CM Naidu urges Centre to notify Amaravati as the capital
Addressing a press conference on his interactions with the Union Ministers, Mr. Naidu said that the combined Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated 10 years ago. On the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, the Central government should notify Amaravati as the capital of Andhra Pradesh under the AP Reorganisation Act, 2014, he said.
'The Bifurcation Act mandates the creation of a new capital for the State. In 2014, the State government declared Amaravati as the capital and began its construction. However, due to the previous government's hasty decisions, the idea of three capitals led to uncertainty about people's future. In this context, I requested an amendment to the law recognising Amaravati as the capital, as per the wishes of the local farmers,' the Chief Minister said..
'From 2019 to 2024, Andhra Pradesh faced severe destruction. It will take 10 years to bring the State back on track from the damage caused by the YSRCP. We promised in the elections that we will rebuild the State once our government comes to power. We are making all efforts accordingly. The previous government left unpaid bills amounting to ₹1.20 lakh crore. This year, the State received a record level of investments,' he said.
Stating that he discussed the Polavaram–Banakacharla Project with Jal Sakthi Minister C.R. Patil and Ms. Sitharaman, Mr. Naidu said that the Polavaram–Banakacharla Project would cost around ₹80,000 crore. It would divert 200 tmcft of water. The project would not cause any inconvenience to other States, as it would divert water that would otherwise flow into the sea.
The Centre was requested to prevail upon the others as Andhra Pradesh was taking up an intra-State project to make use of the 200 tmcft of water which flows into the sea every year. There shouldn't be any problem, as it was not an interstate project. Ms. Sitharaman was requested to do the needful and release funds for taking up the project. Once the Centre approves, the government would begin the project work, he said, adding it would be a game-changer for Andhra Pradesh.
The Godavari Banakacherla project aims at diverting surplus water from the Godavari to water-scarce areas in south-central Andhra Pradesh. It would use lift irrigation and tunnels to connect the regions in three phases. A detailed financing plan had been proposed, building on earlier discussions with the Finance Ministry. The project would benefit millions in drought-hit areas and serve as a model for river-linking across India. The Detailed Project Report (DPR) is expected by June 2025. It will use lift irrigation and tunnels to connect the regions in three phases.
Mr. Naidu also shared copies of the proposal with Mr. Patil, requesting coordination between departments to fast-track the project.
Under the Suryaghar scheme, Andhra Pradesh expressed its desire to provide electricity to 35 lakh households. The State plans to supply solar electricity to 10,000 households in each constituency. 'We requested the Centre to support the implementation of this scheme,' Mr. Naidu said.
He urged the Centre to expedite approvals for the proposal submitted by APDISCOMs to MNRE in January 2025, under which 20 lakh SC/ST households would receive free rooftop solar systems, and BC households will receive a ₹10,000/kWp subsidy for up to 2kWp installations.
The state's Clean Energy Policy 2024–29 targeted an additional 72.6 GW of RE, including 40 GWp solar, and emphasises inclusive access and affordability. The proposed utility-led rooftop model will reduce AP's power purchase costs, empower vulnerable communities, and drive job creation.
The government introduced the AP Integrated Clean Energy Policy, under which the State aims to produce 72 GW of green energy. 'We requested Union Minister Pralhad Joshi to sanction a Green Energy Corridor worth ₹28,346 crore, to which he responded positively,' Mr. Naidu said.
