
Romanian run-off the most crucial vote on Europe's ‘Super Sunday' of elections
are voting in a pivotal presidential run-off that could radically alter their country's strategic alignment and economic prospects, as voters in
Poland
and
Portugal
also cast their ballots in a European electoral 'super Sunday'.
The Romanian contest, the most consequential of the three, pits a brash,
EU
-critical, Trump-admiring populist against a centrist independent in a knife-edge vote that analysts have called most important in the country's post-communist history.
George Simion, a former soccer ultra and ultranationalist agitator who sees his far-right Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR) party as a 'natural ally' of the US Maga movement, comfortably won the May 4th first round with a score of 41 per cent, double that of the Bucharest mayor, Nicuşor Dan.
Recent polls have shown the gap between the two candidates closing, with one putting them neck and neck and another placing Mr Dan – who has described the vote as a battle between 'a pro-western and an anti-western Romania' – ahead.
READ MORE
'This election isn't just about the president of Romania but about its entire direction,' said Siegfried Mureşan, a liberal Romanian MEP. Mr Simion would 'weaken Europe's unity, undermine support for Ukraine, and benefit only Vladimir Putin,' he added.
In Poland, 13 contenders are vying to be the country's next head of state in the first round of presidential elections, with the centrist mayor of Warsaw, Rafał Trzaskowski, a senior member of prime minister Donald Tusk's Civic Coalition, the front-runner.
Polls predict that Mr Trzaskowski and Karol Nawrocki, a historian who is formally independent but has been endorsed by the former national-conservative Law and Justice (PiS) government, will advance to the second round, which is due on June 1st.
A win for the centrist would boost Mr Tusk's ability to push through his reformist agenda, which has been hampered by Polish presidents' power to veto legislation passed by parliament. The outgoing president, Andrzej Duda, is a PiS ally.
Portugal, meanwhile, heads to the polls for its third snap general election in three years after the centre-right prime minister, Luís Montenegro, triggered and lost a confidence vote in parliament over questions about his family's business activities.
Mr Montenegro's Democratic Alliance platform is forecast to finish first but fall short of a majority, and could struggle to form a government, especially if the Socialist party, likely to finish second, keeps its pledge to oppose his legislative agenda.
Mr Montenegro has vowed not to work with the far-right Chega, whose leader, former TV football pundit André Ventura, was hospitalised on Friday after twice collapsing at rallies, but could be replaced as party leader with someone more Chega-compatible.
In Romania, Mr Simion's first-round win triggered the collapse of Romania's government of centre-left Social Democrats (PSD) and centre-right Liberals (PNL), and whoever wins will nominate the next prime minister and influence the formation of a new ruling coalition.
The vote is a rerun of last November's ballot, won by a far-right, Moscow-friendly firebrand, Călin Georgescu, who was barred from standing again after the vote was cancelled amid allegations of campaign finance violations and Russian meddling.
Mr Simion has promised to nominate Mr Georgescu, who is under formal investigation on counts including misreporting campaign spending, illegal use of digital technology and promoting fascist groups, as prime minister if he becomes president.
Romanian presidents have a semi-executive role with considerable powers over foreign policy, national security, defence spending and judicial appointments. They can also dissolve parliament if MPs reject two prime ministerial nominations.
Analysts have said that since neither PSD or PNL would want a snap election with Mr Simion's AUR – the second biggest party in parliament – in the ascendant, a minority AUR-led government, backed perhaps by PSD, is a clear possibility if Mr Simion wins.
