
Blackstone's profit tops estimate on credit strength, fee gains
Shares of the world's largest alternative asset manager rose 3.2%, turning positive for the year.
Even though tariffs uncertainties remain a source of concern for the economy, resilient investors have propelled equity markets to record highs, enabling large asset managers such as Blackstone to capitalize.
Asset sales in the credit and insurance segment were $10 billion, while the company also sold $7.3 billion of private equity assets. It had $181.2 billion of capital available for deployment.
Fee-related performance revenue more than doubled to $472.1 million, powered by a 16% growth in perpetual capital assets under management.
Perpetual capital refers to long-term assets under management that does not have a fixed end date and cannot typically be redeemed by investors on demand.
Distributable earnings, which represent cash that can be used to pay dividends, grew 25% to $1.6 billion, or $1.21 per share, for the three months ended June 30.
It exceeded analysts' expectation of $1.10, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Blackstone has said it remains capable of executing deals even in uncertain environments, underscoring its resilience should trade tensions escalate further.
As of last close, Blackstone's shares were down slightly this year, compared with an 8% gain in the benchmark S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab index.
Inflows of $52.1 billion helped push Blackstone's total AUM to $1.2 trillion, up 13% from a year ago.
The credit and insurance segment attracted more than half of the total inflows. The unit is a key driver of Blackstone's growing influence in private credit, as more companies turn to investment firms for flexible financing.
The private equity arm also recorded segment distributable earnings of $751.4 million, up 55% from a year ago.
AUM at the real estate division fell 3%, but segment distributable earnings grew 10%.
"Blackstone is deploying more in real estate than it is realizing, indicating some bullishness on its part as it is putting more money to work than it's taking off the table," Oppenheimer analyst Chris Kotowski wrote in a note.
The company had said tariffs could drive up construction costs and reduce new supply, potentially elevating real estate values if the economy avoids a recession.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Allianz Life confirms data breach affecting majority of 1.4M US customers
Hackers gained access to personal data on the majority of the 1.4 million customers of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America, the company confirmed Saturday. Minneapolis-based Allianz Life, a subsidiary of Munich, Germany-based Allianz SE, said the data breach happened on July 16 when a 'malicious threat actor' gained access to a third-party, cloud-based system used by the company. 'The threat actor was able to obtain personally identifiable data related to the majority of Allianz Life's customers, financial professionals, and select Allianz Life employees, using a social engineering technique,' Allianz Life said in a statement. "We took immediate action to contain and mitigate the issue and notified the FBI." The company said its own systems were not accessed, just the third-party's platform. Allianz Life said its investigation is ongoing and that the company has begun reaching out to the impacted individuals. It said the incident involves only Allianz Life in the U.S., not other Allianz corporate entities. In the case of data breaches, a 'social engineering technique' usually involves using trickery to gain access. Spokesman Brett Weinberg said he couldn't provide details because they are still investigating. Allianz Life also reported the breach to multiple other authorities, including the Maine Attorney General's Office. A filing on the agency's website said the company discovered the breach the day after it happened, and that it will be offering those affected 24 months of identity theft protection and credit monitoring. Allianz Life was known as North American Life and Casualty until it was acquired by German conglomerate Allianz SE in 1979 and changed its name to Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. It has nearly 2,000 employees in U.S., with the majority working in Minnesota, according to its website. It is one of five North American subsidiaries of the Munich-based global financial services group Allianz SE, which says it serves more than 125 million customers worldwide.


Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BP's scramble to rally big investors behind new chief
Amanda Blanc embarked on an intense charm offensive among top BP shareholders last week to convince them that the choice of low-profile building materials executive Albert Manifold as chairman made sense. There had been an expectation in the City that a thorough recruitment process – conducted by the no-nonsense Aviva chief executive – who is BP's senior independent director and who led the search – might yield a more prominent chairman with wider knowledge of the energy industry. BP was stung by early criticism of Manifold by City brokers Panmure Gordon, who accused the oil giant's board of a 'panic appointment'. The energy giant also found it necessary to repudiate derogatory comments made by an unnamed 'bitter and twisted' losing candidate for the post. Working from Aviva's Canadian headquarters in the last few days, Blanc spoke to all of BP's leading UK and American investors and has seemingly managed to turn the tide of opinion. Most now are reportedly positive about the BP board's final choice. But there was some disappointment at the oil giant's headquarters about the lack of a rise in the share price following the announcement, as well as at some of the negative briefing in the Square Mile. Blanc is said to have convinced leading investors that the naysayers who challenged the choice of Manifold 'lacked credibility'. In selling the selection to the City, BP and its advisers have pointed to Manifold's stellar, under-the-radar performance at CRH, where he drove the value of the group's shares up 342 per cent during a ten-year tenure. The share price performance of CRH, which moved its listing to New York two years ago, is described by BP insiders as 'magnificent'. Blanc is also understood to have pointed to Manifold's considerable experience in making deals, and his knowledge of a building materials industry that has come under close scrutiny from regulators. Despite claims about the new chairman's modest Irish-based lifestyle, it has been noted that he became one of the best rewarded executives in the British Isles, amassing some £54 million of stock options between 2020 and 2024. But while Manifold has a reputation for successfully managing bids and deals, chairing the oil giant is regarded very differently. Being BP chairman requires great diplomatic skills given that its operations include sensitive territories such as Iraq. He will also have to contend with the battle being waged by chief executive Murray Auchincloss to refocus the company on oil production after a disastrous effort under his predecessor Bernard Looney to transmogrify the company into a green energy pioneer. Nevertheless, BP insists that the job of chairman is to lead the board and hold the management to account. 