BJP leader gets bail in officer assault case
Pradhan was released from Jharpada jail here on Wednesday evening. The BJP leader was welcomed by his supporters when he walked out of the jail. The BJP leader and Bhubaneswar (Ekamra) MLA Babu Singh also welcomed him. Then, his supporters took Pradhan to his office in a procession by bursting firecrackers and beating drums.
Speaking to mediapersons, Pradhan condemned the incident (assault on OAS officer) and claimed that he was neither directly nor indirectly involved in the assault on the officer, which was 'proved today by the court.' The OAS Association became the victim of a conspiracy of Opposition BJD, which led to his arrest, he claimed.
'The OAS Association should introspect how they fell into the conspiracy. It is the duty of every officer to ensure smooth functioning of the Mohan Majhi government in the State,' he said.
Earlier in the day, the District and Sessions Court, Khurda, granted bail to Pradhan on a security of Rs 30,000. The court had asked the government counsel to produce the telephonic conversation between Pradhan and Ratnakar Sahoo, the victim OAS officer. The court granted bail to Pradhan after the government counsel 'failed' to produce evidence of a conversation in the court, said advocate Suresh Kumar Sahoo.
The BMC Additional Commissioner, Ratnakar Sahoo, was brutally attacked, dragged on the floor of the office, kicked in the face and humiliated by a group of people, allegedly supporters of Pradhan. The viral video of the officer's assault created a Statewide outrage forcing OAS officers to go on strike demanding the arrest of all the accused persons, including Pradhan, who is accused of masterminding the attack on Sahoo.
On Thursday night, Pradhan surrendered before the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bhubaneswar, and was arrested and sent to jail. He was produced before the SDJM (Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate's) Court in Bhubaneswar which rejected his bail petition and sent him to 14-day judicial custody.
Pradhan was booked under various sections of BNS which deals with offences like assault on public servants, obstructing government work and causing grievous injury. The BJP leader surrendered before the police as the members of the OAS Association went on a cease-work agitation across the State.
Earlier, police had arrested five persons in connection with the case. While Pradhan was granted bail on Wednesday, the hearing of the bail petition of the other five accused is scheduled to be held on July 15, the advocate said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
BJP slams Rahul comments on Jaishankar's meeting with Xi
Accusing him of 'bringing shame to the nation', the BJP on Wednesday targeted Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi for his comments on External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. BJP national general secretary Tarun Chugh said Jaishankar held the meeting with Xi to express the nation's 'concern over Pakistan-sponsored Pahalgam terrorist attack'. 'We all know how Rahul Gandhi used to hold secret meetings with the China officials for breakfast or whatever in Delhi without disclosing the agenda to the people of the nation,' said Chugh. In a post on X, Gandhi had criticised Jaishankar, saying, 'I guess the Chinese foreign minister will come and apprise Modi about recent developments in China-India ties. The EAM is now running a full blown circus aimed at destroying India's foreign policy.'
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘When human lives at stake, matter needs utmost sincerity': SC acquits death row convict
The Supreme Court on Wednesday set aside the conviction of a man sentenced to death for killing four members of his family, including his two minor children, in 2013, saying the prosecution has failed to establish the charge beyond reasonable doubt. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol and Sandeep Mehta said 'there are major contradictions in the testimonies of key prosecution witnesses, accompanied by glaring investigative defects' in the case. Writing for the bench, Justice Nath said, 'The standard of proof is an absolutely strict one and cannot be faltered with. When at stake are human lives and the cost is blood, the matter needs to be dealt with utmost sincerity. Therefore, given the facts and circumstances of the case and in light of the above discussion, we cannot bring ourselves to hold the accused-appellant guilty of the charged offence as his guilt has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.' As per the prosecution, Baljinder Kumar alias Kala killed his wife, daughter, son and sister-in-law and injured two others on November 29, 2013 in Punjab's Kapurthala. He was angry with his mother-in-law who had arranged his sister's marriage, which did not work out, and stood as a guarantor for a payment of Rs 35,000 maintenance to his sister after divorce, but the payment was not made. Baljinder had fights with his wife over this following which she left for her mother's home with their children on November 17, 2013. He had allegedly threatened to kill his wife and children if the money was not paid, the prosecution claimed. A trial court in 2020 convicted Baljinder and sentenced him to death, which was upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in March 2024. The SC in its order pointed to contradictions in the testimony of key prosecution witnesses (PWs). After examining the statement of PW1 and PW2, it concluded that 'PW2's presence at the crime scene as an eyewitness is highly improbable as she is thoroughly self-contradictory about the unfolding of events on that fateful morning. Therefore, her existence as an eyewitness also has to be ruled out'. It said that 'these jarring inconsistencies suggest that the statement of PW2 is highly shaky, varies at every other turn and is not reliable at all'. The judgment also said PW1/complainant, 'while getting the FIR registered, had stated that the accused was carrying a 'datar' while exiting the crime scene. However, in the later statements made by PW1 before the court, which were recorded after the alleged recovery of the