A Reported Reason Why ‘GTA 6' Has Been Delayed So Long
GTA 6
It was shocking but not surprising when Rockstar announced yesterday that Grand Theft Auto 6 would be delayed out of its fall 2025 release window and instead be out 6+ months later on May 26, 2026.
The stated reasons Rockstar gave were the usual things like 'we want to exceed your expectations' and 'deliver the level of quality you deserve,' but behind the scenes, a new report from the ever-reliable Jason Schreier gets into specifics.
And it actually makes Rockstar look…good?
Schreier claims that a part of the reason for this delay is to purposefully avoid the kinds of brutal crunch in races to the finish line that the studio has suffered before. Schreier previously covered this in a 2018 story about Red Dead Redemption 2, and he says he's been keeping an eye on things since. This seems to have resulted in at some positive changes, and that it's factoring into the GTA 6 delay decision. Here's Schreier on BlueSky:
Then, responding to pushback about the crunch issue, he continues:
FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™
Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase
Pinpoint By Linkedin
Guess The Category
Queens By Linkedin
Crown Each Region
Crossclimb By Linkedin
Unlock A Trivia Ladder
GTA 6
This has not been without pain on Rockstar's end, as this announcement to push GTA 6 out of the fiscal year after repeated assurances to investors it would be out this fall, has resulted in a nearly 7% stock drop in the past day, albeit Take-Two has avoided the crushing declines in other areas of the market, with its stock up 50% over the course of the past year. It is currently in the highest window it's ever been, so investors can't be too upset.
There are no real downsides to the GTA 6 delay. Players will get to play a better game. Rockstar employees will hopefully not be worked quite as relentlessly. Other developers can now breathe a sigh of relief that it's not out this fall. And we finally have an actual release date.
But still, how about another trailer? Eh?
Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram.
Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fiverr CEO Micha Kaufman Warns His Employees: 'AI Is Coming For Your Jobs. It's Coming From My Job Too. This Is A Wake Up Call'
Fiverr (NYSE:FVRR) CEO Micha Kaufman isn't sugarcoating the reality of artificial intelligence. In a company-wide email that's been making waves online, Kaufman wrote plainly: 'AI is coming for your jobs. Heck, it's coming for my job too. This is a wake-up call.' In a CBS News interview on May 21, Kaufman said the email was a response to growing unease among his team. 'They weren't really waiting for my email,' he said. 'This email was a validation of the things that they feel. And it was all about, you know, talking openly and directly to our team, like grown-ups.' Don't Miss: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers trust this AI marketing firm — Kaufman's message wasn't about fear—it was about urgency. He encouraged employees to embrace AI as a tool to increase output and quality, saying it should feel like gaining 'superpowers.' 'My expectations are double or triple the output per unit of time, and the same for the quality,' Kaufman told CBS News. 'If something used to take us three months to build and then fail... today we can test things in three days.' He urged his team to automate 100% of their repetitive tasks. 'That might raise the question, will that make them replaceable? And my answer is absolutely not,' Kaufman said. 'Because when you have all of your time free... you free up your time to do things that human beings have special capabilities in—non-linear thinking, judgment calls, issues that have to do with taste, making decisions, thinking about strategy,' he told CBS News. His belief: AI won't erase humanity from work. It will force people to double down on their uniquely human strengths. Trending: Meanwhile, others in the industry are sounding similar alarms, especially when it comes to entry-level jobs. LinkedIn Chief Economic Opportunity Officer Aneesh Raman wrote in a May 27 op-ed for The New York Times that AI is already replacing starter roles like junior software engineers, paralegals and retail associates. 'Breaking first is the bottom rung of the career ladder,' Raman wrote. He warned that college graduates are feeling the pressure hardest, with unemployment among them rising to 30% since 2022. According to LinkedIn data that Raman cited, 40% of Gen Z workers would be willing to take a 2 to 5 percent pay cut if it meant more advancement opportunities. Raman also highlighted long-term consequences. 'Young adults who experience six months of unemployment at age 22 can expect to earn approximately $22,000 less over the next decade,' he wrote in The address the issue, Raman says companies must rethink entry-level work. He pointed to firms like KPMG and Macfarlanes, which are giving new hires higher-level responsibilities and using AI to help, not replace, them. 'They need to redesign entry-level jobs that give workers higher-level tasks that add value beyond what can be produced by AI,' Raman wrote. The message from both Kaufman and Raman is that AI is here, and it's not going away. But instead of running from it, the challenge is learning how to work with it—and make room for the things only humans can do. Read Next: Can you guess how many retire with a $5,000,000 nest egg? .UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Fiverr CEO Micha Kaufman Warns His Employees: 'AI Is Coming For Your Jobs. It's Coming From My Job Too. This Is A Wake Up Call' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Verge
40 minutes ago
- The Verge
People Can Fly cancels two projects and will lay off workers
