NHS trust investigates after ‘unnecessary delay' for thousands of patients
The patients were waiting for ENT appointments provided by Medway NHS Foundation Trust (MNFT) operating out of Medway Maritime Hospital in Gillingham and Darent Valley Hospital in Dartford.
The trust said it was 'very sorry' for the delays caused to patients and has commissioned an independent investigation.
Some 4,279 adults and children were awaiting a first outpatient appointment after a referral, while 4,570 existing patients were awaiting a follow-up appointment, diagnostic test or procedure.
Approximately 20% of those affected are children, and a few patients have waited as much as five years to be seen, the trust confirmed.
Jonathan Wade, chief executive of Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust and interim chief executive of Medway NHS Foundation Trust, said: 'We are very sorry for the unnecessary delay experienced by some of our ENT patients.
'We are in the process of contacting patients to apologise and make arrangements for them to be seen as quickly as possible.'
The delays affected patients predominantly in the Dartford, Gravesham, Swanley, Bexley and Greenwich areas.
When these referrals were first received, they were reviewed by a clinician and assessed as routine, meaning that no urgent concerns, such as cancer, were identified at the time, the trust has said.
Mr Wade continued: 'We have taken immediate action to ensure referrals to this service are correctly managed, with stronger oversight and improved systems in place.
'A full, independent investigation has been commissioned to understand how the error occurred and if anyone has come to harm as a result of these unnecessary delays.
'We are committed to learning from this so that it does not happen again.'
MNFT declined to comment on whether the commissioned investigation has begun, and how long it will take.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Millions on NHS waiting lists yet to have first appointment
Millions of people in England on NHS waiting lists are yet to have their first appointment, new data reveal. Figures from NHS England last month suggest nearly half of those waiting for hospital care have not had their first appointment with a specialist or a diagnostic test since their GP referral. An analysis by health data specialist MBI Health suggests nearly three million out of the 6.23 million patients (48 per cent) waiting for treatment are left in limbo. Experts referred to the issue as a 'frontlog' and warned the crisis 'has gone unchallenged for too long'. MBI's analysis also found that around 70 per cent of referral-to-treatment pathways fall into the category of being 'unseen' since the patient's GP referred them to a specialist. Delays in making a first assessment can lead to late diagnosis, worsening symptoms and pressure on emergency services. The analysis found that ear, nose and throat, trauma and orthopaedics, gastroenterology, ophthalmology and gynaecology and obstetrics departments were consistently the specialist departments with the greatest number of patients not seen for the first time. 'That's a breakdown' As part of the Government's 10-year health plan, the NHS is expected to meet its target of carrying out 92 per cent of routine operations and appointments within 18 weeks by March 2029 – a target that has not been achieved for almost a decade. The latest figures show how challenging that target will be given an estimated one million of the three million unseen patients have already gone more than 18 weeks without receiving any care. 'If accurate, three million people are trapped in an invisible waiting-list crisis, stuck without basic diagnostic tests of first appointments while their conditions worsen,' Rachel Power, the chief executive of the Patients Association, told the Guardian. 'The scale is staggering, as nearly half of all patients on a waiting list haven't been seen by anyone. That's not a healthcare service; that's a breakdown. 'These aren't just statistics. They're people checking their phones daily for hospital calls that never come, unable to plan their lives while their symptoms deteriorate.' Last month it was found people of working age are making up a growing proportion of those on the NHS waiting list for treatment in England. Data tables published for the first time by NHS England also show people in the most deprived parts of the country are more likely to wait more than a year to start hospital treatment than those in the least deprived. The figures, analysed by the PA news agency, showed 56.1 per cent of those on the list at the end of June this year were of working age (defined as age 19 to 64), up from 55.8 per cent a year ago and 55 per cent in June 2022. At the same time, the proportion of people on the waiting list under the age of 19 has fallen, standing at 10.8 per cent in June this year, down from 11.2 per cent a year earlier and 11.9 per cent in June 2022. The proportion who are over 65 has remained broadly unchanged at around 33.1 per cent. People of working age are also more likely to have to wait more than a year to start treatment (three per cent of patients in this age group at the end of June) than those over 65 (two and half per cent). However, the proportion is the same as those under 19 (also three per cent). An NHS spokesman said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year, which are down by more than 260,000 since June 2024. 'All patients are assessed by clinicians as they are added to waiting lists, and we will continue with our plan to improve waiting times for patients throughout the year.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
BrightSpring Health Services Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags
BrightSpring Health Services (NASDAQ:BTSG) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$3.15b (up 15% from 2Q 2024). Net income: US$9.21m (down 54% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 0.3% (down from 0.7% in 2Q 2024). EPS: US$0.046 (down from US$0.10 in 2Q 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period BrightSpring Health Services Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Falls Short Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 5.3%. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 9.3%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 10.0% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 6.0% growth forecast for the Healthcare industry in the US. Performance of the American Healthcare industry. The company's shares are down 4.3% from a week ago. Risk Analysis What about risks? Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for BrightSpring Health Services (of which 1 is a bit unpleasant!) you should know about. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Island Health's new fatigue policy is fuelling staff shortages and burnout, union leaders say
Staffing shortages in health care have been a chronic issue since the pandemic, but new restrictions on overtime Vancouver Island's health district is making the problem worse, according to union leaders representing health-care workers. This spring, Island Health implemented a fatigue policy. Broadly speaking, it stipulates that employees shouldn't work more than 16 hours in a 24-hour period The health authority states that its goal is to ensure front-line staff get the rest they need to reduce injuries and sick time, and to ensure patients get quality care. But union leaders say the restrictions on overtime are having the opposite effect. They report that health units are going understaffed even when there are people willing to work, and the result is added strain on staff at the expense of patients. "We don't want to be relying on overtime as a long term solution," said Sarah Kooner, president of the Health Sciences Association of B.C. which represents health professionals such as lab technologists and physiotherapists. "But our members also know that in the face of chronic staffing shortages, overtime is often the only way to make sure that patients are getting the care that they need," Kooner said. Limiting overtime may also be costing the health-care system money in the long run, she warned. For instance, when occupational therapists are short-staffed, patients have to wait a longer time to be assessed for discharge from hospital. The ripple effects include delays to new patient admissions and overcrowded emergency rooms. Teams short-staffed The Hospital Employees' Union, which represents support staff such as care aides, housekeepers, activity workers and more, is also reporting that its members are routinely being denied overtime shifts, leaving care teams short-staffed. The B.C. Nurses' Union is also seeing difficulties, and president Adriane Gear said there are both direct and indirect impacts on nurses. Nurses are being denied overtime hours, which is resulting in too few nurses on the floor. Furthermore, their support staff — such as care aides — are also being denied overtime, leaving the nurses on shift to pick up the extra work. "The burnout factor for nurses alone, I would think, would be enough to reconsider the strategy," Gear said. Island Health did not grant an interview about the fatigue policy. In a statement it said that overtime has not been eliminated, and that its policy is about wellbeing. However, it also made reference to cost-cutting, saying it's reviewing its scheduling practices to reduce how frequently staff are working an "inordinate" number of shifts in a row or working shifts "at premium rates of pay beyond the expected norm." Leaked memo An internal memo obtained by CBC News sheds light on how the fatigue policy is being implemented. In a July 11 letter from an Island Health manager to staff members, it says no overtime is to be approved for health care assistants, nursing unit assistants, or for general workload coverage. However, in some circumstances, a health unit can make an appeal to senior leadership for overtime approval "if the impact is significant enough." The new policy comes at a time when the health authority is under financial pressure from the province. Last week it laid off 117 people, with a spokesperson saying more layoffs will follow soon.
