economy (US) and the soon to be fourth largest (India) is being tracked by experts world over. Here are 10 recent developments in the India-US trade deal talks that you should know about: 1) Less than 20% tariff? The United States is negotiating an interim trade agreement with India, aiming to lower proposed tariffs to under 20%, sources with knowledge of the discussions have told Bloomberg. This would give India a competitive advantage over other countries in the region. The preliminary agreement is expected to establish a base tariff rate lower than 20%, in contrast to the 26% that was initially suggested, the report said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo 2) India officials in US Soon Meanwhile, a delegation from India's commerce ministry is scheduled to travel to Washington for fresh negotiations with the US, a government official told PTI earlier this week. The discussions will be both for an interim trade deal and the first part of the bilateral trade agreement. The delegation is likely to arrive in Washington next week, the report said. Last month an Indian delegation, headed by chief negotiator Rajesh Agrawal, were in Washington for discussions. Also Read | 'Unnecessary trade barriers…': US hits out at India's dairy certificate requirements at WTO; raises issue amidst trade deal talks 3) Donald Trump on a tariff letter spree - but no letter for India so far Donald Trump has been on a tariff letter sending spree this week. While the effective date for the reciprocal tariffs has been revised to August 1 from July 9, Trump has intimated over 20 countries of the tariff rates that will be applicable on their exports to the US. India has not been sent any such letter till now. According to a Bloomberg report, India expects a trade deal announcement soon instead of a tariff demand letter. Any interim trade deal announcement would give both India and the US time to negotiate on the final trade that is expected by fall. 4) Trump says deal with India soon Earlier this week, Trump announced that America was nearing a trade agreement with India. "We've spoken to everybody. ...it's all done. I told you we'll make some deals, but for the most part, we're going to send a letter. We're going to say, welcome to the United States if you'd like to participate in the greatest, most successful country ever. I mean we are doing better than ever... We've never had numbers like this. We've never had investment like this. We have more than 90... have much more than 90. But most of those are going to be sent to letter. This is exactly what I said. Now we've made a deal with United Kingdom. We've made a deal with China. We're close to making a deal with India," he said. Also Read | India takes strong stand! Retaliatory tariffs planned against US on steel and aluminium at WTO amidst trade deal talks; check details 5) India not working on deadlines Even as the two countries look to seal a deal, India has made it clear that it is not working on any deadlines. Last week Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said that a deal would be made keeping national interest in mind. 'India never makes a trade deal based on a deadline or timeline; when the deal is good, fully matured, and in the national interest, then we accept it,' he said. 'A free trade agreement happens only when there is mutual benefit. When the deal is made while safeguarding India's interests, keeping in mind that national interest will always remain paramount, then India is always ready to make deals with developed countries,' he added. 6) India's trade deal issues India has maintained a strong position on providing duty concessions to the US for agricultural and dairy products, given their sensitive status. India's policy has consistently protected its dairy sector across all previous trade arrangements. Additionally, India continues to uphold its ban on genetically modified food crops, which contrasts with the United States' agricultural practices, where GM varieties dominate corn and soybean cultivation. Unresolved matters persist regarding duties on steel, aluminium (50 per cent) and auto (25 per cent). India is also seeking protection against future tariff hikes by the US. Also Read | Donald Trump's $5 million Gold Card in demand! Indian professionals from these sectors show big interest; what happens to EB-5 visa? 7) India Draws Red Lines India has also established clear boundaries regarding the limited trade agreement. During ongoing discussions for the limited trade pact between India and the United States, India has set definitive positions on vital areas, specifically in the agricultural and dairy sectors. "India has drawn its red lines... now the ball is in the US court," sources told PTI. 8) Trump's BRICS tariff threat Adding to uncertainty around tariff rates is Trump's latest threat of an additional 10% tariff on BRICS nations for 'Anti-America' policies. Trump has issued warnings to BRICS nations opposing the US. "Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump shared on Truth Social earlier this week. Also Read | India-US trade deal soon? Donald Trump says so, but India needs to be wary of 'escalating pressure'; 'in future US may...' 9) Only an interim trade deal for now If a trade deal is announced before the August 1 deadline of Trump, it is likely only to be a mini or interim trade deal. Reports have indicated that the interim trade deal would likely leave out the contentious issues of agriculture and dairy products for now. 10) India-US WTO tiff Meanwhile, the United States has once again brought up concerns at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) about India's dairy certification requirements. The US has voiced fresh objections at the WTO, stating that India's dairy certification criteria create unnecessary barriers for dairy exports from America. The trade disputes between India and the US at the WTO extend beyond dairy matters. India has spoken of retaliatory tariffs against the United States, in accordance with WTO protocols, following American duties on steel and aluminium that were enacted as 'safeguard measures'. Additionally, India has recently signalled its plans to introduce countermeasures in response to US tariffs on automotive products. However, a government official told PTI that India's move to maintain its right for imposing reciprocal duties on the US regarding auto parts tariffs is a standard protocol under World Trade Organisation's safeguard provisions. This will not create any hindrance to the current trade agreement discussions between both nations. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Shah sets target of 20k seats, 25% vote share for NDA in local body polls