People Can Fly has announced it has cancelled two in-development projects and will undergo a round of layoffs. 'Today we made the very difficult decision to suspend the development of project Gemini and project Bifrost,' wrote People Can Fly CEO Sebastian Wojciechowski on the studio's LinkedIn page. 'As a result we have to significantly regroup as a studio and scale down our teams.' Little was known publicly about either project. The Warsaw-based studio known for Bulletstorm and Outriders has been having difficulties with some of its in-development projects for a while now. In December, a notice from the company stated it would suspend production on a project codenamed Victoria and reduce the team working on Bifrost. In today's announcement, Wojciechowski wrote that cancellations were due to an unspecified publisher's failure to present necessary publishing agreements, and a 'lack of communication' regarding whether or not the publisher wants to continue with development. The statement also attributed the cancellations to issues with the publisher's cash flow stating it, 'showed a lack of prospects for securing organizational resources and funds necessary to continue the production.' And the name of the publisher? It isn't exactly a mystery. In the developer's statement from December, People Can Fly named its collaborator on Project Gemini as Square Can Fly — which was acquired by Epic Games in 2012 before going independent again in 2015 — will continue development on Xbox's next Gears of War title, Gears of War: E-Day, as a partner studio working with The Coalition.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Study Shows That Left-Leaning Influencers Remain Active on X, Despite Supporting Bluesky
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. While Bluesky's growth has slowed of late, there is one user cohort in which it continues to gain traction, with news influencers increasingly turning to Bluesky as an alternative to X. Or, really, as a supplement to the app formerly known as Twitter. According to a new study conducted by Pew Research Center, many news influencers, especially left-leaning ones, are indeed now also active on Bluesky, yet they continue to post on X as well, reflecting something of a soft protest to Elon Musk's changes at the app. As you can see in this chart, based on a selection of 500 news influencers identified by Pew, each with more than 100k followers on X, many of them have now activated a Bluesky profile, in addition to their original X presence. Bluesky activity ramped up after the 2024 U.S. election, with the pervading sentiment being that many people had grown increasingly concerned about Elon Musk's rising political influence, and were therefore seeking to move away from X. But they haven't exactly abandoned Elon's social project: As you can see in this chart, while more news influencers are now also active on Bluesky, their posting activity on X hasn't declined in a significant way. As per Pew: 'About half (54%) of news influencers on Bluesky posted there in the first full week of January, but this share grew to 66% in the last full week of March. During the same period, X remained popular but saw a small decline in activity: 92% of news influencers on X posted there in the first full week of January, compared with 87% in the last full week of March.' So while Bluesky has gained momentum, it's not close to surpassing X as the leading news platform as yet, with most left-leaning influencers who are posting on Bluesky still maintaining their activity on Elon's app. The data is reflective of both the opportunity and challenge ahead of Bluesky, with the app's decentralized social approach appealing to those in the know, who have strong views about a free and open web. Yet, for most regular users, decentralized social doesn't mean much, and they don't really care what's being shared where, nor how they can control their personal data. Most people will simply go wherever the crowd is, which is why X remains popular, as it has a far bigger audience (reportedly 600 million users per month) than Bluesky (36 million). Bluesky has also been surpassed by Meta's Threads, which is now up to 350 million actives. That's despite Threads being owned by another tech billionaire, as opposed to going the open-source, freedom-focused, decentralized route. Sure, Threads has its own Fediverse sharing elements as well, but it remains an experimental element, and I'd assume that Meta simply hasn't seen the demand or interest in such to make it more of a focus. Threads is actually a perfect example of how the open network approach isn't catching on, despite a lot of media hype. Because while a lot of media commentators are supporters of a more open approach, which is why these influencers are now active on Bluesky, it's Threads that's seeing major growth momentum, versus Bluesky, which has continued to slow after its post-election boost. So does that mean that it's all over for Bluesky? Well, no. Every time one of the big players slips up, and does something that annoys user sensibilities, there'll be another surge towards Bluesky again. If, for example, Elon was to sell X user data to a third-party AI project, or Meta announced a significant reduction in the reach of link posts in Threads. Things like this will spark negative media coverage, and commentators will once again point to open protocols as a means to side-step corporate, rich-guy-influenced control. Yet, despite that all being true, all being valuable, all relevant info for maintaining important oversight in the modern digital age, where all of our information is online, it's still all about critical mass. And also, convenience. People will only use a social app if there's content there that they want to see, users, creators and brands that they want to engage with. And if Bluesky can't get that critical momentum, with a significant amount of relevant creators, it just won't pull in a crowd. And on the convenience front, as we saw with Mastodon, while being able to dictate which specific server you connect to, which rules are in place for each, and the algorithm weights that dictate your experience, most people will opt for a simpler, set-up and log-in approach, regardless of the expanded benefits. And looking at Bluesky's daily post activity, in regards to the number of people posting to the app, the signs are not great: After the U.S. election, Bluesky reached a peak of 1.5 million daily posters. That's now declined by a third, and it's steadily falling, as Threads continues to rise. Which supports Pew's findings, that important high-profile, left-leaning creators are hedging their bets by posting to Bluesky, yet they're also not going all in on the app. Which means users can still see their content on the platforms where they already have an established profile and following, where they already know what to expect, and they don't need to have an in-depth understanding of server-side architecture to understand how to connect. So while many commentators may well be advocates for more control, more options, and more means to manage your social media experience, even they won't abandon their audience reach on the main apps. Recommended Reading Bluesky Expands Profile Verification to All Notable Users Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
