Sino-Russian cooperation and the world order
According to an AI overview, "Sino-Russian strategic cooperation, particularly within the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), plays a crucial role in regional stability and development. Both nations view the SCO as a platform for enhancing their comprehensive strategic partnership and addressing common challenges. This cooperation extends to various fields including security, economics, and cultural exchange, with both countries actively working to strengthen the organization and ensure its success". Russian president Vladimir Putin is expected to visit China on the occasion of SCO summit to be held in August 2025 in which it is expected that the two global giants will examine in detail how to play a leadership role in the prevailing world order.
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose maximum tariff on Russia and provide military support to Ukraine through NATO. In the aftermath of the Iran-Israel war and West's unequivocal support to the Jewish state, it is expected that Moscow and Beijing will deepen their strategic cooperation under the platform of BRICS and SCO in order to provide an alternate leadership in world order. Majority of members of BRICS and SCO are supportive of the Sino-Russian strategic partnership and argue that if the two great powers remain united, an alternate to the US dollar and its biased trade policies may be agreed upon.
How can the Sino-Russian strategic partnership help ensure peace, stability and multilateralism and why does the Trump administration perceive the leadership role of Moscow and Beijing in BRICS and SCO a major threat to its interests? Will Sino-Russian strategic partnership sustain in the post-Putin and post-XI era and how will the two powers reshape their role in providing an alternate world order once the leaderships of Putin and Xi are part of history?
For decades China and the defunct USSR were adversaries but following the visit of Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev to Beijing in May 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, the two neighbours forged a new relationship based on strategic partnership while freezing their unresolved territorial issues. Certainly, the West had benefited from the Sino-Soviet rivalry, but the replacement of the Russia-China animosity with friendship and meaningful cooperation challenged the US-led unipolar world. Certainly, a multipolar world is the vision of Russia and China which is gradually transforming into a reality.
Certainly, the US still dominates the world economic, military and technological order. With an economy of 28 trillion dollars and defence expenditures amounting to 900 billion dollars, America is still in a commanding position. Technologically also, the US is superior to Russia and China. But, with a huge debt of 37 trillion dollars, American economy is in dire straits. Russia, China and other ambitious powers want to take advantage of the US economic fault lines and its growing use of hard power, making it unpopular in different parts of the world.
One can figure out three major aspects of the Sino-Russian strategic partnership in the world today. First, the success of China in focusing on its economy and the failure of Russia to disengage itself from conflicts in its neighbourhood, particularly the war with Ukraine. China's rise as the world's second largest economy was because of its focus on development and the application of soft power like diplomacy, aid, investments and trade instead of military involvement in its neighborhood. This is not the case with Russia which has its ambitions in former Soviet republics. Its occupation of Crimea in 2014 and attack on Ukraine in February 2022 not only led to worldwide condemnation but imposition of sanctions. The Russian economy also suffered heavily because of its war with Ukraine. President Trump who had a soft corner for Putin is now forced to take a hard stance on Russia's refusal to accept American plan for ending the Russia-Ukraine war. It means Russia is in dire straits and its efforts to widen its support base through BRICS and SCO cannot yield positive results.
Second, China needs to convince the Russian president to reverse its policy of hard power and withdraw forces from Ukraine. If Russia is unable to listen to Beijing's advice, it would mean further deepening of Moscow's military and economic losses in its war with Ukraine. When one major power in BRICS and SCO is not at peace, how can the Sino-Russian strategic partnership strive for a multipolar world? Presently, India is not happy with the Trump administration over the manner in which it dealt with the May 7-10 armed conflict with Pakistan and took the credit for the ceasefire. For India it is the ideal opportunity to put its weight behind the Sino-Russian strategic partnership so as to exert maximum pressure on Washington. Iran is also supportive of a multipolar world because it has suffered the most at the hands of America over the last several decades. South Africa is against the blatant US support to Israel, and the manner in which the American President dealt with the South African President during his meeting at White House proves growing cleavage between South Africa and the Trump administration. Likewise, other members of BRICS and SCO are also not supportive of the perceived American hegemonic designs and subscribe to the Sino-Russian strategic partnership to break the US dominance in the prevailing world order.
