May Mailman education and career: How a Kansas-born lawyer rose to influence US higher education policy from the White House
May Mailman has emerged as a central, yet relatively unknown figure in the Trump administration's relentless campaign targeting some of America's most prestigious universities.
A Harvard-educated lawyer, Mailman has played a pivotal role in crafting policies that have challenged the core principles of higher education, including academic freedom, admissions practices, and diversity initiatives. Her influence has shaped a confrontational approach towards institutions that have long stood as pillars of independent research and academic excellence.
In August 2025, as reported by CBS News, May Davis Mailman departed the White House, ending her tenure as deputy assistant to the president and senior policy strategist.
Despite leaving, she remains involved as a special government employee to wrap up ongoing negotiations, including sensitive talks with Harvard University over frozen federal research funding. Mailman is also planning to start a government affairs firm, although she has committed not to take clients related to her former administration projects.
Early life and education
Born Sylvia May Davis in 1988, Mailman was raised in the Midwest in small, predominantly white towns in Kansas.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
This is What Your Fingers Say About Your Personality
Tips and Tricks
Undo
Her parents met overseas in South Korea before settling in the United States. Growing up as one of the few individuals of Asian descent in her community, Mailman faced social challenges early on but developed a sharp wit and candid communication style.
She attended the University of Kansas, majoring in journalism and actively engaging with the College Republicans. Her political awakening was inspired by a George W.
Bush campaign event, which reshaped her perception of Republican leadership. Later, in 2012, Mailman enrolled at Harvard Law School, where she was remembered as outspoken and energetic by classmates.
Career beginnings and White House roles
After graduating from Harvard in 2015, Mailman initially worked at a midsize law firm in Denver. She was soon recruited to the White House, joining the first Trump administration in various capacities including the staff secretary's office, chief of staff's office, and White House counsel's office.
During this time, she gained unique access to senior advisers, frequently travelling with the president and key staff.
Her role as a policy strategist in Trump's second term
Returning to Washington for Trump's second term, Mailman was tasked with turning campaign promises into actionable policies. She became an architect of controversial executive orders redefining federal policies on gender and diversity, influencing institutions such as the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University.
Her work has been credited with leveraging federal power to reshape university admissions and athletic policies in line with the administration's conservative agenda.
Personal background and political views
Mailman's political philosophy aligns with a libertarian aversion to political correctness, and she has openly embraced roles opposing transgender protections and affirmative action policies. Despite the contentious nature of her work, colleagues praise her as a pragmatic and efficient negotiator. Mailman is also a mother of three and has balanced her demanding career with family life.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Edward Coristine aka Big Balls could get prestigious presidential medal after DC assault; suspects revealed
Former DOGE staffer Edward Coristine, aka Big Balls, who was beaten up at a late-night carjacking attack in Washington, DC, could get the prestigious Presidential Medal of Freedom, the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt hinted. The highest civilian honor has been awarded to historic figures like Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr, and Mother Teresa. Former DOGE worker Edward Coristine aka Big Balls was attacked in Washington DC(X) Leavitt was asked about the honor by MAGA pundit Benny Johnson. He spoke about his personal experience with violence in DC and thanked the press secretary for President Donald Trump's directive to deploy the National Guard in the capital. Johnson asked if Big Balls would get a Presidential Medal of Freedom in view of his 'heroic actions just a few blocks from this building'. 'Perhaps it's something he would consider,' Leavitt replied. Coristine was assaulted around 3 AM on a Sunday in the city's Logan Circle neighborhood by a group of teenagers attempting to carjack him and a woman whom police identified as his significant other, according to authorities. President Trump and former DOGE boss Elon Musk slammed the attack. Big Balls, who earlier this year worked with Musk to cut federal bureaucracy, now holds a position with the Social Security Administration. Information on suspects A 15-year-old boy and a girl were arrested and remain in juvenile detention. DC Metro Police also released two photos of a third suspect. They are yet to be identified. Republican Senator Mike Lee, meanwhile, shared an AI-generated video depicting Trump placing the Medal of Freedom around Coristine's neck. Addressing the attack on Coristine, the president had said that he was 'very badly hurt' and 'beat up by a bunch of thugs in DC'. 'We just almost lost a young man, a beautiful, handsome guy that got the hell knocked out of him the night before last. I'm going to call him now. He was left dripping in blood. He thought he was dead with a broken nose and concussion. Can't believe that he's alive,' Trump said at the time.
