‘Build, baby, build:' Canada's new prime minister wants to make the country into an ‘energy superpower'
Prime Minister Mark Carney won Canada's election this week in what many observers are calling an embrace of Canadian nationalism and rebuke of U.S. President Donald Trump. Carney is a former central banker who became prime minister in March after Justin Trudeau stepped down. He is largely expected to continue the policies adopted by his centrist Liberal predecessor, who supported aligning Canadian law with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the cornerstone of international rights for Indigenous peoples, but also faced criticism for his support for the Trans Mountain oil pipeline.
Carney's Conservative opponent Pierre Poilievre embraced a major expansion of domestic oil and gas development and voted against the 2021 bill to ensure Canadian laws are consistent with the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
'I am very proud to say that I oppose this bill,' Poilievre said at the time. One study found that if Poilievre won, Canada's emissions would increase, whereas Carney's win means the country's emissions will continue to fall — albeit not low enough to avoid the worst effects of global warming.
Indigenous Climate Action, an advocacy group for Indigenous peoples and climate justice in Canada, said in a statement that Carney was considered the 'lesser of two evils' compared to his Conservative opponent but that the organization is concerned that both Carney and Poilievre promised to speed up extractive energy projects in the name of Canadian sovereignty.
'So-called Canadian sovereignty shouldn't come at the expense of Indigenous sovereignty, nor should it be an excuse to violate our inherent rights,' the organization said. 'True climate justice can only be achieved when Indigenous Peoples are given the rightful power to determine the fate of our lands and territories.'
Prior to his election, Carney had a track record of climate advocacy: In 2019, he became the United Nations' special envoy for climate action and finance, with the goal of drumming up private financing to help countries prevent the earth from warning more than 1.5 degrees. A decade ago, he said the 'vast majority of reserves are unburnable' if the world is to avoid the worst-case scenarios of climate change.
Carney's rhetoric has since shifted. One of his first decisions after replacing Trudeau was to remove the federal carbon tax on fossil fuel usage that was widely criticized for increasing the cost of living, despite data indicating rebates reached more than 80 percent of Canadians. The issue had become a political liability for the Liberal party and scrapping the tax ahead of the election undercut what had become a rallying cry for his opponent. Carney has also promised to fast-track resource development projects to decrease Canada's reliance on energy imports.
'Build, baby, build,' Carney said in his victory speech this week, a play on Trump's 'drill, baby, drill' motto that refers to ramping up oil production. For Carney, 'build, baby, build' expresses his commitment to shoring up Canadian infrastructure, including building half a million affordable housing units and expanding domestic energy production.
Read Next
In Canada, Indigenous advocates argue that mining companies violate the rights of nature
Taylar Dawn Stagner & Joseph Winters
'It's time to build new trade and energy corridors working in partnership with the provinces, territories, and Indigenous peoples,' he said in the same speech. 'It's time to build Canada into an energy superpower in both clean and conventional energy.'
Both Carney and Poilievre embraced constructing energy corridors, but it's not clear what pipelines or other projects would comprise the corridor Carney has championed.
Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, an advocacy organization for Canada's First Nations, said she is optimistic Carney's administration will involve Indigenous communities with planning and decision-making as he pursues his aggressive energy development goal.
'They're going to have to make sure that they work with First Peoples on whose land Canada is made,' Nepinak said. 'First Nations aren't anti-development but they do want to do things in a balanced and sustainable way because we don't have another planet to send our children to. We always try to think to the generations ahead: Are we ruining what we have?'
Carney's campaign has been full of promises to that effect. 'A Mark Carney-led government will: work in full partnership with First Nation, Inuit, and Métis to advance and realize the rights of Indigenous peoples through a distinctions-based approach,' according to his website. A Mark Carney-led government will 'support Indigenous-led processes for advancing self-determination,' it continued, and 'implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act.' The website frequently described Indigenous peoples as partners and promised to expand funding and services for them. In March, Carney doubled federal infrastructure financing for Indigenous communities from $5 billion to $10 billion.