Finally, the forthcoming SCO summit in China provides a valuable opportunity for member countries to forge consensus on striving for a multipolar world. For that purpose, it is essential that contentious issues among SCO members are resolved through diplomacy. Notable in the context is the rivalry between India and Pakistan, the two nuclear-armed SCO members. Without bringing peace between the two, it will not be possible for Russia and China to transform the US-led world order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Japan rubber futures dip on China auto price war, firmer yen
Japanese rubber futures fell on Tuesday, pressured by a stronger yen and prolonged price war in China's automobile sector, which continues to weigh on rubber prices. The Osaka Exchange (OSE) rubber contract for January delivery ended daytime trade down 4.1 yen, or 1.26%, at 321.9 yen ($2.17) per kg. The rubber contract on the Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) for September delivery lost 230 yuan, or 1.51%, to 15,010 yuan ($2,091.61) per metric ton. The most active September butadiene rubber contract on the SHFE fell 290 yuan, or 2.39%, to 11,835 yuan($1,649.18) per metric ton. A Reuters analysis of consumer complaints found widespread inflation of sales figures by Chinese automakers and dealers, a tactic used to boost car sales numbers amid a prolonged price war in the world's largest auto market. This approach masks the true level of inventory held by automakers, potentially causing them to overestimate monthly demand and schedule higher production. Japanese rubber slips on profit-taking Lower automobile prices, driven by fierce competition, exert a downward pressure on rubber tyre prices. Meanwhile, the yen edged up to 148.22 per dollar. A stronger currency makes yen-denominated assets less affordable to overseas buyers. Still, top rubber producer Thailand's meteorological agency warned of heavy rains and accumulations on July 29. Elsewhere, top producer Thailand and Cambodia agreed to a ceasefire on Monday after five days of intense fighting. However, Thailand later accused Cambodian troops of multiple attacks in violation of the agreement. front-month rubber contract on Singapore Exchange's SICOM platform for August delivery last traded at 168.5 U.S. cents per kg, down 1.1%.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Indian refiner Nayara trims crude runs in wake of EU sanctions, sources say
NEW DELHI: Russia-backed Indian refiner Nayara Energy has reduced operations at its 400,000-barrel-per-day refinery in the aftermath of new European Union sanctions that targeted the firm, five sources familiar with the matter said. Privately-held Nayara, which runs India's third-biggest refinery at the port of Vadinar in the western state of Gujarat, controls nearly 8% of the country's total refining capacity of about 5.2 million bpd. The sanctions package unveiled on July 18 against Russia and its energy sector has made it tougher for Nayara to export its refined products, resulting in storage constraints, two of the sources said. Since the EU curbs on Nayara, traders have grown cautious in dealing with its fuel, trade and industry sources say. Last week, Reuters reported that at least two tankers skipped planned loadings at Vadinar while a tanker carrying a cargo of Russian crude was diverted away from the refiner. One source said Nayara was operating the refinery at 70% of capacity, while another put the figure at 80%. EU-sanctioned Indian refiner Nayara takes Microsoft to court over outage Nayara ran at more than 100% of its nameplate capacity in each of the three months through June, the most recent government data shows. All the sources sought anonymity because they were not authorised to speak to the media. Nayara did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Nayara typically exports at least four million barrels of refined products each month, including diesel, jet fuel, gasoline and naphtha, through traders. India has become the biggest buyer of seaborne Russian crude in the aftermath of Moscow's Ukraine invasion. Nayara, majority-owned by Russian entities including Rosneft, is a key buyer of Russian oil. Nayara's chief executive resigned after the sanctions and was replaced by Sergey Denisov, who had been its chief development officer, Reuters reported on Friday. On Monday, Nayara said it filed legal proceedings against U.S. software giant Microsoft following its suspension of services to the refiner. Nayara, based in the commercial capital of Mumbai, operates more than 6,000 fuel stations.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Gold hovers near 3-week low as trade war fears ebb, dollar firms
Gold prices were little changed on Tuesday, hovering near a three-week low, as easing fears of a global tariff war and a stronger dollar dampened its safe-haven appeal. Spot gold held its ground at $3,318.71 per ounce, as of 0601 GMT. The precious metal hit its lowest since July 9 in the previous session. U.S. gold futures were up 0.2% at $3,317.50. 'Gold trading at circa $3,300 or below is still getting the attention of buyers. While short-term market dynamics courtesy of trade deals and a stronger USD aren't helping gold, looking further ahead there is still upside potential,' KCM Trade Chief Market Analyst Tim Waterer said. Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials met in Stockholm on Monday for more than five hours of talks aimed at resolving longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, seeking to extend a truce by three months. Gold prices firm The U.S. struck a framework trade agreement with the European Union on Sunday, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods - half the threatened rate - and averting a bigger trade war between the two allies that account for almost a third of global trade. The dollar index held near a two-week high, making gold costlier for buyers holding other currencies. Investors are awaiting a set of U.S. macroeconomic data this week, including inflation figures and the employment report, alongside the Federal Reserve's two-day policy meeting beginning later in the day, with expectations that rates will be held steady. If U.S. data is weak or if U.S. President Donald Trump's criticisms of the Fed inspire the central bank to adopt a more dovish tone this week, that could be positive for gold, Waterer said. Spot silver was steady at $38.18 per ounce, while platinum edged down 0.1% to $1,388.98 and palladium slipped 1.7% to $1,225.44.
