
3M Stock Bulls Prepare to Pump the Brakes Ahead of Earnings Gauntlet
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
As MMM approaches its Q2 earnings report, scheduled for July 18, investors are eager to see if the turnaround story will continue strongly or if challenges remain too significant. The key question is whether 3M can sustain growth amid ongoing headwinds—from tariff impacts to lingering legal uncertainties—and justify its current valuation premium.
I'm taking a cautious stance, rating 3M as a Hold ahead of earnings precisely because the outlook remains unclear. It's hard to confidently predict a consistent growth trajectory without major interference from macro headwinds.
Rating 3M's Operations
When we look at a capital-intensive business like 3M—a company producing a vast range of products and operating numerous plants, labs, and pieces of equipment worldwide—it's clear that efficiently managing investments and turning them into operating profits is key to creating value for shareholders.
For example, by taking the company's operating income (EBIT) and dividing it by its net working capital (the money tied up in inventory, receivables, and payables that are essential for daily operations) plus the physical value of its assets (Property, Plant & Equipment), we get a return on investment metric that makes sense for a capital-heavy business like 3M.
Right now, based on EBIT, working capital, and PP&E over the last twelve months, 3 M delivers an ROI of around 29%. On the surface, that looks solid—especially compared to an estimated weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of about 8%—but it's still well below the ROI of above 40% that the company consistently delivered four or five years ago.
Coincidentally, 3M shares dropped over 50% from their mid-2021 peak to early 2024, only recently recovering to levels seen five years ago. The primary drivers of this decline have been ongoing litigation and escalating legal costs— particularly related to PFAS contamination (the so-called 'forever chemicals') and earplug lawsuits—which have added billions in potential liabilities, significantly impacting EBIT and increasing operating expenses.
As a result, transformation initiatives have become unavoidable. In recent years, 3M has been actively restructuring and simplifying its portfolio, but that also comes with upfront charges, write-downs, and investments in new technologies. On top of that, the post-COVID surge in raw material costs, plus transportation and labor headwinds, has added even more pressure to the company's margins.
A Closer Look at Latest Turnaround Developments
The good news is that the market seems to be betting on a turnaround at 3M, especially with shares back near the $160 level again. In the most recent quarter (Q1), 3M posted organic revenue growth of 1.5% year-over-year, while expanding adjusted operating margins to 23.5%—an increase of 2.2 points year-over-year and already above the pre-pandemic level of 19.2%.
In fact, based on the updated 2025 guidance, management was encouraged by the strong start to the year in Q1. They reaffirmed their outlook for organic sales growth of 2% to 3% —at or above macro trends —and EPS between $7.60 and $7.90, driven by margin expansion and an estimated conversion of about 100% of its earnings into free cash flow.
Looking further ahead, long-term EPS growth points to a 5-year CAGR of around 6.6%, which is slightly lower than six months ago, when the same period was expected to see a CAGR of 6.9%. At a similar pace, the 5-year revenue CAGR is now estimated at 3.9%, just a bit softer than the 4.1% forecast earlier this year.
I would attribute these more cautious revisions mainly to the impact of tariffs. As management highlighted in Q1, tariffs are expected to have a $850 million annual impact, which could shave about $0.20 off EPS. On top of that, there's the ongoing drag from legal uncertainties, like the billion-dollar settlements tied to PFAS and earplug lawsuits, which continue to drain cash and require additional provisions.
As Q2 results approach, the numbers to beat are an estimated EPS of $2.01 (up 4% year-over-year) and revenues of $6.1 billion (down 3% year-over-year). However, historically, it's the annual guidance that's often the primary driver of post-earnings sentiment.
In this case, management's tone has been cautious, signaling that the solid Q1 performance might not carry through to full-year results, with tariff risks, softer GDP, and global auto production potentially weighing on projections.
That's why I'm somewhat uneasy with 3M trading at roughly a 15% premium to the sector, based on a forward EBITDA multiple of 13.5x —nearly 20% above its own five-year average. Viewed through an earnings yield lens—using operating profit divided by enterprise value (a helpful measure for capital-intensive businesses)—3M's trailing figures translate to an earnings yield of about 4.5%, based on $4.15 billion in operating profit and a $91.1 billion enterprise value. That falls short of a reasonable weighted average cost of capital (WACC), even under optimistic assumptions.