Mr. Naidu expressed confidence that with the Centre's support, Andhra Pradesh could set a national benchmark in inclusive renewable energy adoption.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
All roads lead to first Business Standard Infrastructure Summit today
Three key Union ministers will grace the first edition of The Business Standard Infrastructure Summit in New Delhi on Thursday. Minister of Road Transport & Highways Nitin Gadkari, Minister of New and Renewable Energy Pralhad Joshi and Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways Sarbananda Sonowal, through their interactions, are set to capture India's infrastructure scene — both opportunities and challenges. With the theme 'India Builds: For Growth & Green', the summit will bring together policymakers, industry leaders, financiers, and global experts to deliberate on the country's infrastructure roadmap for a sustainable and developed Bharat. Aiming to bring India's infrastructure success story to the fore, the premier event is being organised at the Taj Mahal Hotel here. A carefully curated agenda would cover the whole gamut of India's infrastructure ambition. The day-long event will range from funding models for Viksit Bharat to the future of energy, aviation, and logistics. The summit will host six sessions through the day on varied topics related to roads, shipping, airports, power, renewable energy and more. The event will host some of the biggest names of the infrastructure sector including Christoph Schnellmann, CEO, Noida International Airport; Videh Kumar Jaipuriar, CEO, Delhi International Airport; Praveer Sinha, CEO and MD, Tata Power; Rahul Mithal, Chairman and Managing Director, RITES; Amit Singh, Head of Business, South Asia & Middle East, Mitsui OSK Lines (MOL); and Kapil Mahajan, CITO, Allcargo Logistics. Some of the other leaders of the infrastructure sector to speak at the summit include Gauri Singh; Deputy Director General, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Vaishali Nigam Sinha, Co-Founder, ReNew; Prashant Choubey, President, Avaada Group; Alok Kumar, Former Secretary, Ministry of Power; Akshit Bansal, CEO & Founder, Statiq; Jagan Shah, CEO, Infravision Foundation; and Ramanuj Kumar, Partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. The three ministerial sessions will be a key highlight of the day, with renewable energy minister Pralhad Joshi and shipping minister Sonowal delivering special addresses, while roads and highways minister Nitin Gadkari featuring in the closing fireside conversation on India's infrastructure vision, policies, and regulatory outlook. The summit is expected to offer a mega platform for dialogue between the government, industry, and experts at a time when infrastructure is poised to be the backbone of India's growth story for decades to come.
The Hindu
7 minutes ago
- The Hindu
STEM education should be inclusive of students with disabilities
Increased access, equity, and inclusion for disadvantaged and underprivileged students in the education sector are envisioned in the current National Education Policy, 2020. This is a welcome step towards making society truly inclusive, but while this is an ideal that one can aspire to, the fact is that most higher education institutions (HEIs) have a long way to go to make it possible. When it comes to education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, the reality is depressingly different, in even the most well-funded institutions. The estimate from the National Family Health Survey 5 (in a publication of the Indian Council of Medical Research) is that there are 63 million people with disabilities in India. This is less than 5% of the population and below the World Health Organization data which suggest that about 15% of the world population lives with with some form of disability. There is no dearth of well-meaning legislation: the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act of 2009 guarantees access to free education up to the age of 14, including for children with disabilities. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 provides a comprehensive set of guidelines with considerable thought gone into them. It spells out the duties of educational institutions and the responsibility of the Union and the State governments to promote inclusive education. Unfortunately, though, the reality is very different across the country. At the primary and secondary levels, students with disabilities are frequently segregated in special-needs schools, an unintended consequence of which is that their access to higher education and their exposure to different areas of study is selective and limited. Reservation norms Under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, all government and government-aided higher educational institutions are required to reserve 4% of seats for students with disabilities. Since most higher education and research institutions in India fall in this group, it is important that the Act be implemented in practice as well as in spirit. Disabilities that are covered include blindness and low vision, hearing impairment, locomotor disability, cerebral palsy and related disabilities, specific learning disabilities, and autism spectrum disorder. At present, there are few institutions where this requirement is met, and wherever it is met institutionally, it is not done on a more fine-grained level, namely across departments. Indeed, most students with disabilities get admission through a so-called horizontal quota: seats are not specifically reserved for students with disabilities, and often they are discouraged from science subjects since that will decrease the number of seats