logo
Construction pros react to interest rate decision

Construction pros react to interest rate decision

Yahoo3 days ago
This story was originally published on Construction Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Construction Dive newsletter.
Contractors hoping for relief from the Federal Reserve will have to wait a while longer.
The central bank held its benchmark federal funds interest rate steady Wednesday afternoon in the range of 4.25% to 4.5%. The decision disappointed builders that had hoped for a jolt to jumpstart stalled projects.
The pause also keeps heat on Fed Chair Jerome Powell. President Donald Trump has repeatedly pressured Powell to cut rates and has even floated firing him. Legal experts say a president's authority to do so is dubious, except for cause.
The administration has been trying to build a case for just such a cause, though, calling into question costs for the $2.5 billion renovation at the Fed's headquarters, which Trump visited last week.
But after Wednesday's decision, Trump — and general contractors rooting for a rate cut — will have to sit tight for now.
Private work stalling
Prolonged borrowing costs continue to weigh on developers reliant on traditional financing.
Many projects still depend on short-term floating debt, said Joe Biasi, head of commercial capital markets research at Newmark, a New York City-based commercial real estate advisory firm. That structure has become harder to justify as borrowing costs have remained elevated and lenders have grown more selective.
Yet not all sectors are slowing at the same pace.
'Markets that rely on more traditional financing will continue to be cautious or slower in 2026,' said Matt Murphy, core markets leader and leadership team member at DPR, a Redwood City, California-based general contractor. 'But markets with large amounts of capital investment such as data centers and manufacturing are forecasted for continued fast-paced growth.'
That uneven environment has pushed contractors to lean harder on portfolio diversification. At Adolfson & Peterson, a Minneapolis-based general contractor, a blend of public and private work has helped soften the blow from weaker commercial activity.
'If interest rates remain unchanged going into 2026, we expect a mixed impact on our project pipeline,' said Granger Hassmann, regional president at Adolfson & Peterson. 'Private sector work, especially in residential and commercial markets, will remain slow due to continued financing constraints.'
To keep projects on track in this environment, contractors say success depends on tighter preconstruction planning and flexible execution. These are essential for risk mitigation and ultimately maintaining momentum, said Robert Brown, CEO of GCM Contracting Solutions, a Fort Myers, Florida-based general contractor.
'Our ability to self-perform concrete and deliver projects under a design-build model gives us an edge when speed, cost control and schedule certainty matter most,' said Brown. 'Those are critical differentiators in this environment.'
Brown added GCM is spending more time on feasibility studies, engineering support and front-end procurement.
'We're seeing heightened scrutiny on financing and pro forma performance,' said Brown. 'Clients [are] looking to preserve flexibility, whether that means phasing a project, streamlining specifications or delaying vertical construction.'
Hassman echoed that view. He said Adolfson & Peterson is pursuing early buyouts and using value management to keep projects viable. Collaborative contracting has also helped the firm protect budgets and avoid delays.
'We're having proactive conversations with owners and developers about project timing, financing challenges and how to keep deals in place despite the market pressures,' said Hassmann. 'Our goal is to stay ahead of any potential cost impacts and provide solutions that keep projects moving forward without compromising value or schedule.'
Shift to public work
With many privately financed projects hitting a wall, contractors are increasingly turning to public projects backed by federal infrastructure dollars and local bond measures, said Peter Dyga, president and CEO of Associated Builders and Contractors Florida East Coast Chapter. The result is a discernable shift in portfolio strategy.
'There's been a noticeable pivot toward public and institutional work,' said Dyga. 'Prolonged interest rates have made private capital more cautious, while public sector projects have offered more predictable timelines and financing.'
That shift doesn't mean firms have abandoned private-sector work altogether. Many are simply leaning into segments still showing activity, such as data center and manufacturing construction, said Murphy.
'When some of our core markets are slower, others have ramped up dramatically,' said Murphy. 'That allows us to shift focus to those and not pursue work outside of our normal scope.'
Fed still cautious
The Fed's decision to hold rates reflects more than just macroeconomic caution. Powell has pointed to persistent inflation as justification for holding back on cuts.
The most recent June inflation data posted higher results than expected. The consumer price index increased at a 2.7% annual rate in June, above the Fed's 2% inflation target.
'The why matters,' said Biasi. 'If rates remain unchanged because of a reacceleration in inflation, that is a problem for construction activity.'
A Newmark-tracked basket of 21 common construction inputs rose 2.5% through the first half of 2025, nearly identical to midyear increases in 2024 and 2023. But some materials surged faster.
Copper wire and cable prices jumped 10.3% through June, following a 17.6% jump over the same period last year. Those pressures have made it more difficult to underwrite new construction, said Biasi.
'Construction is using short-term floating debt, so expectations of rate cuts can be helpful to getting construction going, and construction lending has picked up in the first half of 2025 when compared to 2024,' said Biasi. 'However, higher interest rates reduce the amount of projects that can pencil.'
Projects that do move forward, he said, tend to be smaller or rely on less leverage.
Not everyone is waiting
Not all firms see interest rate movement as the defining factor in whether to move forward. Some developers say they have already priced in current conditions, and will be pressing ahead where fundamentals make sense.
'If the Federal Reserve holds rates steady, we do not expect a significant shift in our project pipeline,' said Patrick Chesser, president of the Southeast region at Ryan Cos., a Minneapolis-based construction firm. 'Everyone borrowing capital would prefer a lower cost, but we are in a unique environment where cutting short-term rates could actually push the 10-year Treasury higher.'
The 10-year Treasury yield serves as a benchmark for long-term fixed-rate financing, so an unexpected spike could make permanent debt more expensive, even if the Fed cuts its policy rate. Chesser said Ryan Cos. updates its pro formas monthly based on yield curve data and avoids making bets on political cycles.
'We trust the Fed will continue to follow the data and remain focused on its dual mandate, rather than respond to political pressure,' said Chesser.
Even in higher-rate conditions, projects with pre-leasing, credit tenants or strong long-term outlooks still make sense. 'A good deal remains a good deal, and we focus on projects we believe in and are confident we can close,' said Chesser. 'Securing the right partner early in the process is essential.'
Outlook on future cuts this year
The Fed has not ruled out rate cuts later this year. But its latest decision, paired with ongoing inflation concerns, suggest change will come slowly.
In the meantime, contractors continue adapting with a focus on project fundamentals and long-term strategy.
'Many firms are prioritizing backlog quality over quantity,' said Dyga. 'Higher interest rates have narrowed margins and led to more conservative go or no-go decisions.'
And even if rates fall, limits on labor could prevent a sudden wave of new construction.
'Lower interest rates may increase demand for projects,' said Murphy. 'But the industry can only build as much as there is labor to do so.'
Recommended Reading
Interest rate fog stalls construction momentum
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Side Gigs That Could Struggle in a High-Tariff Economy
3 Side Gigs That Could Struggle in a High-Tariff Economy

