
A year after uprising, Bangladesh's youth struggle to find jobs
Bangladesh faces a youth unemployment crisis after political upheaval. Quota reforms sparked protests, but job creation lags. Garment factory closures worsen the situation. The interim government plans training and seeks investment. US tariffs and aid cuts pose further threats. Experts urge support for existing businesses and focus on livelihoods. Private investment is crucial for job growth.
AP Students clash with police during a protest over the allocation of government jobs, in Dhaka, Bangladesh A year after an uprising forced the Sheikh Hasina regime in Bangladesh out of power, challenges persist to address the severe lack of jobs among youth who took their grievances to the streets. The uprising, in which some 1,400 people were killed, according to the United Nations, was sparked by the issue of quota reservations in civil service recruitment tests. More than half of highly sought-after government jobs were reserved for certain designated groups, including women, disabled people and descendants of veterans of the 1971 War of Independence. The country's high court has since reduced the quota reservations to 7%. Since the interim government headed by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus took over, a broad agenda of reform has been drawn up, but experts say a lack of opportunities for the young workforce remains a problem.
"Amid jobless growth faced by the country's youth, a fair chance at civil service recruitment tests became a rallying cry," said Tuhin Khan, a leading activist in the quota reform movement and the July uprising. "But since then, we have not seen enough meaningful focus from the government on the economic pressures faced by ordinary people as politics took center stage," he added. About 30% of Bangladeshi youth are neither employed nor in school or training, according to the International Labour Organization (ILO). Also, about 23% of young women are unemployed compared with 15% of young men - and last year's protests featured the wide participation of young women. Women in Bangladesh typically have limited opportunities for employment and career growth beyond a few sectors like government, non-governmental organizations and education. The protesters ranged from graduate students seeking government jobs to garment workers and balloon sellers, as segments of the urban poor demanded better, more dignified lives, said Maha Mirza, a researcher who teaches economics at Jahangirnagar University. But the creation of decent jobs depends upon jump-starting investment, which may have to wait for an elected government to be sworn in, said Rashed Al Mahmood Titumir, a professor of Development Studies at Dhaka University. "When we have a stable policy regime, there would be more investment, and that will bring in the much-needed jobs for young people, including graduates and women," he said.
JOB LOSSES While the protest focused on government jobs, those can provide for only a small slice of the job market. Last year, about 18,000 government recruitments were available, yet more than 2 million young people enter the job market each year. One major employer of young people is the garment and textile sector, but a number of factories shut down due to political changeover, including more than a dozen factories owned by Beximco Group that employed 40,000 workers. Since the political shift, about 10,000 people have been arrested on various charges including corruption and even murder, and they include a number of business owners linked to the former ruling party. Jasim Uddin was a supervisor in a garment factory in the outskirts of Dhaka, but he has been jobless for months. "I had quit my earlier workplace as they were holding up the payment of wages. Since then, I went from door to door in search of a job," he said. Many factory owners affiliated with the earlier government feared arrest and went into hiding, resulting in plant closures, said Arman Hossain, a trade union activist from Gazipur. "We expected the government to appoint administrators who could temporarily operate those closed factories so that workers would not go jobless - but that did not happen," Hossain said. Additional challenges come from the global economy. The 35% tariff announced on Bangladesh's products by the United States, the largest buyer of the country's clothes, poses a threat to many of the four million workers in its garment industry. Meanwhile, the cutting of aid from the U.S. has left about 20,000 development workers in Bangladesh jobless, said aid agency Caritas.
