logo

Atlanta Fed shock sounds 'Trumpcession' warning: McGeever

Zawya04-03-2025

(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)
ORLANDO, Florida - "Trumpcession".
If you haven't heard the term before, you will now, as a closely watched real-time U.S. economic weathervane is signalling that GDP is shrinking at the fastest pace since the pandemic lockdown.
The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model estimate for annualized growth in the current quarter was a stunning -2.8% on Monday, down from +2.3% last week. A month ago the model showed that growth in the January-March period was tracking close to +4.0%.
These estimates are published regularly as new economic data is released, and can be quite volatile. There were 11 in February alone. Friday's shock reading of -1.5% was led by a record-high $153 billion trade deficit in January, most likely as firms front-loaded imports ahead of tariffs, and Monday's decline was driven by soft manufacturing activity.
There's every chance -2.8% turns into a positive reading in a few weeks.
True, the Atlanta Fed number is an outlier for now. The New York Fed's equivalent Nowcast real-time tracking model was updated on Friday to +2.9% annualized growth in Q1 from +3.0%. And the Dallas Fed's "weekly economic index", which doesn't include the most recent data, was showing +2.4% on February 27.
But the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow real-time estimates are historically the most reliable of these models, and the negative figures didn't come out of nowhere. A lot of soft economic indicators, like sentiment surveys, have been extremely weak in recent weeks, and some hard economic activity indicators are flashing red too.
Consumer sentiment in January slumped the most in three and a half years, retail sales dropped by the most in nearly two years, real spending fell at the fastest rate since early 2021, and retail giant Walmart has warned of a tough year ahead. It's perhaps no surprise that Citi's U.S. economic surprises index has slid into negative territory, hitting the lowest point since September.
A common thread running through all of this is the huge level of uncertainty being created by U.S. President Donald Trump's agenda: trade protectionism, particularly tariffs; his apparent growing closeness with Russia and distance from traditional allies like Europe; and the DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) scythe being taken to federal spending and employment.
NEGATIVE WEALTH EFFECT
Markets are certainly signaling there could be trouble ahead. The Nasdaq has lost as much as 9% in 10 days, with Big Tech down even more. Investors are seeking the safety of U.S. Treasuries: the two-year yield on Friday fell below 4.00% for the first time since October, and the 10-year yield has tumbled 60 bps since mid-January.
These moves could matter to the real economy because of the "wealth effect". As Moody's Mark Zandi noted recently, the top 10% of American households now account for around half of all consumer spending. That's a record. They also own a lot of stocks, and if Wall Street is heading south, they are more likely to tighten their belts.
Economist Phil Suttle said he expected Trump's agenda to weigh on the economy this year, but didn't expect it to have such an apparently negative impact so quickly. But if the "blunt and chaotic" implementation of Trump's spending and trade policies hit growth harder than imagined, the Federal Reserve may cut rates in the second quarter, Suttle reckons.
The Fed's rate-cutting cycle is on hold for now, largely because of the uncertainty surrounding Trump's trade and fiscal policies. But an impending "Trumpcession" probably wasn't on policymakers' mind when they pressed the pause button. It likely is now.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)
(By Jamie McGeever)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tariffs seen lifting underlying US consumer prices in May
Tariffs seen lifting underlying US consumer prices in May

