Poll: Zohran Mamdani's policies are popular with Americans outside New York — even if Mamdani is not
Mamdani's surprise victory also made him an instant lightning rod for Democrats and Republicans nationwide. Some of the conversation has centered on Mamdani's identity — he is a Muslim who was born in Uganda to Indian-origin parents — and his pro-Palestinian views. (The New York Times reported last week that Mamdani checked the boxes for 'Asian' and 'Black or African American' on his application to Columbia University in 2009.)
But perhaps the more interesting debate — or at least the one with wider implications — is whether Mamdani's unapologetically populist agenda can serve as a blueprint for Democrats elsewhere as they struggle to regain power in the Age of Trump.
A new Yahoo News/YouGov poll suggests that wouldn't necessarily be the worst idea.
The survey of 1,597 U.S. adults — which was conducted from June 26 to 30, just before Mamdani's primary win — did not find the candidate himself to be particularly popular (or well known). Overall, just 22% of Americans say they have a favorable opinion of Mamdani. A greater share (31%) see him unfavorably — and an even greater share than that (46%) say they don't know what to think. Even among Democrats, Mamdani's favorability rating (47%) is under the 50% threshold, and a full 42% don't have an opinion about him yet.
But the Democratic Party as a whole is in worse shape (60% unfavorable vs. 32% favorable) than the Republican Party (56% unfavorable vs. 36% favorable), so it can use all the help it can get.
The poll shows that Mamdani's ideas are much more popular than Mamdani himself. Asked whether they 'approve or disapprove of the following proposals to lower the cost of living' — none of which were attributed to Mamdani — Americans approved by wide margins in every instance:
62% approved and 24% disapproved of implementing free child care for every child aged 6 weeks to 5 years (a +38-point margin)
60% approved and 22% disapproved of freezing rent for lower-income tenants (a +38-point margin)
51% approved and 31% disapproved of creating a network of government-owned grocery stores focused on keeping prices low rather than making a profit (a +20-point margin)
49% approved and 34% disapproved of raising the minimum wage to $30 by 2030 (a +15-point margin)
46% approved and 36% disapproved of permanently eliminating the fares on public buses (a +10-point margin)
And 65% approved and 22% disapproved of raising taxes on corporations and millionaires to pay for these proposals (a +43-point margin)
While Democrats are the most supportive — predictably so — Mamdani's policies still garner significant support among Republicans, with roughly 4 in 10 saying they approve of freezing the rent (38%), implementing free child care (38%) and raising taxes on corporations and millionaires to foot the bill (40%).
Asked whether they would 'vote for a candidate whose platform included all of these proposals,' half of Americans say yes (50%) — and just a quarter say no (26%).
This doesn't mean that Mamdani would win an election outside NYC. Like Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the city's new mayoral nominee identifies as a 'democratic socialist' — and far fewer Americans say they would support a candidate who embraces that label (30%) than say they would not (43%).
__________________
The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,597 U.S. adults interviewed online from June 26 to 30, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.2%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
21 minutes ago
- UPI
State Department cutting 1,353 jobs amid downsizing
The State Department on Friday notified more than 1,300 workers they were being fired as part of downsizing planned by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Photo by Al Drago/UPI | License Photo July 12 (UPI) -- The State Department on Friday began notifying 1,353 affected workers of their pending job losses as the department reduces its workforce by 15%. The people losing their jobs amid the downsizing work in positions that are being eliminated or consolidated, a State Department official told media on Thursday, NBC News reported. "This is the most complicated personnel reorganization that the federal government has ever undertaken," the official told reporters during a briefing. "It was done so in order to be very focused on looking at the functions that we want to eliminate or consolidate, rather than looking at individuals." The State Department notified 1,107 civil service and 246 foreign service workers of their pending job losses, CBS News reported. The department plans to eliminate nearly 3,400 positions, including many who have already accepted voluntary departure offers this year. The State Department also will close or consolidate many U.S.-based offices as part of the reduction in force that is being done in accordance with a reorganization plan, which members of Congress received in March. The Trump administration says the downsizing is needed to eliminate redundancy and better enable the State Department to focus on its primary responsibilities. Secretary of State Marco Rubio created the downsizing plan, which he said is needed due to the department being too costly, ideologically driven and cumbersome, The New York Times reported. The downsizing isn't going unchallenged on Capitol Hill. All Democratic members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Friday opposed the downsizing in a letter sent to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. "During a time of increasingly complex and widespread challenges to U.S. national security, this administration should be strengthening our diplomatic corps -- an irreplaceable instrument of U.S. power and leadership -- not weakening it," the Democratic Party senators said. "However, [downsizing] would severely undermine the department's ability to achieve U.S. foreign policy interests, putting our nation's security, strength and prosperity at risk." The Senate Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee include Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Chris Coons of Delaware, Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland and Tim Kaine of Virginia. The Senate committee's other Democratic Party members are Jeff Merkley of Oregon, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Brian Schatz of Hawaii, Tammy Duckworth of Illinois and Jacky Rosen of Nevada.
