logo
No 3rd language for even higher classes in SCERT's draft curriculum framework

No 3rd language for even higher classes in SCERT's draft curriculum framework

Forced to withdraw its decision to introduce Hindi as the third language in primary classes in Maharashtra, the State Council for Educational Research and Training (SCERT) has now released a draft curriculum framework for school education where it has included only two languages for all classes from classes 3 to 10.
The decision has sparked a fresh discussion in the education sector as the third language has not been included for higher classes (classes 6 to 10) for the first time since the system was introduced from the academic year 1971-72.
The SCERT on Sunday released a draft curriculum framework for classes 3 to 10 inviting suggestions from stakeholders. It includes only two languages for all classes – preparatory stage (classes 3 to 5), middle school (classes 6 to 8) and secondary (classes 9 and 10).
As per information shared by the SCERT, this draft is prepared on the basis of the State Curriculum Framework prepared in 2024 which is as per the recommendations by the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. It provides a list of a total 20 subjects, combined for all these classes; with some new entrants such as Vocation Education apart from conventional subjects such as Mathematics, Science, Social Science. Stakeholders have time until August 27 to submit suggestions.
About the missing third language from all these classes, the SCERT has released a note along with the draft.
It states, 'A committee has been appointed under the chairmanship of Dr. Narendra Jadhav as per the Government Resolution (GR) dated June 30, regarding the implementation of the language policy. The existing system will continue till the decision regarding the third language is implemented on the recommendation of the said committee and in accordance with the decision of the Government thereon.'
This has sparked confusion among teachers and schools as they question the connection between the new committee and three languages already taught in higher classes.
'The said committee is to deliberate upon whether the third language can be implemented from Class 1, which was the point of contention leading to formation of that committee. Nobody had opposed the three-languages taught in higher classes, which has been happening for many years now,' said a senior language teacher from Mumbai, further questioning the hurry in issuing the draft curriculum framework when the final decision cannot be taken until the committee's report.
Mahendra Ganpule, from Maharashtra School Principals' Association said, 'The note insists that until then existing practice will continue. But the draft is for upcoming structure for these classes as per the NEP recommendations. But this missing mention of language three, which has always been part of curriculum for higher classes, definitely leaves room for confusion.'
Echoing that there is confusion, Madhav Suryawanshi, coordinator of the Shikshan Vikas Manch, a consortium of teachers and educationists from across the state, said, 'Owing to this confusion and for other discussions, the consortium is going to hold an online session for teachers across state to get more clarity by resolving doubts with experts.'
Stating that SCERT is simply playing safe, senior educationist Vasant Kalpande said, 'System of third language in higher classes has been an existing system. Its exclusion from the syllabus framework is likely to cause confusion over the third language in higher grades, which nobody has contended.'
When contacted, SCERT Director, Rahul Rekhawar said, 'The committee is deliberating upon the three-language formula of the state. This makes it important to wait for its recommendations because without that we cannot decide from which Grade the third language can be implemented.'
Vocational Education from Class 6
Among the new subjects, noteworthy is the introduction of Vocational Education subject from Class 6. In a first a separate curriculum is prepared for Vocation Education which will be taught until Class 10 wherein students will be given hands-on experience in various skills such as agriculture, poultry, gardening, mechatronics, AI, robotics, food processing, carpentry, beauty and wellness, and tourism.
Another notable change is that, subject 'Environmental Studies (Part 1 & 2)' for classes 3 to 5, will be replaced with 'The World Around Us (TWAU) (Part 1 & 2)'.
The existing textbook for Grade 4 ('Shivchatrapati') will continue as such. Whereas from classes 6 onwards, separate curricula have been developed for History, Geography, and Civic studies. From class 9 onwards, separate curricula have been prepared for Political Science and Economics.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'I will not speak in English': BJP's Nishikant Dubey on Tamil Nadu MPs request in LS amid glitch in translating system
'I will not speak in English': BJP's Nishikant Dubey on Tamil Nadu MPs request in LS amid glitch in translating system

Mint

time19 minutes ago

  • Mint

'I will not speak in English': BJP's Nishikant Dubey on Tamil Nadu MPs request in LS amid glitch in translating system

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, on Tuesday, refused to speak in English, rejecting Tamil Nadu MPs request in Lok Sabha amid a glitch in translating system. He further claimed that the MPs 'only had a problem with Hindi.' The BJP MP made the comments in the Lok Sabha after after Tamil Nadu MPs requested Nishikant Dubey to speak in English following a a technical glitch in the translator (system) in the Lok Sabha. Responding to them, Dubey said "...It would have been better if you had asked me to speak in Tamil or Bengali. English is a foreign language, and your insistence on it reflects your mindset. Someone spoke in Bengali for half an hour, yet Tamil Nadu MPs didn't object. You only have a problem with Hindi. Congress and its allies don't like North Indians or Hindi. If you keep promoting English, we'll end up becoming England. 'Hum phir se gulaam ho jayenge' (We will become slaves again)..." During the Monsoon Session of the Parliament on Tuesday, several leaders launched scathing attacks on the government about India's Operation Sindoor in the aftermath of the brutal Pahalgam terror attack in April that killed 26 people. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav said the launch of Operation Sindoor after the Pahalgam attack was a "symbol of the government's intelligence failure". Uttar Pradesh's former chief minister also said that India's foreign policy has 'completely collapsed,' while labelling China as a 'monster' that will "gobble up our (India's) land and market". "Who will take responsibility for the intelligence lapse in the Pahalgam attack?' Akhilesh Yadav said about the tragedy. Rahul Gandhi also took a swipe at the government, daring PM Modi to call 'Trump a liar,' referring to the POTUS's repeated claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. While India has consistently denied these assertions, the US President continues to highlight his alleged role in de-escalating tensions between the two nations following the Pahalgam terror attack. Following Rahul Gandhi's claims, PM Modi while addressing the Lok Sabha, refuted claims made by US President Donald Trump regarding his role in halting India's military action against Pakistan. He said said no world leader asked India to stop its military action against Pakistan during 'Operation Sindoor' after four days of conflict in May in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack.

