Taoiseach to attend UN Ocean Conference in Nice
Ten years on from the Paris Agreement, a landmark deal at COP21 that set targets to limit global warming, the world's oceans will take centre stage at UNOC3, which is being co-hosted by France and Costa Rica.
This week's event follows previous UN ocean conferences in New York in 2017 and Lisbon in 2022.
World leaders, UN bodies, climate activists, scientists, businesses and communities that rely on maritime environments to make their living are all taking part in what is being viewed as a crucial conference on the future of the world's oceans.
Many marine scientists are warning that the world's oceans are nearing a point of no return.
Decades of plastic pollution, over-fishing, seabed mining, coral bleaching and climate change have threatened the existence of many marine species and the livelihoods of coastal communities, particularly in the Global South.
Speaking ahead of the conference, Mr Martin said: "As an island nation, Ireland is keenly aware of the importance of the marine environment, and the other roles our waters play, including as a vital trade route.
"I look forward to joining with fellow world leaders over the coming days to discuss and collaborate on ways to secure the future of our oceans and seas."
This evening, the Taoiseach will attend the inauguration of the conference's 'Green Zone', hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron. More than 60 other world leaders will be in attendance.
Tomorrow, the Taoiseach will take part in an event to launch the European Ocean Pact, jointly hosted by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Mr Macron.
The pact, adopted by the Commission last week, ties together a number of EU ocean policies under one framework and aims to help member states protect and restore maritime habitants.
It also proposes a new European law on the oceans by 2027 to include legislation on combatting illegal fishing.
Later tomorrow, Mr Martin will deliver a statement on behalf of Ireland at the conference's main plenary session.
The world's oceans produce half of all the globe's oxygen and that more than three billion people rely on marine biodiversity to survive.
According to the UN, up to 12 million metric tonnes of plastics enter the ocean each year. That is the equivalent of a bin truck every minute.
Over 60% of marine ecosystems are already degraded and fishing stocks have plummeted since the 1970s.
Global fish stocks that are classified within safe biological limits have plunged from 90% in the 1970s to just over 62% in 2021.
Rising sea temperatures also pose a danger for maritime habitats. In April, global sea temperatures reached their second-highest levels ever.
While some of the worst cases of coral bleaching are currently affecting marine habitats in the Caribbean, the Indian Ocean and parts of the Pacific.
Li Junhua, UN Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs, who will act as Secretary-General of the conference has said that the world's oceans are facing "an unprecedent crisis".
To date, there have been a number of non-binding declarations made by governments to protect ocean life but there is no single legal agreement to tie them all together.
A treaty on limiting marine plastic pollution is still in progress while a World Trade Organization agreement to preserve fish stocks has not yet been fully implemented.
In 2023, 21 countries signed up to the so-called High Seas Treaty to protect marine life in international waters, with France and Spain the only two European signatories.
Two years later, the treaty has been ratified by fewer than 30 countries, short of the 60 countries needed to implement it at UN level.
Representatives of national delegations who have already backed the treaty hope to get enough new signatories in Nice for it to enter into force.
Over the next five days in Nice, hundreds of new pledges are expected from governments.
Conference organisers hope that by Friday, countries will adopt the Nice Ocean Action Plan - a political declaration setting out the main pledges to accelerate action on the conservation and sustainable use of oceans.
