
Editorial: 80 yrs since Potsdam, Japan must defend rule of law against great power politics
The declaration was a final ultimatum, announced during the Potsdam Conference where the leaders of the U.S., Britain and the Soviet Union discussed the postwar governance of Germany and Japan following Germany's defeat.
Japan ignored the ultimatum, and the United States used this as justification to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Soviet Union also broke its neutrality pact with Tokyo, joined the declaration, and invaded Japanese-controlled territory.
Then Prime Minister Kantaro Suzuki's Cabinet ultimately decided to surrender, but was unable to persuade the hardline military leadership to do so. It was only through the "sacred decision" of Emperor Hirohito (posthumously Emperor Showa) that Japan accepted the declaration, bringing the war to an end.
Until that moment, Japan pinned its hopes on Soviet mediation for peace. A key factor behind this miscalculation was Japan's failure to grasp the existence of the Yalta Agreement, signed five months earlier by the U.S., British and Soviet leaders.
In that secret deal, Washington, eager to end the war quickly, asked Moscow to enter the war against Japan, and in return agreed to Soviet demands for the cession of southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands.
Then U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in doing so, set aside the "no territorial expansion" principle he had championed in the Atlantic Charter, and pandered to Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin.
Roosevelt knowingly accepted not only the Soviet claim to southern Sakhalin, lost by Russia to Japan in the Russo-Japanese War, but also the Kuril Islands, which had belonged to Japan even before that -- a move that was clearly excessive.
While such wartime diplomacy may have been realist, the U.S.-Soviet deal left a lasting scar. The Northern Territories issue, with Russia's illegal occupation of a clutch of islands off Hokkaido, remains unresolved to this day.
The calculations of great powers also led to a divided world. The postwar partition of Germany by the U.S., Britain, France and Soviet Union, and the U.S. military occupation of Japan, triggered the start of the Cold War. The struggle for spheres of influence sparked a fierce arms race, pushing the world to the brink of nuclear war. We must reflect once more on the harsh history of the 20th century.
Today, there is growing concern over great power politics surrounding the war in Ukraine. Russia has not hesitated to threaten to resort to nuclear arms, and Washington has even indicated a willingness to accept the partial cession of Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory to Moscow.
If the self-serving logic of major powers is allowed to prevail, it risks a return to the age of imperialism. We must not turn back the clock.
The Potsdam Declaration, which called for respect for fundamental human rights, became the foundation for postwar Japan's democracy and its path as a peaceful nation. Rejecting the arbitrary actions of great powers that shake international order and defending the rule of law is the role Japan must play now.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Japan and China commemorate World War II anniversary on different dates
BENXI, China (AP) -- Eighty years after the end of World War II, Japan and China are marking the anniversary with major events, but on different dates and in different ways. Japan remembers the victims in a solemn ceremony on Aug. 15, the day then-Emperor Hirohito announced in a crackly radio message that the government had surrendered, while China showcases its military strength with a parade on Sept. 3, the day after the formal surrender on an American battleship in Tokyo Bay. Japan occupied much of China before and during WWII in a devastating and brutal invasion that, by some estimates, killed 20 million people. The wartime experience still bedevils relations between the two countries today. A museum in the Chinese city of Benxi highlights the struggles of anti-Japanese resistance fighters who holed up in log cabins through fierce winters in the country's northeast, then known as Manchuria, before retreating into Russia. They returned only after the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and launched an offensive into Manchuria on Aug. 9, 1945 -- the same day the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki -- adding to the pressure on Japan to surrender. Nowadays, it is China's military that raises alarm as it seeks to enforce the government's territorial claims in the Pacific. When Japan talks of building up its defense to counter the threat, its militaristic past gives China a convenient retort. "We urge Japan to deeply reflect on its historical culpability, earnestly draw lessons from history and stop using hype over regional tensions and China-related issues to conceal its true intent of military expansion," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said last month. Japan's surrender broadcast Hirohito's prerecorded surrender broadcast on Aug. 15, 1945, was incomprehensible to many Japanese. He used arcane language and the sound quality was poor. What was important, historians say, was that the message came from the emperor himself. Hirohito was considered a living god, and the war was fought in his name. Most Japanese had never heard his voice before. "The speech is a reminder of what it took to end the wrong war," Nihon University professor Takahisa Furukawa told The Associated Press in 2015. The current emperor, Hirohito's grandson Naruhito, and the prime minister are set to make remarks at the annual ceremony in Tokyo on Aug. 15, broadcast live by public broadcaster NHK. At last year's event, Naruhito expressed deep remorse over Japan's actions during the war. But on the same day, three Japanese cabinet ministers visited Tokyo's Yasukuni shrine, drawing criticism from China and South Korea, which see the shrine as a symbol of militarism. China marks Victory Day Japan surrendered on Sept. 2, 1945, in a ceremony on board the American battleship USS Missouri. The foreign minister, in a top hat and tails, and the army chief signed on behalf of Hirohito. The signatories on the other side were U.S. Gen. Douglas MacArthur and representatives from China and other nations that had fought Japan. China designated the next day, Sept. 3, as Victory Day. Eleven years ago, the Communist Party stepped up how China marks the anniversary. All of China's top leaders, including President Xi Jinping, attended a commemorative event on Sept. 3. The renewed focus came at a time of rising tension with Japan over conflicting interpretations of wartime history and a still-ongoing territorial dispute in the East China Sea. The next year, China staged a military parade on the 70th anniversary of the end of the war. A decade later, preparations are underway for another grand parade with missiles, tanks and fighter jets overhead. Russian President Vladimir Putin is among those expected to attend.