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump sent military to ‘silence' LA protests, says California as judge questions president's authority on troop deployment
The US government's decision to deploy National Guard troops in Los Angeles to protect the officers carrying out the US President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown was an illegal move and it should be ended, said a lawyer of California state to a federal judge on Tuesday. The landmark trial against the federal government began on Monday and California's lawyer presented evidence that showed soldiers of Nationals Guard and Marines, deployed in Los Angeles in June by the Trump administration, violated a 19th century law that restricts the military from civilian law enforcement. According to lawyer Meghan Strong of the California Attorney General's Office, 'The government wanted a show of military force so great that any opposition to their agenda was silenced,' Reuters reported. He was just getting warmed up in Los Angeles. He will gaslight his way into militarizing any city he wants in America. This is what dictators do. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) August 11, 2025 Defending the federal government's move, Justice Department attorney Eric Hamilton said that there was 'substantial violence' in Los Angeles that merits the deployment of military and said that National Guard and Marines troops were in the city only to protect federal agents and property. In June, Trump had ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles in order to contain days of protests and unrest triggered by mass immigration raids carried out by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). California Governor Gavin Newsom opposed the federal government's move and alleged it violates prohibitions on the use of the military in law enforcement, while suing the Trump administration. US District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco is hearing the arguments and has not revealed when he would rule in the matter. Breyer will determine whether the Trump administration violated the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA). A Reuters report stated that Judge Breyer appeared skeptical whether President Trump had the sole discretion to decide when troops were needed. 'Is it a 'rebellion' because the president says it is a 'rebellion'?' Breyer asked Justice Department's attorney Hamilton during the government's closing argument.
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Behind US-China trade truce
United States President Donald Trump on Monday extended his trade truce with China for another three months until November 10, pausing the triple-digit import duties that the two countries would have levied on each other's goods. Trump's move — 'to continue the suspension' of the prohibitive 145% tariff on Chinese goods and keep it at 30% following an earlier executive order dated May 12 — comes in the wake of Beijing's strong response with retaliatory measures of its own. That included not just imposing a 125% tariff on US shipments (since lowered to 10%), but also curbing exports of rare-earth metals and magnets, impacting American auto, aerospace, defence, and semiconductor manufacturers. However, it isn't just the choking of the supply of critical minerals that China has used as a leveraging tool to bring Trump to the negotiating table. In its ongoing, albeit temporarily halted, trade war with the US, China has also employed a 'trump card' in the form of agricultural imports. The accompanying table shows that the exports of US farm produce to China have more than halved, from $13.1 billion during January-June 2024 to $6.4 billion in the first six months of 2025. It comes on top of declines in the last two years, and is a far cry from the peak of $40.7 billion scaled in 2022. The fall in agricultural imports has been led by soyabean, with China importing hardly $2.5 billion worth of the leguminous oilseed from the US in January-June 2025, as against over $17.9 billion in 2022. That explains why Trump, in a post on his Truth Social platform on Monday, urged China to 'quickly quadruple' its soyabean imports from the US. He wrote, 'Our great farmers produce the most robust soybeans…Rapid service will be provided. Thank you President Xi [Jinping]'. Soyabean apart, China has massively reduced its purchases of US corn (maize), coarse grains (mainly sorghum and barley), cotton, beef, pork, poultry meat, and even forest products and tree nuts such as almonds, pistachios and walnuts. China is a huge importer of agri-commodities. Till two years ago, it was the world's biggest buyer of soyabean, rapeseed, wheat, barley, sorghum, oats and cotton, and No. 2 for corn (after Mexico) and palm oil (after India). A lot of these imports — 105 million tonnes (mt) of soyabean, 14.2 mt of barley, 13.8 mt of corn, 11.2 mt of wheat and 8.7 mt of sorghum in 2024 — catered to the protein and energy requirements of its massive swine herd and poultry flock. China houses roughly half of the world's pig population, and a fifth of its chickens. In 2024, China imported 74.7 mt of soyabean from Brazil and only 22.1 mt from the US. By sourcing more from Brazil, Argentina, Canada, Paraguay and other countries, it is hurting the interest of farmers in the US 'corn belt' states stretching from Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Missouri to North and South Dakota, Nebraska and Kansas. In addition, there are the beef farmers in Texas and Oklahoma, and the tree nut growers in California, Oregon, New Mexico, and Georgia, who stand to lose from a trade war with China. Simply put, China is not only leveraging its control over the global rare-earth elements market — from mining and refining to exports — but also its power as an agri-commodities importer to push Trump to continue 'productive discussions' with Beijing 'to resolve trade disputes and strengthen economic ties'. While US exports of farm produce to China have plunged by 51.3% in January-June 2025 over January-June 2024, that to India have soared 49.1% for the same period. As reported in this newspaper, agricultural trade between India and the US has actually been booming. Based on shipment value trends so far, both exports from the US to India and that from India to the US are set to top $3.5 billion and $7.5 billion respectively. India has, in fact, overtaken China to emerge as the biggest market for US tree nuts, with exports at more than $1.1 billion in 2024 and growing by 42.8% year-on-year to $759.6 million in January-June 2025. The US, likewise, has a 35% share in India's seafood exports. In frozen shrimps and prawns, more than $1.9 billion out of the $4.5 billion of Indian exports during 2024-25 (April-March) went to the US. It's another thing that despite this robust two-way trade engagement — more so in a sector that has become a sticking point in the ongoing bilateral trade talks — the Trump administration has doubled the tariff on Indian imports to 50%, effective from August 27. That includes a 25% 'penalty' for the purchase of Russian oil, which China has also been doing without inviting any such coercive duty.