'It is not to be the deep technical expert,' one person involved in the search noted. Being an industry expert is also no guarantee of success. Manifold's predecessor, Helge Lund, a Norwegian veteran of the oil sector, quit due to mounting investor pressure and criticism of his performance in the role. An adviser to BP's rival Shell expressed surprise that the selection panel overlooked its newest non-executive director, Simon Henry, who was appointed to the board earlier this month. Henry is a former finance director of Shell and has been influential on the board of mining giant Rio Tinto. BP's response is to argue that in bringing both Henry and Manifold aboard, the group 'had the best of both worlds'. Manifold's first task will be to keep notorious activist investor Elliott Investment Management onside. It welcomed his appointment and wanted to see him 'urgently' address the company's 'shortcomings'. But other leading American holders of BP shares have recognised that turning the tanker around will take time, and believe that the newish team deserve at least eight quarters, or two years, of grace to show that things are on the mend. The big question is whether Manifold will be able to withstand the pressure on BP to cut back spending on new oil and gas facilities while providing better returns to shareholders. He has experience in this area, having previously faced down activists at CRH. There has been some concern about the length of the process to appoint the chairman. Blanc insisted on a thorough process using head-hunters, a long-list and short-list, and bringing the board along with her. But the drawn-out procedure allowed speculation to build of a takeover approach by Shell. Fortunately for BP's top team, Shell denied any early-stage talks and took itself out of the picture for at least six months. Outside observers were not the only ones surprised by the choice of Manifold, with many BP insiders having no knowledge of his background. In a bid to bolster his credentials, he has in the past few days made a point of touring the oil giant's offices in St James's Square in central London and holding a series of one-to-one meetings with executives and colleagues. But only time will tell if the former building materials boss can cement his legacy at BP.


Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
City giants: Face-to-face annual meetings vital for share owner rights
Face-to-face shareholder meetings are 'a cornerstone of the financial system' and key to sustainable economic growth, a group of powerful City investors has told The Mail on Sunday. In a big boost to this paper's push to stop annual meetings becoming online-only, the Governance for Growth Investor Campaign (GGIC) says it is 'vital' they operate 'in a way which allows for genuine interaction with shareholders'. The Mail on Sunday is campaigning for all FTSE 100 companies to hold physical annual general meetings (AGMs) in the UK, and to make it easier for shareholders to vote via a platform or nominee so their voices can be heard – a move hailed by retail investor group ShareAction. It follows a trend by firms such as drug giant AstraZeneca, defence contractor BAE Systems and toothpaste-maker Haleon to move their AGMs to a digital-only format, effectively barring share owners from attending in person. On Friday, Nationwide came under fire at its virtual AGM for not allowing any of the 16 million members who own Britain's biggest mutual to attend in person, leading to charges that bosses were not being properly held responsible. 'Virtual-only AGMs make it harder for shareholders to hold firms to account and support the long-term value creation vital for sustainable economic growth,' said GGIC leader Caroline Escott. 'Hearing other shareholders' views, and being heard in turn, without our perspectives being filtered by management, is a key shareholder right,' added Escott, who is head of investment stewardship at train workers' pension fund Railpen. The GGIC is an alliance of pension schemes controlling £150 billion of assets, including BT's retirement fund and the Church of England Pensions Board on behalf of 11 million members. Escott added: 'The right of shareholders, as the owners of capital, to freely and genuinely engage with boards and executives is a cornerstone of our financial system. 'It's therefore vital AGMs are run in a way that allows for genuine interaction with shareholders.' The move to virtual-only meetings is shrouded in legal uncertainty, with Ministers under pressure to clarify the law about the physical location of AGMs. A review is expected later this year. Escott added: 'It's just one of the important shareholder rights that we must protect in the UK if we are to achieve the thriving UK companies, capital markets and economy that we all want to see.' And it's good enough for Warren Buffett! Directors tempted to stage digital-only annual meetings should follow the example of legendary US money manager Warren Buffett, says Ann Francke, head of the Chartered Management Institute. The 94-year-old, pictured right, has turned the in-person meeting of his Berkshire Hathaway fund into 'the focus of his leadership'. Each year, he outlines his strategy and decisions to 40,000 people who pack out an arena in Nebraska. Buffett may be stepping back from his role, but his commitment to openness has won the loyalty of investors, transforming Berkshire from a small textile firm into a $1 trillion conglomerate. The event will continue under Greg Abel, his successor. Francke said that in-person meetings show a willingness in bosses to be held accountable, adding: 'Directors need to be able to look shareholders in the eye: it's hardly much to ask and the process needs to be as inclusive as possible. 'I do believe that we behave differently when we are face-to-face.' It also means bosses have to be more authentic, and cannot avoid awkward issues or angry shareholders.