KP governor administers oath to Opposition MPAs
The oath-taking ceremony was held here at Governor's House on Sunday.
After the adjournment of the proceedings of the KP Assembly in the name of the lack of quorum in an especially summoned session of the house for the purpose, the Chief Justice, Peshawar High Court (PHC) on a request of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in line with Article 255 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan had nominated the Governor Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to administered oath to newly elected members of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly on reserved seats for women and non-Muslims.
PHC bars elected MPAs on reserved seats from taking oath
A formal notification (No. 453-J) issued by the High Court Registrar directed that the oath-taking ceremony should take place at the earliest in accordance with the constitutional framework and prescribed legal procedures.
The Governor has been tasked to ensure that the oath is administered in the prescribed manner and that official record is properly maintained.
The court has also instructed the Secretary of the Provincial Assembly to facilitate the process by enabling the newly notified members to sign the Roll of Members as per Rule 6 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Procedure and Conduct of Business Rules, 1988.
A formal notification in this regard also issued on Sunday, and its copies were forwarded to key stakeholders including the Speaker and Secretary of the Provincial Assembly, the Election Commission, and the Chief Secretary of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
A ceremony to administered oath to women and non-Muslims elected on reserved seats is schedule at Governor's House today (Monday) at 9:00 A.M.
The Treasury benches in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly created the issue of quorum to avoid the administering of oath to women and non-Muslims elected to the house against reserved seats.
A special session of the provincial legislature was convened on the request of the Chief Minister to administer oath to the women and minorities' representatives elected on reserved seats to formally enrolled them as members of the house.
But it could not happen due to the strategy evolved by the treasury benches, which is divided into two groups over the issuance of tickets by the party leadership, particularly by the jailed PTI founder Imran Khan.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly is going to elect 11 Senators and on the basis of its strength in the electoral college, it has fielded six candidates by issuing them party ticket. The candidates fielded by the ruling party include Murad Saeed, Noor-ul-Haq Qadri and Mirza Khan Afridi on general seats, Azam Swati on technocrat and Robina Naz on seats reserved for women.
The Chief Minister Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Ali Amin Gandapur and joint opposition in the provincial legislature have already developed consensus on the distribution of seats by allowing the election of the five candidates of the later to the Senate. However, some PTI leaders Irfan Saleem, Khurram Zeeshan and Ayesha Bano, who had had filed nominations, but were denied tickets are not ready to accept the decision of the leadership and have come in the forefront of the leadership against the decision of the party.
Though the session of the legislature was convened. However, the staying away from the house by the legislatures, particularly treasury benches braked it due to the lack of quorum in the house.
As the house began proceedings with Speaker Babar Saleem Swati in the chair, a treasury benches member Sher Ali Afridi pinpointed the lack of quorum and the Speaker has to order the ringing of the bells to bring legislators to the house. But, in legislators did not turned up prompting the Speaker to adjourned the proceedings of the house till July 24,2025.
Later, speaking informally in the house, the leader of opposition Dr Ibadullah said that how long will this continue? He said that a period of over on years has been passed, but the members are still awaiting their oath.
He said that if the Speaker does not take the oath, then they will file a petition with the Chief Justice of the Peshawar High Court to administer the oath to them.
Earlier, while speaking to the media, Speaker Babar Saleem Swati said tha the oath-taking will take place whenever the assembly session is held, quorum in the house merely after entering the house.
