Espionage case: YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra's judicial custody extended till July 21
The Hisar Police arrested Ms. Malhotra, who ran a YouTube channel 'Travel with JO', on May 16. From Hisar, the YouTuber was arrested at the New Aggarsain Extension and booked under provisions of the Official Secrets Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
Ms. Malhotra is currently under judicial custody, which has been extended by the court, her lawyer Kumar Mukesh said. 'Her judicial custody has been further extended by 14 days, and the next date of hearing has been fixed by the court on July 21.'
Also Read | Espionage case: YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra moves court, seeks regular bail
The 33-year-old YouTuber appeared before the court through video conference.
On June 9, another court in Hisar rejected her regular bail plea. Police had opposed the bail, arguing that the investigation in this case was still underway.
After her arrest on May 16, Ms. Malhotra was remanded to five days of police custody by the court.
Also Read | Espionage case: YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra's judicial custody extended by two weeks
Following the completion of the remand, the court extended the custody by four more days after the police sought to question her further. On May 26, the court remanded her to judicial custody for 14 days, which was extended later.
The Hisar Police previously said no evidence had emerged to indicate Malhotra had access to any military or defence-related information but claimed she was in contact with some people and was aware that they were Pakistani intelligence operatives.
Police sources had previously said she was in touch with Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish, a staffer at the Pakistani High Commission, since November 2023.
Also Read | Haryana YouTuber had been in touch with Pakistani staffer since 2023: Police
India expelled Danish on May 13 for allegedly indulging in espionage.
Police had in May claimed that Pakistani intelligence operatives were developing Malhotra as an "asset".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: DNA test reports on rescued child beggars expected next month
Over three weeks after DNA tests were conducted on six rescued child beggars and the adults accompanying them to ascertain parentage, the district administration is still waiting for the report. District child protection officer (DCPO) Rashmi Saini said they have been informed by the competent officials that the reports would be out by September. District child protection officer Rashmi Saini said they have been informed by the competent officials that the reports would be out by September. (HT Photo) On July 20, the district administration, under project Jeevanjyot 2.0, raided various areas of the city and rescued 18 kids. While the accompanying adults of 12 kids submitted credible claim of parentage, six were suspected to be cases of child trafficking. These six kids and their accompanying adults were DNA tested on 23 July to ascertain if they shared any biological relation with the kids. Meanwhile, five of the 12 kids for whom their accompanying adults provided a parentage claim have been handed back to their parents. The parents of the rest of the kids are still submitting the documents and once they are verified the kids will be handed over to them. 'These people hail from far away states. They are taking time to bring documents, like birth certificates, to prove parentage,' said DCPO Rashmi. Forensic sciences laboratory (Kharar) director, Dr Rajnish, when asked about the time period in which the lab is supposed to produce the DNA reports, he said, 'We don't have any such guidelines. Rules regarding it haven't been framed yet.' Meanwhile, the children continue to be lodged at the children's home in Doraha, waiting for the reports to find out what the future holds for them. The Jeevanjyot 2.0 project draft reads, 'If DNA tests match, the child shall be restored to the family. The authorities shall issue a warning to the family to not indulge the child into begging. The DCPO shall provide counselling to the family to enrol the children in schools and about the ill effects of keeping the child on streets.' If parents still put kids to begging, the draft calls for the parents to be declared 'unfit guardians' and 'the child shall be sent to children home and the child shall be declared legally free for adoption.' And if the tests turn out negative, the child welfare committee will initiate legal action by filing an FIR under the BNS, Juvenile Justice Act, Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, or other relevant legislation against the adults found accompanying them. Additionally, the child's photos and details will be uploaded on the 'Track the Child' portal to trace their biological parents for rehabilitation. DC Himanshu Jain had on 21 July established a committee to ensure the seamless execution of DNA testing after the attempt at DNA testing failed on 21 July due to lack of clarity on guidelines. The committee comprises the district child protection officer, representatives from the police commissioner, and the civil surgeon, tasked with overseeing the DNA testing process under Project Jeevanjot 2.0 to combat child trafficking and exploitation.
