Risa eyes independent bloc if Duterte allies in Senate become minority
Senator Risa Hontiveros has no plans of being in one group with senators allied with former President Rodrigo Duterte who branded themselves as the "opposition" to the Marcos administration.
During the Kapihan sa Senado on Wednesday, Hontiveros said that if the Duterte-allied senators would establish themselves as the minority bloc in the 20th Congress, her "plan B" is to form an "independent bloc" with her political allies namely, senators-elect Francis "Kiko" Pangilinan and Bam Aquino.
Hontiveros said she is "sure" of the probable scenario that there would be two groups that will seek to be the minority bloc in the upcoming Congress.
"Wala po akong planong sumali sa isang Duterte bloc (I have no plans of joining a Duterte bloc)," she said.
"Kung makukuha nila 'yung label ng minority, may option pa rin po ako or kami kung mag-decision po kami na isang independent bloc na magpapatuloy talaga sa pag-check and balance, magpapatuloy sa pag-fiscalize, at pati sa labas ng Senado, magpapatuloy sa pagbubuo ng oposisyon—, pareho sa Duterte at sa kina Presidente (Marcos)… As in everything sa pag-organize ng Senate, it's a matter of numbers," she added.
(If they get the label of minority, I or we still have the option to form an independent block that will continue doing the checks and balances, continue fiscalizing, even outside of the Senates, and push forward with forming an opposition [like the senators who are allied] with Duterte, and with the President... As in everything related to organizing in the Senate, it's a matter of numbers.)
According to Hontiveros, no one has talked to her about the Senate presidency yet.
"They haven't talked to us as a group. They haven't talked to me individually… Wala rin text message. Pero take note, ang minority, kahit 'pag hindi kinakausap, nagsasalita," she said.
(They haven't talked to us as a group. They haven't talked to me individually... No text messages at all. But take note, the minority speaks even if no one is talking to them.)
Impeachment trial
In the same press conference, Hontiveros vowed to maintain neutrality and objectivity in voting during the impeachment trial of Vice President Duterte.
The senator made the remark despite her previous heated exchange and criticism of the Vice President's handling of her offices' confidential and intelligence funds.
"Basta impeachment, neutrality of a senator-judge, judging on the basis of the evidence. Gan'un lang. Na-distill na to its essence. And that's it. That's my message to anyone, even to her," she said.
(As long as it's about impeachment, it should show the neutrality of a senator-judge judging on the basis of evidence. That's all. Distilled to it essence. And that's it. That's my message to anyone, even to her.)
In response to the Vice President saying she wants a "bloodbath" on her impeachment trial, Hontiveros said this term is not in her "vocabulary."
"Bilang senator-judge, wala naman sa bokabularyo ko para sa impeachment 'yung ganyang salita (As a senator-judge, those words are not in my vocabulary related to impeachment). But as I said, and I am committed just to have that neutrality demanded of judges, and in particular in the case of impeachment of senator-judges," she said.
"The only vocabulary that matters sa impeachment ay… 'yung neutrality and 'yung pagiging senator-judge and voting on the basis of the evidence," she pointed out.
(The only vocabulary that matters during impeachment is the neutrality and the senator judge voting on the basis of evidence.)
PrimeWater deal
Meanwhile, Hontiveros is seeking the launch of the Senate probe into PrimeWater Infrastructure Corp.'s services in June.
"Pag-resume namin sa Hunyo, inaasahan kong ma-refer siya sa proper committee. And like every other resolution, ifa-follow up ko sa chair na ma-schedule nila ng pagdinig. Kahit isang hearing lang muna ngayong patapos na 19th Congress," she said.
(When we resume session in June, I trust it would be referred tot the proper committee. And like every other resolution, I will follow it up with the chair so that the hearing can be scheduled now that the 19th Conress is lemonning.)
Asked if it felt awkward to investigate a corporation that is close to the Villars, Hontiveros said, "Mas awkward kung hindi kumilos ang Senate doon (It's more awkward if the Senate doesnt take action on this.)"
Hontiveros clarified that it will not only be PrimeWater that will be investigated, but also the two other water concessionaires over the problems in their services.
PrimeWater is owned by the Villar family. There are two Villars in the current Congress, namely Senator Mark Villar and her mother, outgoing Senator Cynthia Villar.
