logo
CEO Tom Gardner: No Day Trading -- Hold Everything at Least 12 Months

CEO Tom Gardner: No Day Trading -- Hold Everything at Least 12 Months

Yahoo23-07-2025
Key Points
Day trading takes a lot of time and effort, and in the end most people will wind up losing money.
Institutional investors always have more information than a day trader relying on technical analysis.
These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›
Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner recently sat down for an interview in which he discussed investments that people should avoid, particularly when first starting out on their investment journey. Among his tips was a word of caution about the practice of day trading.
Day trading is a method of picking and choosing stocks by attempting to time trades by recognizing specific technical indicators, such as Bollinger Bands, the Relative Strength Index (RSI), and moving average convergence/divergence, among others. Day traders move in and out of positions regularly, as opposed to buy-and-hold investors who invest with a long time horizon.
If you think day trading sounds difficult, you're right. According to DayTrading.com, more than 85% of day traders fail in their first year, and only 10% to 15% report making any money at all. So, it's no wonder that Motley Fool's CEO issued a warning against day trading. In a June 2025 article, he said:
You will not day trade. You will not actively trade anything. Anything you buy, you must hold for at least 12 months. I have to get you in for 12 months. ... If you can find Costco early on and just hold it, you're going to become a millionaire. Day trading Costco, there's just a tragedy of epic proportions.
The dangers of day trading
Day trading is a really hard way to make money. If you're going to try to be a day trader, there are several challenges you'll have to overcome.
Timing the market: This refers to the philosophy of buying low and selling high. Sounds great in theory, but in reality, market timing is extremely difficult, if not downright impossible. According to Hartford Funds, 78% of the stock market's best days from 1995 to 2024 occurred either during a bear market or during the first two months of a bull market. And if you missed out on the market's 10 best days in that period, your returns were cut by 54%.
Transaction fees: Sure, brokers like Robinhood offer commission-free trades. But day-traders can also lose money through a practice known as payment for order flow. The broker sells their orders to third-party market makers to handle the trades. The market makers, which process huge numbers of trades each day, execute the trade and get a profit from the bid-ask spread, which is the difference between what someone is willing to buy a stock for and what someone is willing to sell it for. The day trader gets a slightly worse price -- and the costs for that type of transaction can add up quickly.
In addition, according to Gardner, day traders will never be able to compete on a level playing field with institutional investors when it comes to "the costs, the taxes, and the fact that unless you have an incredible amount of money to build the most high-powered frequency trading system in your home, you're going to be behind others in institutions that are trading faster than you," he said. "You are always going to be a loser."
Stress: Yes, day trading can be incredibly stressful. You have to be on your game every day -- and pretty much for the entire trading day -- to try to identify and take advantage of opportunities (keeping in mind that you're playing against a stacked deck). That's a lot to handle for a career in which only 4% manage to make a living.
Alternatives to day trading
Instead of trying to time the market in a task where you're nearly guaranteed to lose, first-time investors should instead follow the Warren Buffett approach to investing: Seek out quality businesses with a distinct competitive advantage and reliable earnings. Those are the kinds of businesses that you can buy and hold for a long time.
As Buffett, the longtime CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, once said, "Our favorite holding period is forever. We are just the opposite of those who hurry to sell and book profits when companies perform well but who tenaciously hang on to businesses that disappoint."
And Buffett knows what he's talking about. Berkshire's portfolio gained 5,502,284% from 1965 to 2024, far outdistancing the S&P 500's gain of 39,054%, which includes dividends.
Another ideal investment strategy is dollar-cost averaging, which is the practice of splitting your investment into a series of transactions over a set period of time. For instance, if you had $50,000 to invest in Microsoft, you could buy $10,000 of the stock every Monday for five weeks. This removes the uncertainty of market fluctuations and any attempts to time the market, as your investment is on a set schedule.
These strategies are better than day trading and would give investors a better chance to get richer and one day enjoy a stable, happy retirement.
Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $433,181!*
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $40,702!*
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $641,800!*
Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Patrick Sanders has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway, Costco Wholesale, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
CEO Tom Gardner: No Day Trading -- Hold Everything at Least 12 Months was originally published by The Motley Fool
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These are the cities where an Uber ride is going to cost you the most
These are the cities where an Uber ride is going to cost you the most

