logo
Trump has the chance and the legal tools to tap Alaska's minerals and energy

Trump has the chance and the legal tools to tap Alaska's minerals and energy

The Hill22-04-2025
President Trump returned to office committed to delivering our country to a position of energy dominance. And his executive order unleashing the extraordinary natural resources in Alaska set a positive tone by seeking to override many harmful Biden-era actions. When it comes to both energy exploration and the search for critical minerals, the President can and should use the full authority of his office to allow America's Last Frontier to achieve its full potential.
For decades, leftist environmentalist crusaders have used permitting processes and litigation to drown projects vital to Alaska's interests in red tape. But last year's Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo provides the Trump administration with a clear pathway to cutting through the bureaucratic thicket. By eliminating excessive deference to an unaccountable administrative state, the Court returned power to the political branches, handing Trump the machete he needs to slash unnecessary delays.
Take, for instance, Alaska's Ambler Mining District, home of critical minerals including gold, silver, cobalt, and billions of pounds of copper and zinc. In 2020, the Trump Administration approved permits for a 211-mile road that would link the district to Alaska's highway system, allowing for exploration and development of these important natural resources.
But upon taking office, the Biden Administration pulled the right of way permits, and then initiated a supplemental environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act permitting process. Last June, the Bureau of Land Management under Biden denied the permit that Trump had previously approved, in an act which one local publication rightly said 'could limit future resource development in Alaska.'
Apart from the fact that Native tribes and the bipartisan Alaskan congressional delegation opposed the action, the Biden Administration's denial also violated federal law. The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, signed in the final days of Jimmy Carter's presidency in 1980, included a congressional finding that 'there is a need for access for surface transportation purposes' in the Ambler Mining District, and directed that 'the Secretary [of the Interior] shall permit such access.' The law even specified a streamlined permitting process, stating that 'such analysis…shall not be subject to judicial review.' Yet Biden Administration bureaucrats decided to countermand the explicit actions made by a prior Democratic Congress and Democratic President.
President Trump's Day One executive order directed his Administration to review the Biden rejection of the permit, and restore the decision made in his first term allowing the road to proceed. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum should act swiftly to reverse the actions of his predecessor and should cite both Loper Bright and the Carter-era law in doing so. Congress was very clear about its desire to promote access to the Ambler Mining District, and no unelected bureaucrat decades later should have the ability to reverse that clear intent.
More broadly, the Trump Administration can and should use similar grants of authority from Congress to steamroll the dilatory tactics of environmental activists intent on holding back our country's untapped potential. As with the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act clarified Congress' desire for energy exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Secretary Burgum should invoke that statute liberally, to prevent a recurrence of the illegal tactics the Biden Administration utilized over the past four years to prevent Alaska from developing its full potential.
From the lower oil and gas prices resulting from energy exploration in ANWR to the renewable batteries and defense products associated with Ambler's critical minerals, Alaska can provide the resources necessary to power our country through the 21th century — and beyond. Doing so only requires an administration dedicated to following the law, rather than thwarting it. I hope and pray that Trump will do just that.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats need to start using AI to help save democracy
Democrats need to start using AI to help save democracy

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Democrats need to start using AI to help save democracy