Put simply, the company's operating return doesn't adequately justify its risk and cost of capital. For an industrial blue chip still facing significant legal overhangs, I believe a 6%–7% earnings yield is more appropriate to compensate for that added risk. Reaching that level would most likely require a reduction in enterprise value, rather than a dramatic improvement in operating profit.
Is 3M a Buy, Hold, or Sell?
Although Wall Street's consensus is mostly bullish, there's still plenty of room for skepticism around the investment case. Of the 11 analysts covering the stock over the past three months, six are bullish, three are neutral, and two are bearish. MMM's average stock price target stands at $155.36, which implies ~1.5% downside from the current share price.
Uncertainty Lingers for MMM Amid Legal Risks and Lofty Valuation
I'd say the outlook is still pretty opaque for 3M heading into its Q2 earnings. The growth and synergies from the turnaround, in my opinion, just don't put enough certainty behind the risks of betting on a business that could still disappoint on growth—while facing bigger legal and tariff headwinds—all while trading at what might be stretched multiples.
That said, I'm keeping 3M rated as a Hold for the time being. Given tepid consumer demand and ongoing macro pressures, it's still very uncertain whether the company can do more than just beat estimates—in other words, actually raise guidance.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Delta Air Lines Projects Clearer Skies Ahead
Delta Air Lines may just be the wind beneath the entire industry's wings. In its second-quarter earnings report on Thursday, the Atlanta-based carrier reinstated a full-year profit forecast and cited a notable rebound in travel demand. Its share price, unsurprisingly, took flight following the news — with its industry peers lining up on the runway for takeoff just behind it. READ ALSO: Pentagon to Take $400 Million Stake in Rare Earth Miner Outside Vegas and Ferrero Puts Snap, Crackle and Pop into Its Earnings With WK Kellogg Acquisition There were some rough skies for a couple of months there, but Delta seems to think it has now punched through to the other side. Economic uncertainty triggered by the trade war kneecapped US consumer confidence, stifling domestic demand. Meanwhile, a sudden PR problem had foreigners rethinking any potential travel plans to the USA. Then there were incidents including a fatal collision in Washington that sparked fears of widespread air traffic control problems. And did we mention yet that business travel is still down as much as 20% from pre-pandemic levels? In April, Delta became the first major airline to flick the seatbelt sign on, pulling its outlook for the year as the stormy clouds of 'Liberation Day' announcements rattled financial markets. The rest of the industry soon followed suit — and has paid the price. Through Wednesday, the S&P Supercomposite Airlines Index had fallen 16% year-to-date, compared with the 6.5% ascent of the overall index. Now? Delta sees itself pulling out of the tailspin and getting back to cruising altitude — though it still won't quite be able to make up all the ground it lost: Delta reported a $2.1 billion profit in its second quarter, beating analyst expectations and topping its performance in the same quarter a year ago by a full 63%. It also projected better-than-expected results for its next quarter and announced a new earnings outlook for the year of $5.25 to $6.25 a share (better than no guidance, but still down from the $7.35 a pop it projected as the year took off in January). The reason for the optimism? Stabilizing demand, specifically among high-income consumers who continue to splurge on international travel and premium tickets. While Delta said main cabin sales fell 5% in the second quarter, premium ticket sales soared 5%. 'Premium has certainly been where our margins have continued to expand, and so we're highly focused on continuing to provide improved service to those customers and more segmentation,' Delta President Glen Hauenstein said on the company's earnings call Thursday. Taking Flight: Shares of Delta closed up 12% on Thursday following the good news. The rest of the industry caught its tailwind: United soared 14%, American climbed 12% and Southwest added about 8%, as did Alaska and JetBlue. Still, some analysts caution against getting too enthusiastic over the news. 'Delta's guidance is encouraging for other full-service carriers, but we would hesitate on overextrapolating the guidance for airlines without premium/diverse revenues,' TD Cowen analyst Tom Fitzgerald wrote in a note Thursday. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Here are investors' burning AI questions with tech earnings around the corner