3 hours ago
Japan Govt Asks Fukuoka Pref. for Support to Raise Minimum Wages
News from Japan Society Aug 14, 2025 19:52 (JST) Fukuoka, Aug. 14 (Jiji Press)--Japanese economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa called for support from the governor of Fukuoka Prefecture, southwestern Japan, on Thursday to raise minimum wages in the country. On Aug. 4, the Central Minimum Wages Council, which advises the labor minister, recommended that minimum hourly wages be raised by a record 63 yen, or 6 pct, on national average in fiscal 2025, which began last April. Based on the recommendation, prefectural councils determine their own minimum wages. The Japanese government has a target of raising minimum wages to 1,500 yen on average during the 2020s. This means that an increase of at least 7.3 pct is necessary every year. Akazawa told Fukuoka Governor Seitaro Hattori in their meeting at the prefectural office on Thursday that he wants to see a wage hike above the recommended level achieved in the prefecture. The minister told reporters after the meeting that he has called five or six other prefectural governors to ask for their cooperation. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press


The Mainichi
6 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Xenophobic column raises question over Japan publisher's human rights awareness
Japanese publisher Shinchosha released a column written by journalist Masayuki Takayama in the July 31 issue of its weekly magazine "Shukan Shincho." It was a xenophobic piece targeting individuals of foreign descent with differing opinions from his, and it raises questions about the human rights awareness of the major publishing house. Takayama named figures with foreign roots, including an author, researcher and actor, attacking them by saying, "It's your choice if you dislike Japan or the Japanese, but at least don't use Japanese names." The column's title "Soshi-kaimei 2.0" references a policy that forced people in the colonial Korean Peninsula to adopt Japanese-style names. Such rhetoric denies diversity and could lead to the exclusion of foreigners. Names are part of an individual's identity, and demanding their change is unacceptable. "What does it mean for a publisher, supposed to be a part of global literature, to propagate racism?" said writer Ushio Fukazawa, whose name was mentioned by Takayama in the column, recently at a press conference demanding an apology from Shinchosha. Fukazawa, who has roots in the Korean Peninsula, has depicted the struggles faced by Korean residents of Japan. The Japan P.E.N. Club has issued an urgent statement, saying, "We express our concern over the prevalence of exclusionist discourse." Other writers have also voiced protest. Following the press conference, Shinchosha posted an apology on its website to Fukazawa, acknowledging that the column "emotionally hurt the writer and caused significant psychological pain." It also promised to "inform (the columnist) about changes in public opinion and societal demands." However, in his latest column, Takayama did not address this issue at all. In 2018, Shinchosha published a contribution that disregarded human rights. Mio Sugita, then a Liberal Democratic Party member of the House of Representatives, claimed in the monthly magazine "Shincho 45" that sexual minority couples are "unproductive." This became a social issue, leading to the magazine's suspension. Publishers have a fundamental responsibility to contribute to a better society. Yet, Shinchosha has repeatedly allowed disregard for human rights. An in-depth examination of the underlying causes is necessary. Society is built by people from various origins and cultural backgrounds. If arguments that reject differing opinions based on one's background are accepted, it could threaten individuals' rights and lead to societal stagnation.