logo
Donald Tusk's self-own

Donald Tusk's self-own

Photo by NurPhoto/Getty
It's no surprise that the marginal win on 2 June of Poland's President-elect, Karol Nawrocki, has rattled politics internationally considering his anti-EU stance – and his victory couldn't have been more of a blow to Poland's prime minister, Donald Tusk. Sensing the country's politics have once again become destabilised, Tusk called for a vote of confidence on Monday (11 June) in an attempt to bolster his party and strengthen their political power. 'I needed this vote for obvious reasons,' Tusk said after the votes have been cast. 'There have been speculations that this government won't be able to support itself and it's difficult to work in these conditions.' Yet the vote did little to prove his critics wrong.
Marginal wins have recently become depressingly commonplace in Polish politics: in the first round of the presidential election, Rafał Trzaskowski narrowly won before Nawrocki secured the office with a 0.9 per cent advantage in the second round. Now Tusk has garnered the support of just 53 per cent of the Polish parliament, the Sejm. Rather than proving that Polish MPs have trust in his leadership, the vote of confidence has further demonstrated that Poland is divided. One member of the opposition said that what Tusk called on himself was in fact a 'vote of no confidence'. Only seven members of the Sejm abstained from voting, including Jarosław Kaczynski, the leader of the right-wing Law and Justice party, whose relations with Tusk have been tense since his first term as prime minister in 2007.
So, what did the vote of confidence achieve? Simply put: nothing. The question period that proceeded the vote was less of a Q&A than an opportunity for Tusk's opponents to air their grievances in front of one another. Addressing the 'usually not present' prime minister – a phrase that many members of the opposition wielded to highlight Tusk's frequent lack of attendance in the Sejm – the usual repertoire of issues was broached ranging from education, public spending, the national healthcare system and the prime minister's systematic failures in their regard. As the question period dragged on, the condemnations disguised as questions became more audacious. A Law and Justice MP, Łukasz Kmita, called Tusk's leadership pathological and only possible thanks to his 'kiss-asses'. This sentiment was shared by fellow Law and Justice MP Zbigniew Bogucki who called Tusk's premiership 'pato-władza' – pathological governance. Another MP addressed Tusk as 'Herr Tusk' and proceeded to speak to him 'in a language he will understand' – German. The anti-German sentiment of the opposition was impossible to ignore, especially aimed at the prime minister. For years Tusk has been the subject of conspiracy theories that paint him as a 'German spy' due to his pro-EU sentiments, allyship with Germany – a position some view as selling Poland out – and his German heritage on his mother's side.
So, yes, Donald Tusk won his vote, but he didn't exactly bolster confidence. In the past, the vote of confidence has been a tool wielded in difficult and important political moments – something Tusk has experience with having called on it in 2012 and 2014. This is one of those significant political moments, yet the tactic failed. Rather than proving unity, the vote drew a firm divisive line. With an upcoming parliamentary reshuffle in July and the presidency of Nawrocki starting in August, the country is entering a summer of political disturbance. According to United Surveys, 44.8 per cent of the Polish public think that Tusk should resign – a sentiment clearly shared with many members of the Sejm. The political divide in the country and in the Polish parliament will lead to further disillusionment and political fatigue. Nawrocki's presidency will not only add to the domestic political unrest but will also have an inevitable ripple effect on politics and policy beyond Poland's borders.
[See also: The world is finally turning against the war on Gaza]
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Related

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Irish leaders ‘deeply concerned' by air strikes on Iran
Irish leaders ‘deeply concerned' by air strikes on Iran

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Irish leaders ‘deeply concerned' by air strikes on Iran

Israel launched strikes on Tehran early on Friday, targeting the country's nuclear programme and rekindling fears of a full-scale conflict. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has warned that Israel should expect 'severe punishment' in response, and it was reported on Friday morning that drones had been launched. The attack appeared to be the most significant Iran has faced since its war with Iraq in the 1980s. Irish premier Micheal Martin said that stability was needed and called for diplomacy. 'I call on all in the Middle East to exercise the utmost restraint and to avoid further escalation,' the Taoiseach said. 'The region and the world need stability. Diplomacy must be the only way forward.' Ireland's deputy premier Simon Harris said further escalation would risk 'regional spillover', which would be 'disastrous'. 'I am deeply concerned about the reports of extensive military air strikes by Israel on Iran overnight,' the Tanaiste said. 'The Middle East desperately needs peace and stability. 'Further escalation would bring a very real risk of regional spillover. This would be disastrous for all the peoples of the region. 'I urge restraint and de-escalation by all involved, and for those with influence to use it positively at this critical moment. A negotiated solution is needed to address Iran's nuclear programme. 'My officials are in touch with our embassy in Tehran regarding the safety of the small Irish community in Iran and we are in close contact with our EU partners.'