Senator-elect Camille Villar will replace her mother Cynthia, and she will join her brother Mark in the 20th Congress. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
4 hours ago
- GMA Network
Retired SC justices sign San Beda statement urging VP Sara Duterte impeachment trial
'There is no sound constitutional and legal basis for any delay in the trial. In fact, an undue delay sends the signal to the nation that mandated processes are thwarted for ulterior ends,' the statement read. Professors at the San Beda University Graduate School of Law have asked the Senate to proceed with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. Among them are retired Supreme Court Associate Justices Adolf Azcuna and Jose Vitug, and graduate school dean Fr. Ranhilio Aquino. Their statement came a day after more than 100 members of the faculty of the University of the Philippines College of Law made a similar call for the Senate to hear the articles of impeachment against the Vice President. 'We, professors of the Graduate School of Law of San Beda University, in our individual capacities, respectfully urge the Senate of the Philippines to proceed with the trial of the Vice President in accordance with Article XI of the Constitution,' the San Beda law professors said in their statement. The members of the faculty said, 'Article XI is clear that when the verified complaint is endorsed by at least one-third of the members of the House of Representatives, trial by the Senate must thereupon proceed.' 'There is no sound constitutional and legal basis for any delay in the trial. In fact, an undue delay sends the signal to the nation that mandated processes are thwarted for ulterior ends,' the statement read. The statement said that accountability is crucial to the workings of a government that should be able to earn the respect and trust of citizens. The trial is a measure of accountability. 'The problem with government, and the resulting lack of public trust in it, has to do with deficits in measures of accountability,' it said. 'We therefore urge the Senate to convene as ordained by the Constitution and to proceed with the impeachment trial of the Vice-President,' it added. On Thursday, over 100 members of the UP College of Law faculty called on the Senate to start the impeachment trial and "let the truth unfold." In an open letter, the faculty members called on the Senate to comply with the constitutional duty to "forthwith proceed" with the trial. "Respectfully, a dismissal at this point would be deemed by the Filipino people as effectively engineered by the Senate's own delay and an abdication of its constitutional role in impeachment," it read. The faculty members also stressed that the 19th Congress should not preempt whether the trial should continue. It said this should be left to the 20th Congress. "For the Senate to decide for the 20th Congress would be undemocratic, contrary to the very rationale underlying the 'non-continuing body' argument," the letter read. The members stressed that a dismissal would mean an abandonment of the Senate's tradition as an august chamber and will alter the country's system of checks and balances. "It will also undermine the people's trust in the Senate as an independent and impartial institution before which the highest officials of the land may demonstrate and prove their fealty to the principles of accountability, public service, and democracy," it said. Section 3(4) of Article XI, which states: In case the verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed. –Jiselle Anne C. Casucian/NB, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
8 hours ago
- GMA Network
Prosecutor says House won't withdraw impeachment raps vs. VP Sara
'Returning it to sender or dismissing the impeachment complaint right away are unconstitutional acts,' Zamora told reporters in an online interview. The House prosecution panel is not considering withdrawing the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte or receiving them in case the Senate returns them to the House of Representatives, San Juan Rep Ysabel Maria Zamora said on Friday. Zamora said these options, as well as outrightly dismissing the impeachment complaint without a trial, are unconstitutional. 'Returning it to sender or dismissing the impeachment complaint right away are unconstitutional acts,' Zamora told reporters in an online interview. 'There's no option for the Senators to dismiss it. There's also no option for the House to withdraw it,' she added, citing the constitutional provision on the Senate impeachment court needing to hear the complaints forthrightly after they had been received. Zamora said the House prosecution panel was focused on preparations for the impeachment trial. She said Batangas Rep. Gerville Luistro was assigned to read the articles of impeachment before the Senate on June 11. All 11 House prosecutors will be present. 'We have been preparing for several months, and we are still preparing. In fact, the members of the panel are preparing for our presentation in the Senate. So we are not affected by what's going on in the Senate, the draft resolution, or the comments that we hear from the Senators. We are still continuing to do our job because that is our job under the Constitution. So that is our duty. We have to be ready to present the evidence,' Zamora said. 'Honestly, it is our stand that they have already been convened or constituted as an impeachment court right from the start na nag-transmit tayo ng articles sa kanila,' Zamora said. She also said the House Prosecution Panel talked about the draft resolution prepared by the office of Senator Ronald 'Bato' dela Rosa to outrightly dismiss the impeachment complaint. 'We talked about it. We were shocked. But, you know, siguro dahil alam natin na some senators are really openly planning to dismiss or have the impeachment proceedings dismissed right away. Lalo na, alam naman natin si Senator Bato dela Rosa ay very close, isa sa mga bata ng Duterte family. So, you know, they will surely do everything to dismiss, to have it dismissed or to delay the process,' Zamora said. 'The mere fact na nag-draft sila ng isang resolution that openly violates the Constitution is shocking for us,' she added. She also denied Senate President Chiz Escudero's pronouncement that members of the House of Representatives are 'sunud-sunuran' to House Speaker Martin Romualdez. 'Hindi po kami sunud-sunuran kay Speaker. In fact, uulitin po, wala pong naging pilitan sa pagpirma ng impeachment,' Zamora stressed. Zamora also thanked the Catholic Church for its support for the impeachment. The Church has announced it will conduct a vigil at the Senate next week. 'We are very thankful for their support for the impeachment. Like we always say, hindi naman po natin ginagawa to para panigan ang isang party or what but we are doing this as our duty to the nation to protect the Office of the Vice Presidency, the Office of the Vice President,' Zamora said. –NB, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
9 hours ago
- GMA Network
ICC denounces Trump's sanctions vs. 4 judges
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has denounced the sanctions imposed by US President Donald Trump's administration against four of its judges, including one who is handling the case of former President Rodrigo Duterte, saying this will only embolden those who believe they can act with impunity. In a statement dated June 5, the ICC said that it provides justice and hope to victims of atrocities and upholds the highest standard in protecting the rights of both suspects and victims. 'Targeting those working for accountability does nothing to help civilians trapped in conflict. It only emboldens those who believe they can act with impunity,' the ICC said. Trump's administration imposed sanctions after the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and opened an investigation into alleged war crimes committed by US troops in Afghanistan. The sanctioned judges are Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin, and Beti Hohler of Slovenia. Alapini Gansou is among the judges handling Duterte's crimes against humanity case over his administration's war on drugs.. For the ICC, the sanctions also target those who support the court, including nationals and corporate entities of state parties. 'They are aimed against innocent victims in all Situations before the Court, as well as the rule of law, peace, security and the prevention of the gravest crimes that shock the conscience of humanity,' it said. Despite the sanctions, the ICC vowed that it will remain undeterred in its work to bring justice to victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and the crime of aggression. Duterte is currently under the custody of the ICC in The Hague, Netherlands. The confirmation of charges will take place on September 23, 2025. Based on government records, around 6,200 drug suspects were killed during the Duterte administration's anti-drug operations. Human rights organizations, however, say that the number may reach 30,000 due to the unreported related slays. —LDF, GMA Integrated News