Big Tech companies are soon going to let investors know if all the hype is still worth it. Amid tariff turmoil and market uncertainty, the tech trade continues to power the S&P 500 higher. With mega-cap tech earnings due to kick off later this month, investors are looking for clues to know if the AI-fueled momentum can keep powering stocks higher. The launch of DeepSeek—a cost-efficient AI model from a startup in China—was an "existential moment" for the AI trade, according to Eric Sheridan, co-business unit leader of the TMT group at Goldman Sachs. "There's an increasing focus on the payoff or the return dynamic," Sheridan told Business Insider. "How are we seeing enterprises use AI? How are we seeing consumers adopt AI applications in their day-to-day life? Is AI technology delivering on its promise of increasing productivity and profit margins? Investors will soon be turning to second-quarter earnings season for answers. Will AI capex continue to soar? Big Tech companies have poured billions into building out AI infrastructure, and there's a lot of debate on Wall Street about how much more companies can spend. As of February, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta 's total AI investment for 2025 was over $300 billion, a notable increase from the $246 billion spent in 2024. Competition in the AI space is fierce as Big Tech companies race to develop better large language models. And it's still early stages, meaning that this level of capital expenditure could persist well into the future. "There's still pretty low visibility into what they're going to spend next year," Sheridan said of the Big Tech companies. "I wouldn't put a high probability on a slowdown," he added. Are companies putting AI to work? A lot of money and effort is being poured into AI tools for companies, but investors want a clearer sign of what it all means. Investors will look for clues on earnings calls that AI adoption is accelerating. They're not just interested in whether Nvidia beats consensus expectations; they're also looking for more widespread adoption of AI among other companies. Investors have reasons to be optimistic, as there have been green shoots in previous months. The earliest signs of AI adoption have been showing up primarily in the software industry as companies adopt agentic AI to complete tasks autonomously. According to Bank of America, earnings calls of Russell 2000 companies have mentioned AI more frequently over the last few quarters. This quarter's earnings season will be key to determining whether the trend holds. In June, Bank of America identified software winners, including Microsoft, Salesforce, and ServiceNow. The bank expects monetization to begin taking off in 2026. For Big Tech, the pressure is on to show strong software margins. "We think the AI backdrop is a big stimulant for the cloud computing businesses on the revenue side," Sheridan said. "And we'll be looking for some proof points around that through earnings season as well." Can savings from AI offset tariff headwinds? First-quarter earnings were stronger than expected despite uncertainty related to tariffs. That's mostly thanks to Big Tech, and investors are watching to see if the sector can continue to lead to outperformance again. Nadia Lovell, senior US equity strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management, believes AI will continue to be the primary driver of earnings growth across the S&P 500. "Yes, there might be vulnerability, but we need to focus on those secular and structural growth stories, like AI power and resources," Lovell said at the bank's roundtable on July 8. Tariffs are putting extra pressure on the AI trade, as investors are worried about higher import costs eating into company margins. Could AI use cases provide a shield against tariff headwinds? Jeremy Siegel, Wharton professor and senior economist at WisdomTree, thinks firms need to start showing investors that they're putting AI to use, especially as tariffs drag on consumer sentiment. "I think they're going to have to do it very soon, facing some of these tariff price increases," Siegel said on CNBC on Friday.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks to Buy Before They Soar 150% and 735%, According to Certain Wall Street Analysts
Nvidia and Tesla are two of the three best-performing stocks in the S&P 500 since January 2020, notching returns of 2,690% and 1,010%, respectively. Nvidia has a dominant market position in data center GPUs and generative AI networking equipment, and the rise of physical artificial intelligence (AI) should be a major tailwind. Tesla's electric car business is struggling with market share losses, but CEO Elon Musk says the company will dominate the robotaxi market in the future. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) rank among the three best-performing stocks in the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) so far this decade, and artificial intelligence (AI) has been a major tailwind for both companies. Since January 2020, Nvidia shares have added 2,690% due to soaring demand for AI chips. Meanwhile, Tesla shares have added 1,010% due to excitement about self-driving cars and autonomous robots. In both cases, some Wall Street analysts expect more fireworks in the years ahead. Beth Kindig at the I/O Fund thinks Nvidia stock will reach $410 per share by 2030. That implies 150% upside from its current share price of $164. Tasha Keeney at Ark Invest thinks Tesla stock will reach $2,600 per share by 2029. That implies about 735% upside from its current share price of $310. Here's what investors should know about these companies. Beth Kindig, lead technology analyst at the I/O Fund, thinks Nvidia will trade at $410 per share by 2030, which implies a market value of $10 trillion. The investment thesis centers on rapidly growing demand for artificial intelligence (AI) hardware and software in data centers, as well as edge devices like autonomous cars and robots. Nvidia is best known for its graphics processing units (GPUs), chips also known as artificial intelligence accelerators. It holds over 90% market share in data center GPUs, and analysts at TD Cowen expect the company to maintain the same level of dominance through the end of the decade, with AI chip sales increasing 160% during that period. However, investors need to understand Nvidia is more than a chipmaker. The company also leads the market for generative AI networking gear and it has a burgeoning cloud services business. "We stopped thinking of ourselves as a chip company long ago," CEO Jensen Huang told attendees at the annual shareholder meeting in June. Importantly, while generative AI is currently the largest source of demand for Nvidia AI infrastructure, the company is well positioned to benefit as the physical AI boom unfolds. Physical AI refers to autonomous machines like cars and robots that understand, interact with, and navigate the real world. "We're working toward a day where there will be billions of robots, hundreds of millions of autonomous vehicles, and hundreds of thousands of robotic factories that can be powered by Nvidia technology," Jensen Huang explained to shareholders last month. So, can Nvidia reach $410 per share by 2030? I think so. That implies annual returns of 18%. Grand View Research estimates AI spending will increase at 36% annually through the end of the decade, which means Nvidia could achieve similar annual earnings growth. In that scenario, the stock could hit $410 per share in late 2030 at a reasonable valuation of 22 times earnings. For context, the stock currently trades at 53 times earnings, which itself is a substantial discount to the three-year average of 80 times earnings. Ark Invest analysts led by Tasha Keeney expect Tesla to trade at $2,600 per share by 2029, which implies a market value of $8.3 trillion. Their investment thesis centers on robotaxis, which are expected to account for 63% of revenue by the end of that period. Meanwhile, electric cars (26%), energy storage (10%), and insurance (1%) will comprise the remaining portion. While Alphabet's Waymo is currently the market leader, Tesla theoretically has an edge in autonomous driving technology. Its full self-driving (FSD) software is powered entirely by computer vision, rather than a costly array of lidar, radar, and cameras like Waymo. For context, Tesla says its dedicated robotaxi (the Cybercab) will cost less than $30,000, but Waymo sensors alone can cost as much as $100,000. Also, Tesla has more camera-equipped vehicles on the road collecting data than every other automaker combined. That data advantage should translate into better AI models. Indeed, Ark Invest says Teslas in FSD mode can drive 3,200 miles per crash on surface streets, which makes them an estimated 16 times safer than an average driver and six times safer than Waymo. Tesla recently started its first autonomous ride-sharing service in Austin, Texas. CEO Elon Musk says robotaxis could be a material source of revenue by late next year, and he thinks Tesla will eventually have 99% market share in what could be a multitrillion-dollar industry. Indeed, Tom Narayan at RBC Capital estimates marketwide robotaxi revenue will reach $1.7 trillion by 2040. While that outcome is plausible, I would be remiss not to mention Tesla's woes. It has lost substantial market share in electric cars in the past year due to its aging product lineup and Elon Musk's political activities. In fact, Tesla deliveries dropped 13% in the first and second quarters, despite a 35% increase in global electric car sales year to date through May, according to Morgan Stanley. So, can Tesla reach $2,600 per share by 2029? I doubt it. While I think autonomous driving technology will be a big catalyst for the company, Ark's target price implies the stock will return 60% annually over the next four-plus years. That means Tesla's earnings would need to increase at 60% annually during the same period just to maintain its already-expensive valuation of 170 times earnings. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,432!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,005,854!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Trevor Jennewine has positions in Nvidia and Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks to Buy Before They Soar 150% and 735%, According to Certain Wall Street Analysts was originally published by The Motley Fool