As American democracy unravels at the hands of President Trump and his enabling congressional and Supreme Court majorities, millions of Americans are desperate to identify whatever possible countermeasures remain to slow the country's descent into fascism. The outcome of the 2026 midterms is unlikely to produce meaningful change, even if the Democrats take control of the House. Without a cooperative Senate, it will be impossible either to pass legislation or secure a conviction on impeachment charges. Oversight hearings can bring public attention to things like rampant corruption, but the threats Trump poses to the rule of law and democracy are already well-known. The courts can only do so much. There's another emerging tool, however: artificial intelligence. Trump seems to understands the transformative power of AI. Last month, the administration announced an ' AI Action Plan ' for 'winning the AI race.' Among other measures, it promises to remove 'onerous Federal regulations that hinder AI development and deployment, and seek private sector input on rules to remove.' As part of this initiative, the General Services Administration and OpenAI announced earlier this month that the company will be 'providing ChatGPT to the entire U.S. federal workforce' under a 'first-of-its-kind partnership.' Participating agencies will pay a nominal cost of $1 each for the first year to enable federal employees to 'explore and leverage AI.' The company is also 'teaming up with experienced partners Slalom and Boston Consulting Group to support secure, responsible deployment and trainings.' Last week, the AI company Anthropic likewise announced it had struck the same deal with GSA to enable federal agencies' access to its Claude model. The Trump administration's effort to streamline the federal government with AI models makes some sense. Research has shown that generative AI — particularly large language models, which consume vast amounts of data to understand and generate natural language content — can enhance government efficiency in data processing, analysis and drafting, among other potential advantages. But AI systems also increase the risk of widespread government surveillance, personalized misinformation and disinformation, systematic discrimination, lack of accountability and inaccuracy. According to a recent academic paper, 'although many studies have explored the ethical implications of AI, fewer have fully examined its democratic implications.' Trump's alliance with OpenAI head Sam Altman goes back to start of his second term, when he announced a $500 billion joint venture with OpenAI, Oracle and Softbank to build up to 20 large AI data centers. Trump called the venture 'Stargate.' The deal's details are murky, including who will have access to Stargate and how it will possibly benefit taxpayers. Although a spokesman for OpenAI told Fox News Digital that 'Sam Altman sort of planted a flag on democratic AI versus autocratic AI,' let's not forget that Altman is not a government official or employee. As a legal matter, it is unclear whether these ' fast-tracked ' deals will fully comply with traditional oversight and procurement laws and procedures. No major AI company is currently approved under the Federal Risk And Authorization Management Program, for example, which is the process for authorizing the use of cloud technologies by federal agencies. According the GSA website, the program aims to ensure 'security and protection of federal information' by imposing strict cybersecurity controls to protect against data breaches, hacking and unauthorized access, and requiring ongoing monitoring and reporting. Given that the GSA is reportedly working on 'developing a separate authorization' for generative AI systems like ChatGPT and Claude, the potential threats to national security and private citizens' personal information are significant. The Trump administration's lack of transparency also risks creating a black-box government run by proprietary algorithms that the public cannot inspect — centralizing control over federal AI in two companies whose interests clearly lie in market dominance, not the public good. This is why these kinds of decisions are best made through established legal procedures — including the Federal Competition in Contracting Act (requiring fair and open competition), the Privacy Act of 1974 (limiting how agencies can collect and disclose personal data), the Federal Records Act (requiring the proper retention and archiving of public records) and the Administrative Procedure Act (requiring public comment and input into major policy decisions). For now, OpenAI has promised that its 'goal is to ensure agencies can use AI securely and responsibly. ChatGPT Enterprise already does not use business data, including inputs or outputs, to train or improve OpenAI models. The same safeguards will apply to federal use.' This promise from Altman's company is no substitute for actual legal standards enforced by the federal government. Whether AI tools embedded in federal government systems could one day be used to sway elections to favor Trump and his cronies is a vital question. For now, what's clear is that Democrats need to get into the AI game, and fast. A Democratic political action committee called the National Democratic Training Committee recently unveiled on online course entitled 'AI For Progressive Campaigns,' which is designed to teach candidates how to use AI to help create social media content, draft speeches, craft voter outreach messaging and phone-banking scripts, conduct research into their constituencies and opponents, and develop internal training materials. The founder and CEO of the group, Kelly Dietrich, stated that 'thousands of Democratic campaigns can now leverage AI to compete at any scale.' This effort, although laudable, does not go far enough to capitalize on AI's potential to help outmaneuver authoritarianism in the U.S. There's much more that might be done, including using AI to educate citizens on the benefits of democracy, how institutions work and the facts underlying important issues; to create large-scale, moderated public deliberation and consensus around divisive issues; to detect and alert the public to manipulated media, thus combatting misinformation and disinformation and fostering public trust in an alternative to Trump; and to create and implement effective messaging strategies for alternative visions for the future of the country. AI could be American voters' best friend, not their enemy. It just needs to be asked.

Air Force chief of staff to retire after only two years in role
Air Force chief of staff to retire after only two years in role

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Air Force chief of staff to retire after only two years in role

The Air Force's chief of staff, Gen. David Allvin, will retire this November after serving only two years of his four-year term, the service has announced, making him the latest senior military officer pushed out under the Trump administration. The Air Force revealed the surprise move in a Monday statement, noting that Allvin had 'announced plans today to retire effective on or about Nov. 1.' The release did not name a successor to be the Air Force's highest-ranking uniformed officer, adding that Allvin will continue to serve until one is confirmed by the Senate. 'I'm grateful for the opportunity to serve as the 23rd Air Force Chief of Staff and I'm thankful for [Air Force Secretary Troy Meink], [Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth] and President Trump's faith in me to lead our service,' Allvin said in a statement. 'More than anything, I'm proud to have been part of the team of Airmen who live out our core values of integrity, service and excellence every day as we prepare to defend this great nation.' The statement did not give a reason for Allvin's abrupt retirement plans, but The Washington Post reported that he was informed last week that he would be asked to retire as Hegseth wanted to go in another direction with the Air Force. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Hill. Allvin's looming departure follows a string of firings of other senior military officers in Trump's second term, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. CQ Brown — who also did not serve his full four years — Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti, Coast Guard Commandant Adm Linda Fagan, and a slew of others serving in less prominent roles. Allvin, who became Air Force chief of staff in 2023 after service as the vice chief of staff since November 2020, is a career mobility pilot with thousands of hours flying aircraft throughout his 39-year career. In February 2024, Allvin and other Air Force officials revealed a sweeping reorganization plan in a bid to prepare the U.S. for a fight against China. But Hegseth a year later ordered the Air Force to hold off on its changes to the service and its structure. In addition, the Pentagon chief has differed with Allvin on the future of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store