for other students. In short, they continue to face ableism, the various practices and prejudices that disadvantage disabled students and researchers. Ableism effectively is discrimination in favour of non-disabled people. The lack of tangible inclusivity measures in higher education institutions means that students with diverse abilities, with a keen interest in STEM subjects, and perhaps having been encouraged up to the high-school level, find the doors of tertiary education closed to them. The institutions face many hurdles on the road to inclusivity. Campuses require a significant investment in order to become accessible: Most classrooms, laboratories, and hostels cannot accommodate students with disabilities. Administrators have many complex choices to make on where their (usually meagre) funds are to be deployed, and something that impacts less than 5% of the students may not seem cost-effective, but these are considerations that one needs to rise above. Measures that have been implemented in countries in the developing world as well as in developed nations, in addition to strengthening national legal frameworks (UNESCO guidelines), include devising policies and strategies inclusive of persons with disabilities; making education accessible; adapting the form and substance of education; monitoring the implementation of the right to education for persons with disabilities; and promoting the right to education of persons with disabilities. Accessibility audit Reservation in education addresses only a small part of these rights. A far more urgent need is for sensitisation and training. Campuses constructed after 2016 should adhere to the National Building Code but this is rarely enforced. Older campuses require an accessibility audit, to learn what needs to be done in terms of reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities. Campuses are typically large in extent. Older buildings have no lifts or ramps. Toilets are inaccessible. The list is long. Conventional classrooms and laboratories are ableist: chairs, tables, and benches are of fixed heights, and access to laboratory equipment such as fume-hoods and furnaces is poor. Teaching and learning spaces in STEM do not easily adapt for students with disabilities who are then naturally discouraged from pursuing such disciplines. Making laboratory experiments in science accessible requires both dedication and sensitivity. Physical access for students with impaired mobility is daunting, but the bias in the design of almost all laboratory experiments and much of pedagogy in general poses a major challenge for students with impaired vision. Since other than in pure mathematics, there is a component of laboratory instruction in all science courses, the physical environment of most existing teaching (or research) laboratories exclude students with disabilities. There is enough empirical evidence to suggest that when given the same opportunities and access, students with disabilities perform equally well as other students. There is also evidence to suggest that awareness of special needs facilitates the science that has to be developed to mitigate them. The science of optometry started from a need to correct poor vision, and telephony traces its motivation to Alexander Graham Bell's need to communicate with his wife and mother (both of whom had difficulty hearing) but there are many other examples, with more wide-ranging benefits. With today's technology it requires little additional effort to make laboratory experiments accessible to students with disabilities, be it through the use of speech-activated equipment, AI and electronics-based interfaces to convert signals from one form to the other (say visual to audio for the visually challenged and audio to visual for hearing challenged) In this age, there is increased awareness of human rights and an increased awareness of diversity and of the various identities. Doing science is a privilege, and this privilege needs to be shared by all those who wish to be scientists. More to the point, this is a privilege that should not be denied to anybody, least of all because of the imagined limitations of mind or body. Ramakrishna Ramaswamy is a Honorary Professor, Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Berhampur, Odisha; views are personal
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
Amit Shah defends minister-removal bill, says people must decide
Union Home Minister Amit Shah introduced three bills in the Lok Sabha proposing the removal of PM, CMs, and ministers 30 days after arrest. Shah criticized the opposition, asserting PM Modi subjected himself to the law, while they seek to govern from jail. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Hours after introducing three bills in the Lok Sabha on the removal of PM, CMs and ministers 30 days after their arrests, Union home minister Amit Shah , in a series of posts on X, slammed the Opposition and called upon people to ponder over the new bill. He said PM Modi brought a constitutional amendment bill to bring himself within the ambit of the law while the Congress and the Opposition want to remain outside the ambit of the law, run governments from jail and not relinquish power."Now, the people of the country will have to decide whether it is appropriate for a minister, chief minister or the prime minister to run the government while in jail," he posted on X. "The purpose of this bill is to elevate the declining level of morality in public life and bring integrity to politics."Shah said the Constitution makers couldn't have imagined that there would be a situation when a political person won't resign after being arrested on moral grounds.