EFFORT AND RESULTS The interim government has announced training programs for young people and courted foreign investment to create jobs. Asif Mahmud Shojib Bhuyain, who heads the youth and sports ministry, has said the government had plans to create 500,000 new jobs for youth besides training 900,000 young people. At an investment summit in April, businesses from various countries shared investment proposals of about 31 billion taka ($255.35 million), the Bangladesh Investment Development Authority (BIDA) said. But the share of private investment in the economy has dropped from 24% last year to about 22.5% this year - although in actual numbers it saw a slight uptick from 11,985 billion Taka ($97.68 billion) to 12,484 billion Taka ($101.74 billion), said the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). Investment by the private sector depends upon how much confidence businesses have that the political regime is stable and business risks can be managed, Titumir said. Businesses that employ significant numbers of workers, especially the youth, need support, Mirza added. "You cannot create thousands of industries or millions of jobs right away, but you can make sure that businesses that provide jobs to workers keep running," she said. That could include reopening shuttered textile factories, ensuring the fair price of agricultural products for the country's 16.5 million farming families and providing targeted support to small and medium-sized industries like poultry breeding and light engineering, she said. "We just need a bit more attention to the livelihood crisis of ordinary people," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Brazil Supreme Court orders house arrest of former president Jair Bolsonaro
Brazil's Supreme Court on Monday issued an house arrest order for former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is standing trial for allegedly plotting a coup, in a move that could escalate tensions with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro's press representative confirmed the house arrest order and restrictions on using a cell phone.(AP) Justice Alexandre de Moraes said in his decision that the right-wing firebrand did not comply with judicial restraining orders imposed on him last month. Moraes also banned Bolsonaro from receiving visits, with exceptions for lawyers and people authorized by the court, and use of a cell phone either directly or through third parties. The restrictions on Bolsonaro were imposed over allegations that he courted the interference of Trump, who recently tied steep new tariffs on Brazilian goods to what he called a "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro. The former Brazilian leader is facing charges that he conspired with dozens of his allies to overturn his 2022 electoral loss. Bolsonaro's press representative confirmed the house arrest order and restrictions on using a cell phone.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Despite Trump's 25% Tariff, How India Still Beats Pakistan, Bangladesh On Trade Balance
New Delhi: Even as U.S. tariffs on Indian goods climb to 25 percent, the numbers tell a more layered story. Despite the blow, India still holds a stronger position in trade dynamics than some of its closest neighbours. In 2024, Indian products entering the American market faced an average effective tariff of 17.4 percent. That is lower than the 19.9 percent slapped on Bangladeshi goods, the 18.1 percent faced by Pakistan and Sri Lanka's 19.2 percent. These figures come from a recent analysis by Moneycontrol that measured the effective duties levied by the United States on major South Asian exporters. U.S. President Donald Trump, who reimposed tough trade penalties last month, had pointed fingers at India in a strongly worded post on July 30. 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world. They have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country… INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST,' he wrote on Truth Social. However, data on what economists call the tariff differential, the gap between what a country pays in U.S. tariffs versus what it charges on American imports, suggests India's trade relationship with Washington remains more balanced than many others in the region. India's tariff differential currently stands at 11.3 percentage points. That is significantly narrower than Bangladesh's 17.2-point gap or Pakistan's 13.6 points. Another regional exporter, Vietnam faces a 13-point spread. Bangladesh's position appears the most lopsided: its exports are hit by the highest U.S. tariffs, but it barely charges American goods in return. Meanwhile, India maintains an average 6.1 percent tariff on U.S. imports, more than Bangladesh but less than others, offering a cushion against the recent spike from Washington. Neighbouring Asian countries such as Thailand and the Philippines fare slightly better in terms of tariff balance, with gaps at 6.4 and 9.8 points respectively. But their trade mix is different, heavily skewed towards electronics and intermediate goods. India's exports to the United States, on the other hand, lean heavily on pharmaceuticals, garments, jewellery and consumer products. These sectors are more vulnerable to tariff hikes. While India's trade ties with Washington remain under strain, the data reflects that it may still be navigating the turbulence more stably than its regional peers.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Crossfire Hurricane': Grand jury probe Obama-era intel for role in 2016 Trump-Russia narrative; DOJ examines conspiracy claims
Director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard (Image credits: AP) The justice department has convened a federal grand jury to investigate officials from former US President Barack Obama's administration, who are accused of pushing a false scandal about President Donald Trump's alleged ties to Russia during the 2016 election. The investigation could lead to criminal charges against several prominent figures from the Obama era, including former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former CIA director John Brennan, and former FBI director James Comey, according to The New York Post. The inquiry focuses on claims that these officials conspired to create and promote the Trump-Russia narrative in the early days of the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation. The Crossfire Hurricane probe began in July 2016, when the FBI launched an investigation into alleged connections between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. That inquiry later led to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, whose 2019 report acknowledged 'links' between Trump associates and Russian individuals but found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy. However, subsequent scrutiny raised concerns about the FBI's conduct, particularly the improper use of FISA warrants against Trump adviser Carter Page. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo In October 2020, then-attorney general Bill Barr appointed John Durham as special counsel to examine the origins of the probe. Recent reports have highlighted a newly uncovered annex containing intelligence that 'predicted the FBI's actions with alarming specificity,' adding weight to Republican claims that the bureau may have sought to influence the 2016 election in favor of Hillary Clinton. Trump and current director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have both called for a federal investigation into the origins of the Russia probe. Trump has accused the former officials of carrying out a 'treasonous and seditious conspiracy' aimed at undermining his first-term agenda. He also acknowledged that Obama is likely immune from prosecution following a 2024 Supreme Court ruling that shields presidents from criminal charges related to official acts.