weapon… PW1 readily changed his stance and stated to have seen the accused carrying a 'gandasi'.' The SC said, 'It must be noted that the two weapons are considerably and visibly different, and a rural individual, especially such as PW1 himself, is understood to be adept in such difference and would not ordinarily mistake one for the other.' The court said, 'The trial court as well as the High Court have very conveniently brushed aside such contradictions in the testimonies of PW1 and PW2 by holding that minor contradictions do not go to the root of prosecution case. We are unable to succumb to the view of categorising above-discussed contradictions as 'minor.' It added, 'In the instant case, there are different versions of the same set of events which are being told by these witnesses at differing points of time, statements retracted and remoulded as per their convenience, wherein such difference in statements are leading to material alterations in the chain of events. As a result, the prosecution timeline and the fundamental details about the occurrence are not at all corroborated between its two key witnesses. Therefore, we observe that the contradictions in prosecution witnesses' testimonies, as pointed above, are major ones and carve a gaping hole in the prosecution story altogether.' The court further said, 'We cannot turn a blind eye to the obvious inconsistencies in the depositions of its main witnesses, which indicate deliberate embellishment and coaching, rendering these testimonies unreliable. Therefore, we have no hesitation to hold that no credence can be lent to the testimonies of PW1 and PW2 and their account of being 'eyewitness' to the incident or having seen the accused has to be discarded.' On the testimony of a child witness who was injured in the attack, the court said he did not actually witness the incident. In his cross-examination… he stated that he did not see the appellant as he was half-asleep. 'He specifically stated that he did not see the appellant inflicting injuries on the deceased persons'. Therefore, even if his 'testimony is treated as completely reliable, it is clear that his statement cannot be considered as incriminating against the appellant for the lack of having witnessed the actual incident'.
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Dhan-Dhaanya Krishi Yojana: Scheme to develop 100 agri districts across country gets Cabinet go-ahead
The Union Cabinet on Wednesday approved the 'Prime Minister Dhan-Dhaanya Krishi Yojana' (PMDDKY), which envisages development of 100 agricultural districts through the convergence of existing schemes with an annual outlay of Rs 24,000 crore per year. 'The scheme will be implemented through convergence of 36 existing schemes across 11 departments, other State schemes and local partnerships with the private sector,' said an official statement issued after the Cabinet meeting. At a briefing on the Cabinet's decisions, Information and Broadcasting Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said the scheme would be implemented for six years beginning from 2025-26. 'A master plan will be prepared for each district. It will include agriculture and other allied activities,' Vaishnaw said. He said the scheme would benefit about 1.7 crore farmers. The scheme was first announced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in her Budget speech earlier this year. Saying that the government was 'motivated by the success of the aspirational districts programme', she had said the scheme would cover '100 districts with low productivity, moderate crop intensity and below-average credit parameters'. Cropping intensity is a measure of how efficiently land is used — the number of crops grown in the area in an agricultural year (July-June). 'One hundred districts will be identified based on three key indicators of low productivity, low cropping intensity, and less credit disbursement. The number of districts in each state/ Union Territory will be based on the share of net cropped area and operational holdings. However, a minimum of one district will be selected from each state,' the official statement said on Wednesday. 'The scheme aims to enhance agricultural productivity, increase adoption of crop diversification and sustainable agricultural practices, augment post-harvest storage at the panchayat and block levels, improve irrigation facilities and facilitate availability of long-term and short-term credit,' it said. According to the statement, committees will be formed at the district, state and national levels for effective planning, implementation and monitoring of the scheme. Central nodal officers will be appointed for field visits, review and monitoring. A district agriculture and allied activities plan will be finalised by the District Dhan Dhaanya Samiti, which will be headed by the district collector and include progressive farmers as members. 'The district plans will be aligned to the national goals of crop diversification, conservation of water and soil health, self-sufficiency in agriculture and allied sectors as well as expansion of natural and organic farming,' the statement said. In addition, Central and State agriculture universities will be assigned each district as technical knowledge partner. The scheme is designed on the lines of the 'Aspirational Districts Programme' that was launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in January 2018 in 112 most under-developed districts across the country. In PMDDKY too, the Dhan-Dhaanya districts will be ranked based on their performance. A portal/ dashboard will be developed to monitor the progress of the scheme in each district on 117 key performance indicators on a monthly basis, said the statement. 'As the targeted outcomes in these 100 districts will improve, the overall average against key performance indicators will rise for the country. The scheme will result in higher productivity, value addition in agriculture and allied sector, local livelihood creation and hence increase domestic production and achieve self-reliance (Atmanirbhar Bharat). As the indicators of these 100 districts improve, the national indicators will automatically show an upward trajectory,' it said.