'Fix Accountability': M Kharge's Volley Against Centre In Op Sindoor Debate
'Fix Accountability': M Kharge's Volley Against Centre In Op Sindoor Debate

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

'Fix Accountability': M Kharge's Volley Against Centre In Op Sindoor Debate

New Delhi: Launching a volley of attacks on the Centre during the debate on Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge on Tuesday said "factories of lies" have been set up and demanded that accountability be fixed for repeated intelligence failures. Extending his condolences to the families of those killed in the Pahalgam attack on April 22, the Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha said members of the treasury benches, in their speeches, have tried to deflect attention from the issues at hand. "Our history is a long one. The history of the Congress is a long one. Our contribution to nation-building has been immense. There is not one Public Sector Unit that you have set up. You have only set up factories of lies. Then you talk about HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited) and other PSUs that we have created," Mr Kharge said in Hindi. The Congress President said Amit Shah visited Jammu and Kashmir on April 7 and 8 and said that the terrorist ecosystem had been crippled under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government. "If it was crippled, how was the Pahalgam attack carried out? You keep saying so many things that are so far from the truth. Just three days before the attack, PM Modi cancelled his scheduled visit to J&K... This is an issue I have raised before as well and I have got no answers. Did the Centre suspect that an attack was about to be carried out? If so, why were the tourists and pilgrims not stopped from going?" Mr Kharge asked. At this point, BJP President and leader of the House JP Nadda intervened and called for some remarks to be expunged. 'Arrogance' Continuing his attack, the Congress president said he and Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, wrote letters demanding a special session of Parliament to discuss the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, but got no response. "Our letters seem to end up in the waste bin. They don't even look at them. This much arrogance is not good. You don't have time to write a couple of sentences and reply? During the 1962 India-China War, then PM Jawaharlal Nehru had agreed to a special session and said nothing should be hidden from the people. We also asked for the truth to be told in all-party meetings at least. We attended those meetings, where was PM Modi? Why was he not there?" he questioned. 'Who Is Responsible?' Pointing to the 2016 Uri and Pathankot terrorist attacks, the Pulwama attack in 2019 and Pahalgam this year, Mr Kharge alleged that the government has to admit there have been repeated intelligence failures. "I want to ask the Home Minister, who is responsible for this? If he is responsible, accountability should be fixed... There have been five attacks in Pahalgam alone since the BJP government came to power. Mistakes may have happened, but what did you do to fix them? If the Home Minister is responsible, he should resign. If he is not, the Prime Minister should decide what action needs to be taken," the Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha said. "Even the Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha said there was a security lapse in the Pahalgam terror attack," Mr Kharge said and, when someone from the treasury benches began shouting, added, "You keep talking about what we have done. Under Indira Gandhi, we split Pakistan into two and ensured Bangladesh got Independence," he added. The Congress President said Home Minister Shah has said three terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack have been killed. "But what about the others? Where are they hiding? Why haven't you been able to find them?" he asked. Stating that the Opposition had extended all possible support to the government in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, Mr Kharge said that did not stop the Centre from attacking the Congress and other parties for electoral gains. The Congress president also said at least 27 people, including five children, were killed in Pakistani firing during Operation Sindoor and asked why they were not moved to safer places.

'Speak Tamil, Not Foreign Language Like English': BJP's Nishikant Dubey Slams DMK MPs
'Speak Tamil, Not Foreign Language Like English': BJP's Nishikant Dubey Slams DMK MPs

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

'Speak Tamil, Not Foreign Language Like English': BJP's Nishikant Dubey Slams DMK MPs

In a fiery language face-off in the Lok Sabha, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey stunned the House by rejecting DMK MPs' request to switch from Hindi to English due to a technical glitch in the translator system. Calling English a 'foreign language,' Dubey said he would have appreciated a request to speak in Tamil instead. He accused the DMK of harboring hatred for Hindi and North Indians, pointing out that Tamil Nadu MPs didn't object when a fellow MP spoke in Bengali for 30 minutes. 'Keep promoting English and we'll become England again, slaves,' Dubey warned. His defiant remarks ignited a storm in Parliament and online, exposing the deep fault lines in India's ongoing language politics. Watch the full debate, reactions from opposition parties, and what this clash means for India's federal identity, culture, and Constitution.#operationsindoor #operationmahadev #nishikantdubey #hindivsenglish #languagepolitics #dmkvsbjp #parliamentdebate #indianpolitics #parliament #loksabha #loksabhadebate #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store