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Land worth Rs 1 crore belonging to father of Pakistan-based militant attached by J-K Police
The Jammu and Kashmir Police said it attached a parcel of land in north Kashmir's Baramullah district that belonged to the father of a Pakistan-based militant. The land, measuring 3 kanals and 18 marlas (roughly 0.5 acre), belonged to Mohammad Maqbool Dar, the father of Pakistan-based militant Asif Maqbool Dar, who was designated a terrorist by the Ministry of Home Affairs in 2023 under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). Police said attaching the land located at Bandi Payeen village in Baramulla was a 'major step in dismantling the terror networks and their support structures'. 'Srinagar police have attached orchard land measuring 3 kanals and 18 marlas, valued at approximately Rs 1 crore, belonging to designated terrorist Asif Maqbool Dar, son of Mohd. Maqbool Dar, who is presently operating from across the border. The property is located at Bandi Payeen, district Baramulla,' the police said in a statement. 'Although the property is formally held in the name of his father, Mohd. Maqbool Dar… investigations have established that Asif Maqbool Dar is an active stakeholder,' police said, adding, 'He has been involved in facilitating terrorism, spreading anti-national propaganda, and inciting disaffection against the government through various social media platforms for several years.' Police said the attachment of the land is aimed at sending a message to anti-national elements. 'This decisive action by Srinagar police is intended to send a clear and strong message — those engaged in anti-national and terror-related activities will face strict legal consequences, including forfeiture of their assets,' police said. In a separate incident, the Anantnag police have attached land belonging to Adil Hussain Thoker, a militant from south Kashmir's Bijbehera. Thoker's house had been demolished after his name cropped up in the Pahalgam terror attack. However, the NIA later said that only three Pakistani nationals were behind the attack. 'The action has been taken in connection with FIR No. 11/2023 registered under Sections 20, 38 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and Sections 2/3 of the EIMCO Act,' police said, adding, 'This attachment is part of lawful measures aimed at dismantling the support structure of terrorism in the district.'
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Customer or ‘gangster': Ludhiana police's hasty FIR raises eyebrows
The Ludhiana police face embarrassment after rushing to lodge an FIR of conspiracy to murder without verifying the identity of the 'accused' seen in CCTV footage from a shoe shop in Ludhiana's Sector 32. The FIR was lodged on the complaint of shoe trader Gurvinder Singh Prinkle, who claimed that Lakhu Baba entered his shop in his absence and threatened his staff with a pistol. What was believed to be gangster Lakhu Baba entering the shop with a pistol, as per the complainant, turned out to be a regular customer, only looking for a pair of new shoes. The Division Number 7 police had booked eight persons, including gangster Lakhbir Singh, alias Lakhu Baba, of Jalandhar and his associate Rishav Benipal, under stringent sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including abetment to murder, criminal conspiracy, criminal intimidation, rioting, and under the Arms Act. The FIR was lodged on the complaint of shoe trader Gurvinder Singh Prinkle, who claimed that Lakhu Baba entered his shop in his absence and threatened his staff with a pistol. Prinkle claimed that Lakhu Baba was acting at the behest of gangster Rishav Benipal, who had opened fire at him at his shop in September 2024. Prinkle also submitted a CCTV footage of the 'accused' and shared it online. Eventually encountering the video online, the man in the video, Sachin of Bhattian Colony, a Ludhiana-based salesman, was shocked to realise the allegations against him. Releasing a video, he clarified that he was merely visiting the shop to enquire about shoe prices and had no connection with any gangsters. 'I earn only ₹500 a day working at a shop. I went there to check prices, found them costly and left. Later, I was shocked to learn that the police had booked me in a conspiracy-to-murder case based on the CCTV footage. My children have started doubting me after watching the video. This humiliation is forcing me to think of ending my life,' Sachin said in his video. The incident has raised serious questions about the credibility of the investigation process adopted by the police before lodging the case, simply based on CCTV visuals without cross-checking identities. The case is now under review. When contacted, ADCP (City 4) Mandeep Singh said, 'We will reinvestigate the matter and cancel the FIR if it turns out to be a case of mistaken identity.' The complainant, Prinkle, himself was also arrested on Tuesday for using 'derogatory' remarks on social against an advocate and his kin.