When asked regarding the delay in the oath-taking, the Speaker with a meaningful smile said that it will happen eventually.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump to host South Korean president Aug 25: Seoul
SEOUL: US President Donald Trump will host his South Korean counterpart on August 25 to hammer out details of their recent trade deal and discuss chips, shipbuilding and other topics, Seoul said Tuesday. In return for cutting threatened tariffs of 25 percent to 15 percent, Trump said on July 31 that South Korea would 'give' to the United States $350 billion for investments and buy $100 billion of energy products. Trump also said that South Korea agreed to invest an additional 'large sum of money', the level of which would be announced when President Lee Jae Myung visits the White House. Lee's office said that the meeting would be about developing the alliance into a 'future-oriented comprehensive strategic partnership' in response to the evolving global security and economic environment. Trump and Lee will discuss cooperation 'in manufacturing sectors such as semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding, as well as in economic security partnerships covering advanced technologies, critical minerals and other areas,' spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said. South Korea says timing of US tariff cut on autos not decided South Korean officials have said that Seoul's commitment to help the United States revive its shipbuilding industry was instrumental in reaching the trade deal. South Korea's shipbuilding industry is the world's second-largest following China, with the United States lagging far behind both. Washington is also increasingly looking to overseas shipyards to strengthen its Asia-Pacific military operations, positioning South Korea as a key defence partner. In 2024, Hanwha Ocean, one of South Korea's largest shipbuilders, became the first non-US company authorised to conduct dry-dock maintenance on a US Navy vessel. The leaders' summit will be their first since Lee's election in June, which followed the impeachment of his predecessor after he declared martial law.
Business Recorder
13 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trade ambitions and sanctions realities
EDITORIAL: It is a promising signal that Iran and Pakistan have chosen to deepen economic cooperation at a time when the region — and indeed the world — is realigning itself under shifting power equations. A USD 10 billion annual trade target is no small ambition, and President Pezeshkian's first official visit to Pakistan since taking office underlines Tehran's readiness to work with Islamabad to meet it. The warmth on display, from Lahore to Islamabad, and the repeated gestures of solidarity exchanged between the two delegations reflect encouraging maturity in bilateral ties. But ambition alone doesn't move trade. As with most things in this part of the world, the bigger story lies in what isn't being said. The last time Pakistan tried to pursue a transformative energy partnership with Iran, through the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline, the entire project was brought to its knees by American pressure and the threat of sanctions. Today, the geopolitical temperature is even higher — and the sanctions' regime is far more aggressive. So the question is simple: how exactly do both sides plan to reach that USD 10 billion mark? The Americans have made it clear that even friends and strategic partners are not exempt from the rules. India was sharply reprimanded for engaging too openly with Russia. European states have faced secondary threats for exploring trade that could circumvent restrictions. In this environment, it is inconceivable that Washington will sit idle while two Muslim neighbours forge an expansive trade relationship with one of the world's most heavily sanctioned economies. And yet that's precisely why this initiative matters. If Pakistan and Iran can demonstrate an effective, legal framework to grow trade while navigating the sanctions' minefield, they may offer a blueprint for others in the region facing similar dilemmas. But that framework has to be clearly articulated. Otherwise, this remains yet another round of high-sounding intent with little prospect of implementation. Border markets, local currency settlements, barter mechanisms, and third-party intermediaries have all been discussed in the past. But without serious institutional design, and real political will, they haven't gone far. If this renewed push is to succeed, both capitals must show how the mechanics of trade will be shielded from punitive action, how banks and customs authorities will be protected, and how businesses will be incentivised to take part despite the obvious risk. There is also a diplomatic layer that cannot be ignored. For Pakistan, this balancing act will only become harder as it tries to maintain strategic relations with both Iran and the west. The same applies to Iran, which must decide how to engage regional players without endangering its existing partnerships. Quietly, both sides likely understand that a successful trade expansion must also include a quiet understanding with Washington; or, at the very least, the ability to convincingly demonstrate that the arrangement does not violate international obligations. It is also worth asking why there hasn't been more transparency from both governments about how these goals will be achieved. The statements from the Iranian president were full of brotherly warmth and regional vision. The Pakistani side echoed those sentiments. But beyond calls for unity and generic pledges of cooperation, there is still little detail on how a sanctions-proof architecture will be built. This silence is understandable, perhaps. But it is also dangerous. In an economic environment as fragile as Pakistan's, and as constrained as Iran's, lofty goals without credible roadmaps invite not just scepticism, but policy fatigue. Stakeholders — whether state-owned firms, private traders, or regional partners — need clarity before they can commit. Still, this moment holds promise. For once, both countries are aligned in political vision and economic intent. If they can now align on execution, the results could be transformative. But they must also be realistic. In today's world, trade isn't just about tariffs and logistics; it's about sovereignty, resilience, and the skill to navigate hostile global currents. That's the test before them now. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Israel's ‘Vietnam'?