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Side Gigs That Could Struggle in a High-Tariff Economy

The world is bracing for a changing economy as many of President Trump's new tariffs go into effect. Not only will these added costs on imports hurt Americans' wallets, they could make earning money in the gig economy harder, too. Consider This: Read Next: Trump announced on Wednesday, July 16 that he would send a letter implementing tariffs on goods from 150 smaller countries. Tariffs with larger trade partners, including Mexico, the European Union and Canada would also go into effect on August 1. Tariffs already in effect include a 25% tariff on vehicle import and auto parts, a 30% tariff on many Chinese imports, and up to 50% on steel and aluminum, according to NewsNation. These tariffs will affect prices on consumer goods, which, in turn, could hurt small businesses and gig workers. GOBankingRates spoke with Keith Spencer, career expert at Resume Now, to find out which gig workers could be hit hardest by tariffs in 2025. Rideshare and Delivery Drivers Drivers for companies like Uber and Lyft could feel the sting of tariffs on oil imports, motor vehicles and car parts, which would increase their business costs. 'Fuel, tires and parts, many of which are imported, become more expensive,' Spencer said. At the same time, demand might decrease. Faced with rising costs, people might forgo little luxuries like ordering DoorDash or having their groceries delivered via InstaCart. 'In a high-tariff economy, side gigs that rely heavily on consumer convenience tend to struggle first,' Spencer said. 'When prices rise, people naturally start cutting back on discretionary spending. That often impacts gig workers who depend on steady, high-volume demand.' Learn More: Task-Based Gigs and Home Help People who have been making money doing random tasks around the home through services like TaskRabbit may struggle to find customers. People who assemble furniture, mount TVs or perform small contracting and handyman tasks around the home will likely feel the impact of tariffs. People may choose to complete these tasks on their own rather than hiring someone. Plus, Spencer said, 'If the price of imported goods like furniture or electronics increases, people may delay or avoid those purchases. That naturally reduces demand for anyone offering services to set them up. Even when demand is steady, the cost of tools and materials often rises, which means gig workers are spending more out of pocket just to do their jobs.' Online Resellers If you've been earning money through eBay, Facebook Marketplace or affiliate sales, you may want to brace yourself for reduced sales and shrinking profit margins. 'If your side hustle involves sourcing products from overseas, such as electronics, clothing or beauty items, you may see your margins shrink,' Spencer said. 'Tariffs raise the base cost of goods, and consumers may push back on higher prices. That combination makes it harder for solo sellers to compete or stay profitable.' What To Do Instead While some gig workers may struggle, it doesn't mean the gig economy is dead. 'Not all side gigs are equally vulnerable,' Spencer said. Pointing to recent data from Resume Now, he noted that administrative support roles saw a 10% pay increase in the first quarter of 2025. Remote healthcare support has seen 70% year-over-year growth, based on further Resume Now data. 'Workers who want to future-proof their income in a high-tariff or high-cost economy might consider transitioning into roles that are both essential and automation-resistant,' Spencer advised. 'The side gigs most likely to succeed in a high-tariff economy are those that meet essential needs, help others cut costs, or can be performed remotely.' More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on 3 Side Gigs That Could Struggle in a High-Tariff Economy Sign in to access your portfolio