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

These are the cities where an Uber ride is going to cost you the most

Taking Ubers is getting expensive across the nation but a half-hour ride in certain states and cities is going to do far more damage to your wallet than in others, according to a new analysis. Net Credit collected the average price of a 30-minute ride in an Uber in locations across the U.S., and found ride-share passengers in Washington state are paying the most, with a half-hour drive costing on average $53.46. On the other side of the list is Indiana, where the average half-hour ride in an Uber will cost around $30.35. Other states with less expensive rides include Texas at $30.96, Utah at $30.71, and Oklahoma at $31.54. But a ride in plenty of other states is going to cost upwards of $40. The average price of a half-hour Uber ride in California, Oregon, Wyoming, Montana, Louisiana, Alabama, Delaware, New Jersey, and New York are all at least $40, and rides in several other states — South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arkansas, and Nevada — will cost just under that mark. When it comes to individual cities, Seattle tops the list as the most expensive city for a half-hour Uber ride. In Seattle a half-hour ride costs almost $60, according to the analysis. The nine next most expensive cities for Ubers aren't necessarily each the sprawling, wildly expensive, cities one might expect. Those are Cheyenne, Reno, New York City, San Diego, Baton Rouge, Newark, Anchorage, San Jose, and Portland. The cheapest overall city for Uber for a half-hour ride is Indianapolis where it'll cost around $28.33. Following Indianapolis, the most affordable cities for taking an Uber are Fort Worth, Tucson, Mesa, Omaha, Miami, Oklahoma City, Raleigh, Houston, and Memphis. According to Net Credit, the price of Uber rides increased by 7.2 percent across the country in 2024. Net Credit noted that part of what may be driving down prices in Indianapolis is the appearance of a competitor, inDrive, which allows riders to propose a price for their ride, and drivers can counter-bid for a higher fee. 'We're giving both the driver and passenger the freedom to kind of choose their own adventure," Adam Warner, the company's head of U.S. operations, told Net Credit. 'So you get to select the driver. Are you willing to wait 10 minutes for this person to pick you up in a Tesla Model Y, or are you comfortable with the Chevy Malibu that's only two minutes away to pick you up?' Net Credit also worked out which city's Uber costs were the most and least expensive relative to the average wages of its residents. The city with the most affordable Uber rides — relative to its residents' average hourly wage — is Washington, D.C., where a 30-minute trip will still cost riders 106.5 percent of their average hourly wage. Following the nation's capital, the most affordable cities for Ubering relative to residents' average hourly wages include San Jose, San Francisco, Fort Worth, Indianapolis, Stamford, Raleigh, Boston, Mesa, and Baltimore. The least affordable city was determined to be Cheyenne, Wyoming, where a ride is 224 percent of a resident's average hourly wage. Reno, Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Jackson, Seattle, Fresno, Las Vegas, Augusta, and Buffalo made up the rest of the list.

Fairholme Fund's Strategic Moves: The St. Joe Co Sees a -2.08% Portfolio Impact
Fairholme Fund's Strategic Moves: The St. Joe Co Sees a -2.08% Portfolio Impact

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fairholme Fund's Strategic Moves: The St. Joe Co Sees a -2.08% Portfolio Impact

Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s Investment Philosophy and Recent Portfolio Adjustments Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with JOE. Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) recently submitted its N-PORT filing for the second quarter of 2025, shedding light on its strategic investment decisions. Managed by Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio), the fund has a remarkable history, achieving a 253% gain in its first decade since inception in 1999, while the S&P 500 experienced losses. This portfolio is distinct from the broader portfolio under Berkowitz's name, which encompasses various accounts and funds he manages. Known for his concentrated investment approach, Berkowitz seeks companies with strong management and cash flow, adhering to his motto: "Ignore the Crowd." Key Position Increases Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) also increased stakes in a total of one stock, notably: The most notable increase was in Bank OZK (NASDAQ:OZK), with an additional 229,300 shares, bringing the total to 244,200 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 1,538.93% increase in share count, a 1.15% impact on the current portfolio, and a total value of $10,825,390. Key Position Reduces Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) also reduced positions in three stocks. The most significant changes include: Reduced The St. Joe Co (NYSE:JOE) by 410,600 shares, resulting in a -2.37% decrease in shares and a -2.08% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $44.57 during the quarter and has returned 21.56% over the past three months and 14.84% year-to-date. Reduced Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET) by 80,000 shares, resulting in a -32.44% reduction in shares and a -0.16% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $17.62 during the quarter and has returned 11.23% over the past three months and -4.57% year-to-date. Portfolio Overview As of the second quarter of 2025, Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s portfolio included six stocks. The top holdings were concentrated as follows: 85.7% in The St. Joe Co (NYSE:JOE), 10.3% in Enterprise Products Partners LP (NYSE:EPD), 2.09% in Imperial Metals Corp (TSX:III), 1.22% in Bank OZK (NASDAQ:OZK), and 0.36% in Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA). The holdings are primarily concentrated in four of the eleven industries: Real Estate, Energy, Basic Materials, and Financial Services. This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Catherine Wood's Strategic Moves: Circle Internet Group Inc. Takes Center Stage
Catherine Wood's Strategic Moves: Circle Internet Group Inc. Takes Center Stage