CNBC
40 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump threatens to revoke comedian Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship
President Donald Trump said Saturday that he is considering revoking comedian Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship, a dramatic escalation of Trump's threats to use the executive branch to target his opponents. "Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. He called O'Donnell a "threat to humanity" and said that she should "remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland," which is where she currently resides. O'Donnell moved to Ireland in January following Trump's re-election. There is no legal precedent for a president revoking the citizenship of a U.S.-born citizen, and such a move has no legal basis under current law. It's not the first time that Trump has mentioned an opponent's U.S. citizenship in a not-so-subtle threat. Trump earlier this month falsely questioned the citizenship of Zohran Mamdani, who won New York City's Democratic mayoral primary. "A lot of people are saying he's here illegally," Trump said of Mamdani. "We're going to look at everything. Ideally, he's going to turn out to be much less than a communist. But right now he's a communist. That's not a socialist." O'Donnell has been a vocal Trump critic, and the two have publicly feuded for years. After Trump's Truth Social, O'Donnell took to Instagram to lob her own insults at the president. "The president of the usa has always hated the fact that i see him for who he is - a criminal con man sexual abusing liar out to harm our nation to serve himself - this is why i moved to ireland," she wrote. She said that Trump is going to "deport all who stand against" his "evil tendencies."
Chicago Tribune
43 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Medicaid, environment experts react to Trump's megabill, potential effects
Northwest Indiana Medicaid and environmental experts expressed concern with the impacts of the Trump Administration's megabill. President Donald Trump signed a megabill focused on tax breaks and spending cuts into law July 4, the day after a tight House roll call vote of 218-214 in favor of the bill. At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, D-Highland, issued a statement after last week's House vote explaining his opposition vote. While the bill may seem 'beautiful' to corporations and the wealthy, for a teacher in East Chicago, a nurse in Gary, the steelworker in Portage or a farmer in LaPorte County, the bill creates 'uncertainty and actually increases the cost of living.' 'I opposed this measure because I cannot in good conscience leave people behind. The Republican Majority made a decision to prioritize their elite donors and corporations, and now seniors, veterans, hard-working Americans, women, children and those yet to be born will pay with increased costs and possibly their lives,' Mrvan said. The bill passed the Senate vote two days before the House vote. The Senate's 50-50 tie was broken by Vice President JD Vance. U.S. Sen. Todd Young said the package includes his legislation that incentivizes R&D activity as well as leveraging private sector investment to increase affordable housing options. 'While I wish this legislation included additional fiscal reforms, this is a strong bill that will benefit Hoosier families and increase the security and prosperity of all Americans,' Young said in a statement. U.S. Sen. Jim Banks, who voted for its passage in the Senate on Tuesday, lauded its increased funding for the Departments of Homeland Security and Defense. 'I'm proud to support the biggest tax cut for working families in American history. This bill delivers on President Trump's promises to secure the border and strengthen our military, while also making the largest spending cut ever.' Under the federal law, states have until Jan. 1, 2027, to enforce the work requirements for Medicaid enrollees. The new law means Hoosiers 19 to 64 years old will have to work at least 80 hours per month to be eligible, according to a statement from the Indiana House Democratic Caucus. Under the law, parents of children 13 years and younger and medically frail individuals are exempt from the work requirements. But the law requires those who have to follow the work requirements to complete eligibility redeterminations twice a year, as opposed to once a year, according to the statement. Earlier this year, the Indiana Legislature passed a law that as of July 1, imposed a work or volunteer requirement of 20 hours per week, quarterly eligibility checks and monthly monitoring of internal reviews of personal information, according to the statement. Further, Indiana has a trigger law that requires Medicaid expansion to automatically begin unwinding if federal funding for Medicaid expansion drops below 90%, which means services would be reduced, according to the release. Currently, Indiana's Medicaid program is funded 90% by the federal government and 10% through the cigarette tax and hospital assessment fee, said Tracey Hutchings-Goetz, a Hoosier Action organizer. The new federal Medicaid law will supersede the state Medicaid law, Hutchings-Goetz said. In Indiana, Children's Health Insurance Program, Hoosier Healthwise, Healthy Indiana Plan, Hoosier Care ConnectTraditional Medicaid, MedConnect, or Medicaid for employees with disabilities, are all funded through Medicaid, according to the release. The bill cuts a trillion dollars from Medicaid through shifting the financial burden of Medicaid to states and taxpayers, according to the release. 