Israel's Gaza takeover plan has aroused a great deal of froth and indignant verbiage at the UN and in many countries of the world. To take a representative sample, UN Assistant Secretary General Miroslav Jenca told the UN Security Council on August 10, 2025 that the plan risks another calamity with far-reaching consequences reverberating across the region, causing further forced displacement, killings and destruction. The UN's humanitarian office OCHA said 98 children had died from acute malnutrition since the start of the conflict in October 2023, with 37 deaths since July 2025, figures that are probably a gross underestimate. OCHA's Coordination Director Ramesh Rajasingham says, 'This is no longer a looming hunger crisis – this is starvation, pure and simple.' People do not need this belated description of events in Gaza when they are confronted daily by pictures of emaciated children in hospitals being cared for by distraught but incredibly calm mothers. Palestinian Ambassador to the UN Riyad Mansour said 'over two million victims are enduring unbearable agony', while Israel's plans for the takeover of Gaza City are 'illegal and immoral'. All this diplomatic huffing and puffing is taking place in the hallowed halls of the UN in New York, where the Security Council is meeting to address the issue of Israel's plans for Gaza. Notable absentees at the meeting are the veto-bearing US and its ally Israel, both berating even this articulate waterfall of words, which nevertheless remain as hollow as the shameful inaction by Arab and Muslim countries in solidarity with their oppressed Palestinian brothers and sisters. Some of these worthy neighbours of Israel continue to enjoy diplomatic relations with Tel Aviv and others even feel little or no compunction in entering into lucrative trade and economic deals with the Zionist entity. So much for Muslim solidarity. The death toll (probably an underestimate) since October 2023 has climbed to 61,430, most of whom have been killed while seeking food at aid centres. All the hot air emanating from Palestine's original Muslim supporters and, lately, Western capitals finally appalled at Israeli cruelty and falling back on the moribund 'two-state solution' for fear of worse, cannot and will not change an iota of the misery and suffering of the people of Gaza. Only action will. There has been unceasing talk, and protests by people in Western countries, to boycott Israel in arms and the economy, on the lines of the boycott that so successfully hollowed out South Africa's apartheid regime. But this holy campaign has yet to see the light of day in any meaningful sense, misgivings and vows of cutting off arms supplies by Germany and others of late notwithstanding. Benjamin Netanyahu's plan is to take over Gaza City and another area not yet fully in the control of the Israeli army to destroy Hamas and rescue the remainder of the Israeli hostages still with Hamas. But even his own military chief has expressed strong reservations regarding the plan, fearing the hostages will be lost and the Israeli army bogged down in a protracted guerrilla war with Hamas. He was firmly overruled by Netanyahu and has now agreed to implement the plan. The far-right in Netanyahu's Cabinet wants the plan to be strengthened and made more rigorous. It feels the plan does not go far enough. By this they mean their desire to capture Gaza and eject the Palestinians. Netanyahu's 'short timetable', destruction of Hamas and rescue of the hostages are all likely to fail. The Israeli military's professional assessment is probably nearer the mark. Netanyahu intends, if his plans succeed, to impose a government in Gaza composed of neither Hamas nor the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO). He is hoping to impose a government of the elements opposing Hamas, composed mostly of bands of Bedouin criminals. Hamas has clearly messaged that any such collaborationist regime imposed on Gaza will be treated as an arm of the Israeli enemy. Interestingly, Italy's Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani in an interview has put a new twist on Israel's plans for Gaza. He thinks the invasion of Gaza risks turning into a 'Vietnam' for Israeli soldiers. That is surely not a fate Israel's main unremitting supporter the US would wish to see replicated and visited on its beloved Zionist 'pet'. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