Irish leaders ‘deeply concerned' by air strikes on Iran
Irish leaders ‘deeply concerned' by air strikes on Iran

Belfast Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Irish leaders ‘deeply concerned' by air strikes on Iran

Israel launched strikes on Tehran early on Friday, targeting the country's nuclear programme and rekindling fears of a full-scale conflict. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has warned that Israel should expect 'severe punishment' in response, and it was reported on Friday morning that drones had been launched. The attack appeared to be the most significant Iran has faced since its war with Iraq in the 1980s. Irish premier Micheal Martin said that stability was needed and called for diplomacy. 'I call on all in the Middle East to exercise the utmost restraint and to avoid further escalation,' the Taoiseach said. 'The region and the world need stability. Diplomacy must be the only way forward.' Ireland's deputy premier Simon Harris said further escalation would risk 'regional spillover', which would be 'disastrous'. 'I am deeply concerned about the reports of extensive military air strikes by Israel on Iran overnight,' the Tanaiste said. 'The Middle East desperately needs peace and stability. 'Further escalation would bring a very real risk of regional spillover. This would be disastrous for all the peoples of the region. 'I urge restraint and de-escalation by all involved, and for those with influence to use it positively at this critical moment. A negotiated solution is needed to address Iran's nuclear programme. 'My officials are in touch with our embassy in Tehran regarding the safety of the small Irish community in Iran and we are in close contact with our EU partners.'

Lots more fleshing out of the ‘how and when' for indy will be required
Lots more fleshing out of the ‘how and when' for indy will be required

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Lots more fleshing out of the ‘how and when' for indy will be required

Independence is not for me but for the people of Scotland, and that dream must be realised within a feasible timescale as part of a clear and defined plan. My take from Tuesday's National, particularly the sentiment from the letters pages, is that of disappointment. Disappointment we do not have that clarity and the plan; disappointment we are still not shouting out the benefits of independence and the many downsides of today's Union; disappointment with the lack of vision; disappointment with lack of inspired campaigning; disappointment that the constitutional convention is not in place; disappointment that independence – the raison d'etre of the SNP – has not been promoted as we continue to persuade the undecided, primarily through good governance. After 18 years, how many more years do we need? Do we really believe this will translate into a few more percentage points for independence no matter what the Unionists throw at us? READ MORE: SNP's losing strategy for by-election took the electorate for fools Voting SNP1 and SNP2 is seen as a folly. Perhaps one for James Kelly – how many independence-supporting MSPs do we get by voting SNP1 and SNP2 compared with SNP1 and Green or Alba or other as vote 2? That clarity might help me and other voters. James Dornan MSP advocates keeping John Swinney, recognising the SNP and John's achievements. I see no advantage in change at this point. However, James says that we must put indy left, right and centre. He implies good governance over the years. He does not properly explain why indy has not been to the fore and kept to the fore of late. James says a referendum will follow a pro-indy majority. I suggest a lot more fleshing out of 'exactly how and when' is needed, together with a detailed plan to counter the many obstacles that lie ahead, courtesy of the overwhelming pro-Union media, the other political parties and the establishment. I will remain optimistic that independence will be achieved. It would be good to see a new citizens' convention or constitutional convention in place and positive contributors such as Believe in Scotland and Common Weal help drive independence. Ken Howells Longniddry IN his letter 'Will the SNP once again seek 'both votes'?' (June 10), James Duncan refers to the 'stupid call for 'Both votes SNP'' and ... and the possibility of 'list voters being encouraged to vote for other independence-supporting candidates on the list'. There was a letter published in The National on Tuesday, December 10, 2024 which explained why this is not possible. READ MORE: The SNP can't suggest we use our second votes for a different party James may be thinking of what is called 'apparentement' in mainland Europe, in which electoral law permits political parties to form alliances for an election campaign. Such an arrangement is not permissible by current electoral law here. If such an arrangement was possible, the result of the Scottish Parliament elections in 2021 could have been more than 75% of the seats with almost 49% of the vote – not very democratic. If a political party has the highest quotient at any time during the calculations for allocation of list seats, it MUST be allocated that seat even if it has all of the constituency seats in a region. Michael Follon Glenrothes MORE smoke and mirrors from the Labour Party and the UK Government. From my recollection, this is the third time the UK Government has proclaimed financial backing for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project (proposed 20 years ago) but there is still no money on the table. While tens of billions of pounds continue to flow into projects south of the Border, Scotland is supposed to be grateful for the UK Government now declaring financial support for the Edinburgh exascale supercomputer a year after it cancelled funding. Increased public spending commitments have been cynically hailed by Labour Party politicians without reference to projected inflation increases or different spending choices made north and south of the Border. READ MORE: Fraser of Allander calls out Labour's Spending Review claim To cap it all, Governor Murray now hypocritically says that the Scottish Government did not spend last year's budget increase 'wisely' when much of it was spent on increased public-sector wages while the Scottish Government also continued to mitigate the effects of Westminster-imposed austerity. Or has the 'Governor' (also referred to by some as the 'Viceroy') now abandoned the last vestiges of socialist principles he presumably once held? If that is the case, why are Scottish trade unions still supporting a Labour Party that in government continues to betray the poor and disadvantaged in Scotland while also being complicit in the continuing slaughter and devastation in Gaza? Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian THE words of the UK Chancellor 'we are renewing Britain' were heard in the House of Commons on Wednesday, yet what followed left questions unanswered. The Chancellor announced a 0.8% increase to Scotland's block grant, yet most UK Government departments were allocated more than 2%, prompting the question 'where is Scotland's 2%'? Catriona C Clark Falkirk

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store