Mr Simion opposes further aid to Ukraine and has sharply criticised the EU's leadership. While he insists he wants Romania to stay in the EU and Nato, he could ally with Hungary's Viktor Orban and Slovakia's Robert Fico as another disruptive force. – Guardian
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
20-07-2025
- Irish Times
Japan grapples with far-right surge and prospect of new leader after general election
Japanese prime minister Shigeru Ishiba is on the political ropes after a humiliating rebuke by voters in a general election on Sunday, which saw a striking rise in the popularity of fringe populist parties. The results suggest that a country largely untouched until now by the far-right populism that has roiled European and American politics may be in for a period of messy instability. Exit polls on Sunday night predict Ishiba's coalition government will lose its Upper House majority, handing them their second major electoral drubbing in less than a year, following the loss of the Lower House last October. Most of the gains in the election went to the right or far right, led by Sanseito, a new party with an anti-immigrant platform that advocated lower taxes and peddled Maga-style grievances about immigrants and globalists. Japan's public service broadcaster NHK on Sunday projected that Sanseito could win 10-22 seats. The Democratic Party For the People, another conservative populist party, is projected to win 17 seats and the far-right Conservative Party of Japan could win two. Komeito, the Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) Buddhist-backed junior coalition partner, will also lose seats. The centre-left Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan is expected to gain seats. READ MORE If confirmed, Sunday's result would be the first time in 70 years that a government led by Ishiba's LDP has lost control of both branches of the Diet. One of the world's most successful political machines, the LDP has held power for all but a handful of years since 1955. During the campaign, the Japanese media reported that LDP candidates around the country were refusing to campaign with Ishiba, suggesting he had become a toxic figure. [ As an Irishman living in Japan, I watch the rise of anti-immigrant rhetoric with unease Opens in new window ] Ishiba's popularity swooned after a scandal involving the payment of gifts to rookie lawmakers in March. Record food prices and declining wages have also been an emotive electoral issue. The price of rice, a national staple, almost doubled in June year-on-year. In May, the agriculture minister was forced to quit after he infuriated voters by saying he 'never had to buy rice' because his supporters gave it to him as a gift. Sanseito advocated tougher restrictions on foreigners and other right-leaning causes, including changes to school education to make Japanese people 'proud of their country's history and culture'. Several Sanseito candidates said Japan should build a nuclear bomb. Although he softened his tone during the campaign, Sanseito party leader Sohei Kamiya has been a high-profile anti-vaxxer and has blamed 'international financial capital affiliated with Jews' for the exaggerated fears of the coronavirus pandemic. Among the party's prescriptions was that young men should be conscripted to work on farms. Inflation helped drive voters away from the LDP. Many are also frustrated by the threat of new US tariffs of 25 per cent, due to take effect on August 1st. Trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa was dispatched to Washington seven times in a fruitless bid to avoid the tariffs, giving the impression, said one lawmaker, that Japan was being 'mugged' by US president Donald Trump, who wants to cut a $70 billion trade deficit with Japan. [ Donald Trump's nonsensical economics Opens in new window ] The election was prefaced by a sell-off of Japanese government bonds amid concerns that the government was floundering. Bond yields were pushed last week to their highest levels since 2008. Ishiba is now likely to come under pressure to adopt some of the populist measures of its rivals. As the results came in on Sunday night, Yoichi Masuzoe, former governor of Tokyo, said that the rise of Sanseito 'feels strikingly similar to the situation after the 1929 Great Depression when the Nazis expanded their influence through elections'.


Irish Times
16-07-2025
- Irish Times
Poland's chief rabbi rejects memorial to wartime pogrom as ‘disgrace'
Poland's chief rabbi has described as a 'disgrace' new memorial stones to a wartime pogrom in Nazi-occupied Poland , disputing that ethnic Poles were among the perpetrators. At least 300 and as many as 1,600 Polish Jews – many women, children and the elderly – died on July 10th, 1941, in the village of Jedwabne in northeastern Poland when they were rounded up and burned alive in a barn. Research in the last 25 years has established that local villagers, ethnic Poles, were among those who rounded up and killed their neighbours. These revelations in 2000 about the Polish perpetrators caused a national earthquake and, in subsequent years, have transformed the 1941 Jedwabne pogrom into a key battleground of Poland's politicised memory culture. READ MORE Many historians, as well as Poland's state Institute of National Remembrance, note the complicated nature of the country's tragic past. Most see broader responsibility for this and other Holocaust-era crimes with the German occupying force and its genocidal policies. Many on Poland's nationalist hard right, however, insist this pogrom was an exclusively German endeavour. Given the millions of Polish victims of nazism, a founding stone of modern Polish history and identity, they reject the idea of Poles perpetrating anti-Jewish crimes as an exercise in blame-shifting. The new memorials – large rocks mounted with metal plaques carrying text – reflect this nationalist reading of Polish history. One plaque says, in Polish and English, that 'evidence and witness accounts disprove the claims of Polish perpetration of the murder of Jews in Jedwabne … in reality, this crime was committed by a German [army] unit.' The new crowdfunded memorials, installed unofficially in advance of the 84th anniversary of the massacre, were described by Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial as 'an apparent attempt to distort the story of the massacre of Jews' to 'absolve the perpetrators' through the 'blatant falsification of history'. A second plaque says the partition of Poland for more than a century until 1918 was 'an unimaginable tragedy for Poles … [but] a source of satisfaction for many Jews'. A third plaque claims that, in the interwar period, 'many Jews openly sympathised with communism and identified with the Soviets, who were hostile to Poland'. Poland's chief rabbi, Michael Schudrich, described the messages on the memorial plaques as a 'manifestation of the disease that is anti-Semitism'. A key driving force behind the memorial plaques is author Wojciech Sumliński, who has written books critical of recent historical research. For him, the last decades of research into Polish involvement in the Jedwabne pogrom is an 'attempt to extort billions of dollars from us'. Last week, Sumliński attended the official inauguration of the plaques, which included a Catholic Mass. In a statement, the Yad Vashem memorial said it was 'profoundly shocked and deeply concerned by the desecration of historical truth and memory at the Jedwabne memorial site in Poland'. Its demand for the Polish government to remove the memorials is unlikely to be met, however, as the stones have been installed on private land. Polish foreign minister Radolslaw Sikorski has criticised the memorials and warned that 'there is no consent for an escalating campaign of racism and anti-Semitism' in Poland. The Jedwabne anniversary prompted a second controversy after a far-right opposition politician claimed in a live radio interview that the gas chambers in Auschwitz were 'fake' and the death camp memorial was pursuing a 'pseudo-historical narrative'. Grzegorz Braun, who attracted 6 per cent in Poland's recent presidential election, faces a criminal investigation for his remarks. He is already under investigation for using a fire extinguisher in 2023 to put out the Hanukkah candles on a menorah in the Polish parliament.