While in Nice, Mr Martin will also take part in a number of bilateral meetings, including with the King of Jordan, Abdullah II bin Al-Hussein, Prime Minister of Barbados Mia Mottley and former US Secretary of State John Kerry who also held a key climate portfolio during the Biden administration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Robinson accuses Israel of 'nonsense', 'malicious lying'
Former President Mary Robinson has condemned what she called "ridiculous", "nonsense" and "malicious lying" regarding Israeli claims that it is ready to distribute aid into Gaza. Mrs Robinson said that Israeli claims that UN agencies are not working quickly enough to distribute aid are "all ridiculous". "We saw the most there was incredible collaboration between the Egyptian Red Crescent... and the UN," she said, after a visit to Egypt and the Rafah crossing alongside former New Zealand president Helen Clark. Following the visit, Mrs Robinson said that targeted sanctions should be imposed on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and all members of his security cabinet. Speaking on RTÉ's News at One, Mrs Robinson said that there are "piles of vital materials that have been rejected, sent back. Tents, wheelchairs, crutches". She saw two lorries coming back with food parcels and one driver told her that he had been rejected twice in 24 hours for very minor reasons, such as the load being "too high". "I mean, for goodness sake," Mrs Robinson said, calling it "unconscionable". "We need to prevent and to punish, not to allow genocide." Israel has denied responsibility for hunger spreading in Gaza, accusing Hamas militants of stealing aid shipments, which Hamas denies. However, in response to a rising international uproar, Israel late last month announced steps to let more aid into the enclave, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas and announcing protected routes for aid convoys. 'I don't know how many will die before September' She praised "the effort on one side" of the border and condemned "the lack of even working hours on the other (Israeli) side", who often "knock off at four in the afternoon". "It is nonsense and it's part of the malicious lying on the Israeli side to deny starvation and to blame the UN". She recalled a trip to Somalia during the famine there in the 1990s, and "what it means when you have a severely malnourished child". But in Somalia those children "were getting exactly the medical aid" they needed. "There are 325,000 severely malnourished children in Gaza today," Mrs Robinson said, adding: "I don't know how many of them will die before September." She said that "there are stockpiles ready to go", and that "tomorrow they could flood Gaza with necesssary food". Mrs Robinson insisted that trade with Israeli is "crucial". She called on the EU "to implement the commitment under Article 2 of the Israeli-EU trade agreement, and stop the preferential trade" with Israel. The fact that three G7 countries are going to recognise Palestine in September "is really important". She also called on the League of Arab States "to step up". Asked of the prospects for a ceasefire, she said: "If President Trump would put some of his political energy behind it, it would happen." "We know that... he's the man that can do things fairly instantly."
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
How hunger and starvation are used as political weapons in Gaza
Analysis: Hunger has been used as a weapon of war for millennia, but is now recognised both morally and legally as a crime against humanity "We must never accept hunger as a weapon of war". So says UN Secretary-General António Guterres reflecting on the catastrophic reality in Gaza today, where the population of two million are being deliberately and systematically destroyed by famine and malnutrition. He is right of course, except that hunger has been a weapon of war for millennia. In 52 BC, Julius Caesar secured his most important victory against the Gauls, and hunger was his chosen weapon. The Roman army starved its enemy into submission. The fortified town of Alesia, in modern day eastern France, was subjected to Caesar's most audacious siege. In his Commentarii de Bello Gallico (Gallic Wars), Caesar boasts of killing 250,000 people, one of the earliest recorded genocides in history. Modern historians will tell you that that's a gross exaggeration, but they also agree that many thousands, mostly women and children, died of hunger and malnutrition in that siege. I wouldn't be surprised if Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a copy of Caesar's Gallic Wars on his desk. From RTÉ Radio 1's Sunday Miscellany, Mary Byrne's Looking for Gauls in Gallia Narbonensis on the trail of the Gauls from Caesar's Gallic Wars to Asterix The siege of Alesia was not the first time hunger was used as a weapon of war, and certainly not the last. There have been many sieges since then, and the 20th century was not an exception. Some of the most recent devastating sieges of the last 100 years include Stalingrad (1942-3), Beirut (1982) and Srebrenica (1992-5). Hunger is, and always has been, a weapon of war. In fact, hunger has always been a