Nektar Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NKTR) is a favorite amongst institutional investors who own 53%
Nektar Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NKTR) is a favorite amongst institutional investors who own 53%

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nektar Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NKTR) is a favorite amongst institutional investors who own 53%

Key Insights Significantly high institutional ownership implies Nektar Therapeutics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership Insiders have been selling lately We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Every investor in Nektar Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NKTR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 53% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Nektar Therapeutics, beginning with the chart below. Check out our latest analysis for Nektar Therapeutics What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nektar Therapeutics? Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. Nektar Therapeutics already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Nektar Therapeutics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 13% of Nektar Therapeutics shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.3% of shares outstanding. BVF Partners L.P. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.4% of common stock, and Millennium Management LLC holds about 5.4% of the company stock. A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. Insider Ownership Of Nektar Therapeutics The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Nektar Therapeutics in their own names. It has a market capitalization of just US$397m, and the board has only US$4.0m worth of shares in their own names. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. General Public Ownership With a 33% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Nektar Therapeutics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. Next Steps: While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Nektar Therapeutics has 4 warning signs (and 3 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Results: Exponent, Inc. Beat Earnings Expectations And Analysts Now Have New Forecasts
Results: Exponent, Inc. Beat Earnings Expectations And Analysts Now Have New Forecasts

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Results: Exponent, Inc. Beat Earnings Expectations And Analysts Now Have New Forecasts

Last week, you might have seen that Exponent, Inc. (NASDAQ:EXPO) released its quarterly result to the market. The early response was not positive, with shares down 5.4% to US$68.33 in the past week. Exponent reported US$133m in revenue, roughly in line with analyst forecasts, although statutory earnings per share (EPS) of US$0.52 beat expectations, being 5.6% higher than what the analysts expected. Following the result, the analysts have updated their earnings model, and it would be good to know whether they think there's been a strong change in the company's prospects, or if it's business as usual. We thought readers would find it interesting to see the analysts latest (statutory) post-earnings forecasts for next year. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. After the latest results, the three analysts covering Exponent are now predicting revenues of US$530.2m in 2025. If met, this would reflect a modest 2.1% improvement in revenue compared to the last 12 months. Statutory earnings per share are expected to decrease 2.3% to US$1.98 in the same period. Before this earnings report, the analysts had been forecasting revenues of US$529.8m and earnings per share (EPS) of US$1.97 in 2025. The consensus analysts don't seem to have seen anything in these results that would have changed their view on the business, given there's been no major change to their estimates. View our latest analysis for Exponent There were no changes to revenue or earnings estimates or the price target of US$88.00, suggesting that the company has met expectations in its recent result. That's not the only conclusion we can draw from this data however, as some investors also like to consider the spread in estimates when evaluating analyst price targets. The most optimistic Exponent analyst has a price target of US$100.00 per share, while the most pessimistic values it at US$76.00. With such a narrow range of valuations, the analysts apparently share similar views on what they think the business is worth. One way to get more context on these forecasts is to look at how they compare to both past performance, and how other companies in the same industry are performing. It's pretty clear that there is an expectation that Exponent's revenue growth will slow down substantially, with revenues to the end of 2025 expected to display 4.3% growth on an annualised basis. This is compared to a historical growth rate of 6.8% over the past five years. Compare this against other companies (with analyst forecasts) in the industry, which are in aggregate expected to see revenue growth of 5.8% annually. So it's pretty clear that, while revenue growth is expected to slow down, the wider industry is also expected to grow faster than Exponent. The Bottom Line The most obvious conclusion is that there's been no major change in the business' prospects in recent times, with the analysts holding their earnings forecasts steady, in line with previous estimates. On the plus side, there were no major changes to revenue estimates; although forecasts imply they will perform worse than the wider industry. The consensus price target held steady at US$88.00, with the latest estimates not enough to have an impact on their price targets. With that said, the long-term trajectory of the company's earnings is a lot more important than next year. We have estimates - from multiple Exponent analysts - going out to 2027, and you can see them free on our platform here. Even so, be aware that Exponent is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about... Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store