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Catherine Wood's Strategic Moves: Circle Internet Group Inc. Takes Center Stage

Exploring the Latest 13F Filing and Investment Strategies Catherine Wood (Trades, Portfolio) recently submitted the 13F filing for the second quarter of 2025, providing insights into her investment moves during this period. With over 40 years of experience, Cathie Wood founded ARK in 2014 to focus solely on disruptive innovation while adding new dimensions to research. Through an open approach that spans across sectors, market capitalizations, and geographies, she believes ARK can identify large-scale investment opportunities in the public markets resulting from technological innovations centered around DNA sequencing, robotics, artificial intelligence, energy storage, and blockchain technology. As chief investment officer and portfolio manager, Wood spearheaded the development of ARKs philosophy and investment approach and is ultimately responsible for investment decisions. Recognizing that disruptive innovation causes rapid cost declines, cuts across sectors, and spawns further innovation, ARK uses an iterative investment process that combines top-down and bottom-up research. The firm strives to identify innovation early in order to capitalize on the opportunity, providing long-term value to investors. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with META. Summary of New Buy Catherine Wood (Trades, Portfolio) added a total of 7 stocks, among them: The most significant addition was Circle Internet Group Inc (NYSE:CRCL), with 2,924,403 shares, accounting for 3.89% of the portfolio and a total value of $530,165,020. The second largest addition to the portfolio was DoorDash Inc (NASDAQ:DASH), consisting of 178,522 shares, representing approximately 0.32% of the portfolio, with a total value of $44,007,460. The third largest addition was Etoro Group Ltd (NASDAQ:ETOR), with 248,032 shares, accounting for 0.12% of the portfolio and a total value of $16,516,450. Key Position Increases Catherine Wood (Trades, Portfolio) also increased stakes in a total of 80 stocks, among them: The most notable increase was Advanced Micro Devices Inc (NASDAQ:AMD), with an additional 1,285,634 shares, bringing the total to 2,708,105 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 90.38% increase in share count, a 1.34% impact on the current portfolio, with a total value of $384,280,120. The second largest increase was ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF Beneficial Interest (ARKB), with an additional 3,752,535 shares, bringing the total to 6,622,008. This adjustment represents a significant 130.77% increase in share count, with a total value of $237,001,670. Summary of Sold Out Catherine Wood (Trades, Portfolio) completely exited 13 of the holdings in the second quarter of 2025, as detailed below: UiPath Inc (NYSE:PATH): Catherine Wood (Trades, Portfolio) sold all 8,319,250 shares, resulting in a -0.86% impact on the portfolio. AvidXchange Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:AVDX): Catherine Wood (Trades, Portfolio) liquidated all 943,393 shares, causing a -0.08% impact on the portfolio. Key Position Reduces Catherine Wood (Trades, Portfolio) also reduced positions in 101 stocks. The most significant changes include: Reduced Palantir Technologies Inc (NASDAQ:PLTR) by 2,208,913 shares, resulting in a -35.14% decrease in shares and a -1.87% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $116.76 during the quarter and has returned 33.92% over the past 3 months and 109.72% year-to-date. Reduced Roblox Corp (NYSE:RBLX) by 2,302,680 shares, resulting in a -25.38% reduction in shares and a -1.34% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $78.23 during the quarter and has returned 86.34% over the past 3 months and 115.94% year-to-date. Portfolio Overview At the second quarter of 2025, Catherine Wood (Trades, Portfolio)'s portfolio included 190 stocks, with top holdings including 7.17% in Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA), 6.74% in Coinbase Global Inc (NASDAQ:COIN), 5.45% in Roku Inc (NASDAQ:ROKU), 5.34% in Robinhood Markets Inc (NASDAQ:HOOD), and 5.22% in Roblox Corp (NYSE:RBLX). The holdings are mainly concentrated in 9 of all the 11 industries: Technology, Healthcare, Financial Services, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, Industrials, Energy, Utilities, and Basic Materials. This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store