Thiruvananthapuram: Union home minister Amit Shah on Saturday urged BJP members in the state to work hard to ensure the NDA wins over 20,000 seats and secures 25% of the votes in the upcoming local body elections. The state has a total of 23,612 wards across its local self-govt institutions, including grama panchayats, block panchayats, district panchayats, municipalities and corporations. Addressing party workers at a ward-level leadership meet at Putharikandam Maidan, Shah said BJP had established its presence in all booths in Kerala and would form the govt in the state after 2026 assembly election. "If the people of Kerala want development, they have only one choice — the BJP. They should end the practice of alternating between LDF and UDF," Shah said. He inaugurated the leadership meet after opening the new BJP state office. Shah said BJP's vote share had risen from 11% in 2014 to 16% in 2019, and it touched 20% in the 2024 Lok Sabha election. Both LDF and UDF had been involved in corruption whenever they were in power, while the NDA govt led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi had not faced any corruption allegation. He said the 2020 gold smuggling case was the biggest corruption scam ever sponsored by a state govt in the country. "A developed India is not possible unless south Indian states develop. And Kerala's development is not possible without BJP," he said, adding that the party would wrest power in Tamil Nadu also in the upcoming assembly election. Shah asserted that BJP was not a north Indian party as claimed by political opponents. "BJP won and formed the govt in Assam. BJP wrested power from CPM in Tripura. It also came to power in Odisha. Opponents always used to dismiss BJP's efforts to form govt in these states, but we proved them wrong. After the 2026 assembly election, the BJP-led NDA would form govt in Kerala too," he said. Shah alleged that under LDF and UDF govts, Kerala had become a hub of corruption, appeasement, violence and anti-national activities. "The CPM-led LDF govt did nothing to stop the emergence of Popular Front of India (PFI) as an anti-national force. It was the Modi govt that banned PFI when it started making its presence in other states, posing a threat to the country. PFI is still alive in Kerala in different forms. CPM must clarify what action the LDF govt has taken against this communal terror group," he said. Shah said BJP placed the welfare of the country above the interests of its own cadre, but the focus for CPM was always on the welfare of its own cadre. PM Modi has declared adherence to three principles: corruption-free governance, non-discriminatory governance and the end of vote-bank politics, he said, adding that Kerala can progress only by following the path laid down by Modi and his govt.


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor proved India's readiness; exposed inefficiency of Pak's Chinese military gear: US warfare expert
. NEW DELHI: Operation Sindoor , India's military response to the Pahalgam terror attack , sent a strong message to the world — not just about capability, but about intent, says John Spencer, a leading expert on modern warfare. Speaking to ANI, Spencer — who chairs Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute in New York — said India showed it could strike with precision and restraint. 'This was not just about targeting terrorists. It was also a demonstration of India's indigenous military systems, tested against Chinese-made weapons used by Pakistan,' he said. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, days after 26 civilians were killed in a terror attack in Pahalgam. Strikes were carried out on terror infrastructure across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). India also repelled Pakistani military attempts that followed and targeted their airbases. The conflict de-escalated after a call from Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) to the Indian side. According to Spencer, Pakistan, being heavily equipped with Chinese military systems, became a kind of 'testing ground' for Beijing's defence technology. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo 'China uses Pakistan as a lab. And this was a chance for India to show what its homegrown defence tech can do,' he explained. He added that the world — including adversaries like China — was watching closely. 'Wars are the ultimate test. It's not about what you say, but what satellite footage and strike videos actually show.' Spencer also stressed the difference between a full-scale war and an operation like Sindoor. 'This had a clear trigger and a clear objective. It wasn't open-ended. But it does sit within a larger pattern — where countries use proxies, borders, and pressure tactics to weaken neighbours.' On future conflict risks, Spencer said wars are unpredictable, but preparation matters. 'You can't predict when the next war will break out. But you can prepare. And India has been preparing — from reforms in the military to tech innovations and doctrine changes.' He added that his interest in Operation Sindoor wasn't just about the four days of strikes — but about India's build-up over the past decade. On Pakistan's use of Chinese weaponry, Spencer said the strikes may lead to a rethink in Islamabad. 'If something you bought doesn't perform well, you either go back to the seller or look elsewhere. But Pakistan has money problems, and that limits their choices.' "Every Indian strike was a message not just to Pakistan, but to the world" says John Spencer He also pointed to "user error" as a possible factor in how poorly some systems performed. 'They want advanced systems, but affordability is a challenge. Still, they'll be forced to look for alternatives.' Spencer concluded that India's show of preparedness and capability during Operation Sindoor was a lesson in deterrence — one that the world, including its adversaries, took note of.