Irish Times
11-07-2025
- Irish Times
Von der Leyen's allies reject no-confidence motion through gritted teeth
On paper, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen comfortably breezed through a motion of no confidence in the European Parliament tabled by MEPs from the far right. Some 360 of the 553 MEPs who voted rejected the effort to censure Von der Leyen. If the motion had been successful, the head of the EU's powerful executive would have had to resign, along with the 26 EU commissioners who sit around the table with her. The motion was tabled by a far-right Romanian MEP, over a long-running controversy dubbed Pfizergate, related to the manner in which Von der Leyen had negotiated deals for supplies of Covid-19 vaccines during the height of the pandemic. The vote of censure was backed by 175 MEPs, who nearly all came from far-right or nationalist parties such as Law and Justice in Poland, Marine Le Pen's National Rally in France, Alternative for Germany and Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban's party Fidesz. READ MORE Four Irish MEPs – Lynn Boylan, Kathleen Funchion, Luke 'Ming' Flanagan, and Ciaran Mullooly – were among a tiny group of others who voted in favour of her removal. The traditional middle-ground majority that for years has held the balance of power in the European Parliament shot down the motion. Von der Leyen knew she could rely on the support of her own political family, the European People's Party (EPP), which is the largest group in the parliament and includes Fine Gael and centre-right parties leading a dozen other national governments. The second biggest grouping, the centre-left Socialists and Democrats, supported her, as did Renew, the smaller centrist group dominated by French president Emmanuel Macron's party, and the Greens. It was clear, though, that many MEPs from those centre and centre-left groupings were giving Von der Leyen a dig-out through gritted teeth. Renew, the Greens and the Socialists and Democrats are irritated at Manfred Weber, the conservative German MEP who leads the EPP in the parliament. This 'centre majority' supported Von der Leyen's reappointment as head of the commission last year. Since then, however, Weber has been happy to have the EPP break away on certain votes and side with an alternative right-wing majority. The EPP has teamed up with nationalist and far-right parties to gut climate legislation and block an independent EU ethics watchdog, among other things. These more extreme-right MEPs are the same ones who supported the motion of no confidence in Von der Leyen on Thursday. [ Fianna Fáil MEPs will not support censure of Ursula von der Leyen Opens in new window ] 'Who do you want to govern with?' Iratxe García, the Spanish MEP who leads the Socialists and Democrats, asked Von der Leyen during a debate on the censure motion this week. Patience for Weber siding with those further to his right when it suits him is wearing thin. 'Respect your word, and if you betray it once again, the Socialists and Democrats will lead the resistance,' García told Von der Leyen. The leader of Renew, French MEP Valérie Hayer, had much the same message for the commission president. 'Don't take anything for granted, put your own political house in order, get a grip, so that we can work together with you,' she said. Far-right and hard-right parties gained ground in the European elections last year, winning about a quarter of the 720 seats in the parliament. At the time many insisted that, despite a growing wave of support for populist forces, the political centre had held. One year into this parliament's term, it is clear the populist right have a lot more influence over the EU legislative machine, thanks to their working relationship with Weber and the EPP. It is a situation Von der Leyen's centrist allies in Renew, the Greens, and the Socialists and Democrats may not be willing to tolerate indefinitely.