Read Next
Canada to phase out single-use plastic
Joseph Winters
Carney has also promised to support Indigenous-led conservation efforts, and 'enshrine First Nations' right to water into law.' He pledged to add at least 10 new national parks or marine conservation areas and 15 new urban parks, and make national park access free this summer. He's also promised to create new programs to support Arctic Indigenous guardianship over ecosystems and Indigenous climate adaptation.
Carney's ability to enact his agenda might be hampered by the fact that, unlike with his predecessor Trudeau, the Liberal party did not win a majority of seats in Parliament this week, which will require the party to work with others to pass legislation.
'When the Liberals won a majority under Justin Trudeau in 2015, the government was able to implement major climate policy, like the carbon pollution pricing system and regulations restricting methane,' the Canadian nonprofit news site The Narwhal reported. Carney's climate goals include making Canada 'a world leader in carbon removal and sequestration,' and compared to Trudeau, his platform has been described as 'more carrot, less stick.'
The newly-elected Carney is now facing pressure from energy developers to be friendlier to the oil and gas industry than Trudeau was, as well as calls from environmentalists to take a hard stance against burning more fossil fuels.
'We stopped a far-right government from taking power,' said Amara Possian, Canada team lead at 350.org. 'But the real work lies ahead as we build a future where our climate is protected and our communities thrive.'
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline 'Build, baby, build:' Canada's new prime minister wants to make the country into an 'energy superpower' on May 2, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Britain expands 'Deport Now Appeal Later" scheme to 15 more countries
Aug. 11 (UPI) -- Britain tripled the number of countries whose citizens face being deported immediately upon having their asylum claim denied or being convicted of a crime as part of a so-called "Deport Now Appeal Later" scheme designed to prevent foreigners from using the legal system to remain in the country. An additional 15 countries, including Canada, Australia, India and Bulgaria, were being added to the existing eight whose nationals could now be returned before being able to appeal, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Foreign Secretary David Lammy said in a news release Sunday. They said expanding the scheme, which applies in England and Wales only, would ease pressure on the detention system and prison overcrowding by boosting the government's ability to "remove foreign criminals at the earliest opportunity." Foreign nationals who have had their human rights claim denied will be deported to their home country, from where they can lodge an appeal, taking part in any proceeding via video-link. Separately, the Justice Ministry unveiled a parallel scheme that will work in tandem, removing foreign national offenders immediately after sentencing, saving taxpayers the cost of holding them until the current halfway point in their sentence in British prisons before they can be deported. Prisoners serving long prison terms for terrorism, murder and other serious offenses will have to serve out their sentences before becoming eligible for deportation. "For far too long, foreign criminals have been exploiting our immigration system, remaining in the U.K. for months or even years while their appeals drag on. That has to end. Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced," said Cooper. People whose asylum claim has been denied can be removed before their appeal if the home secretary can certify it would not breach the European Convention on Human Rights, which says people cannot be removed if they would be exposed to "serious irreversible harm" by doing so. Most of the other countries being added to the list are in Africa and Asia with the new countries accounting for 774 prisoners, or just 7% of the 10,772 foreigners serving time in prisons in England and Wales. Albanians are the largest foreign group in the prison population with 1,193 inmates. The Home Office claimed it had removed 5,200 people since the Labour government took office in July 2024, up 14% on the previous 12 months. The changes are part of a government pledge to tackle "illegal" migration that it said had resulted in 35,000 people with no right to remain being returned in the past 12 months, a 50% jump in workplace raids and arrests and paring down the asylum claims backlog by more than doubling the number of decisions. Shadow Home Secretary, Conservative MP Chris Philp, criticized what he said was a U-turn by Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government. "Until Keir Starmer either commits to deporting all foreign criminals or stops rolling out the red carpet for migrants the world over, this problem is not going away," Philp said. The government is in the early stages of formulating new legislation to crack down on what it claims is abuse of a "right to a family life" clause in the country's Human Rights Act -- incorporating the ECHR into British law -- which it argues is widely invoked in appeals against deportation or when asylum claims are denied. Under the strategy, defendants with immediate family in the United Kingdom can argue that separating them from their relatives by forcibly removing them to another country is a breach of their human rights.


Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Expectations grow for US-China trade truce
With help from Doug Palmer QUICK FIX — The United States is likely to extend a trade war truce with China that is set to expire Tuesday. The two could nail down a firmer deal during a global gathering this fall. — The White House clarified that Japan's 15 percent duty won't stack on top of existing tariffs amid conflicting interpretations of the trade deal. — The Trump administration is hiking duties on Canadian softwood lumber days after slapping the country with a 35 percent tariff on goods. It's Monday, Aug. 11. Welcome to Morning Trade! Got news tips? Suggestions? Want to grab a coffee? Hit us up at: ahawkins@ ddesrochers@ and dpalmer@ Follow us on X: @_AriHawkins, @drdesrochers and @tradereporter. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. Driving the day U.S.-CHINA DEAL TRACKER: The United States and China are likely to extend a tariff truce that expires on Tuesday. They could also push for a more comprehensive trade deal by the end of October, when leaders of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation will meet in South Korea for their annual summit, according to three former U.S. trade officials. 'You can see the choreography of what's happening,' said Jeff Moon, a former assistant U.S. trade representative for China, during a discussion posted Friday by the Washington International Trade Association. Certain 'confidence-building steps,' including China easing restrictions on rare earths exports and the U.S. effectively reversing a ban on H20 chips, highlight the hopes of a bigger deal to manage trade relations between the two sides, he said. Context needed: With existing duties remaining in place, the U.S. in May agreed to temporarily lower tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent, while the Chinese dropped levies on U.S. goods from 125 percent to 10 percent. That agreement is set to expire and would amount to an effective blockade on trade between the world's largest economies. Chris Padilla, who was Commerce undersecretary for international trade in the George W. Bush administration, and Stephen Vaughn, who was USTR general counsel in the first Trump administration, both agreed that President Donald Trump was likely to extend the tariff truce. But the three had varying opinions about how likely the two sides were to reach a deal by the Oct. 31 APEC leaders summit and how comprehensive any agreement might be. Who has the upper hand? Trump 'exhausted his tariff leverage three months ago when he threatened an effective embargo and then backed off,' Moon said. 'The Chinese now have the leverage because they've found rare earths as a magic bullet and something that the West absolutely needs.' Trump's apparent decision not to hit China with 'secondary tariffs' over its oil purchases from Russia, after threatening to do that and hitting India with them last week, is another sign of how badly he wants an agreement, both Padilla and Moon said. What kind of deal? Vaughn, a partner at King & Spalding, where U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer formerly worked, disagreed that the negotiating dynamic has shifted in favor of Beijing and said any deal reached at APEC is likely to be similar to the broad frameworks that the administration has reached with other trading partners. But Padilla said he doubts Chinese President Xi Jinping would agree to a 'very high-level, informal' deal like the ones Trump struck with the European Union, Japan and South Korea in which few details are written down. 'I call them 'bar napkin agreements,'' Padilla said. Moon said he thinks any deal would probably look like the January 2020 'Phase 1' agreement that committed China to buy an additional $200 billion worth of U.S. goods over two years — even though Beijing fell short of those purchase commitments. REGULATORY REVIEW CLARITY WANTED: Higher tariffs on Japanese imports will replace existing duties rather than be stacked on top, a White House official confirmed to your host on Sunday, clearing up competing interpretations of the agreement unveiled last month. 'We agreed in subsequent discussions to provide Japan the same treatment as the EU with respect to MFN duties and reciprocal tariff rates. But that was not what was initially hashed out in the Oval Office,' said the White House official, granted anonymity to divulge details. The statement seeks to clear up uncertainty over the terms of the U.S.-Japan trade agreement, after a 'no stacking' provision was applied to a trade deal between the U.S. and the EU but not Japan. That would mean certain Japanese commodities already subject to duties could see tariff rates rise, such as from the current 26.4 percent to 41.4 percent for beef. Trump is expected to issue a new executive order to make the change official in the near future. Why it matters: The development is the latest indication of how the lack of a deal on paper is sparking confusion and raising tensions between the U.S. and its fifth-largest trading partner. Keep in mind: The White House added that the 15 percent rate is 'separate from 232 matters,' referring to tariffs imposed under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Japan is still vulnerable to duties on critical sectors, after the administration hiked levies on steel, aluminum, autos and auto parts using the provision, and is conducting probes in nine additional sectors. FIRST IN MORNING TRADE: Fifty-two House Democrats sent Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio a letter Sunday asking for more information about the status of the U.S. negotiations with the Democratic Republic of Congo on critical minerals, which are being held behind closed doors. 