Gulf Today

time2 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

Tariffs seen lifting underlying US consumer prices in May

US consumer prices likely increased moderately in May amid relatively cheaper gasoline, but the Trump administration's import tariffs probably started filtering through to other goods, potentially raising underlying inflation pressures. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) report from the labour Department on Wednesday could show the CPI less the volatile food and energy components rising by the most in four months. Economists said the increase in the so-called core CPI would be attributable to higher prices from President Donald Trump's sweeping import duties. May would mark the start of tariff-related high inflation readings that could last through year end, they said. Walmart last month said it would begin raising prices in late May and June. Economists said inflation has been slow to respond to tariffs as most retailers were selling merchandise accumulated before the duties took effect. 'Retailers showed remarkable restraint in April,' said Stephen Stanley, chief US economist at Santander US Capital Markets. 'May should bring the leading edge of price increases, with the maximum impact coming in June and July.' The CPI likely increased 0.2 per cent last month after advancing by the same margin in April, a Reuters survey of economists showed. Gasoline prices were mostly lower in May as concerns over global economic growth curbed crude oil prices. In the 12-months through May, the CPI was forecast increasing 2.5 per cent after rising 2.3 per cent in April. Some of the rise in the year-on-year CPI would reflect last year's low readings dropping out of the calculation. Core CPI is forecast to have climbed 0.3 per cent, which would be the biggest gain since January, after rising 0.2 per cent in April. In the 12 months through May, core CPI inflation is estimated to have increased 2.9 per cent after rising 2.8 per cent in April. The Federal Reserve tracks different inflation measures for its 2 per cent target. The US central bank is expected to leave its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25 per cent-4.50 per cent range next Wednesday while policymakers monitor the economic impact of the tariffs. The CPI data will come under close scrutiny in the months ahead after the Bureau of labour Statistics, the labour Department's agency that compiles the report and other economic releases including the closely watched employment report, announced last week the suspension of CPI data collection in three cities because of resource constraints. The BLS like all government agencies has been severely affected by mass firings, voluntary resignations, early retirements and hiring freezes, which are part of an unprecedented campaign by the White House to drastically reduce the size of government and remake it. The BLS has also announced that it would, effective with the release of the July Producer Price Index data in August, end the calculation and publication of about 350 indexes. That would include data from PPI industry, commodity, final demand-intermediate demand and special index classifications. Economists said that the BLS had with the CPI data reported a rise in the share of categories for which prices were calculated using a method called different cell imputation, which some viewed as less accurate. The BLS said on Tuesday its published data met rigorous standards, but did not address staffing issues. 'Data quality is evaluated through measures of variance, bias studies, and assessments of survey methods,' the agency said in a statement to Reuters. 'BLS continues to evaluate data quality.' A former BLS commissioner told Reuters that staff levels were considerably low at the agency. 'I understand that BLS staffing is down by at least 15% now, that's not reflected in any official numbers yet, because many of them are still being paid,' said Erica Groshen. 'They are not at work and it is impinging on the agencies. Also the hiring freeze means that they can't be replaced.' Groshen said the CPI report remained reliable, noting an increased shift towards electronic collection of data. 'At a national level, the standard errors aren't really affected very much, and the reliability is still good, but it's really disaggregated at the granular level, where you're starting to see some real losses,' she said. 'It's just not aiding publication standards, and so they're not putting it out, but they can still use it as input to the national numbers.' Other economists agreed, noting that the collection suspension only affected a small area. 'I don't see that as being a deal breaker,' said Brian Bethune, an economics professor at Boston College. 'The problem would be, if they start to have to suppress more of them or drop them out of the survey, then that could be more problematic.' Reuters

A fragile truce reached during US-China trade talks
A fragile truce reached during US-China trade talks

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

A fragile truce reached during US-China trade talks

After 20 hours of intense negotiations in London – and a late-night delivery from a well-known restaurant – the US and China have emerged with a framework trade agreement that offers a pause in escalating tensions but falls short of a full breakthrough. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick described the outcome with cautious optimism. 'We finally have meat on the bone,' he told reporters in London. 'This is progress – not just atmospherics – and it reflects meaningful give on both sides.' Three pillars of the London framework Tariffs stopped until August 10: Both nations have agreed to a temporary halt in tariff escalation to allow space for continued dialogue. Concessions from China have been agreed on to ease export controls on rare earth elements and industrial magnets, critical for the US defence and automotive sectors. This move is seen as a strategic opening, particularly given China's grip on global rare earth supplies. US concessions include a rollback on selected semiconductor restrictions, a signal that Washington is open to de-escalation in the sensitive tech space. Implementation or illusion? The agreement is now in the so-called 'implementation phase', awaiting ratification by Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump. But the reaction from financial markets is one of cautious recalibration. 'Markets have seen the movie of a US-China deal falling apart, so too have markets seen the patch-up movie many times,' said veteran analyst Terry Haines at Pangaea Policy. Equities, bonds and foreign exchange markets registered only marginal moves. The hesitation is rooted in scepticism, given the long history of similar efforts unravelling. 'China's not interested in geopolitical moderation,' Mr Haines said. 'Today's geopolitical situation argues against China wanting to do any broad deals – especially with China's client states, Russia and Iran, both becoming more belligerent and difficult over the past week.' Cynicism or realism? The broader concern among analysts is that China may be engaging in what's been called 'extend and pretend' – offering incremental concessions to avoid conflict while avoiding deeper structural change. What happens next? Markets and risk takers have a simplistic take on 'fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me'. The framework agreed to in London represents a moment of stability in a volatile relationship, but few are mistaking it for a turning point. Markets, policymakers and analysts alike are watching closely – not for more words, but for tangible implementation and long-term change.

Trump says Musk was 'very nice' to express regret on his posts
Trump says Musk was 'very nice' to express regret on his posts

Khaleej Times

time4 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Trump says Musk was 'very nice' to express regret on his posts

Donald Trump on Wednesday responded to Elon Musk expressing regret about some of his social media posts about the US President, saying in an interview with the New York Post that he thought it was very nice that Musk did that. Musk earlier said he regretted some of the posts he made last week about Trump as they had gone "too far", the latest sign of a tentative reconciliation between the two men. "I thought it was very nice that he did that,' the New York Post quoted Trump as saying.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store