political weapon, even outside of wars. In his book The Politics of Hunger, which focuses on politics in England between 1750 and 1840, Carl Griffin examines how hunger was deliberately used by the British Empire as a disciplining device. The Irish people were often at the receiving end of this crushing policy. The future is unpredictable, however history has a tendency to repeat itself. Where wars erupt, hunger, malnutrition and starvation tend to follow. What is happening in Gaza today should not surprise anyone, least of all António Guterres. Nor should it surprise US president Donald Trump, who seemed flabbergasted when asked whether Israel was fuelling hunger in Gaza during his recent visit to Scotland: "I don't know... those children look very hungry... that's real starvation stuff". From RTÉ News, aid agencies say humanitarian suffering in Gaza at 'unimaginable' levels It's important to remind ourselves that at least one thing has changed since Julius Caesar's roamed with impunity across France, Germany and Britain, and more recently since the violent supremacy of the British Empire. The advent of the culture of human rights, and the international law framework for punishing or rebuking those who violate human rights, has been a game changer since the end of World War II. Hunger as a weapon of war is now recognised both morally and legally as a crime against humanity. The concept of crime against humanity has legal recognition in international law, thanks to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The crimes that can be charged as crimes against humanity include enslavement, deportation or forcible transfer of population, torture and sexual violence (rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization). It also includes the crime of extermination. While open to different interpretations, according to William Schabas, Professor Emeritus at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the University of Galway, the deprivation of access to food and medicine can constitute an act of extermination. From RTÉ News, Taoiseach says Israel's Gaza blockade 'clearly a war crime' The International Criminal Court has jurisdiction in accordance with the Rome Statute with respect to four legally recognized crimes: the crime of genocide; crimes against humanity; war crimes and the crime of aggression. These are not just abstract concepts, or mere words. The recognition of these crimes is an acknowledgement of our common humanity. Impunity or indifference in the face of these unimaginable atrocities that shock the conscience of humanity risk breaking not just the common bonds that unite all peoples, but also shattering the very meaning of what is to be human. Depriving access to food and medicine is considered by many human rights scholars a violation of a basic right, to be precise the right to subsistence. This right can be traced back to the work of 17th century German jurist and political philosopher Samuel von Pufendorf, but more recently it has been vindicated by some of the most influential scholars in human rights and political philosophy, including Henry Shue, who advocates the right to those material provisions needed for one's self-preservation. As Shue writes in his 1996 book Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy, "no one can fully, if at all, enjoy any right that is supposedly protected by society if he or she lacks the essentials for a reasonably healthy and active life". These essentials, which make up the right to subsistence, include the right to water, food, shelter, and access to basic medical provisions. From RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland, "I'm a genocide scholar. I know it when I see it". Holocaust historian and former Israeli soldier, Prof Omer Bartow, says the IDF campaign in Gaza amounts to genocide Israel signed the Rome Statue on December 31st 2000, but withdrew on August 28th 2002, and they have since formally indicated that they no longer plan to ratify the treaty. Sudan, the United States and Russia also withdrew their signature from the Rome Statute. Nevertheless, if international law is to retain any legitimacy and standing, it is imperative that the international community keeps using these terms, and that politicians and concerned global citizens keep referring to these crimes in relation to current affairs, whether the accused state is a signatory or not to the Rome Statute. The malnourished and starving children of Gaza are not the only victims of this conflict. The biggest casualty of the war in Gaza risks being politics itself. International politics and international human rights law are facing an existential crisis. It takes a gargantuan effort of optimism to keep believing in the power of politics during times of war, but the alternative is too dire to even consider. António Guterres says that we must never accept hunger as a weapon of war because he knows that the UN is being starved of its legitimacy, and international law is being starved of its efficiency. As Israel defends its latest plan to take control of Gaza City, the future of human rights - not only for Palestinians but for all of us - is in the balance.
Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Brazilian beef glut set to hit UK and EU markets
A tsunami of Brazilian beef, diverted from the USA by a new 76.4% tariff, is the last thing already inflated world markets need. American importers must now sharply reduce imports from Brazil. For the rest of 2025, about 165,000 tons of displaced Brazilian beef must find a new home, and much of it may be attracted to the high-priced markets in the UK and Europe that Ireland depends on. This market disruption could give us an early taste of the threat of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement trade deal hanging over cattle farmers in Ireland, the UK, and Europe. Soon, EU member states will assess a final consolidated agreement between Mercosur and the European Commission, and will decide if they can approve the trade deal. Such a deal would probably be enough to prevent beef farming in the EU recovering from its current low point. Yes, EU beef prices are very high now, but that is only because years of rising input costs, labour shortages, and increasing environmental pressures eroded herd sizes. In several parts of the world, farmers breeding for beef struggled too long to survive on low prices. Climate action pressure ground them down even further. It's not guaranteed they can recover and increase the supply of quality beef from the suckler sector. Many moved away to other farmer enterprises, or are unable to expand now because of advancing years (beef farmers in many countries are generally older than the farmer average age, which is nearly 60 in Ireland). Across the Atlantic, where cattle scarcity and record beef prices are also seen now, there is a perceptible trend of aging ranchers availing of the opportunity to cash in by selling off their herds. Ireland and the UK, and the rest of the world, are short of beef. Beef-loving consumers have to grit their teeth and pay much inflated prices. Will the market come to consumers' rescue, with the low supply generating high prices which incentivise beef farmers to increase production? Maybe not. Here in Ireland, the Irish Cattle and Sheep Farmers' Association (ICSA) beef chairman John Cleary said the 3.8% drop in the number of cattle up to June "could double next year". He said farmers were finding it harder and harder to maintain viable stocking rates. With supply dwindling, smaller processors could be squeezed out, he warned. In Scotland, QMS Market Intelligence manager Iain Macdonald, said: 'The continued contraction of Scotland's livestock herds highlights the urgent need for action.' He said high input costs, labour shortages, and elevated interest rates have reduced herds. Meanwhile, Irish farmers have a ringside seat, as beef cattle prices in many parts of the world continue rising at record levels. Usually, Irish beef farmers are looking up at higher prices worldwide, but that is no longer the case. Ireland now has the highest cattle prices for steer, heifer, or young bull beef in most of the UK or Ireland. Scottish farmers are up there also, and narrowly ahead of the Irish steer beef price. But farmers in Ireland have been getting the top rates for heifers, cows, and young bulls. In sterling terms, at last week's average prices, Irish farmers got nearly 658p/kg for steers, while the price was about 659p in Scotland. It was as low as 646.5p in the British midlands and Wales. The nearest others get to the 661p for heifer beef at Irish factories was 657p in Scotland, with these cattle making as low as 645.4p in southern England. Young bull prices ranged from 654.5p in Ireland, back to 636p in Northern England. As for the rest of Europe, prices at the beef processing level in Ireland shot above prices in most other EU member states since April, according to the Agri-Food Regulator's Beef Dashboard. Now, while the EU average male carcase languishes at just over €6.70 per kilo, it has gone to €7.80 in Ireland, according to European Commission data. Even as Irish cattle farmers enjoy prices for finished cattle projected to increase at least 35% compared to 2024, they are wondering where it will all end. Weanling prices have also surged. With input costs largely stable, these price improvements are translating into substantial income gains. And with cattle such an important commodity across tens of thousands of farms, Ireland's average farm income in 2025 is forecast by Teagasc to reach €48,500, 39% ahead of 2024, driven by dairy and drystock income gains. But can the export markets that take up to 90% of Ireland's livestock products absorb the beef price rise? About half of Ireland's beef goes to the UK, but what happens to that trading relationship, now that Irish prices have largely passed out UK prices? Inevitably, other supplying regions will chip away at Ireland's dominance of the UK's beef import market. Brazil and Australia are already reported to be increasing beef exports to the UK, an even more important international market destination this year, because UK imports are expected to increase 6%. UK retail beef price inflation has exceeded 9%, which market analysts say will cut total beef sales by 2.5%. It is well known British consumers in such circumstances buy less beef, or switch to other meats. Market information for the 12 weeks to mid-July indicated average UK prices for beef products had increased 13% year-on-year, resulting in a volume decline of 7.4% (9,498 tonnes), but a spend increase of 4.6%. Price increases in the dining-out market are also turning UK consumers away from beef.