'As Members of Congress, we are deeply concerned with your administration's failure to consult Congress and the lack of transparency, especially given the dire security, human rights, labor, and environmental situation associated with mineral mining in the DRC,' the lawmakers wrote in the letter, which was led by Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.). Keep in mind: China has historically outmaneuvered the U.S. when it comes to developments in Africa, particularly the DRC, thanks to Beijing's deployment of large-scale financing projects that include government-to-government engagement deemed exploitative by U.S. officials. Around the World LUMBER DUTIES HIKED: The Commerce Department on Friday announced higher countervailing duties on Canadian softwood lumber to offset what it says are unfairly low prices and Canadian subsidies, raising the total duty rate to 35.19 percent. The countervailing duty rate is being raised to 14.63 percent, up from 6.74 percent, and would be in addition to existing anti-dumping duty rates. Another stressor: The final levels are largely in line with projections, but are poised to inflame tensions between the U.S. and Canada as they pursue broader trade talks, and come days after Trump slapped a 35 percent tariff on the country, affecting goods deemed noncompliant with an existing North American trade deal known as the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement. 'This decision will harm communities on both sides of the border,' Kurt Niquidet, president of the BC Lumber Trade Council, which advocates for the Canadian lumber sector, said in a statement. 'It places unnecessary strain on forestry-dependent regions in Canada while driving up construction costs for American builders and families.' Context: The duties on Canada come as the Trump administration separately pursues a Section 232 probe that could lead to new tariffs on lumber from more countries. TRADE OVERNIGHT —After the trade war, a new essay in Foreign Affairs from former United States Trade Representative and Council on Foreign Relations President Michael Froman. — Foreign governments bet big to lobby Trump on tariffs. Most came up empty, POLITICO reports. — Intel CEO Singled Out by Trump to Visit White House on Monday, per the Wall Street Journal. — Canada courts Mexico as Trump escalates tariff fight, POLITICO reports. — WTO cuts 2026 trade forecast as Trump tariff hike takes hold, per POLITICO Pro. — Trump calls for Intel CEO to resign, per POLITICO Pro. — Coast Guard discloses role in probe of Chinese ship-to-shore cranes, per POLITICO Pro. THAT'S ALL FOR MORNING TRADE! See you again soon! In the meantime, drop the team a line: dpalmer@ ddesrochers@ and ahawkins@ Follow us @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Trade.


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Australia to recognize Palestinian state, leader says
Australia will recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations in September, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Monday, joining a wave of Group of 20 nations that have moved to rebuke Israel over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. 'A two-state is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering, and starvation in Gaza,' Albanese said at a press conference. 'The international community's vision for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East always encompassed two states living side-by-side with internationally recognized borders.' Australia joins Canada, Britain and France in moving to recognize a Palestinian state, a largely symbolic gesture, as international outrage builds over Israel's war in Gaza, now approaching its two-year mark. Like the recognitions planned by other Western countries, Australia's comes with conditions: a commitment to demilitarization, democratic elections and assurances that Hamas will play no part in a Palestinian government. Albanese said he spoke on Thursday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has largely resisted international pressure to shift the war from his own timeline. 'Most of the Jewish public is against the Palestinian state for the simple reason that they know it won't bring peace. It'll bring war. To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that, fall right into it and buy this canard, it's disappointing,' Netanyahu said at a Sunday press conference, prior to Australia's announcement. 'I think it's actually shameful.' The Israeli government late last week confirmed its military would seek to control Gaza City, one of the last slices of the besieged enclave not already under Israeli control. The Israeli prime minister has doubled down in response to international condemnation of the move, including Germany saying it would halt certain military exports to Israel. New Zealand is also weighing recognizing Palestinian statehood, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said Monday. The Palestinian Authority currently has observer status at the United Nations, allowing it to engage with the international community but without voting rights in the U.N.'s General Assembly. The Vatican holds similar status. Admission of the Palestinian Authority as a member state with full voting rights would require the assent of the U.N. Security Council, where the United States holds veto power.