'Indiana Medicaid enrollees could face cuts to services and longer waitlists due to the loss of federal funding. Even the privately insured will feel the squeeze of Medicaid cuts as hospitals and clinics will now have to eat the costs to provide uncompensated care for uninsured individuals,' according to the release. At Hoosier Action, a community organization that focuses on issues like health care, leaders are 'deeply concerned' about the megabill, and the people the organization supports are scared, Hutchings-Goetz said. Hutchings-Goetz said that she has heard daily from Medicaid recipients who are self-employed, chronically ill, with disabilities or parents with sick children with questions about how the bill will impact them and what they can do. In anticipation of a lapse of coverage, Hutchings-Goetz said people are considering stockpiling medications and other emergency preparedness strategies. 'People are trying to plan and they don't have enough information, and we don't have enough information,' Hutchings-Goetz said. 'People are really scared.' In Indiana, the Medicaid cuts will result in 12 rural hospitals closing, Hutchings-Goetz said. When that happens, people will have to travel further for care, which will lead to sicker populations and potential death, she said. 'This bill is going to make us sicker and poorer, and we're not happy with it,' Hutchings-Goetz said. Leslie Hawker, program manager for Everybody Counts Inc., said the new federal Medicaid law is 'devastating' for everyone, as it's projected that 17 million people will be kicked off Medicaid. As the uninsured go to hospitals for emergency care, Hawker said insurance costs will increase for those who have private insurance as hospitals seek to recoup the cost of caring for the uninsured, Hawker said. 'It's going to kill people, and for what? Who benefits by this bill? It's not the normal, everyday John Q. Public. It's people who own corporations. It's a death sentence for a lot of people,' Hawker said. Coupled with Medicaid changes, one former Environmental Protection Agency leader believes environmental changes will have drastic effects for U.S. citizens. 'It will increase a variety of pollution threats, like emissions from power plants, from heavy-duty diesel buses and trucks,' said former EPA Region 5 Administrator Debra Shore. 'Eventually, it will lead to early deaths, loss of work and school hours. It's a severe hit to the gains we had made in protecting public health.' While the megabill was still going through the House and Senate, the EPA posted on Facebook, saying it 'delivers for all Americans,' by eliminating hundreds of billions of dollars in Green New Deal tax credits, repealing former President Joe Biden administration's electric vehicle mandates, and opening federal lands and waters to oil, gas, coal, geothermal and mineral leasing, according to Post-Tribune archives. Shore, who led the EPA's Chicago office during Biden's presidency, said the bill is 'perhaps the most sweeping rollback of environmental and public health protections in modern U.S. history.' 'The size of cuts in the EPA budget will effectively, in my opinion, eviscerate the agency,' Shore said. 'At a time where Congress has been adding to the agency's statutory mission to protect human health and the environment, it's removing the resources that would enable it to fulfill its obligations.' Shore is particularly worried about cuts to the agency's Office of Research and Development budget. The budget proposes a nearly 34% decrease in science and technology funding, which is about $255 million, according to a budget breakdown. Specific laboratories and research areas impacted include air and energy, sustainable and healthy communities, safe and sustainable water resources, and chemical safety for sustainability. Between the four research areas, about $204.1 million from the EPA's budget is cut in the upcoming fiscal year. 'I've never worked with such a team of smart, devoted professionals who had a shared sense of mission, namely to protect public health and the environment,' Shore said. 'It is heartbreaking to hear how they are being treated with willful cruelty, with dismissal of expertise and utter disregard for their passionate devotion to the agency's mission.' Susan Thomas, director of policy and press for Just Transition Northwest Indiana, said that although the megabill's passage was imminent, it doesn't make it any easier. 'So much has been stripped away,' Thomas said. 'It's destruction for destruction's sake.' Thomas is worried about how much oil and gas companies will benefit from the megabill and how it will impact generations to come. Environmental justice communities — such as those in Northwest Indiana — could continue to suffer if industries are given more power. She believes public health will worsen as a result of EPA rollbacks and Medicaid cuts. An October report from Industrious Labs found that most residents in Gary are in the top 10% of U.S. residents most at-risk for developing asthma and at-risk of low life expectancy. In 2020, Indiana had a lung cancer rate of 72.5 per 100,000 people, with Lake County as one of the counties with the highest cancer mortality rates, according to the American Lung Association. A 2016 JAMA Network report also found Gary as one of the top five U.S. cities with the lowest life expectancy at one point. 'We've really got to take a step in our communities and be hyperlocal,' Thomas said. 'That will help make local progress, and when you make connections with folks, you make friendships, you make bonds, and you start to rely on each other. It's really powerful.'
